independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Prince: Music and More > We over romanticize Prince 1980-1988
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 3 of 3 <123
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #60 posted 01/15/04 8:18pm

the3rddoctor

avatar

I finally popped in NEWS tonight on the way home. It's really not a bad CD overall. I don't care for the jazzy parts, but it's not too bad. I got to WEST when I got home.

I like instrumental stuff. It just seemed wierd that it was Prince.
I've reversed the polarity of the neutron flow... Now to find a way to exterminate Melody Cool and Rosie Gaines... blowupshoot3sperm

http://artists.primetones...e_master68
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #61 posted 01/15/04 8:38pm

Supernova

avatar

the3rddoctor said:

Supernova said:

the3rddoctor said:

tricky99 said:

The problem with the org is that group of peolpe who want to simplify things into pre 1988 (brilliant) and post 1988 (crap, shit). It is way to extreme. And says more about the simplicity of their thought processes (intellectally lazy) than Prince's music.


Yes, it's much more enlightening to accept everything he puts out like a conditioned zombie/junkie rather than have the free will to like/dislike as we see fit.

That's not what he said.


Sure sounded that way to me...

Nope.
This post not for the wimp contingent. All whiny wusses avert your eyes.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #62 posted 01/15/04 8:38pm

TonyC

the3rddoctor said:

I finally popped in NEWS tonight on the way home. It's really not a bad CD overall. I don't care for the jazzy parts, but it's not too bad.


"not too bad"...what a great endorsement. I think the point of this thread is that you never would have heard anyone with musical taste say that the "Dirty Mind" album or "1999" alubm is "not too bad". Those albums kicked ass and "NEWS" is just tolerable.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #63 posted 01/15/04 9:09pm

violator

spaceboy said:

skywalker said:

Face it. The commercial sales of every album in that era, besides Purple Rain, were not that great. The reviews for over half of these albums were mixed.I am not saying that this wasn't Prince at his best-I am just saying that people (around here especially) tend to see these years as untouchable, when in reality,they are not.


1980-1988 is seen as untouchable because in those days Prince had fewer songs on each album compared to 1989-now. This made the albums seem better(more consistent)overall and the b-sides and bootlegs from that era sounded sweeter as well. If Emancipation would have only been 8 or 9 songs long we would've all called it one of his best ever and rushed out to buy the boots and b-sides containing "Mr. Happy" etc.

The quality of Prince's work from 1989-present isn't a great deal worse than what came before. His sales have dropped off for sure, but 20+ years in the business and no major record label will do that. The opinion of music critics (if it matters) has been just as mixed as always.
I just think that the change in how he presents his music as well a the cynicism that comes with age and years of listening to music has unfarily made Prince of now "not as good" as the Prince of old in the minds of many around here.

Either that or we are all to obsessed with him and his music in the 1st place.


Very true...the cd has given artists a bigger medium to fill. Albums are not 30 to 44 minutes anymore but are twice as long.


Yeah, but regardless of the medium Prince was still shoveling out a shitload of music in the 80's. It all comes back to if it's quality music nobody's cares much about the quantity. You have to remember that when Prince was doing '1999', he was also doing 'Vanity 6' and also doing 'What Time Is It'. This was all his material. And then when he did 'Purple Rain', he was also doing 'Apollonia 6', 'Ice Cream Castles', and 'The Glamorous Life'. And so on and so forth. I don't remember anybody complaining much back then.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #64 posted 01/15/04 9:40pm

jtgillia

avatar

The music on Vanity 6, Appolonia 6, and Ice Cream Castles are hardly first rate material, though. It's below average Prince funk by the numbers, in my opinion. This is despite the fact that these three albums still spawned three big hit singles (yeah, I'm actually including "Sex Shooter" here)

I will say that Prince has somewhat forgotten how to write an original, catchy single after 1996 or so... Although, that may be mostly due to lack of marketing. For all the songs he wrote between '82 and '87 that screamed "hit", it was truly amazing. He had quite a gift. Kind of like The Beatles rolled up into one man. However, every artist who is worth their salt has maybe five years of great hit material in them before they start to lose their "freshness".
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #65 posted 01/15/04 10:02pm

violator

jtgillia said:

The music on Vanity 6, Appolonia 6, and Ice Cream Castles are hardly first rate material, though. It's below average Prince funk by the numbers, in my opinion. This is despite the fact that these three albums still spawned three big hit singles (yeah, I'm actually including "Sex Shooter" here)

I will say that Prince has somewhat forgotten how to write an original, catchy single after 1996 or so... Although, that may be mostly due to lack of marketing. For all the songs he wrote between '82 and '87 that screamed "hit", it was truly amazing. He had quite a gift. Kind of like The Beatles rolled up into one man. However, every artist who is worth their salt has maybe five years of great hit material in them before they start to lose their "freshness".


Point taken, but consider this: While Prince was pumping out an album per year of his own critically acclaimed, multi-million selling music, he also did 'The Time', 'What Time Is It', 'The Family', 'The Glamorous Life' and 'Romance 1600'. I think by almost any definition of the 'Minneapolis Sound' you accept, these were good to exceptional albums. Mind you, this was in addition to the album per year of his own material.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #66 posted 01/16/04 5:46am

DavidEye

BlaqueKnight said:

I think Prince's time of innovation is done. Its okay. He's already BEEN effective and influential. Nobody(other than orgers and a few others) even gives a damn anymore. I guess he's doing what he wants now. Doesn't matter to me, because I feel as if his truly effective music has been done already. I haven't been feelin' his work for quite soem time now. I HEAR it, but it doesn't affect me. I don't FEEL it. Hate me if ya want for sayin' it, but its true for me. Its NOT as simple as pre/post 1989. He's had some good stuff post 1989. He has fallen off BIG TIME, though. S'aight. He had his day. No one stays relevant forever.



nod Very good analysis.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #67 posted 01/16/04 6:05am

the3rddoctor

avatar

Supernova said:

the3rddoctor said:

Supernova said:

the3rddoctor said:

tricky99 said:

The problem with the org is that group of peolpe who want to simplify things into pre 1988 (brilliant) and post 1988 (crap, shit). It is way to extreme. And says more about the simplicity of their thought processes (intellectally lazy) than Prince's music.


Yes, it's much more enlightening to accept everything he puts out like a conditioned zombie/junkie rather than have the free will to like/dislike as we see fit.

That's not what he said.


Sure sounded that way to me...

Nope.


Yep.
I've reversed the polarity of the neutron flow... Now to find a way to exterminate Melody Cool and Rosie Gaines... blowupshoot3sperm

http://artists.primetones...e_master68
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #68 posted 01/16/04 7:41am

namepeace

DavidEye said:

BlaqueKnight said:

I think Prince's time of innovation is done. Its okay. He's already BEEN effective and influential. Nobody(other than orgers and a few others) even gives a damn anymore. I guess he's doing what he wants now. Doesn't matter to me, because I feel as if his truly effective music has been done already. I haven't been feelin' his work for quite soem time now. I HEAR it, but it doesn't affect me. I don't FEEL it. Hate me if ya want for sayin' it, but its true for me. Its NOT as simple as pre/post 1989. He's had some good stuff post 1989. He has fallen off BIG TIME, though. S'aight. He had his day. No one stays relevant forever.



nod Very good analysis.


I agree. If he made new fans through his work in the 90's up until now, that's great. He has made some very good, even some great, music in the years since Lovesexy. But no artist remains hot forever.

I think some of y'all who think "'80-'88" is overrated have gotten a little defensive. No one is discounting your opinions, so calm down. You just have to realize that many of us grew up in that era and have a preference for the music of that era, much like people who grew up in the 1960's swear that when Dylan went electric his music was never the same, or no one can touch the Beatles, etc.

