independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Prince: Music and More > Sign O' the Times - as good as people say?
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 3 of 3 <123
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #60 posted 08/29/03 1:44am

hectim

dawn74 said:

FunkMistress said:

Jem said:

*
*
*
EVERYONE SING IT
"I want to do it to you all the time, ..."
*
*
*


All right!


# cause when we do it girl it is so devine...


woohoo! dancing jig


All right![/
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #61 posted 08/29/03 5:42am

DavidEye

"Even 'Come' is better and that was pretty awful"


You gotta be joking.I realize that we all have different opinions,but I just don't see how ANY fan could say that 'Come' is a better album than 'SOTT'.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #62 posted 08/29/03 6:14am

funkaholic1972

avatar

DrD said:

Almost all those who believe SOTT is his best album listened to it in 1987, when it came out. I was among those and was also blown away. But for someone getting into prince today, it is no surprise that it is not viewed as his best or even one of his best, for some of the reasons I have mentioned above (Actually a friend of mine aged 25 discovered -well, more precisely, really went into-Prince through my collection last year, and simply did not like Sign. He thought 1999, Purple Rain, TRC, Lovesexy, parade were better. Same thing for my brother, aged 22)

Times have changed, sone albums have aged fantastically (1999, which is at the root of modern house music), other remain amazing (Purple Rain, Parade), while others sound progressively out-dated (and to me Sign really falls into that catagory, although a little half of the songs on it remain fantastic)


I wholeheartedly agree with your comments!
RIP Prince: thank U 4 a funky Time...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #63 posted 08/29/03 6:33am

DavidEye

I remember in 1987 being shocked at what some of the critics were saying about this album.The critic in my local newspaper (Harry Sumrall) described the album as "vapid",and Steve Ivory ( a well-known R&B music writer) referred to the album as "unbalanced".Of course,the negative reviews were in the minority.Most critics loved this album.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #64 posted 08/29/03 6:35am

DavidEye

BorisFishpaw said:



Actually, not liking it on first listen seems to be quite common
for newer fans. Personally I think it's got more to do with
the really poor CD mastering on that album (it really is the
quietest and flatest CD transfer out of all his albums by a
long shot). It's the only album that I regularly still play on
vinyl cuz the CD is so bad!




Bingo! The 'SOTT' CD is just begging to be remastered.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #65 posted 08/29/03 6:38am

Cloudbuster

avatar

DavidEye said:

I remember in 1987 being shocked at what some of the critics were saying about this album.The critic in my local newspaper (Harry Sumrall) described the album as "vapid",and Steve Ivory ( a well-known R&B music writer) referred to the album as "unbalanced".Of course,the negative reviews were in the minority.Most critics loved this album.


I remember the album having quite a lot of lukewarm reviews.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #66 posted 08/29/03 6:43am

EvilSkittle

mksprior said:

Okay let's compare it to Parade for example. What is it that makes S0TT so much better than Parade? I think Parade is vastly superior - it somehow manages to be hugely imaginative AND concise. And the songs are just... better! I listened to Strange Relationship on S0TT a minute ago and I ended up turning it off cos it was so weak!


Strange Relationship and IGBABN are the weakest tracks on the second disc IMO. SR is a great song, just don't like that particular version and I've always hated live tracks on studio albums. Besides, that's probably the weakest version of IGBABN I've heard.

Parade had some great tracks, but Do U Lie is utter shit and Kiss just doesn't belong there. The opening track I don't care about either. Overall I think SOTT is the better album of the two.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #67 posted 08/29/03 11:42am

Sdldawn

The best version of Strange Relationship is the one thats unreleased... They got it in perfect quality now, and it is fabulous!!! I love the indian sounding vibe goin..
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #68 posted 08/29/03 12:11pm

whodknee

LouieLaFunk said:

i would put sott in my prince top 5 albums but it doesnt stand out as much as the people in here say. i still say 1999 was his best work.


I'm with you on that Louie. I didn't get into Prince until the 90's even though I was coming of age in the early to mid 80's so production-wise it wasn't current. However, if you listen to 1999 it still sounds fresh.

It's obvious to me this thread was flame- bait because nobody who likes Prince would conceivably rate this as a bad album. I don't think it's his best-- top 5 or 10 certainly.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #69 posted 08/29/03 12:14pm

milty

avatar

stop it now! if you started with the 90s stuff and worked your way backwards, of course you will like the 90s better.
plain and simple...it's the best constructed pop album of the 80s. and i didn't write that - it came from Spin or Q magazine.
it's actually better than you think it is.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #70 posted 08/29/03 12:55pm

EvilSkittle

whodknee said:

LouieLaFunk said:

i would put sott in my prince top 5 albums but it doesnt stand out as much as the people in here say. i still say 1999 was his best work.


I'm with you on that Louie. I didn't get into Prince until the 90's even though I was coming of age in the early to mid 80's so production-wise it wasn't current. However, if you listen to 1999 it still sounds fresh.

It's obvious to me this thread was flame- bait because nobody who likes Prince would conceivably rate this as a bad album. I don't think it's his best-- top 5 or 10 certainly.


Delirious, Free and International Lover killed 1999 as far as I'm concerned.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #71 posted 08/29/03 1:45pm

2freaky4church
1

avatar

Evilskittle, hold up. You better not be saying that Free, International Lover and Delirious worship are shitty songs? If you are, then put up your dukes man.

boxing
All you others say Hell Yea!! woot!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #72 posted 08/29/03 2:13pm

rld

given all being said, SOTT deserves to be remastered!!!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 3 of 3 <123
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Prince: Music and More > Sign O' the Times - as good as people say?