SensualMelody said: stymie said: SensualMelody said: Anji said: Honest answer, no I did not listen to the ones that were filled with profanity and sex... Remember Janet Jackson's Velvet Rope? I just assumed it would be allright cause it was Janet...opened it, read the lyrics... Trashed it. Did not listen to it once. Really I could have listened because when it played on someone's radio I could not understand a word she was saying...lol. I'm not putting anyone else down nor trying to say I'm a saint... I am certainly not a saint! But these standards I set for myself when I was very young. People are different and the things that turn some people on turn others off. Just of interest...the "F" word. I hate it! I don't even know why. I just hate it...has nothing to do with religion, It is just a vulgar word to me. Now neither of my parents use profanity...(baptists, both) so maybe that's why I have an aversion for it. Who knows??? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SensualMelody said: giotto said: Anji said: what happens when those closest to you have gone? What does one turn to?
. That's actually a very good question. Having a family and close friends around doesn't necessarily mean they will be there for you in times of emotional crisis, nor will they be willing to offer love and support on tap in times of adversity. This is a common misconception. More often than not,they will tend fold like a bad hand of poker. . This is so true. I believe this is why spiritual support is so important to many people. The scriptures say... "In case my own father and my own mother did leave me, Even Jehovah himself would take me up" ...Psalms 27:10 Spirituality is based solely on the belief in one's own mind. Whatever you choose to believe in as truth, your mind will point you in directions to find evidence to support those ideals. This is why I don't think it's truthful to view any religious following as THE truth. In my opinion, there is no such thing as accurate knowledge, or the everlasting now, but if you find comfort (and hope) in those scriptures, then that becomes a valuable endeavour in learning to rely on oneself. Afterall, it's not actually Jehovah you're choosing to believe in, but rather yourself. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SensualMelody said: Baby...baby, there, there, What is your problem?
It's your HYPOCRISY, my dear! Your hiding behind the Bible to justify your IDOL WORSHIP of Prince! I am not angry.
I am amused. We all know you would have failed a LIE DETECTOR TEST on that one! Don't we! That posting you wrote was dripping with it! You are so confused.
Only in your wildest dreams my dear. Only in your wildest dreams! You damn well I'm right on this one, but your not being HONEST with yourself about the matter: YOUR IDOLIZING PRINCE! I am not the victim...YOU are.
A victim of what? You don't know me, or anything about me...These are nothing but useless WORD GAMES you're playing my dear! I'M HIP TO YOU! Have you forgotten that Prince himself is a JW?
Even if he is, that's no reason to violate Bible principle by IDOLIZING the man!-- Oh, I get it! You have been listening to Prince's music all along when you SHOULD'NT HAVE and now that he is ASSOCIATING with JWs--IT IS ALL THE EXCUSE YOU NEED TO COME OUT OF THE WOOD WORK WITH IT! I think you might even be a little envious. because I know who I am.
You sound a little INSECURE HERE by throwing the burden of proof on me. That tactic does'nt work good here, my dear. Try again! And I like who I am.
Who are you trying to convince here? ME or YOURSELF? Don't worry yourself about analyzing me.
Why? Are you afraid to look in the mirror at yourself? Oh, I see... You can dish-it-out by arrogantly speaking AT! people about the Bible! But you can't take it when the TABLES ARE TURNED and some else does it to you! Try to make your reply a little more coherent.
The message was quite CLEAR and you KNOW IT! Otherwise, why bother wasting your time! Right? I am so where I want to be.
We already WE KNOW THAT! You're here because you IDOLIZE AND WORSHIP PRINCE! That's the real reason you're here NO MATTER WHAT YOU SAY OR HOW YOU CHOOSE TO WEAVE ALL OF YOUR BEAUTIFUL WORDS TOGETHER! And to say otherwise, you're LYING to yourself! You really think your little ramblings could make me angry?
Sure they did! It got your attention because DEEP DOWN you know it's the TRUTH! YOU ARE GUILTY OF IDOLATRY! You really don't know me.
I don't have to know personally know you to pick up things! Sit tight and people tell you everything you want to know about... Who are you, anyway?
Sorry, but I don't give out personal info on the web. Too many shysters around, kid. Sorry... You are so right Handclaps...(meatloaf...I smell meatloaf!...ewww!)