It's a matter of personal perspective and opinion. In ten years, if the org is still here and Prince is still making music, new orgers will say that the 1990's were overrated and the folks on here who think the 80's were overrated will disagree.

But at least we'll still be talking about him. smile

twocents
Good night, sweet Prince | 7 June 1958 - 21 April 2016

Props will be withheld until the showing and proving has commenced. -- Aaron McGruder
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #69 posted 01/16/04 12:08pm

Supernova

avatar

the3rddoctor said:

Supernova said:

the3rddoctor said:

Supernova said:

the3rddoctor said:

tricky99 said:

The problem with the org is that group of peolpe who want to simplify things into pre 1988 (brilliant) and post 1988 (crap, shit). It is way to extreme. And says more about the simplicity of their thought processes (intellectally lazy) than Prince's music.


Yes, it's much more enlightening to accept everything he puts out like a conditioned zombie/junkie rather than have the free will to like/dislike as we see fit.

That's not what he said.


Sure sounded that way to me...

Nope.


Yep.

If that's how you wish to interpret it, so be it.
This post not for the wimp contingent. All whiny wusses avert your eyes.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #70 posted 01/16/04 6:07pm

the3rddoctor

avatar

Supernova said:

the3rddoctor said:

Supernova said:

the3rddoctor said:

Supernova said:

the3rddoctor said:

tricky99 said:

The problem with the org is that group of peolpe who want to simplify things into pre 1988 (brilliant) and post 1988 (crap, shit). It is way to extreme. And says more about the simplicity of their thought processes (intellectally lazy) than Prince's music.


Yes, it's much more enlightening to accept everything he puts out like a conditioned zombie/junkie rather than have the free will to like/dislike as we see fit.

That's not what he said.


Sure sounded that way to me...

Nope.


Yep.

If that's how you wish to interpret it, so be it.


It is...
I've reversed the polarity of the neutron flow... Now to find a way to exterminate Melody Cool and Rosie Gaines... blowupshoot3sperm

http://artists.primetones...e_master68
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #71 posted 01/16/04 7:11pm

Scrapluv

avatar

no...we dont
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #72 posted 01/16/04 7:14pm

SquirrelMeat

avatar

Its simple.

Take the work of the eighties, as a whole.

Take the work of the nineties, as a whole.

Add Salt and pepper to taste.


Result

the 90s sucked.
.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #73 posted 01/16/04 7:17pm

Scrapluv

avatar

bananacologne said:

MattyJam said:

What about tracks like In This Bed I Scream? Circle Of Amour? Last December? The Everlasting Now? One Nite Alone? The One? The Holy River? I Will? Dreamin About U? Days Of Wild? Come On? A Case Of U? The Future? The Love We Make? Truth? The Ride? Sweet Baby? Billy Jack Bitch? P Control? I Love U But I Don't Trust U Anymore? Don't Play Me?


'A CASE OF YOU'??? ...U are kidding...right? eek

lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #74 posted 02/05/04 1:12pm

the3rddoctor

avatar

SquirrelMeat said:

Its simple.

Take the work of the eighties, as a whole.

Take the work of the nineties, as a whole.

Add Salt and pepper to taste.


Result

the 90s sucked.


Tell me about it...

When you have to search high and low for songs you like as opposed to songs you hate...
I've reversed the polarity of the neutron flow... Now to find a way to exterminate Melody Cool and Rosie Gaines... blowupshoot3sperm

http://artists.primetones...e_master68
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #75 posted 02/05/04 3:01pm

JonSnow

skywalker said:

Face it. The commercial sales of every album in that era, besides Purple Rain, were not that great. The reviews for over half of these albums were mixed.I am not saying that this wasn't Prince at his best-I am just saying that people (around here especially) tend to see these years as untouchable, when in reality,they are not.


1980-1988 is seen as untouchable because in those days Prince had fewer songs on each album compared to 1989-now. This made the albums seem better(more consistent)overall and the b-sides and bootlegs from that era sounded sweeter as well. If Emancipation would have only been 8 or 9 songs long we would've all called it one of his best ever and rushed out to buy the boots and b-sides containing "Mr. Happy" etc.

The quality of Prince's work from 1989-present isn't a great deal worse than what came before. His sales have dropped off for sure, but 20+ years in the business and no major record label will do that. The opinion of music critics (if it matters) has been just as mixed as always.
I just think that the change in how he presents his music as well a the cynicism that comes with age and years of listening to music has unfarily made Prince of now "not as good" as the Prince of old in the minds of many around here.

Either that or we are all to obsessed with him and his music in the 1st place.



I actually tend to agree with you, to an extent. There is this mythical aura of holiness about these years, and if you look at it objectively one could argue that it's not warranted. How much is perception, and how much is reality? Has Prince released songs since 1988 that are equal or superior to many songs released prior to 1988? Yes. In the scheme of things, how much greater is Controversy or Dirty Mind than Come? I don't know the answer, other than to say I like all three. I don't buy the notion that nothing post-88 compares to his "glory days". I tend to look at his career as consistently making great and interesting music, while being plagued by missteps that has cost him his commercial stature as an artist.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #76 posted 02/05/04 5:15pm

mozfonky

avatar

Both sides make valid points about the 80-88, 90's eras. We all have totally different definitions of what quality is here and there is really not much to argue about. The era of 80 to 88 were not pristine in terms of art as some would assume. Dirty Mind was then looked back on by critics as his mythical highpoint which no album afterward seemed to reach for them. Controversy got so so reviews but sold better than Dirty Mind, 1999 got good reviews but he was still being said to deviate from his Dirty Mind 'peak', purple rain was likewise, unfavorably compared to 1999, Around the world got great to poor reviews, Parade got the same, sign of the times was not seen as perfect at the time it came out but even at the years end critics were converted into calling it the years best. I guess my point is we leave out human nature, I can't state how many reviews I've read on every new album and how he's "back' to form of 1999, dirty mind, sott or whatever.
I would like to say that in many ways he's gotten much better with age,(voice,production,arranging) and in other ways he's lost his edge. Pop-art, is a arc that all great artists hit for a few years, a time when their creativity is in tune with their commerciality. Take 1999, it's music is what prince said, "I was in kindergarten then" is very simple and the production is not great but their was that huge amount of innovation, weirdness, creativity that came through it and his best work of the time. That's the guy I think of at his prime. Even though I think a lot of his later work is just fine and too harshly criticized. His talent is still their but that element that he had then is, if not gone, then diminished. It's a complicated thing but it's a great topic to dissect.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #77 posted 02/09/04 4:06am

the3rddoctor

avatar

I never claimed everything post 88 was crap, merely that post 88 has brought more and more crap. In that "golden" period, almost every song per album was pretty great.

Since SOTT, it got to where more and more songs were just mediocre.

I'll take a ding and say alot of it is also due to my own personal growth. I was turning from a teen to a young man and maybe my tastes changed somewhat.

But given that so many feel the same way, I find it hard to believe that it's predominantly on my end that the music started sucking ass more and more, to where I refused to buy the CD's anymore.

I mean, I could well do without D&P and the symbol CD...
I've reversed the polarity of the neutron flow... Now to find a way to exterminate Melody Cool and Rosie Gaines... blowupshoot3sperm

http://artists.primetones...e_master68
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #78 posted 02/09/04 8:34am

Welcome2daRevo
lution

avatar

Screw commercial sales! Leave that crap for Micheal Jackson. Prince dared to be different. He always kept us guessing. I didn't always understand it, but I enjoyed the ride anyway.
CALL ME A DREAMER 2!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #79 posted 02/09/04 9:05am

TheFrog

i'm good at this double posting thing.

sorry
[This message was edited Tue Feb 10 3:31:25 PST 2004 by TheFrog]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #80 posted 02/09/04 9:11am

TheFrog

mozfonky said:

Both sides make valid points about the 80-88, 90's eras. We all have totally different definitions of what quality is here and there is really not much to argue about. The era of 80 to 88 were not pristine in terms of art as some would assume. Dirty Mind was then looked back on by critics as his mythical highpoint which no album afterward seemed to reach for them. Controversy got so so reviews but sold better than Dirty Mind, 1999 got good reviews but he was still being said to deviate from his Dirty Mind 'peak', purple rain was likewise, unfavorably compared to 1999, Around the world got great to poor reviews, Parade got the same, sign of the times was not seen as perfect at the time it came out but even at the years end critics were converted into calling it the years best. I guess my point is we leave out human nature, I can't state how many reviews I've read on every new album and how he's "back' to form of 1999, dirty mind, sott or whatever.
I would like to say that in many ways he's gotten much better with age,(voice,production,arranging) and in other ways he's lost his edge. Pop-art, is a arc that all great artists hit for a few years, a time when their creativity is in tune with their commerciality. Take 1999, it's music is what prince said, "I was in kindergarten then" is very simple and the production is not great but their was that huge amount of innovation, weirdness, creativity that came through it and his best work of the time. That's the guy I think of at his prime. Even though I think a lot of his later work is just fine and too harshly criticized. His talent is still their but that element that he had then is, if not gone, then diminished. It's a complicated thing but it's a great topic to dissect.


I almost totally agree. Prince may be a better arranger and producer than he was (although his tendency to over-arrange can piss me off occasionally; see the Old friends 4 sale re-hash for The Vault), but nothing beats the fresh, funky, & experimental stuff (not to mention great pop) he was laying down in the 80s. We maybe do get a bit too sentimental about that period but the truth is that he was consistently brilliant then. In later albums there was always brilliance but it wasn't necessarily maintained throughout the album.

Don't get me wrong - it was, and is, still bloody good (apart from Kama Sutra). But i'm still going to romanticize about the 80s music, and play Dirty Mind a whole lot more than Rave.
Am i overly romanticizing? Probably.

But i like it. wink
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #81 posted 02/10/04 3:44am

Rhondab

Is this coming from someone born in 1989. WTF!!!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #82 posted 02/10/04 3:49am

FiveFootNine

avatar

bananacologne said:

Answers you seek, eager you are...

fear leads 2 misunderstanding,

misunderstanding leads to naiivety,

naiivety leads 2 purple kool aid, purple kool aid leads 2 NPGMC etc etc...
bored




:FALLOFF: :CLAP: FUCKING EXCELLENT!! :FALLOFF: :CLAP:
**...they were right about you.**
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #83 posted 02/10/04 4:40am

Ubiquity

67TBirdHeartAttack said:


Almost exactly echoing my thoughts, everything up to Lovesexy was a journey, he was finding his way spiritually and discovering things on the way. His music reflected this, it was all a journey and sometimes that journey was a struggle, tough mountains to climb and at other times floating a clear crystal lake. Lovesexy & Batman & Graffiti Bridge were the discovery time and the wanting to share the discovery with everyone.

TRC is an extension of that search. It`s in my opinion the most intimate piece of music he put out (besides Emancipation. But I didnt like the latter musically). You just dont happen to like the music as you did with Lovesexy. But TRC is by no means less spiritual and soul searching.

Diamonds & Pearls acceptance of who he was and what he believed and if others didn't then hey it didn't matter and have a bit of fun just with life in general, prince a man falling in love with a woman (enter Mayte full time) from here on in I think a little lost, perhaps not focused totally on his music as he had a partner in his life big time. I sort of lost touch a bit here with Prince and didn't listen much to the stuff, musically it wasn't doing much for me and certainly nothing in the lyrics that touched me. The Gold Experience and I am back in with a vengence, the lull was over! Wrong, back into the previous groove with the following releases. Then bang The Rainbow Children - oh my the wait was worth it, he's back on track again - once again WRONG! Lovesexy was one thing, TRC was a whole other! Arrogance personified! My apologies to any who follow the JW faith.

Well, you said it pretty clear yourself. "Lovesexy is one thing, TRC is a whole other." It`s all about musical and spiritual progression. I wouldn`t want anybody in 2002 to remain at their spiritual level of 1988.

For those who didn't have God in their life before 1988 or understood what God was, Lovesexy brought this to them and we embarked on the journey. For those that did, they celebrated with Prince on his discovery. All that had gone before made sense, we looked at things with new eyes, we saw a new world.

So Lovesexy changed your life. Great. That happens to very few people. So what do you expect? That TRC would change your life a second time? It`s just music, man. And it`s great music. But what do you want? Every Prince album a spiritual awakening to your like?

The Prince of Now is nothing more than a musician who once rocked my world and changed my life. I see glimpses every now and then. I cried when I saw him in Australia last October because I felt I had lost a part of me. The happy Prince who had found what was right for him and made sense to many was gone.

You must have seen a different Prince then. Because the one I saw was happier than ever. Musically and spiritually mature, a man acting his age. An adult, both as a musician and a man. And maybe you should ask Prince about this. Because he would tell you that he finally has found what is right for him. Who are you to judge what`s best for him? Prince`s spiritual choices are there for him, and only him. He shouldnt be judged for what impact he has on others who are not strong enough to find their spiritual path by themselves.

I am not saying any of the above is right or wrong, just how I feel. (this is edited from a very long essay I wrote so sorry if it seems disjointed in places)

Isnt how Prince feels about himself the most important thing? He feels happier than ever, and he would disagree with everything you say. The way I see it, you seem to be caught up in the past and you want Prince to be the same person he was 15 years from today. That`s kinda unfair, don`t you think? Give the man the right to change, to grow up, to find what he really wants in life. Don`t judge him by your spiritual expectations. Because your spiritual goal you will have to find yourself, don`t use him for that. That`s not his job. If you find that he doesnt give you what you want, than this is YOUR problem, not his. Prince is a musician, and he was never more than that, although you make a messiahs of him. He came to play music, make us happy through music, share his feelings during his quest to spirituality. Now he has found it. Be happy that he did. Because in 1988, Prince was a very confused, young and angry man who obviously wasnt happy. Today he is, and he is still giving us music, even more music than ever before. You may like it or not, but Prince is no less of a person only because you seem to have lost touch with him. It`s obvious that Prince has moved on, while you still want to live in 1988. That`s sad. Go ahead and find yourself and do it by yourself. You dont need Prince or anybody for that.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #84 posted 02/10/04 4:47am

SquarePeg

avatar

BlaqueKnight said:

[color=blue:5575c25b33:f149662e36]I think Prince's time of innovation is done. Its okay. He's already BEEN effective and influential. Nobody(other than orgers and a few others) even gives a damn anymore. I guess he's doing what he wants now. Doesn't matter to me, because I feel as if his truly effective music has been done already. I haven't been feelin' his work for quite soem time now. I HEAR it, but it doesn't affect me. I don't FEEL it. Hate me if ya want for sayin' it, but its true for me. Its NOT as simple as pre/post 1989. He's had some good stuff post 1989. He has fallen off BIG TIME, though. S'aight. He had his day. No one stays relevant forever.


except Jimi Hendrix, right?...rolleyes
The Org is the short yellow bus of the Prince Internet fan community.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #85 posted 02/18/04 7:31pm

67TBirdHeartAt
tack

avatar

Ubiquity said:

67TBirdHeartAttack said:


Almost exactly echoing my thoughts, everything up to Lovesexy was a journey, he was finding his way spiritually and discovering things on the way. His music reflected this, it was all a journey and sometimes that journey was a struggle, tough mountains to climb and at other times floating a clear crystal lake. Lovesexy & Batman & Graffiti Bridge were the discovery time and the wanting to share the discovery with everyone.

TRC is an extension of that search. It`s in my opinion the most intimate piece of music he put out (besides Emancipation. But I didnt like the latter musically). You just dont happen to like the music as you did with Lovesexy. But TRC is by no means less spiritual and soul searching.

Diamonds & Pearls acceptance of who he was and what he believed and if others didn't then hey it didn't matter and have a bit of fun just with life in general, prince a man falling in love with a woman (enter Mayte full time) from here on in I think a little lost, perhaps not focused totally on his music as he had a partner in his life big time. I sort of lost touch a bit here with Prince and didn't listen much to the stuff, musically it wasn't doing much for me and certainly nothing in the lyrics that touched me. The Gold Experience and I am back in with a vengence, the lull was over! Wrong, back into the previous groove with the following releases. Then bang The Rainbow Children - oh my the wait was worth it, he's back on track again - once again WRONG! Lovesexy was one thing, TRC was a whole other! Arrogance personified! My apologies to any who follow the JW faith.

Well, you said it pretty clear yourself. "Lovesexy is one thing, TRC is a whole other." It`s all about musical and spiritual progression. I wouldn`t want anybody in 2002 to remain at their spiritual level of 1988.

For those who didn't have God in their life before 1988 or understood what God was, Lovesexy brought this to them and we embarked on the journey. For those that did, they celebrated with Prince on his discovery. All that had gone before made sense, we looked at things with new eyes, we saw a new world.

So Lovesexy changed your life. Great. That happens to very few people. So what do you expect? That TRC would change your life a second time? It`s just music, man. And it`s great music. But what do you want? Every Prince album a spiritual awakening to your like?

The Prince of Now is nothing more than a musician who once rocked my world and changed my life. I see glimpses every now and then. I cried when I saw him in Australia last October because I felt I had lost a part of me. The happy Prince who had found what was right for him and made sense to many was gone.

You must have seen a different Prince then. Because the one I saw was happier than ever. Musically and spiritually mature, a man acting his age. An adult, both as a musician and a man. And maybe you should ask Prince about this. Because he would tell you that he finally has found what is right for him. Who are you to judge what`s best for him? Prince`s spiritual choices are there for him, and only him. He shouldnt be judged for what impact he has on others who are not strong enough to find their spiritual path by themselves.

I am not saying any of the above is right or wrong, just how I feel. (this is edited from a very long essay I wrote so sorry if it seems disjointed in places)

Isnt how Prince feels about himself the most important thing? He feels happier than ever, and he would disagree with everything you say. The way I see it, you seem to be caught up in the past and you want Prince to be the same person he was 15 years from today. That`s kinda unfair, don`t you think? Give the man the right to change, to grow up, to find what he really wants in life. Don`t judge him by your spiritual expectations. Because your spiritual goal you will have to find yourself, don`t use him for that. That`s not his job. If you find that he doesnt give you what you want, than this is YOUR problem, not his. Prince is a musician, and he was never more than that, although you make a messiahs of him. He came to play music, make us happy through music, share his feelings during his quest to spirituality. Now he has found it. Be happy that he did. Because in 1988, Prince was a very confused, young and angry man who obviously wasnt happy. Today he is, and he is still giving us music, even more music than ever before. You may like it or not, but Prince is no less of a person only because you seem to have lost touch with him. It`s obvious that Prince has moved on, while you still want to live in 1988. That`s sad. Go ahead and find yourself and do it by yourself. You dont need Prince or anybody for that.




All I can say is I disagree with your comments on so many levels. TRC is a progression from Lovesexy? BS!!! Lovesexy was all about sprituality and accepting God into your life. But there was no definition of what God was apart from the fact that God was Love. This and this alone was what it is all about for me. If you feel love and accept love and give and receive love then your life will change.

Religion is shoved down our throats with the thou shalt not do this and thou shalt do that etc etc etc. The JW faith is this in the extreme. With rules and then the inability not to shove it down others throats.

If you have Lovesexy in your life ie Love ie Godthen you need no damn rues you just know what is right and wrong for you.

When someone stands before you such as Prince did in '88 and bared his whole heart and soul and you understood and felt the same this cannto be forgotten. I don't see the stage now and in between as progression but that is just me and this is a forum for opinions.

And one more thing. Prince in 1998 was NOT confused. Welcome to the New Power Generation, the reason my voice is so clear is there is no smack in my brain. Transalation - the reason my voice is so clear is there is no doubt in my mind!!
In the distance a light shines and I know it is mine. Someday I will touch it because it calls me. It says cross the line, cross the line. I know everything is not always what it seems, so I pinch myself daily just in case it's a dream
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #86 posted 02/19/04 6:04am

Rev

avatar

67TBirdHeartAttack said:

BlaqueKnight said:

[color=blue:5575c25b33:86dc500cc1]I think Prince's time of innovation is done. Its okay. He's already BEEN effective and influential. Nobody(other than orgers and a few others) even gives a damn anymore. I guess he's doing what he wants now. Doesn't matter to me, because I feel as if his truly effective music has been done already. I haven't been feelin' his work for quite soem time now. I HEAR it, but it doesn't affect me. I don't FEEL it. Hate me if ya want for sayin' it, but its true for me. Its NOT as simple as pre/post 1989. He's had some good stuff post 1989. He has fallen off BIG TIME, though. S'aight. He had his day. No one stays relevant forever.[/color]


Almost exactly echoing my thoughts, everything up to Lovesexy was a journey, he was finding his way spiritually and discovering things on the way. His music reflected this, it was all a journey and sometimes that journey was a struggle, tough mountains to climb and at other times floating a clear crystal lake. Lovesexy & Batman & Graffiti Bridge were the discovery time and the wanting to share the discovery with everyone. Diamonds & Pearls acceptance of who he was and what he believed and if others didn't then hey it didn't matter and have a bit of fun just with life in general, prince a man falling in love with a woman (enter Mayte full time) from here on in I think a little lost, perhaps not focused totally on his music as he had a partner in his life big time. I sort of lost touch a bit here with Prince and didn't listen much to the stuff, musically it wasn't doing much for me and certainly nothing in the lyrics that touched me. The Gold Experience and I am back in with a vengence, the lull was over! Wrong, back into the previous groove with the following releases. Then bang The Rainbow Children - oh my the wait was worth it, he's back on track again - once again WRONG! Lovesexy was one thing, TRC was a whole other! Arrogance personified! My apologies to any who follow the JW faith.

For those who didn't have God in their life before 1988 or understood what God was, Lovesexy brought this to them and we embarked on the journey. For those that did, they celebrated with Prince on his discovery. All that had gone before made sense, we looked at things with new eyes, we saw a new world.

The Prince of Now is nothing more than a musician who once rocked my world and changed my life. I see glimpses every now and then. I cried when I saw him in Australia last October because I felt I had lost a part of me. The happy Prince who had found what was right for him and made sense to many was gone.

I am not saying any of the above is right or wrong, just how I feel. (this is edited from a very long essay I wrote so sorry if it seems disjointed in places)




The both of you saved me a lot of time summing up my feelings and thoughts on this. I will never forget what Prince meant to me as a kid, a teenager, a young adult and even now he hits me when I don't expect it. Chewymusic and I would race each other to get B sides and boots. He may not be relevent to the pop scene, but there is no imagination there now. Prince still has that.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 3 of 3 <123
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Prince: Music and More > We over romanticize Prince 1980-1988