independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Prince: Music and More > Owen Husney
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Reply   New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Author

Tweet     Share

Message
Thread started 02/28/26 10:41pm

rap

Owen Husney

Apologies if the link doesn't work, but I don't know how to post a photo: https://www.facebook.com/...1392872367
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1 posted 02/28/26 11:58pm

SoulAlive

May be an illustration of text that says 'I Coury Presden: Chidl pratingOlficer RSO May 19, 1977 Owen R. Husney. Amer Americ ican Artists Ιπc. 430 Oak Grove, Suite 10 Minneapolis, Minn. 55403 Dear Owen enclosed material PRINCE has been reviewed by Department and feel there great potential not the type o ΔcC we are looking for this point in time. Thanks for consideration, Sincerely, Al Coury Cony AC/1w Enclosures Copyright Owen Husney RSO ORECORDS, INC. 9200 Sunset Blvd.. Suite 505.1m Anpdles, Coй. 90060 Telephonet 213 278-1680'

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #2 posted 03/01/26 12:02am

SoulAlive

RSO Records? At the time,they were riding high with the Bee Gees.I bet they later regretted their decision to not sign Prince.

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #3 posted 03/01/26 12:53am

rap

SoulAlive said:

May be an illustration of text that says 'I Coury Presden: Chidl pratingOlficer RSO May 19, 1977 Owen R. Husney. Amer Americ ican Artists Ιπc. 430 Oak Grove, Suite 10 Minneapolis, Minn. 55403 Dear Owen enclosed material PRINCE has been reviewed by Department and feel there great potential not the type o ΔcC we are looking for this point in time. Thanks for consideration, Sincerely, Al Coury Cony AC/1w Enclosures Copyright Owen Husney RSO ORECORDS, INC. 9200 Sunset Blvd.. Suite 505.1m Anpdles, Coй. 90060 Telephonet 213 278-1680'

Thanks.

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #4 posted 03/01/26 8:19pm

databank

avatar

SoulAlive said:

RSO Records? At the time,they were riding high with the Bee Gees.I bet they later regretted their decision to not sign Prince.


IDK. Signing Prince was one thing. Supporting and promoting him the right was was another. On all accounts, WB did everything right until at least the mid-80s. The story we know may have turned out very, very differently had Prince signed with any other label.
A COMPREHENSIVE PRINCE DISCOGRAPHY (work in progress ^^): https://sites.google.com/...scography/
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #5 posted 03/02/26 7:13am

Vannormal

FSrK63bX0AA3FiN?format=jpg&name=medium

-

They also refused U2.

[Edited 3/2/26 7:15am]

"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves. And wiser people so full of doubts." (Bertrand Russell 1872-1972)
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #6 posted 03/02/26 10:48am

bizzie

databank said:

SoulAlive said:

RSO Records? At the time,they were riding high with the Bee Gees.I bet they later regretted their decision to not sign Prince.

IDK. Signing Prince was one thing. Supporting and promoting him the right was was another. On all accounts, WB did everything right until at least the mid-80s. The story we know may have turned out very, very differently had Prince signed with any other label.

.

Exactly. He spent his three-record advance on his first album, and Warners just let him continue. (His manager recently claimed that was part of the deal, but it's not like a record company can't make things very hard.) There are plenty of one-album artists in the 70s and 80s that never got a second chance. Not saying they're all as talented as Prince, but who knows what we missed out on.

.

Just look at someone like Shuggie Otis, who got plenty of chances yet basically disappeared after his 1974 album until he got some new appreciation twenty years later.

.

Prince signing with another label, spending a large amount of money on his first album and then getting dropped after it flops and never getting another chance is a very real alternate scenario.

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #7 posted 03/02/26 11:13am

Kares

avatar

bizzie said:

databank said:

SoulAlive said: IDK. Signing Prince was one thing. Supporting and promoting him the right was was another. On all accounts, WB did everything right until at least the mid-80s. The story we know may have turned out very, very differently had Prince signed with any other label.

.

Exactly. He spent his three-record advance on his first album, and Warners just let him continue. (His manager recently claimed that was part of the deal, but it's not like a record company can't make things very hard.) There are plenty of one-album artists in the 70s and 80s that never got a second chance. Not saying they're all as talented as Prince, but who knows what we missed out on.

.

Just look at someone like Shuggie Otis, who got plenty of chances yet basically disappeared after his 1974 album until he got some new appreciation twenty years later.

.

Prince signing with another label, spending a large amount of money on his first album and then getting dropped after it flops and never getting another chance is a very real alternate scenario.

.
Prince was part of the last generation of artists who had the chance of working under the great record label bosses such as Mo Ostin, before the lawyers and accountants took control and ruined everything. So while I understand that many of his grievances were valid, P was lucky to be born at the right time that allowed his intergalactic career path.
.

Not that his incredible mix of skills and talents wouldn't have found their way to an audience otherwise, but it is certain that he would've had a much harder time becoming a star in the '90s.

.
Speaking of Shuggie Otis:
it's true that he owes a lot to David Byrne for his 'second coming', but his case is also proof that with the right marketing, P could have a career-resurgence too.

Please sign my petition: https://c.org/B8L8SPz9Wf

The Paisley Park Vault spreadsheet: https://goo.gl/zzWHrU
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #8 posted 03/02/26 6:14pm

databank

avatar

Kares said:

bizzie said:

.

Exactly. He spent his three-record advance on his first album, and Warners just let him continue. (His manager recently claimed that was part of the deal, but it's not like a record company can't make things very hard.) There are plenty of one-album artists in the 70s and 80s that never got a second chance. Not saying they're all as talented as Prince, but who knows what we missed out on.

.

Just look at someone like Shuggie Otis, who got plenty of chances yet basically disappeared after his 1974 album until he got some new appreciation twenty years later.

.

Prince signing with another label, spending a large amount of money on his first album and then getting dropped after it flops and never getting another chance is a very real alternate scenario.

.
Prince was part of the last generation of artists who had the chance of working under the great record label bosses such as Mo Ostin, before the lawyers and accountants took control and ruined everything. So while I understand that many of his grievances were valid, P was lucky to be born at the right time that allowed his intergalactic career path.
.

Not that his incredible mix of skills and talents wouldn't have found their way to an audience otherwise, but it is certain that he would've had a much harder time becoming a star in the '90s.

.
Speaking of Shuggie Otis:
it's true that he owes a lot to David Byrne for his 'second coming', but his case is also proof that with the right marketing, P could have a career-resurgence too.

I think he definitely did from 2004 onwards. Nothing like 1984-1993, I'll give you that, but probably way more than Shuggie Otis (whose name remain relatively unknown).

In the end Prince wasn't off the radars for very long, barely a decade at most (depending on the territory).

I think we just overdramatized it as fans, because we (irrealistically) hoped he'd remain at the center of the conversation and on top of the charts forever.

A COMPREHENSIVE PRINCE DISCOGRAPHY (work in progress ^^): https://sites.google.com/...scography/
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #9 posted 03/02/26 6:18pm

databank

avatar

bizzie said:

databank said:

SoulAlive said: IDK. Signing Prince was one thing. Supporting and promoting him the right was was another. On all accounts, WB did everything right until at least the mid-80s. The story we know may have turned out very, very differently had Prince signed with any other label.

.

Exactly. He spent his three-record advance on his first album, and Warners just let him continue. (His manager recently claimed that was part of the deal, but it's not like a record company can't make things very hard.) There are plenty of one-album artists in the 70s and 80s that never got a second chance. Not saying they're all as talented as Prince, but who knows what we missed out on.

.

Just look at someone like Shuggie Otis, who got plenty of chances yet basically disappeared after his 1974 album until he got some new appreciation twenty years later.

.

Prince signing with another label, spending a large amount of money on his first album and then getting dropped after it flops and never getting another chance is a very real alternate scenario.

nod

A COMPREHENSIVE PRINCE DISCOGRAPHY (work in progress ^^): https://sites.google.com/...scography/
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply   New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Prince: Music and More > Owen Husney