I know I am! And so do you! **************************************************
"You can catch the Devil, but you can't hold him long..."--Rod Serling | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Take it easy, it's not a sin if Senual Melody loves Prince and his music, that's what it's about.I don't think anyone thinks of Prince as a god. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
cloud9mission said: dnaplaya said: When u listen 2 a record like Lovesexy, it religious, but it's like:
IT's FUNKY U KNOW IT I KNOW IT TAKE IT OR LEAVE IT That's what i loved about the whole religious slant, it was like "Take it and love it, otherwise, that's cool, but that's u're loss". The whole JW thing seems forced and seems like something Prince only said yes to, to keep Larry happy. I don't like all these consipiricy style theories (like Starous and Superstitions)and lyrics that pop up in the songs. It seems more Joyful and positive without these references Well said mmm hmmm | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SensualMelody said: For STOP who questions my being here:
See, this is where you tell on yourself. You hold me to a higher standard because I am JW. You do not hold others to the same standards. It is not I who say I that JWs are too nicey-wicey to be here. It is you. I am selective to which topics I open. But I live in the same world you do. I shop at the same grocery stores. I work at the same kinds of jobs. I raise children. I laugh. I cry. I am human. I just happen to be a human who is also a JW. Because of this one fact, you revile me... One reason I am here is to stand up for what I believe. To give truthful answers in the face of slander. To show what JWs like me are made of. People have said we are brainwashed, yet here I am. People say I have no freedom, yet here I am. And guess what? I am one of those who spends many hours witnessing to others each month... at their doors and in their homes. So unlike your vision of JWs...I am me. I am JW. I love it. :wOOt: . . . Edited to speak more directly to STOP... [This message was edited Sat Apr 26 19:28:38 PDT 2003 by SensualMelody] respect to you for being one of the lonely few to defend against this ridiculous hatred for the JW folks. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Anji said: ...but let's say Prince did fall prey to a dehibilitating way of life. Can you describe how you would feel? Would you be able to support him through his illness? And if so, how? Remember, this is like losing a friend...
It is sort of like losing a friend. Some of us were attracted to Prince's music and his message, and felt in sync with it. Now that his interests and agenda are departing from our own, its awkward and uncomfortable. I'm not giving up my standards and beliefs just because they aren't in line with Prince's. And the more I read about JW's practices, the more irritated I am that one of my favorite musicians is adopting this lifestyle. At the same time though, I'm not dragging him by his heels out of Kingdom Hall, I'm just voicing an opinion. Prince is free as ever to do what he wants. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
lovebird said: Take it easy, it's not a sin if Senual Melody loves Prince and his music, that's what it's about.I don't think anyone thinks of Prince as a god.
Actually, I do. And Prince.org is my temple. [This message was edited Mon Apr 28 8:49:42 PDT 2003 by ConsciousContact] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
When people try to enforce something on others, or push something strongly as the only option, it is usually because their own belief is so fragile that they need it reinforced by others. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
VelvetSplash said: When people try to enforce something on others, or push something strongly as the only option, it is usually because their own belief is so fragile that they need it reinforced by others. I would agree to a certain extent but that's not always the case. For example, what happens when you think you're genuinely 'right'? Everyone has their two cents worth. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Tom said: Anji said: ...but let's say Prince did fall prey to a dehibilitating way of life. Can you describe how you would feel? Would you be able to support him through his illness? And if so, how? Remember, this is like losing a friend...
It is sort of like losing a friend. Some of us were attracted to Prince's music and his message, and felt in sync with it. Now that his interests and agenda are departing from our own, its awkward and uncomfortable. I'm not giving up my standards and beliefs just because they aren't in line with Prince's. And the more I read about JW's practices, the more irritated I am that one of my favorite musicians is adopting this lifestyle. At the same time though, I'm not dragging him by his heels out of Kingdom Hall, I'm just voicing an opinion. Prince is free as ever to do what he wants. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
lovebird said: Take it easy, it's not a sin if Senual Melody loves Prince and his music, that's what it's about.I don't think anyone thinks of Prince as a god.
I agree but STOP is trying to prove that Sensual may be acting 'out of convention' here, given her beliefs and her fandom. STOP believes Sensual idolises Prince, which I don't think is allowed according to JW's teachings. From what Sensual has written on this thread, it doesn't look like she's idolising Prince at all so I can't really understand where STOP is coming from (apart from a pre-conceived bias). | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Anji said: VelvetSplash said: When people try to enforce something on others, or push something strongly as the only option, it is usually because their own belief is so fragile that they need it reinforced by others. I would agree to a certain extent but that's not always the case. For example, what happens when you think you're genuinely 'right'? Everyone has their two cents worth.If you're right, you don't need other people's approval, agreement, or acceptance. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
VelvetSplash said: Anji said: VelvetSplash said: When people try to enforce something on others, or push something strongly as the only option, it is usually because their own belief is so fragile that they need it reinforced by others. I would agree to a certain extent but that's not always the case. For example, what happens when you think you're genuinely 'right'? Everyone has their two cents worth.If you're right, you don't need other people's approval, agreement, or acceptance. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Anji said:[quote] SensualMelody said: Anji said: SensualMelody said: Anji said: SensualMelody said: Anji said: Then when I saw him do the Christ...my admiration turned to affection. When he began to sing about my passion and my reason for living, I began to love him like my own brother...Understand? Anyone listening to Prince will hear the explicit, parental advisory level to his work. Yes, you can selectively censor out what you dislike hearing, and you can view the message on a higher spiritual plane, but it's clear that Prince intended to use sex and profanity (for example, Erotic City, Irresistible Bitch, Sexy M.F. etc) as a means to drive his message through the music. He wanted you to hear what he was saying and there is/was a way of drawing attention to it. Sex and profanity sells and sold Prince. That may not be the case now but they are so intertwined that in many cases it would be near impossible to fully follow Prince and not hear his evolution through the past. This relates to this notion of 'old' and 'new,' and that there is no such thing as 'new' with anything, just evolution. So where (and how) can you draw the line with Prince? You say that it's automatic love you share with Prince now that he is a JW but won't you need to always view Prince's music through a prism? For example, by continuing to be selective with most of his body of work, there must be some level of disregard (and some would argue, disrespect) on your behalf. Afterall, his music is a representation of himself and therefore by censoring his music, you effectively are showing some level of disregard (and disrespect) to him as a person. If that line is being drawn with Prince, can that really speak to an absolute trust, an absolute love and absolute sharing of experiences? By the way, I'm asking you these questions to try and understand how JW's doctrine may be influencing Prince's decisions regarding his own past, present and future. Of course, you can only speak for yourself but there nay be some principles that are transferable and we can all learn from. Also, I can't think of a better means to understand further but through a Prince fan who also happens to be a JW. I hope you don't mind! This "automatic" relationship I spoke of is based on a mutual love for Jehovah God. It is the same love I have for any one who shares this experience with me. As I mentioned before, you have to be one to understand the experience. Although this brotherly love is genuine and heartfelt, I never mentioned absolutes. As far as sharing in "all" of the person, this is not necessary. Think of what happens when you meet a person and develop a friendship with him. You may come to genuinely care for that person. Then someone comes and says "If you really knew his past, you may not like him." Do you then say, "Tell me all about his past." or do you take the person as you have come to know him as he is? you said Anyone listening to Prince will hear the explicit... it's clear that Prince intended to use sex and profanity (for example, Erotic City, Irresistible Bitch, Sexy M.F. etc) as a means to drive his message through the music. He wanted you to hear what he was saying and there is/was a way of drawing attention to it. Here is what I am saying The songs you named above...I have never heard. My Prince collection basically begins with Rainbow Children. My Witness friends who grew up with Prince music (as they were generally not JWs until later) share with me what they know I will like. That's how I came to hear The Ladder. And God Created Woman..etc...I never even heard The Cross...only "The Christ". I also bought a Greatest Hits CD which includes Purple Rain and Thieves in the Temple. Prince's efforts to re-do his songs show clearly that he is now interested in driving a different message through his music. The question is...how many can comfortably hear this message? Now Anji, if you really want to know how the JW doctrine is influencing Prince's decisions, you need only to obtain a copy of the "Knowledge Book"... Thus the "Knowledge Room" This would really clarify much of what is now being reflected in his lifestyle and his music right now. Of course this would be for educational purposes only. Thanks for you questions. Melody So...how's everybody doing? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SensualMelody said:[quote] Anji said: SensualMelody said: Anji said: SensualMelody said: Anji said: SensualMelody said: Anji said: Then when I saw him do the Christ...my admiration turned to affection. When he began to sing about my passion and my reason for living, I began to love him like my own brother...Understand? Anyone listening to Prince will hear the explicit, parental advisory level to his work. Yes, you can selectively censor out what you dislike hearing, and you can view the message on a higher spiritual plane, but it's clear that Prince intended to use sex and profanity (for example, Erotic City, Irresistible Bitch, Sexy M.F. etc) as a means to drive his message through the music. He wanted you to hear what he was saying and there is/was a way of drawing attention to it. Sex and profanity sells and sold Prince. That may not be the case now but they are so intertwined that in many cases it would be near impossible to fully follow Prince and not hear his evolution through the past. This relates to this notion of 'old' and 'new,' and that there is no such thing as 'new' with anything, just evolution. So where (and how) can you draw the line with Prince? You say that it's automatic love you share with Prince now that he is a JW but won't you need to always view Prince's music through a prism? For example, by continuing to be selective with most of his body of work, there must be some level of disregard (and some would argue, disrespect) on your behalf. Afterall, his music is a representation of himself and therefore by censoring his music, you effectively are showing some level of disregard (and disrespect) to him as a person. If that line is being drawn with Prince, can that really speak to an absolute trust, an absolute love and absolute sharing of experiences? By the way, I'm asking you these questions to try and understand how JW's doctrine may be influencing Prince's decisions regarding his own past, present and future. Of course, you can only speak for yourself but there nay be some principles that are transferable and we can all learn from. Also, I can't think of a better means to understand further but through a Prince fan who also happens to be a JW. I hope you don't mind! This "automatic" relationship I spoke of is based on a mutual love for Jehovah God. It is the same love I have for any one who shares this experience with me. As I mentioned before, you have to be one to understand the experience. Although this brotherly love is genuine and heartfelt, I never mentioned absolutes. As far as sharing in "all" of the person, this is not necessary. Think of what happens when you meet a person and develop a friendship with him. You may come to genuinely care for that person. Then someone comes and says "If you really knew his past, you may not like him." Do you then say, "Tell me all about his past." or do you take the person as you have come to know him as he is? you said Anyone listening to Prince will hear the explicit... it's clear that Prince intended to use sex and profanity (for example, Erotic City, Irresistible Bitch, Sexy M.F. etc) as a means to drive his message through the music. He wanted you to hear what he was saying and there is/was a way of drawing attention to it. Here is what I am saying The songs you named above...I have never heard. My Prince collection basically begins with Rainbow Children. My Witness friends who grew up with Prince music (as they were generally not JWs until later) share with me what they know I will like. That's how I came to hear The Ladder. And God Created Woman..etc...I never even heard The Cross...only "The Christ". I also bought a Greatest Hits CD which includes Purple Rain and Thieves in the Temple. Prince's efforts to re-do his songs show clearly that he is now interested in driving a different message through his music. The question is...how many can comfortably hear this message? Now Anji, if you really want to know how the JW doctrine is influencing Prince's decisions, you need only to obtain a copy of the "Knowledge Book"... Thus the "Knowledge Room" This would really clarify much of what is now being reflected in his lifestyle and his music right now. Of course this would be for educational purposes only. Thanks for you questions. Melody Even though you don't expect me to fully understand your nowadays 'automatic' connection with Prince unless I myself am a JW, I have understood one thing from your comments: you're only willing to truly connect with others (and accept them as a whole) if they practise the same philosophy as you. . [This message was edited Tue Apr 29 8:27:16 PDT 2003 by Anji] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Anji said:[quote] SensualMelody said: Anji said: SensualMelody said: Anji said: SensualMelody said: Anji said: SensualMelody said: Anji said: Then when I saw him do the Christ...my admiration turned to affection. When he began to sing about my passion and my reason for living, I began to love him like my own brother...Understand? Anyone listening to Prince will hear the explicit, parental advisory level to his work. Yes, you can selectively censor out what you dislike hearing, and you can view the message on a higher spiritual plane, but it's clear that Prince intended to use sex and profanity (for example, Erotic City, Irresistible Bitch, Sexy M.F. etc) as a means to drive his message through the music. He wanted you to hear what he was saying and there is/was a way of drawing attention to it. Sex and profanity sells and sold Prince. That may not be the case now but they are so intertwined that in many cases it would be near impossible to fully follow Prince and not hear his evolution through the past. This relates to this notion of 'old' and 'new,' and that there is no such thing as 'new' with anything, just evolution. So where (and how) can you draw the line with Prince? You say that it's automatic love you share with Prince now that he is a JW but won't you need to always view Prince's music through a prism? For example, by continuing to be selective with most of his body of work, there must be some level of disregard (and some would argue, disrespect) on your behalf. Afterall, his music is a representation of himself and therefore by censoring his music, you effectively are showing some level of disregard (and disrespect) to him as a person. If that line is being drawn with Prince, can that really speak to an absolute trust, an absolute love and absolute sharing of experiences? By the way, I'm asking you these questions to try and understand how JW's doctrine may be influencing Prince's decisions regarding his own past, present and future. Of course, you can only speak for yourself but there nay be some principles that are transferable and we can all learn from. Also, I can't think of a better means to understand further but through a Prince fan who also happens to be a JW. I hope you don't mind! This "automatic" relationship I spoke of is based on a mutual love for Jehovah God. It is the same love I have for any one who shares this experience with me. As I mentioned before, you have to be one to understand the experience. Although this brotherly love is genuine and heartfelt, I never mentioned absolutes. As far as sharing in "all" of the person, this is not necessary. Think of what happens when you meet a person and develop a friendship with him. You may come to genuinely care for that person. Then someone comes and says "If you really knew his past, you may not like him." Do you then say, "Tell me all about his past." or do you take the person as you have come to know him as he is? you said Anyone listening to Prince will hear the explicit... it's clear that Prince intended to use sex and profanity (for example, Erotic City, Irresistible Bitch, Sexy M.F. etc) as a means to drive his message through the music. He wanted you to hear what he was saying and there is/was a way of drawing attention to it. Here is what I am saying The songs you named above...I have never heard. My Prince collection basically begins with Rainbow Children. My Witness friends who grew up with Prince music (as they were generally not JWs until later) share with me what they know I will like. That's how I came to hear The Ladder. And God Created Woman..etc...I never even heard The Cross...only "The Christ". I also bought a Greatest Hits CD which includes Purple Rain and Thieves in the Temple. Prince's efforts to re-do his songs show clearly that he is now interested in driving a different message through his music. The question is...how many can comfortably hear this message? Now Anji, if you really want to know how the JW doctrine is influencing Prince's decisions, you need only to obtain a copy of the "Knowledge Book"... Thus the "Knowledge Room" This would really clarify much of what is now being reflected in his lifestyle and his music right now. Of course this would be for educational purposes only. Thanks for you questions. Melody Even though you don't expect me to fully understand your nowadays 'automatic' connection with Prince unless I myself am a JW, I have understood one thing from your comments: you're only willing to truly connect with others (and accept them as a whole) if they practise the same philosophy as you. . [This message was edited Tue Apr 29 8:27:16 PDT 2003 by Anji] Although I respect your opinions, your conclusions are incorrect. Ask NuPwrSoul. Ask Rio. Ask Abrazo. They are here on the site. You will see that you are as wrong as you can be. I can and do truly connect with those whose philosophies are different from mine. Go ahead, ask them. Melody . . [This message was edited Tue Apr 29 12:38:05 PDT 2003 by SensualMelody] So...how's everybody doing? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SensualMelody said:[quote] Anji said: SensualMelody said: Anji said: SensualMelody said: Anji said: SensualMelody said: Anji said: SensualMelody said: Anji said: Then when I saw him do the Christ...my admiration turned to affection. When he began to sing about my passion and my reason for living, I began to love him like my own brother...Understand? Anyone listening to Prince will hear the explicit, parental advisory level to his work. Yes, you can selectively censor out what you dislike hearing, and you can view the message on a higher spiritual plane, but it's clear that Prince intended to use sex and profanity (for example, Erotic City, Irresistible Bitch, Sexy M.F. etc) as a means to drive his message through the music. He wanted you to hear what he was saying and there is/was a way of drawing attention to it. Sex and profanity sells and sold Prince. That may not be the case now but they are so intertwined that in many cases it would be near impossible to fully follow Prince and not hear his evolution through the past. This relates to this notion of 'old' and 'new,' and that there is no such thing as 'new' with anything, just evolution. So where (and how) can you draw the line with Prince? You say that it's automatic love you share with Prince now that he is a JW but won't you need to always view Prince's music through a prism? For example, by continuing to be selective with most of his body of work, there must be some level of disregard (and some would argue, disrespect) on your behalf. Afterall, his music is a representation of himself and therefore by censoring his music, you effectively are showing some level of disregard (and disrespect) to him as a person. If that line is being drawn with Prince, can that really speak to an absolute trust, an absolute love and absolute sharing of experiences? By the way, I'm asking you these questions to try and understand how JW's doctrine may be influencing Prince's decisions regarding his own past, present and future. Of course, you can only speak for yourself but there nay be some principles that are transferable and we can all learn from. Also, I can't think of a better means to understand further but through a Prince fan who also happens to be a JW. I hope you don't mind! This "automatic" relationship I spoke of is based on a mutual love for Jehovah God. It is the same love I have for any one who shares this experience with me. As I mentioned before, you have to be one to understand the experience. Although this brotherly love is genuine and heartfelt, I never mentioned absolutes. As far as sharing in "all" of the person, this is not necessary. Think of what happens when you meet a person and develop a friendship with him. You may come to genuinely care for that person. Then someone comes and says "If you really knew his past, you may not like him." Do you then say, "Tell me all about his past." or do you take the person as you have come to know him as he is? you said Anyone listening to Prince will hear the explicit... it's clear that Prince intended to use sex and profanity (for example, Erotic City, Irresistible Bitch, Sexy M.F. etc) as a means to drive his message through the music. He wanted you to hear what he was saying and there is/was a way of drawing attention to it. Here is what I am saying The songs you named above...I have never heard. My Prince collection basically begins with Rainbow Children. My Witness friends who grew up with Prince music (as they were generally not JWs until later) share with me what they know I will like. That's how I came to hear The Ladder. And God Created Woman..etc...I never even heard The Cross...only "The Christ". I also bought a Greatest Hits CD which includes Purple Rain and Thieves in the Temple. Prince's efforts to re-do his songs show clearly that he is now interested in driving a different message through his music. The question is...how many can comfortably hear this message? Now Anji, if you really want to know how the JW doctrine is influencing Prince's decisions, you need only to obtain a copy of the "Knowledge Book"... Thus the "Knowledge Room" This would really clarify much of what is now being reflected in his lifestyle and his music right now. Of course this would be for educational purposes only. Thanks for you questions. Melody Even though you don't expect me to fully understand your nowadays 'automatic' connection with Prince unless I myself am a JW, I have understood one thing from your comments: you're only willing to truly connect with others (and accept them as a whole) if they practise the same philosophy as you. . [This message was edited Tue Apr 29 8:27:16 PDT 2003 by Anji] Although I respect your opinions, your conclusions are incorrect. Ask NuPwrSoul. Ask Rio. Ask Abrazo. They are here on the site. You will see that you are as wrong as you can be. I can and do truly connect with those whose philosophies are different from mine. Go ahead, ask them. Melody . . [This message was edited Tue Apr 29 12:38:05 PDT 2003 by SensualMelody] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SensualMelody said: As I mentioned before, you have to be one to understand the experience. so , then why do you feel it is alright to tell people what their experience is, the way that you have in some of the gay threads? if we can't understand the JW experience, how can you understand the gay experience? Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely. - Lord Acton | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Anji said: SensualMelody said: Anji said: SensualMelody said: Anji said: SensualMelody said: Anji said: SensualMelody said: Anji said: SensualMelody said: Anji said: you said Anyone listening to Prince will hear the explicit... it's clear that Prince intended to use sex and profanity (for example, Erotic City, Irresistible Bitch, Sexy M.F. etc) as a means to drive his message through the music. He wanted you to hear what he was saying and there is/was a way of drawing attention to it. Here is what I am saying The songs you named above...I have never heard. Prince's efforts to re-do his songs show clearly that he is now interested in driving a different message through his music. The question is...how many can comfortably hear this message? Now Anji, if you really want to know how the JW doctrine is influencing Prince's decisions, you need only to obtain a copy of the "Knowledge Book"... Thus the "Knowledge Room" This would really clarify much of what is now being reflected in his lifestyle and his music right now. Of course this would be for educational purposes only. Thanks for you questions. Melody (Anji said): Even though you don't expect me to fully understand your nowadays 'automatic' connection with Prince unless I myself am a JW, I have understood one thing from your comments: you're only willing to truly connect with others (and accept them as a whole) if they practise the same philosophy as you. Melody said: Although I respect your opinions, your conclusions are incorrect. Ask NuPwrSoul. Ask Rio. Ask Abrazo. They are here on the site. You will see that you are as wrong as you can be. I can and do truly connect with those whose philosophies are different from mine. Go ahead, ask them. Melody . . Anji said: Sensual, my conclusion is based solely on what you have written on this thread (in response to my questions). If you say I am wrong to conclude my thoughts about you in this way, it is only because that is the distinct impression you have left me with on this thread. I'm always open to changing my mind but I'll base my opinion about you on what you say for yourself (not others). Melody said: Your conclusions are flawed because you base them on questions about one man. George benson is a witness, yet I do not automatically listen to his music. I bought 1 Benson CD in my life. I bought 2 Larry Graham CDs. I bought 2 Prince CDs (got some additional ones from club) I bought 25-30 Luther Vandross CDs. Luther is the one who is not a witness, but the content of his songs...beautiful. And his talent...breathtaking! How do you integrate this data into your findings? You mean you would not accept testimony from my non-JW friends as to whether I have accepted them as they are. How is that objective? But it's ok...think what you want...it's cool. I know me. Melody So...how's everybody doing? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SensualMelody said: Anji said: SensualMelody said: Anji said: SensualMelody said: Anji said: SensualMelody said: Anji said: SensualMelody said: Anji said: SensualMelody said: Anji said: you said Anyone listening to Prince will hear the explicit... it's clear that Prince intended to use sex and profanity (for example, Erotic City, Irresistible Bitch, Sexy M.F. etc) as a means to drive his message through the music. He wanted you to hear what he was saying and there is/was a way of drawing attention to it. Here is what I am saying The songs you named above...I have never heard. Prince's efforts to re-do his songs show clearly that he is now interested in driving a different message through his music. The question is...how many can comfortably hear this message? Now Anji, if you really want to know how the JW doctrine is influencing Prince's decisions, you need only to obtain a copy of the "Knowledge Book"... Thus the "Knowledge Room" This would really clarify much of what is now being reflected in his lifestyle and his music right now. Of course this would be for educational purposes only. Thanks for you questions. Melody (Anji said): Even though you don't expect me to fully understand your nowadays 'automatic' connection with Prince unless I myself am a JW, I have understood one thing from your comments: you're only willing to truly connect with others (and accept them as a whole) if they practise the same philosophy as you. Melody said: Although I respect your opinions, your conclusions are incorrect. Ask NuPwrSoul. Ask Rio. Ask Abrazo. They are here on the site. You will see that you are as wrong as you can be. I can and do truly connect with those whose philosophies are different from mine. Go ahead, ask them. Melody . . Anji said: Sensual, my conclusion is based solely on what you have written on this thread (in response to my questions). If you say I am wrong to conclude my thoughts about you in this way, it is only because that is the distinct impression you have left me with on this thread. I'm always open to changing my mind but I'll base my opinion about you on what you say for yourself (not others). Melody said: Your conclusions are flawed because you base them on questions about one man. George benson is a witness, yet I do not automatically listen to his music. I bought 1 Benson CD in my life. I bought 2 Larry Graham CDs. I bought 2 Prince CDs (got some additional ones from club) I bought 25-30 Luther Vandross CDs. Luther is the one who is not a witness, but the content of his songs...beautiful. And his talent...breathtaking! How do you integrate this data into your findings? You mean you would not accept testimony from my non-JW friends as to whether I have accepted them as they are. How is that objective? But it's ok...think what you want...it's cool. I know me. Melody I've been as objective as I can be regarding your thoughts on this thread. Not following up my conclusions with your friends here is not about objectivity, although I agree it may lead to a less than objective opinion. But then again, I am basing my opinions on what you have told me on this thread. Why talk to them, when I can talk to you? Flawed as my conclusions may be, that's as close as this thread and I am going to get to you. I never said you didn't know you. All I really concluded was that I am getting to know you and I made my conclusions solely based on what you stated. I also said, my mind was open to change. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
"LOVESEXY" or "RAINBOW CHILDREN"?
"GRAFITTI BRIDGE or "EMANCIPATION"? "JW", "CHRISTIAN" or "JEW"? GOD is LOVE, LOVE is GOD... cuz, "...if u're LAST DECEMBER came, what would u do..." LOVE4OneAnother! __________________________________________________
"" Long Live PRINCE and the NPG ~ Peace and B WILD! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
lovebird said: Take it easy, it's not a sin if Senual Melody loves Prince and his music, that's what it's about.I don't think anyone thinks of Prince as a god.
Wrong! And SenualMelody knows better than this too! It's right in tkhe Bible! Matter of fact, look up idolatry in the dictionary: excessive adoration. **************************************************
"You can catch the Devil, but you can't hold him long..."--Rod Serling | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Anji said: lovebird said: Take it easy, it's not a sin if Senual Melody loves Prince and his music, that's what it's about.I don't think anyone thinks of Prince as a god.
I agree but STOP is trying to prove that Sensual may be acting 'out of convention' here, given her beliefs and her fandom. STOP believes Sensual idolises Prince, which I don't think is allowed according to JW's teachings. Definately! From what Sensual has written on this thread, it doesn't look like she's idolising Prince at all so I can't really understand where STOP is coming from (apart from a pre-conceived bias).
There are no pre-conceived BIASES here! Where is all this victim mentality coming from? SenualMedlody is, by every since of the word IDOLIZING Prince! In all of her posts re-addressing mine, she does not once address the issue of IDOLATRY head on--NOT ONE TIME--but instead MANIPULATES the issue into other directions, thereby EVADING AND AVOIDING issue altogether. I think SenualMelody is very SLICK! with her stuff and she knows better than this! She knows where the Bible stands on the issue, but uses any excuse to get around that fact, and although she'll never admitt it, she knows I'm telling the truth. **************************************************
"You can catch the Devil, but you can't hold him long..."--Rod Serling | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
By selecting out recordings and effectively tring to ignore a large part/body of work you are closing your eyes to what has made the man - which is why I have real confusion as to why you (Sensual Melody) then go onto describe what is obviously a deep felt admiration and love for the little guy. He certainly has been bad to the bone - a womaniser obsessed by sex and willing to cross boundaries of taste and decency when it suited him - and fuck whoever is offended by it - that was the whole thing at the beginning of his career and carried on through even to today - just 'cos he may substitute "duck" we all know what he is saying anyhow. I just find it a little condescending for him now to preach to all the peeps who were hooked into all that groove to now throw off what they are to get into God and JW - at least b4 he tried convince peeps by his passion alone - now he is just ramming it downevery1s throats. I am convinced by the way that it is a phase of sorts and he will revert back to somewhere in the middle - who knows?? Religion is the cause of argument and war - lokk at any history or even today. It would all be fine so long as peeps just didn't try to convert every1 all the time. I mean - I am mad into going into the gym and working out - it is a way of life - but I don't go knocking on peoples doors to try to get them to stop eating burgers! Prince is who he was - he cannot and you cannot get away from it. This is of course true of every1 but in his case the world has solid evidence in a small silver or large vinyl disc to prove it.
Sorry - just felt it had 2 b said. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
lovebird said: Take it easy, it's not a sin if Senual Melody loves Prince and his music, that's what it's about.I don't think anyone thinks of Prince as a god.
Anji said I agree but STOP is trying to prove that Sensual may be acting 'out of convention' here, given her beliefs and her fandom. STOP believes Sensual idolises Prince, which I don't think is allowed according to JW's teachings. From what Sensual has written on this thread, it doesn't look like she's idolising Prince at all so I can't really understand where STOP is coming from (apart from a pre-conceived bias). Melody said : Thank you Anji!!!
STOP said : There are no pre-conceived BIASES here! Where is all this victim mentality coming from?
SenualMedlody is, by every since of the word IDOLIZING Prince! In all of her posts re-addressing mine, she does not once address the issue of IDOLATRY head on--NOT ONE TIME--but instead MANIPULATES the issue into other directions, thereby EVADING AND AVOIDING issue altogether. Melody said : You are silly.
STOP said : I think SenualMelody is very SLICK! with her stuff and she knows better than this! She knows where the Bible stands on the issue, but uses any excuse to get around that fact, and although she'll never admitt it, she knows I'm telling the truth.
Melody said: You are funny! While I have your attention, I have the bible study group in my home every Tuesday night. My Book study elder has seen the input I have here. He has seen the enlightenment that we have shared with many who really did not know anything about JWs. Many have requested literature and I have been pleased to share through mailings. He does not agree with your assessment "STOP". I just thought you would be interested to know that this is not something I do apart from the congregation. I am also a pioneer minister. Anyone wanting more information may orgnote me. Peace Melody So...how's everybody doing? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
LoveRobot said: By selecting out recordings and effectively tring to ignore a large part/body of work you are closing your eyes to what has made the man - which is why I have real confusion as to why you (Sensual Melody) then go onto describe what is obviously a deep felt admiration and love for the little guy. He certainly has been bad to the bone - a womaniser obsessed by sex and willing to cross boundaries of taste and decency when it suited him - and fuck whoever is offended by it - that was the whole thing at the beginning of his career and carried on through even to today - just 'cos he may substitute "duck" we all know what he is saying anyhow. I just find it a little condescending for him now to preach to all the peeps who were hooked into all that groove to now throw off what they are to get into God and JW - at least b4 he tried convince peeps by his passion alone - now he is just ramming it downevery1s throats. I am convinced by the way that it is a phase of sorts and he will revert back to somewhere in the middle - who knows?? Religion is the cause of argument and war - lokk at any history or even today. It would all be fine so long as peeps just didn't try to convert every1 all the time. I mean - I am mad into going into the gym and working out - it is a way of life - but I don't go knocking on peoples doors to try to get them to stop eating burgers! Prince is who he was - he cannot and you cannot get away from it. This is of course true of every1 but in his case the world has solid evidence in a small silver or large vinyl disc to prove it.
Sorry - just felt it had 2 b said. Hi LoveRobot I am just replying because you mentioned my name. I underestand where you are coming from. I understand how you feel. I am just not coming from the same place. I have been a JW for 20 years plus... I am also a product of my past...but people do change. There is space enough for all of us...here on earth. Peace Melody So...how's everybody doing? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SensualMelody said: Hi LoveRobot I am just replying because you mentioned my name. so, will you be answering me then? i mentioned u by name 2 Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely. - Lord Acton | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SensualMelody said:[quote]
Melody said : [color=red:68e39423a1:693af616ff] You are silly.
And you are a [color=red:68e39423a1:693af616ff]SELF-RIGHTOUS PRISS While I have your attention, I have the bible study group in my home every Tuesday night.
I don't care what you have. I have known of people in the past through JWs in my family who have done the same thing and where DISFELLOWSHIPED! My Book study elder has seen the input I have here.
He has seen the enlightenment that we have shared with many who really did not know anything about JWs. Many have requested literature and I have been pleased to share through mailings. He does not agree with your asessment "STOP". There's nothing wrong with sending out liturature to people on the org. But it's probably all you've told him! Which is your only saving grace! But from all of your previous posts I have seen from the past year which this Elder did not see, IT'S MUCH DEEPER THAN THIS! AND YOUR NOT TELLING HIM EVERYTHING! Obviously, we are NEVER! going to agree on this one and let's leave it at that. I'm quite sure when presenting your case to this Elder, you never bothered mentioning all of the excessive, drolling, down-right nauseating PRAISE and GLORY that you are accustom to giving Prince when you logg onto this site! You are excessive with your praise of this man at times til I could just VOMIT all over my keyboard! Prince is so this. Prince is so that! Over and over and over again! MAN it's sickening and it's a VERY SUBTLE FORM OF IDOLATRY regardless of anything else you do here. And in your mind, you probably feel this balances everything else out. But I am still convince you SUBTELY IDOLIZE the guy. But that's where I stand on the issue... Period. And I think as someone who claims to be a christain, you need to be more careful:lol: I just thought you would be interested to know that this is not something I do apart from the congregation.
Who are you trying to convince here? Me or yourself? **************************************************
"You can catch the Devil, but you can't hold him long..."--Rod Serling | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SensualMelody said: Anyone wanting more information may orgnote me.
Peace Melody No thankx. I'll get my spirtual fix from more down-to-earth JWs that I know who don't waste their time idolizing some washed-out rock star who'll do anything to draw attention to himself. **************************************************
"You can catch the Devil, but you can't hold him long..."--Rod Serling | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |