YEAH....that qualification determines everything else!
>
Bart knows everything!
>
Tear that building down because it just doesn't and NEVER made any sense!
>

udo said:

(I am being sarcastic!)

Germanegro said:

(I am being sarcastic!)

.

When Prince could not really maintain the building.

When the Estate is too busy paying them leaches instead of fixing the building.

When there is no good income to be expected.

Then what?!

.

Do you want to see the park dilapidate further?

Do you want to see it sold to some uninterested party?

Etc.

.

In such case it best to bring it down, like the puple house, etc,

And you the observationist bystander would be the defeatest toward the endurance of the property?

>

IF the structure crumbles, which it isn't, I think that somebody would be willing to deal with that. But you say to tear it down, already.

>

Hmm--let me see which real estate development corp. you represent.

>

udo said:

When Prince could not really maintain the building.

When the Estate is too busy paying them leaches instead of fixing the building.

When there is no good income to be expected.

Then what?!

.

Do you want to see the park dilapidate further?

Do you want to see it sold to some uninterested party?

Etc.

.

In such case it best to bring it down, like the puple house, etc,

Germanegro said:

And you the observationist bystander would be the defeatest toward the endurance of the property?

>

.

If 'maintenance' remains at the level where it is, your 'endurance' option will only show dilapidation.

.

IF the structure crumbles, which it isn't, I think that somebody would be willing to deal with that.

.

Who announced they want to throw a bag of money towards the maintenance?

.

But you say to tear it down, already.

.

Because there is no bag of money.

And I'd hate to see the building deteriorate further or be sold to some uninterested party.

Oh, I see--blind, ignorant commentary is at hand here. I didn't originally expect that 2B the case!
Sorry.

udo said:

Germanegro said:

Oh, I see--blind, ignorant commentary is at hand here. I didn't originally expect that 2B the case! Sorry.

.

You did not explain anything regarding this statement.

If in such s statement a person is called out as using 'blind commentary' then backgrounds are o be expected from the not-so blind human.

But none...

.

What does that make the human?

I'm saying that the actual reasoning behind your statements that PP should be demolished to save from somebody spending money on preserving it is vague and mysterious.
>
Thus far, it appears to be based on a fear of the estate's inability to afford the property maintenance, and the statements of a general trend toward recording studios' closings by a regular org contributor who typically expounds on the unseemly angle of any Prince, Paisley Park, NPG Publishing, or Prince Estate activity and magnifies it to a degree exclusionary of any positive or reasonable greater perspective.
>
What does that make the human? I dunno. I believe the question should be "what does this make of the knowledge, experience and passion of one who at this point chooses to reccomend demolishing the Paisley Park buildings to save them from deterioration."
[Edited to remove an incorrect statement.]

udo said:

[Edited 5/10/21 11:05am]

Germanegro said:

I'm saying that the actual reasoning behind your statements that PP should be demolished to save from somebody spending money on preserving it is vague and mysterious.

.

I say your conclusion based on my statements (i.e.: writings) is kinda curious.

I never ever mentioned 'saving'.

I mentioned the maintenance level, an imaginary bag of money ('santa claws') and the certain path to dilapidation if nothing changed.

You then started giving weird responses.

And now it appears you draw conclusions out of thin air instead of what I wrote.

You go point out the bag of money to save PP while I go do my yoga exercises.

After U yoga and improve your bloodflow, let us know about all of the "missing money" and your imagined accounting, as well.

>

If U feel my commens are weird, U gotta look in the mirror first, I'd say.

udo said:

Germanegro said:

I'm saying that the actual reasoning behind your statements that PP should be demolished to save from somebody spending money on preserving it is vague and mysterious.

.

I say your conclusion based on my statements (i.e.: writings) is kinda curious.

I never ever mentioned 'saving'.

I mentioned the maintenance level, an imaginary bag of money ('santa claws') and the certain path to dilapidation if nothing changed.

You then started giving weird responses.

And now it appears you draw conclusions out of thin air instead of what I wrote.

You go point out the bag of money to save PP while I go do my yoga exercises.

To be clear, I confused one of my earlier comments to you, that were erroneously based on comments by others that are found in the separate thread discussing the fate of Paisley Park--https://prince.org/msg/7/466617. Therefore, I strike what I said about your comments based on "the disreputable author" (on Facebook). With that removed, I still don't see why you think the property should be taken down ASAP to save it's image--odd reasoning; and to cut the Prince Estate's expenses--more time is needed to make a resolution of such weight.

>

I presume that you may think otherwise, nevertheless. I guess that can't be helped.

[Edited 5/10/21 10:54am]

[Edited 5/10/21 10:56am]

Is there no person capable of resolving the so called issues?

How about anyone who commented on this thread volunteer to fix the issues.

I'm not afraid to walk on a roof, what is y'all's problem?

I can't afford the travel and boarding! Plus I'd be afraid to ask PP for a stipend--they probably won't be able to assign one to my volunteer efforts.

heartpeacesheart said:

Is there no person capable of resolving the so called issues? How about anyone who commented on this thread volunteer to fix the issues. I'm not afraid to walk on a roof, what is y'all's problem?

Germanegro said:[quote]

I can't afford the travel and boarding! Plus I'd be afraid to ask PP for a stipend--they probably won't be able to assign one to my volunteer efforts.

heartpeacesheart said:

That's not what volunteer is about anyway.

Well...in actuality, I don't have any training to make a physical structural assessment. My enthusiasm would be misplaced regardless. It would be nice to stand on the roof up there and look over the landscape.

>

heartpeacesheart said:

Germanegro said:

I can't afford the travel and boarding! Plus I'd be afraid to ask PP for a stipend--they probably won't be able to assign one to my volunteer efforts.

heartpeacesheart said:

That's not what volunteer is about anyway.

I wonder if the construction of an observation stand on the grounds would add value as a super-duper-deluxe Paisley Park tour feature, to look over the stream, ponds and woodlands that are all around.

Germanegro said:

I feel like I have enough experience to accompany someone about it.

Lol at the observation stand.
Like a marching band thing the guy in the Fleetwood Mac "Tusk" video should have stood on instead of the basic step ladder?
[Edited 5/10/21 17:39pm]

Or as in a lifeguard stand?
[Edited 5/10/21 17:40pm]

Like one of those forest fire lookouts

heartpeacesheart said:

Germanegro said:

Well...in actuality, I don't have any training to make a physical structural assessment. My enthusiasm would be misplaced regardless. It would be nice to stand on the roof up there and look over the landscape.

>

I wonder if the construction of an observation stand on the grounds would add value as a super-duper-deluxe Paisley Park tour feature, to look over the stream, ponds and woodlands that are all around.

I feel like I have enough experience to accompany someone about it. Lol at the observation stand. Like a marching band thing the guy in the Fleetwood Mac "Tusk" video should have stood on instead of the basic step ladder? [Edited 5/10/21 17:39pm] Or as in a lifeguard stand? [Edited 5/10/21 17:40pm]

Germanegro said:

Ridiculous.
People sweating other people bankrolls don't know the value or valuation of money.

heartpeacesheart said:

Is there no person capable of resolving the so called issues?

.

They need an 'expert' for such issue.

As I have shown, I can act as such expert.

My fees will be disclosed as soon as the Estate contacts me.

udo said:

.

They need an 'expert' for such issue.

As I have shown, I can act as such expert.

My fees will be disclosed as soon as the Estate contacts me.

they send you a letter asking you to work for them, but it can't fit on your shelf so you decline

lustmealways said:

udo said:

.

They need an 'expert' for such issue.

As I have shown, I can act as such expert.

My fees will be disclosed as soon as the Estate contacts me.

they send you a letter asking you to work for them, but it can't fit on your shelf so you decline

.

No that letter will be framed and put on my wall.