independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Prince: Music and More > Choose , Warner years or the ' Freedom years'
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 2 of 3 <123>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #30 posted 06/18/03 5:31pm

TedW

Warner years, without question.

The business model Prince should have come up with, or perhaps tried to and failed, is Madonna's. I'm sure he wrote her off around the summer of '84 as some no-talent chick getting by on pure sex appeal and provocation only (his ego). But what happened is astonishing, given her amazing lack of ability as a singer, dancer, "songwriter"/lyricist. She renegotiated with Sire/Warners for her own record label, Maverick, which she then hired smart people like Guy Oseary to run -- and then let him run it. Maverick is a full-service label for which Madonna is the marquee act. She can make a record, whatever record, she wants, whenever she wants, have it promoted properly, AND get ALL the fucking money. Hey, that sounds a lot like what Prince wanted/wants... except Paisley was not a full-service label, and Prince, ever the control freak, had to have his hands in every little pie. So all the artists were pseudo-Prince type artists with pseudo-Prince type sounding records. If he'd have backed up a little and let it be an actual record company, he wouldn't be in the situation he's in now -- maybe it's great for his bank account, but he has nowhere near the pop culture impact he once had. It's a shame, because STILL no one is making the music he's making, and more people should be rocking to it.

But then, making his whole mega-stardom period was a fluke of sorts: Prince started as an underground artist; his music, however many chart hits he's had, has always had an unconventional, non-mainstream quality; and now he's back to being essentially an underground artist. Perhaps he has exactly the fan-base size a musician like him should have.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #31 posted 06/18/03 5:39pm

bananacologne

WARNERs - He got we he wanted from the off.
and guess what? It fucking worked 2.
Prince greedy? Nah - never... rolleyes
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #32 posted 06/18/03 7:51pm

Tom

avatar

WarnerBros hands down. At this point I can care less how much money Prince is making at any given point in time. That's not what attracted me to Prince. It was his music. And his music was much more interesting and engaging during his WB years.

Prince has had nearly a decade to do whatever he wants free from WB, and he has spent most of it hastily putting out alot of worthless shit.

New Power Soul VS. Parade?

Chaos & Disorder VS SOTT?

ONA VS Purple Rain?

NPGMC Year 1 VS. Lovesexy?

How can you even argue?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #33 posted 06/18/03 9:35pm

7IS4ME

avatar

warner years,were the best years for prince.the freedom years @#$&%*. PRINCE, BRING BACK THE MUSIC AND STOP THE NOISE.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #34 posted 06/19/03 2:41am

bananacologne

Tom said:


New Power Soul VS. Parade?

Chaos & Disorder VS SOTT?

ONA VS Purple Rain?

NPGMC Year 1 VS. Lovesexy?

How can you even argue?


clapping 'GUILTY! 7 YEARS HARD LABOUR - TAKE HIM AWAY...' lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #35 posted 06/19/03 3:02am

DavidEye

The Warner years smile


I miss the days when a new Prince album came out every year,along with the videos,singles,12" versions,B-sides,tours,etc.Everything seemed so planned out and the music was amazing.


Prince still creates interesting music though,so I guess we shouldn't really complain.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #36 posted 06/19/03 8:44am

huggy

warner years definitly.

ever since he started that crap with them he has been lost in many different ways.

And the saddest thing is that he is only getting worse, cuz Prince himself refuses to see, he is a stubborn mf. The people that kiss his ass all day long don't help shit either, cuz they just make him want to close his eyes and imagine he is still the greatest, when he really isn't.

it is basically a very sad situation...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #37 posted 06/19/03 8:55am

okaypimpn

avatar

Warner...simply for the promotion and the era (80's).
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #38 posted 06/19/03 12:01pm

fairlite

javed said:

I wonder where you all stand. There seems tobe this constant whining in my ears about the music club [come on did you REALLY expect it to run well!], about Prince generally being a big old Bastard who treats people like shit [of course the ex associates forgot that by putting their legs in front of each other it leads to forward motion and gets you out of the door], the crap quality of his music now, awful marketing, he is a pain to deal with etc. Bart recently and rightly pointed out on that other [and far more upto date] site that in the Warner years we had an album every year, he was indulged in putting out new music via Paisley Park [which if it wasn't for his ego and his cock could have been the new Motown], we got those magnificent tours, we got regular videos and a whole lot besides. Above all our man was HOT. What do we have now?, a mad genius still at work who is putting more emphasis on his own development and getting his message out. The club when added up has still released a fair amount of music etc and though far from perfect the site seems tobe moving the right direction. I also happen to love his new musical direction [does that qualify me as an ass kisser?]
Personally i'm here for the ride, i know that the music club is annoying, just like us he has his faults, but i'm here for the music and if that means i have to wait for ages to download or pay over the odds for shipping etc then so be it [call me a fool] . I would be a liar if i said i miss the structure that Warners gave him and would love to see him back with a label that would give him a bit of freedom in return for him being more flexible. If it got to the point where all i could see was bad in Prince both musically and personally then i would move on. Others for some reason have got to that point and still want to stick around. In a couple of years he'll probably be a Buddhist and be wearing yellow robes anyway!.



Warner. His music then was the soundtrack to my life
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #39 posted 06/23/03 7:51am

MartyMcFly

Amen! clapping


---

Warner.

I thinks its a shame. Prince tried to paint a picture about being a slave, but the fact is, he had just renewed his contract.

Its not like he was tied into a crap deal since 77.

In 93, His sales were declining, but Warner were still willing to give him a "mega star" contact.

Prince, believing in his own genius, was happy to lap it up.

In 93, he had the power to negotiate a new deal, which included gaining the old masters, much like REM did around the same time with Warner.

Instead, Prince took the big bucks, and them cried like a baby a year later.

As always, the problem was not slavery (which has began his whole train of throught for the last 5 years), but the fact that Prince wanted his cake, and eat it.

He wanted all song writing credits, the single choices, bad marketing campains done his way, then he expects people to pay millions for it.

RAVE would have worked, if he'd worked with Arista, like Santana, rather than expecting them to bend over backwards for him.

One point of interest. If prince is number one at the bank (his words), and its not about charts or "commercial success". Why does he bother to sign single album deals?

If its about spreading the message, he could release them at half the price or give alot away for free.

He wants maximum money, and exposure, and success, but he wants everyone else to pay for it, as a thank you to his "greatness".

Obviously it never going to happen, so he sinks deeper and deeper into obscurity.

Warner days gave us a quality controlled album every year, plus all the trimmings.

Its that fact that made him a millionaire, so why should it be wrong to want more of the same?

If he don't wanna do that no more, thats fine, but why does he keep advertising like the "old days"?

Example. He made a big point of advertising RAVE as similar to SOTT. Why, to cash in on what people want.

ONA live was advertised as a greatest hits. Remember all the song title in bold on the flash advert?

Well, most of those songs ended us a 30 second snippets in a piano medley.

Its fine that he wants to move on, but if he does, why does he keep trying to pull the wool over peoples eyes, pretending his new stuff is like his old warner days?

He knows Warner was better...he just didn't want to pay for the service he was recieving.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #40 posted 06/23/03 8:31am

JamesS

Warner Years. There was a huge amount of quality music in that period.

I still think when he gets this instrumental stuff out of him, and maybe a few other 'diversions' like the religious themes of TRC, he'll come out with some great music to rival his best... He's showing signs of it... some of his recent songs have a maturity and laid back confidence that was not there in the Warners stuff. Just needs to get the consistency...

Hang on in there - it'll happen!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #41 posted 06/23/03 8:52am

diamondpearl1

fuck warner brothers! after all the hard lessons our ancestors had 2 learn while dealin with these suits it's about time we black folks did our own thang anyway! and 4 those sayin the music suck and that there's 2 much preachin, i rather hear some upliftment and enlightenment over that garbage known as trl...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #42 posted 06/23/03 8:58am

pm1

warner/revolution years definitely !!!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #43 posted 06/23/03 12:40pm

NME

diamondpearl1 said:

fuck warner brothers! after all the hard lessons our ancestors had 2 learn while dealin with these suits it's about time we black folks did our own thang anyway! and 4 those sayin the music suck and that there's 2 much preachin, i rather hear some upliftment and enlightenment over that garbage known as trl...


hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha. very good. you're brilliant. i'd like to send you a cigar... do you smoke..?

you utter retard.
[This message was edited Tue Jun 24 4:57:14 PDT 2003 by NME]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #44 posted 06/23/03 12:46pm

pm1

I HAVE TO AGREE WITH THE POST BEFORE ME.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #45 posted 06/23/03 1:04pm

diamondpearl1

so i'm gettin called a retard 'cause i appreciate and wanna hear somethin different than ya'll? lol fuck what they say! rock on prince! owww...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #46 posted 06/23/03 1:15pm

DeVaniti

avatar

It's really not a fair comparison, The Warner years were his most visible years so of course most will choose Warner's.

I personally feel that his best hasn't been released yet. He's testing the water's with his club and N.E.W.S. Trying to finally get this distribution thing down.{you bbb whiners know what I mean} Then he's going to hit us the real and make all them 'haters believe.
___________________

Welcome 2 The Dawn!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #47 posted 06/23/03 8:21pm

namepeace

When you look at the quality of the output, the effectiveness in marketing the product, and the commercial success of the product, the Warner years were the better period by a mile.

During that time, Prince had a great management team (Cavallo-Ruffalo-Magnoli) and a label willing to indulge his constant thematic and stylistic changes and nimble enough to assist him in staying visible. He helped his case by making some of the most memorable albums of the 80's. I think the commercial fallout with Lovesexy killed that vibe forever.

It's not as if he hasn't made a lot of good music during his "freedom" years. He has. I could understand the fact that he's not selling now if I thought his product was just as good and he was making a good faith effort to market it effectively. Quality is in the eye of the beholder, but I don't see how his "freedom" work compares to even a lot of his post-Lovesexy Warners stuff. Nor do I see him even trying to market himself. He seems to be in this mode where he thinks it's perpetually 1985 and people should be falling all over him. He's to a lot of younger listeners what Mick Jagger used to be to me at that age: a legend, but an old head nonetheless.
Good night, sweet Prince | 7 June 1958 - 21 April 2016

Props will be withheld until the showing and proving has commenced. -- Aaron McGruder
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #48 posted 06/24/03 6:42am

pm1

warner years. can't they just make up.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #49 posted 06/24/03 2:46pm

Universaluv

Depends on what you mean by "the Warner years". Prince+WB in the eighties was hot shit, no question. Prince+WB in the nineties was painful to watch and listen to. I don't think think that relationship would've gotten any better so I understand why he left. Basically, I think he's better off now than he would've been if he'd stayed. You really wanna hear Chaos & Disorder 2?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #50 posted 06/24/03 3:48pm

SquirrelMeat

avatar

Universaluv said:

Depends on what you mean by "the Warner years". Prince+WB in the eighties was hot shit, no question. Prince+WB in the nineties was painful to watch and listen to. I don't think think that relationship would've gotten any better so I understand why he left. Basically, I think he's better off now than he would've been if he'd stayed. You really wanna hear Chaos & Disorder 2?


Good point. But if you did give me the choice of Chaos 2 or News, I'd pick chaos 2.

I'd rather have another "I like it there" or "Same December" than another "North".

As many have said, Prince's best instrument is his voice. Its a shame when he doesn't plug it in.
.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #51 posted 06/24/03 4:18pm

NuPwr319

avatar

TedW said:

Warner years, without question.

The business model Prince should have come up with, or perhaps tried to and failed, is Madonna's. I'm sure he wrote her off around the summer of '84 as some no-talent chick getting by on pure sex appeal and provocation only (his ego). But what happened is astonishing, given her amazing lack of ability as a singer, dancer, "songwriter"/lyricist. She renegotiated with Sire/Warners for her own record label, Maverick, which she then hired smart people like Guy Oseary to run -- and then let him run it. Maverick is a full-service label for which Madonna is the marquee act. She can make a record, whatever record, she wants, whenever she wants, have it promoted properly, AND get ALL the fucking money. Hey, that sounds a lot like what Prince wanted/wants... except Paisley was not a full-service label, and Prince, ever the control freak, had to have his hands in every little pie. So all the artists were pseudo-Prince type artists with pseudo-Prince type sounding records. If he'd have backed up a little and let it be an actual record company, he wouldn't be in the situation he's in now -- maybe it's great for his bank account, but he has nowhere near the pop culture impact he once had. It's a shame, because STILL no one is making the music he's making, and more people should be rocking to it.

But then, making his whole mega-stardom period was a fluke of sorts: Prince started as an underground artist; his music, however many chart hits he's had, has always had an unconventional, non-mainstream quality; and now he's back to being essentially an underground artist. Perhaps he has exactly the fan-base size a musician like him should have.



Well, said. I agree with it all clapping
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #52 posted 06/25/03 7:56am

Universaluv

Well it's not s though his entire post-WB career has been nothing but instrumentals. He did instrumentals with WB (Madhouse) he'll probably do them again in the future. I doubt that he's given up on vocals though just because he's done a couple of instrumental albums.

SquirrelMeat said:

Universaluv said:

Depends on what you mean by "the Warner years". Prince+WB in the eighties was hot shit, no question. Prince+WB in the nineties was painful to watch and listen to. I don't think think that relationship would've gotten any better so I understand why he left. Basically, I think he's better off now than he would've been if he'd stayed. You really wanna hear Chaos & Disorder 2?


Good point. But if you did give me the choice of Chaos 2 or News, I'd pick chaos 2.

I'd rather have another "I like it there" or "Same December" than another "North".

As many have said, Prince's best instrument is his voice. Its a shame when he doesn't plug it in.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #53 posted 06/25/03 8:32am

SynthiaRose

WARNER BROTHERS, DEFINITELY -- HE NEEDS A CENSOR!

Everything produced by a genius is not genius art. This doesn't register with him. He needs somebody to say 'no, this isn't a song/album you should release." He is watering down/ muddying up his legacy by releasing shit.



That whole tantrum with writing slave and burning bridges should have been handling in a more savvy and mature manner.Unfortunately, I'm afraid his behavior during and right after that split may mar his public image for life -- unless he can pull a kick-ass image move to rectify it. The name change? Damn. bad move. especially since it was insincere.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #54 posted 06/25/03 8:48am

whodknee

Warner Brothers was the best thing for him as a young artist. As somebody said, it wouldn't work now. A grown man and mature artist doesn't need people telling him how to make his art and he has learned to delegate when and where necessary.
As one matures they lose interest in the pop world-- or should. I, personally, would not want another Purple Rain as it was. The short Pop format doesn't interest me anymore. On the other hand, long, drawn-out jazz noodlings don't do it for me either. There's got to be a middle ground, which I think TRC finds almost perfectly. I haven't heard N.E.W.S. yet but it doesn't sound as interesting. I agree that his voice is his greatest instrument so I'd like to hear it-- but it's his music so all I can do is not buy it.
[This message was edited Wed Jun 25 8:51:31 PDT 2003 by whodknee]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #55 posted 06/25/03 8:53am

PurpleLove7

avatar

moderator

good ? & in order 2 have The FREE prince or Prince u had 2 have a WB Prince. everything's relative 2 how the path has been walked... if i've learned anything from P u have 2 embrace where u were b4 so u can know where u can go in u'r Future...

so we need both... i LOVE the music prince released AFTER he left The WB biggrin
Peace ... & Stay Funky ...

~* The only love there is, is the love "we" make *~

www.facebook.com/purplefunklover
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #56 posted 06/26/03 1:45am

huggy

DeVaniti said:

It's really not a fair comparison, The Warner years were his most visible years so of course most will choose Warner's.

I personally feel that his best hasn't been released yet. He's testing the water's with his club and N.E.W.S. Trying to finally get this distribution thing down.{you bbb whiners know what I mean} Then he's going to hit us the real and make all them 'haters believe.

lol Hahahahah! You defintly work for the club! It 's a bitch huh? when your company and "labour" is qualified as a rip-off and know to everybody who is interested. get a course in fair business dealings pelase.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #57 posted 06/26/03 1:48am

huggy

MartyMcFly said:

Amen! clapping


---

Warner.

I thinks its a shame. Prince tried to paint a picture about being a slave, but the fact is, he had just renewed his contract.

Its not like he was tied into a crap deal since 77.

In 93, His sales were declining, but Warner were still willing to give him a "mega star" contact.

Prince, believing in his own genius, was happy to lap it up.

In 93, he had the power to negotiate a new deal, which included gaining the old masters, much like REM did around the same time with Warner.

Instead, Prince took the big bucks, and them cried like a baby a year later.

As always, the problem was not slavery (which has began his whole train of throught for the last 5 years), but the fact that Prince wanted his cake, and eat it.

He wanted all song writing credits, the single choices, bad marketing campains done his way, then he expects people to pay millions for it.

RAVE would have worked, if he'd worked with Arista, like Santana, rather than expecting them to bend over backwards for him.

One point of interest. If prince is number one at the bank (his words), and its not about charts or "commercial success". Why does he bother to sign single album deals?

If its about spreading the message, he could release them at half the price or give alot away for free.

He wants maximum money, and exposure, and success, but he wants everyone else to pay for it, as a thank you to his "greatness".

Obviously it never going to happen, so he sinks deeper and deeper into obscurity.

Warner days gave us a quality controlled album every year, plus all the trimmings.

Its that fact that made him a millionaire, so why should it be wrong to want more of the same?

If he don't wanna do that no more, thats fine, but why does he keep advertising like the "old days"?

Example. He made a big point of advertising RAVE as similar to SOTT. Why, to cash in on what people want.

ONA live was advertised as a greatest hits. Remember all the song title in bold on the flash advert?

Well, most of those songs ended us a 30 second snippets in a piano medley.

Its fine that he wants to move on, but if he does, why does he keep trying to pull the wool over peoples eyes, pretending his new stuff is like his old warner days?

He knows Warner was better...he just didn't want to pay for the service he was recieving.

Great post Squirrel meat!
Couldn't be more true.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #58 posted 06/26/03 1:51am

huggy

Handclapsfingasnapz said:

thing of it is, i'm pretty sure there wuz a clause in that contract he signed back in 1977 that said sumfin 2 the point of "ya sign this, and all your shit belongs ta us" that he overlooked. all that aside, the wb years were cool, compared 2 the dwibbling about p's doin now as a free-agent of sorts.

People like Prince don't just overlook such a clause, they get advised and paid for agreeing to it. And not once or twice did he agree to it, but numerous times... ALL FOR $$$.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #59 posted 06/26/03 4:18am

Thirdeye

avatar

Warner Brothers always got my music in the store on time and at the going rate
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 2 of 3 <123>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Prince: Music and More > Choose , Warner years or the ' Freedom years'