Author | Message |
Janet's Tits and Prince's Ass European question to all you Americans :
What's so wrong with showing one tit, when you know that Prince showed his entire ass cut out in his pants once? I just don't understand you Americans. What's so wrong with one little titty, and then again, it was covered up with a beautiful piercing?! What's so shocking about that?? Is it shocking to little children? Older people? Why? Is it too sexual? Violence (for children) is ok, but this is not! Also Knowing that the USA has and controles the biggest 'Porn-industry' of the whole world! Don't you think this all is a bit overdone? My guess is that it's the perfect distraction from Bush's impossible foreign policy.. etc. When Prince showed his barenaked ass, no one said a thing! And it wasn't covered up with 'lace'. I think men can still do what they want, women not. Sexism? Yes, deffinately! Politics? Yes, misused! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Maybe it's just because Janet's tits were down to her knees.
Prince's ass was tight | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
As I just pointed out on the "Justin's Attitude" thread in the Music:Non Prince forum...
There is a time and place for everything.Unfortunately for Janet,she chose the wrong place to be "controversial".A Super Bowl half-time show is watched by families,kids included.That's NOT the place to bare your breast. The VMAs,on the other hand,are different.On that show,you're EXPECTED to be outrageous and wild.That's why Prince was able to wear ass-less pants,and Madonna was able to kiss Britney Spears,without suffering the vicious backlash that Janet is. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
DavidEye said: As I just pointed out on the "Justin's Attitude" thread in the Music:Non Prince forum...
There is a time and place for everything.Unfortunately for Janet,she chose the wrong place to be "controversial".A Super Bowl half-time show is watched by families,kids included.That's NOT the place to bare your breast. The VMAs,on the other hand,are different.On that show,you're EXPECTED to be outrageous and wild.That's why Prince was able to wear ass-less pants,and Madonna was able to kiss Britney Spears,without suffering the vicious backlash that Janet is. Wrong! I mean, why should "naked" or at least just a tiny little bit of someone's (a woman's) body be provokative for children or families? Kids are allowed to watch muder and killing and gunfights all the time. A investigation pointedout that USA children were able to see an avarage 400.000 people die, and 12.000 murders through the movie and television industry before they turn 12 years old! My god, now that's why i call shocking! And also gun abuse and violence is everyday cake within walls of everyday families in the USA (don't know the exact numbers of the report anymore,but they were revealing and shocking!). Now tell me, WHat's worse? I tell you ; puritism leads to racism, intollerance and conservative 'right-wing' thoughts and behaviour. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Even women kissing eachother isn't allowed for kids to see?
Soon you'll be telling me that men (french)kissing eachother is not allowed for children to be seen! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Even women kissing eachother isn't allowed for kids to see?
Soon you'll be telling me that men (french)kissing eachother is not allowed for children to be seen! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
DOROTHYPARK said: DavidEye said: As I just pointed out on the "Justin's Attitude" thread in the Music:Non Prince forum...
There is a time and place for everything.Unfortunately for Janet,she chose the wrong place to be "controversial".A Super Bowl half-time show is watched by families,kids included.That's NOT the place to bare your breast. The VMAs,on the other hand,are different.On that show,you're EXPECTED to be outrageous and wild.That's why Prince was able to wear ass-less pants,and Madonna was able to kiss Britney Spears,without suffering the vicious backlash that Janet is. Wrong! I mean, why should "naked" or at least just a tiny little bit of someone's (a woman's) body be provokative for children or families? Kids are allowed to watch muder and killing and gunfights all the time. A investigation pointedout that USA children were able to see an avarage 400.000 people die, and 12.000 murders through the movie and television industry before they turn 12 years old! My god, now that's why i call shocking! And also gun abuse and violence is everyday cake within walls of everyday families in the USA (don't know the exact numbers of the report anymore,but they were revealing and shocking!). Now tell me, WHat's worse? I tell you ; puritism leads to racism, intollerance and conservative 'right-wing' thoughts and behaviour. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
DOROTHYPARK said: Even women kissing eachother isn't allowed for kids to see?
Soon you'll be telling me that men (french)kissing eachother is not allowed for children to be seen! I really wanna respond,but something tells me I'd better quit while I'm ahead...lol | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
TheOrgerFormerlyKnownAs said: DOROTHYPARK said: DavidEye said: As I just pointed out on the "Justin's Attitude" thread in the Music:Non Prince forum...
There is a time and place for everything.Unfortunately for Janet,she chose the wrong place to be "controversial".A Super Bowl half-time show is watched by families,kids included.That's NOT the place to bare your breast. The VMAs,on the other hand,are different.On that show,you're EXPECTED to be outrageous and wild.That's why Prince was able to wear ass-less pants,and Madonna was able to kiss Britney Spears,without suffering the vicious backlash that Janet is. Wrong! I mean, why should "naked" or at least just a tiny little bit of someone's (a woman's) body be provokative for children or families? Kids are allowed to watch muder and killing and gunfights all the time. A investigation pointedout that USA children were able to see an avarage 400.000 people die, and 12.000 murders through the movie and television industry before they turn 12 years old! My god, now that's why i call shocking! And also gun abuse and violence is everyday cake within walls of everyday families in the USA (don't know the exact numbers of the report anymore,but they were revealing and shocking!). Now tell me, WHat's worse? I tell you ; puritism leads to racism, intollerance and conservative 'right-wing' thoughts and behaviour. It just depends. A man ripping a woman's clothes off can be cool, whenever they both agree to do so. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
DOROTHYPARK said: European question to all you Americans :
What's so wrong with showing one tit, when you know that Prince showed his entire ass cut out in his pants once? I just don't understand you Americans. What's so wrong with one little titty, and then again, it was covered up with a beautiful piercing?! What's so shocking about that?? Is it shocking to little children? Older people? Why? Is it too sexual? Violence (for children) is ok, but this is not! Also Knowing that the USA has and controles the biggest 'Porn-industry' of the whole world! Don't you think this all is a bit overdone? My guess is that it's the perfect distraction from Bush's impossible foreign policy.. etc. When Prince showed his barenaked ass, no one said a thing! And it wasn't covered up with 'lace'. I think men can still do what they want, women not. Sexism? Yes, deffinately! Politics? Yes, misused! That's America. A country of contradictions. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Because Janet isnt Prince Of course & | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
DavidEye said: As I just pointed out on the "Justin's Attitude" thread in the Music:Non Prince forum...
There is a time and place for everything.Unfortunately for Janet,she chose the wrong place to be "controversial".A Super Bowl half-time show is watched by families,kids included.That's NOT the place to bare your breast. The VMAs,on the other hand,are different.On that show,you're EXPECTED to be outrageous and wild.That's why Prince was able to wear ass-less pants,and Madonna was able to kiss Britney Spears,without suffering the vicious backlash that Janet is. exactly... janet's tit was on CBS prince's ass was on MTV not everyone gets MTV, because it's cable... and MTV let's alot more things go. If Janet's tit appeared on MTV, it wouldn't have been that controversial. ...but didn't Nicole Ritchie say the "f" word on CBS or FOX or something...? Sex Kitten
your face looked so good, i wanted to touch your mouth | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
i dont want to see anyone french kissing each other in public. especially french people. i mean especially two guys. and people are making way too big of a deal out of the whole janet thing, but she should not have done it during superbowl half time. it was pretty disgusting the way it was done. it was like a simulated sexual assault rather than a flashing kind of thing. justin should be taking the heat equally for this. after all he was the aggressor in that display. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |