Author | Message |
Hahn's cock-suckers sign up here..or do u just want me to write your name in? or do u just want me to write your name in? "Climb in my fur." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
oooh, rd, when did you get so fammy?
that's it, the engagement is off Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely. - Lord Acton | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
cborgman said: oooh, rd, when did you get so fammy?
that's it, the engagement is off Im not a fam! Im just drawn that way..it as yellow journalism thing with me. Fuck Prince and his bad attruitdue etc. I never said I thoght he was the be all to end all as a person. I just like his music..I know he can be a dick but I also know he can be a generous person as well. Dont stop loving me!! Im here to bring balance! "Climb in my fur." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
sittin down 2 watch the foray... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
rdhull said: or do u just want me to write your name in?
Hold on, if you can be a Hahn hater then we should have balance and have cock suckers..as you describe it. As much as Bart clearly has an agenda, the very same can be said of others...we're not all soo blind. If folks can call people out on things then others can do the same. "Waiting to be banned" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Comeout comeolut wherever u are..ok I will start writing names my damn self:
1.velvetsplash(shuch a shame to with a name liek that) 2. Bart Van progandas' cock sucking Hemelen who's next? come on you Hahn propogandist cock smokers?show your loyalty to boolshet journalism "Climb in my fur." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
rdhull said: Comeout comeolut wherever u are..ok I will start writing names my damn self:
1.velvetsplash(shuch a shame to with a name liek that) 2. Bart Van progandas' cock sucking Hemelen who's next? come on you Hahn propogandist cock smokers?show your loyalty to boolshet journalism oh, alright, the engaemnet is back on... you do realize velvetsplash is a man? you told me i was the only man you loved, rd! engagement's off again! Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely. - Lord Acton | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
we have a No.3..u wanna write your name or should I? "Climb in my fur." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
cborgman said: rdhull said: Comeout comeolut wherever u are..ok I will start writing names my damn self:
1.velvetsplash(shuch a shame to with a name liek that) 2. Bart Van progandas' cock sucking Hemelen who's next? come on you Hahn propogandist cock smokers?show your loyalty to boolshet journalism oh, alright, the engaemnet is back on... you do realize velvetsplash is a man? you told me i was the only man you loved, rd! engagement's off again! when did I say I loved velvetsplash. I only said it was a good name similar to my amp one in essence etc. I love YOU, I LIKE velvets NAME "Climb in my fur." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Good lord, man! McCarthyism much?
It's not like this book is burning up the NY Times Best Sellers list anydamnway, so put yer arm down, the war's over! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
rdhull said: when did I say I loved velvetsplash. I only said it was a good name similar to my amp one in essence etc. I love YOU, I LIKE velvets NAME okay, good point... engagement on again. Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely. - Lord Acton | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
rdhull said: Comeout comeolut wherever u are..ok I will start writing names my damn self:
1.velvetsplash(shuch a shame to with a name liek that) 2. Bart Van progandas' cock sucking Hemelen who's next? come on you Hahn propogandist cock smokers?show your loyalty to boolshet journalism Why is it propaganda?, explain this argument in the context of what Alex Hahn has written in his book? I'm not talking about Bart, he's nuts on many levels, but he's Bart for godsakes...we expect that stuff from him. But why is it Alex that is spouting propaganda and lies? [This message was edited Thu May 15 13:42:15 PDT 2003 by liberation] "Waiting to be banned" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Anxiety said: Good lord, man! McCarthyism much?
It's not like this book is burning up the NY Times Best Sellers list anydamnway, so put yer arm down, the war's over! No.4! fascism is fun! "Climb in my fur." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
rdhull said: Anxiety said: Good lord, man! McCarthyism much?
It's not like this book is burning up the NY Times Best Sellers list anydamnway, so put yer arm down, the war's over! No.4! fascism is fun! wait, was i number 3? Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely. - Lord Acton | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
liberation said: rdhull said: Comeout comeolut wherever u are..ok I will start writing names my damn self:
1.velvetsplash(shuch a shame to with a name liek that) 2. Bart Van progandas' cock sucking Hemelen who's next? come on you Hahn propogandist cock smokers?show your loyalty to boolshet journalism Why is it propaganda?, explain this argument in the context of what Alex Hahn has written in his book? I'm not talking about Bart, he's nuts on many levels, but he's Bart for godsakes...we expect that stuff from him. But why is it Alex that is spouting propaganda and lies? [This message was edited Thu May 15 13:42:15 PDT 2003 by liberation] You dont have to say anything..you're already no.3 ...if you want on th elist just say it. "Climb in my fur." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
cborgman said: rdhull said: Anxiety said: Good lord, man! McCarthyism much?
It's not like this book is burning up the NY Times Best Sellers list anydamnway, so put yer arm down, the war's over! No.4! fascism is fun! wait, was i number 3? No! Liberation is 3! "Climb in my fur." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
rdhull said: Anxiety said: Good lord, man! McCarthyism much?
It's not like this book is burning up the NY Times Best Sellers list anydamnway, so put yer arm down, the war's over! No.4! fascism is fun! Four people willing to suck Hahn's cock so far, huh? - so how many are willing suck YOURS? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Anxiety said: rdhull said: Anxiety said: Good lord, man! McCarthyism much?
It's not like this book is burning up the NY Times Best Sellers list anydamnway, so put yer arm down, the war's over! No.4! fascism is fun! Four people willing to suck Hahn's cock so far, huh? - so how many are willing suck YOURS? dunno ...dont be mad no.4 "Climb in my fur." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
i'm trying to get thru the book..and seriously it's just poorly written...
u2's sound defined by bono's guitar playing? alan leeds has 'melancholy handsome good looks?' wtf? there are more things that i've read and just been like 'huh?' apollonia has denied there was a relationship between them..but 'sources close to the set' say otherwise...kristin scott thomas denies a relationship..again 'sources close to the set' say otherwise...sources close to the set...but not the people actually on the set apparently.. i mean..feelings about prince aside..it's just not a very good book... the forward lists what reads as a 'who's who' among prince's history and none of them would be interviewed... wendy & lisa, morris day, vanity, susannah...i don't have the book in front of me, but the people most reported about are not interviewed...meaning it's primarily hearsay... i don't really understand the blind loyalty toward this book...particularly from people who criticize what they call 'blind loyalty' toward prince... this book sucks worse than 'freaks on this side...' how anyone who has actually read a biography of anyone before could think otherwise is beyond me... whew...i feel better now... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
rio said: i'm trying to get thru the book..and seriously it's just poorly written...
u2's sound defined by bono's guitar playing? alan leeds has 'melancholy handsome good looks?' wtf? there are more things that i've read and just been like 'huh?' apollonia has denied there was a relationship between them..but 'sources close to the set' say otherwise...kristin scott thomas denies a relationship..again 'sources close to the set' say otherwise...sources close to the set...but not the people actually on the set apparently.. i mean..feelings about prince aside..it's just not a very good book... the forward lists what reads as a 'who's who' among prince's history and none of them would be interviewed... wendy & lisa, morris day, vanity, susannah...i don't have the book in front of me, but the people most reported about are not interviewed...meaning it's primarily hearsay... i don't really understand the blind loyalty toward this book...particularly from people who criticize what they call 'blind loyalty' toward prince... this book sucks worse than 'freaks on this side...' how anyone who has actually read a biography of anyone before could think otherwise is beyond me... whew...i feel better now... when it comes from Rio you know its gotta be good (make sense). "Climb in my fur." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
rdhull said: liberation said: rdhull said: Comeout comeolut wherever u are..ok I will start writing names my damn self:
1.velvetsplash(shuch a shame to with a name liek that) 2. Bart Van progandas' cock sucking Hemelen who's next? come on you Hahn propogandist cock smokers?show your loyalty to boolshet journalism Why is it propaganda?, explain this argument in the context of what Alex Hahn has written in his book? I'm not talking about Bart, he's nuts on many levels, but he's Bart for godsakes...we expect that stuff from him. But why is it Alex that is spouting propaganda and lies? [This message was edited Thu May 15 13:42:15 PDT 2003 by liberation] You dont have to say anything..you're already no.3 ...if you want on th elist just say it. As i expected...i'm automatically a cock sucker, in your eyes, because i appear to defend Alex. This is my very point...if you're not on this or that team you have an agenda, you're an agent of evil and are totally biased. Bullshit...it's not about friends or favour, it's about being even handed about a PRODUCT on sale to the general public. No different if Prince himself sold a product to the fans, there is no way any of us could be sure 100% if what we were being told was either accurate or truthful. Prince is a well known and establish liar, he twists the truth to a point whereby he himself no longer knows what it is. So it's about time folks got a grip and cut Alex Hahn some slack, especially the stuff with personal insults and threatening behaviour...because it has happened. "Waiting to be banned" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
i dunno... it was an okay read? do i think it's evil? no. do i think it's the defining truth? no.
it's just a book Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely. - Lord Acton | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
rdhull said: rio said: i'm trying to get thru the book..and seriously it's just poorly written...
u2's sound defined by bono's guitar playing? alan leeds has 'melancholy handsome good looks?' wtf? there are more things that i've read and just been like 'huh?' apollonia has denied there was a relationship between them..but 'sources close to the set' say otherwise...kristin scott thomas denies a relationship..again 'sources close to the set' say otherwise...sources close to the set...but not the people actually on the set apparently.. i mean..feelings about prince aside..it's just not a very good book... the forward lists what reads as a 'who's who' among prince's history and none of them would be interviewed... wendy & lisa, morris day, vanity, susannah...i don't have the book in front of me, but the people most reported about are not interviewed...meaning it's primarily hearsay... i don't really understand the blind loyalty toward this book...particularly from people who criticize what they call 'blind loyalty' toward prince... this book sucks worse than 'freaks on this side...' how anyone who has actually read a biography of anyone before could think otherwise is beyond me... whew...i feel better now... when it comes from Rio you know its gotta be good (make sense). Hey, mang - I thought it was crap too, I just don't like being told what to do. Unless someone's telling me I gotta suck Alex Hahn's cock, in which case the kneepads are already on, honey. Whip that mess out, baby. mmm-MMM!!! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Anxiety said: rdhull said: rio said: i'm trying to get thru the book..and seriously it's just poorly written...
u2's sound defined by bono's guitar playing? alan leeds has 'melancholy handsome good looks?' wtf? there are more things that i've read and just been like 'huh?' apollonia has denied there was a relationship between them..but 'sources close to the set' say otherwise...kristin scott thomas denies a relationship..again 'sources close to the set' say otherwise...sources close to the set...but not the people actually on the set apparently.. i mean..feelings about prince aside..it's just not a very good book... the forward lists what reads as a 'who's who' among prince's history and none of them would be interviewed... wendy & lisa, morris day, vanity, susannah...i don't have the book in front of me, but the people most reported about are not interviewed...meaning it's primarily hearsay... i don't really understand the blind loyalty toward this book...particularly from people who criticize what they call 'blind loyalty' toward prince... this book sucks worse than 'freaks on this side...' how anyone who has actually read a biography of anyone before could think otherwise is beyond me... whew...i feel better now... when it comes from Rio you know its gotta be good (make sense). Hey, mang - I thought it was crap too, I just don't like being told what to do. Unless someone's telling me I gotta suck Alex Hahn's cock, in which case the kneepads are already on, honey. Whip that mess out, baby. mmm-MMM!!! Hold up potna--I never insinuated to "hey dont buy that book" etc. I may have come across as that in fun etc but thats not my meaning. Im saying be wary of yellow journalism, be objective, etc after its read. That is the heart and meat and potatos of what my point is. "Climb in my fur." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
but you know..he got my money...that bastid...
i'm almost through the chapter about prince robbing a liquor store in 1998 (with his gun mic) due to poor ticket sales for 'the jam of the year tour..' okay..it's not really in the book..but sources close to paisley park...well you know... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
rdhull said:[quote]Anxiety said:[quote]rdhull said:[quote] rio said: i'm trying to get thru the book..and seriously it's just poorly written...
Hold up potna--I never insinuated to "hey dont buy that book" etc. I may have come across as that in fun etc but thats not my meaning. Im saying be wary of yellow journalism, be objective, etc after its read. That is the heart and meat and potatos of what my point is. Define "yellow journalism"?...and why is Alex not objective? "Waiting to be banned" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
rio said: but you know..he got my money...that bastid...
i'm almost through the chapter about prince robbing a liquor store in 1998 (with his gun mic) due to poor ticket sales for 'the jam of the year tour..' okay..it's not really in the book..but sources close to paisley park...well you know... LOL Rio! "Climb in my fur." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
rio said: but you know..he got my money...that bastid...
i'm almost through the chapter about prince robbing a liquor store in 1998 (with his gun mic) due to poor ticket sales for 'the jam of the year tour..' okay..it's not really in the book..but sources close to paisley park...well you know... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
liberation said:[quote]rdhull said:[quote]Anxiety said:[quote] rdhull said: rio said: i'm trying to get thru the book..and seriously it's just poorly written...
Hold up potna--I never insinuated to "hey dont buy that book" etc. I may have come across as that in fun etc but thats not my meaning. Im saying be wary of yellow journalism, be objective, etc after its read. That is the heart and meat and potatos of what my point is. Define "yellow journalism"?...and why is Alex not objective? you want another place on the list? just say so silly "Climb in my fur." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
rdhull said: liberation said: Define "yellow journalism"?...and why is Alex not objective?
you want another place on the list? just say so silly Give him slots 1-5. He also used the phrase hating on. This post not for the wimp contingent. All whiny wusses avert your eyes. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |