independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Prince: Music and More > I heard the new Sign O The Times deluxe is sourced from a lossy master.
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 1 of 3 123>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Author

Tweet     Share

Message
Thread started 09/25/20 7:47pm

getwild180

I heard the new Sign O The Times deluxe is sourced from a lossy master.

Can anyone specify if this is true?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1 posted 09/25/20 7:53pm

PurpleMusic768
9

avatar

A few of the vault tracks were seemingly sent to Bernie Grundman as lossy files, not lossless, then were mastered/remastered from those files. I've checked out 3 or 4 sources of the set, "Train", "Can I Play With U?", "Visions", "Colors", "A Place In Heaven (Lisa Vocal Version)" and "Strange Relationship (so-called Original Version...)" were lossy files with light mastering over the compressed area (about 16kHz and up)... Might be forgetting a track or 2.
usually known as "Leaped7689"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #2 posted 09/25/20 8:14pm

getwild180

Thanks. Well that's unfortunate, Maybe it was the best files they have to offer for Bernie.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #3 posted 09/25/20 8:25pm

TrivialPursuit

avatar

PurpleMusic7689 said:

A few of the vault tracks were seemingly sent to Bernie Grundman as lossy files, not lossless, then were mastered/remastered from those files. I've checked out 3 or 4 sources of the set, "Train", "Can I Play With U?", "Visions", "Colors", "A Place In Heaven (Lisa Vocal Version)" and "Strange Relationship (so-called Original Version...)" were lossy files with light mastering over the compressed area (about 16kHz and up)... Might be forgetting a track or 2.


Source for this?

Sorry, it's the Hodgkin's talking.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #4 posted 09/25/20 8:27pm

databank

avatar

PurpleMusic7689 said:

A few of the vault tracks were seemingly sent to Bernie Grundman as lossy files, not lossless, then were mastered/remastered from those files. I've checked out 3 or 4 sources of the set, "Train", "Can I Play With U?", "Visions", "Colors", "A Place In Heaven (Lisa Vocal Version)" and "Strange Relationship (so-called Original Version...)" were lossy files with light mastering over the compressed area (about 16kHz and up)... Might be forgetting a track or 2.

How does that happen? They come from tapes don't they?

A COMPREHENSIVE PRINCE DISCOGRAPHY (work in progress ^^): https://sites.google.com/...scography/
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #5 posted 09/25/20 11:03pm

funkbabyandthe
babysitters

Maybe Michael Howe downloaded some mp3s
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #6 posted 09/26/20 12:05am

WhisperingDand
elions

avatar

TrivialPursuit said:

PurpleMusic7689 said:

A few of the vault tracks were seemingly sent to Bernie Grundman as lossy files, not lossless, then were mastered/remastered from those files. I've checked out 3 or 4 sources of the set, "Train", "Can I Play With U?", "Visions", "Colors", "A Place In Heaven (Lisa Vocal Version)" and "Strange Relationship (so-called Original Version...)" were lossy files with light mastering over the compressed area (about 16kHz and up)... Might be forgetting a track or 2.


Source for this?

https://prince.org/msg/7/464438?pg=2 #43@bluegangsta

[Edited 9/26/20 0:09am]

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #7 posted 09/26/20 4:07am

WhisperingDand
elions

avatar

databank said:

PurpleMusic7689 said:

A few of the vault tracks were seemingly sent to Bernie Grundman as lossy files, not lossless, then were mastered/remastered from those files. I've checked out 3 or 4 sources of the set, "Train", "Can I Play With U?", "Visions", "Colors", "A Place In Heaven (Lisa Vocal Version)" and "Strange Relationship (so-called Original Version...)" were lossy files with light mastering over the compressed area (about 16kHz and up)... Might be forgetting a track or 2.

How does that happen? They come from tapes don't they?

My spectral familiarity ain't what it used to be, but it seems at other forums there's no concrete consensus on whether these are just cassettes or actually MP3s.., would that be the case?


I mean is it possible when dropping off tapes of the master mixes our boy Mikey wrote like a Facebook group mediashare link URL on a cocktail napkin? Is he linking Bernie to bootleg download links?

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #8 posted 09/26/20 4:09am

funkbabyandthe
babysitters

The sde was constructed from 128kbps rips obtained in the file sharing glory years of the early 00s
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #9 posted 09/26/20 9:13am

VaultCurator

avatar

I’ve just checked for myself and I think I’m about to have an aneurysm.

‘Visions’ contains more data on Wendy and Lisa’s Eroica album than the SOTT:SD version?

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #10 posted 09/26/20 9:26am

lustmealways

avatar

i have it on good authority that michael howe typed in "youtube to mp3 converter" on google and that's where they sourced these tracks from

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #11 posted 09/26/20 9:27am

funkbabyandthe
babysitters

VaultCurator said:

I’ve just checked for myself and I think I’m about to have an aneurysm.

‘Visions’ contains more data on Wendy and Lisa’s Eroica album than the SOTT:SD version?

thats prob more to do with the database being used than anything else.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #12 posted 09/26/20 9:28am

funkbabyandthe
babysitters

lustmealways said:

i have it on good authority that michael howe typed in "youtube to mp3 converter" on google and that's where they sourced these tracks from

how do we know that its not a case of the original masters being in bad shape?

or that they were taken from audio cassettes?

am i really to trust random dudes on steve hoffmans message boards?

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #13 posted 09/26/20 9:33am

lustmealways

avatar

funkbabyandthebabysitters said:

how do we know that its not a case of the original masters being in bad shape?

or that they were taken from audio cassettes?

am i really to trust random dudes on steve hoffmans message boards?

gotta be honest, i have no clue how this would've happened in the first place. some of these tracks certainly are lossy, anyone could check it looking at the spectrals. it's my understanding that a degraded master wouldn't result in the whole thing lacking frequencies across the board. as far as i'm aware, this could only be the result of sourcing it from something that had some sort of compression applied or accidentally applying said compression somewhere along the production chain and not realizing it? honestly at a loss here.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #14 posted 09/26/20 9:58am

funkbabyandthe
babysitters

Weird.
Not got my set yet but hope it's not obviously audible.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #15 posted 09/26/20 10:17am

duggalolly

avatar

Especially strange in the case of "Visions," since this track was officially released. It's not like it would have been hard for them to use a lossless source. This is something they could have easily corrected.

"It Be's Like That Sometimes" appears to be lossy as well.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #16 posted 09/26/20 2:06pm

VaultCurator

avatar

Lossy source:
Can I Play With U
Strange Relationship
Train
It Be Like That Sometimes
Rebirth Of The Flesh
A Place In Heaven (Lisa vocal)

Possible lossy source / possibly noise reduction filter:
Visions
Colors


I can't tell for certain but 'All My Dreams' & 'Cosmic Day' also look a bit suspect, but it may just be me reading too much into the spectrals.

Is it possible that private collectors have done a better job preserving Prince’s vault than Prince himself did? I’m genuinely worried this may be the case. Either that or some of the master tapes have been pinched!

[Edited 9/26/20 14:07pm]

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #17 posted 09/26/20 2:08pm

TrivialPursuit

avatar

lustmealways said:

i have it on good authority that michael howe typed in "youtube to mp3 converter" on google and that's where they sourced these tracks from


LOL No you don't.

Sorry, it's the Hodgkin's talking.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #18 posted 09/26/20 2:14pm

databank

avatar

funkbabyandthebabysitters said:



lustmealways said:


i have it on good authority that michael howe typed in "youtube to mp3 converter" on google and that's where they sourced these tracks from



how do we know that its not a case of the original masters being in bad shape?


or that they were taken from audio cassettes?


am i really to trust random dudes on steve hoffmans message boards?


Cassettes are not lossy. The only way to get lossy is digital compression, which is not something they could have gotten from the vault at least not with old tracks like this. This is why I'm puzzled.
A COMPREHENSIVE PRINCE DISCOGRAPHY (work in progress ^^): https://sites.google.com/...scography/
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #19 posted 09/27/20 4:17am

WhisperingDand
elions

avatar

databank said:

funkbabyandthebabysitters said:

how do we know that its not a case of the original masters being in bad shape?

or that they were taken from audio cassettes?

am i really to trust random dudes on steve hoffmans message boards?

Cassettes are not lossy. The only way to get lossy is digital compression, which is not something they could have gotten from the vault at least not with old tracks like this. This is why I'm puzzled.

So would they have to have been mp3s pressed to disc? It's not possible bad cassettes led to those spectrals?

The thing is... collector's mainly deal in FLAC/lossless.., so why couldn't Howe&Co. just... download FLACs instead?

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #20 posted 09/27/20 6:53am

Milty2

I know that the original album is brackwalled and all that and that it has been a bug bear for years but I compared the remastered album with the original on the iTunes store and to be honest, I hear better results in the original despite it just being lower in volume - U Got The Look is the best example. That track is lower in volume than the others on the original album. There is a gloss added to the remaster overall that I'm not sure I like. Same with the Purple Rain remaster. Can't speak for the vault tracks since I only have bootlegs to compare them to.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #21 posted 09/27/20 7:03am

LoveGalore

Milty2 said:

I know that the original album is brackwalled and all that and that it has been a bug bear for years but I compared the remastered album with the original on the iTunes store and to be honest, I hear better results in the original despite it just being lower in volume - U Got The Look is the best example. That track is lower in volume than the others on the original album. There is a gloss added to the remaster overall that I'm not sure I like. Same with the Purple Rain remaster. Can't speak for the vault tracks since I only have bootlegs to compare them to.



Factual information: if you compare the PR remaster to the SOTT remaster, you got peanut butter in your ears.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #22 posted 09/27/20 7:04am

purplethunder3
121

avatar

rolleyes

"Music gives a soul to the universe, wings to the mind, flight to the imagination and life to everything." --Plato

https://youtu.be/CVwv9LZMah0
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #23 posted 09/27/20 8:29am

Milty2

LoveGalore said:

Milty2 said:

I know that the original album is brackwalled and all that and that it has been a bug bear for years but I compared the remastered album with the original on the iTunes store and to be honest, I hear better results in the original despite it just being lower in volume - U Got The Look is the best example. That track is lower in volume than the others on the original album. There is a gloss added to the remaster overall that I'm not sure I like. Same with the Purple Rain remaster. Can't speak for the vault tracks since I only have bootlegs to compare them to.

Factual information: if you compare the PR remaster to the SOTT remaster, you got peanut butter in your ears.

I didn't compare the PR remaster to the SOTT remaster. If you had correctly read what I said you will have seen that I said that there is a gloss to the PR remaster that I also don't like. Just becasue it's "louder" dosen't make it better. As for having peanut butter in my ears, you must too if you can't hear the difference but if you wish to just accept that the remaster is a better job, that's your thing. Maybe if you spent a little bit of time actually listening (doesn't seem like you care to), you might learn something instead of just lobbing insults.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #24 posted 09/27/20 8:32am

databank

avatar

WhisperingDandelions said:

databank said:

funkbabyandthebabysitters said: Cassettes are not lossy. The only way to get lossy is digital compression, which is not something they could have gotten from the vault at least not with old tracks like this. This is why I'm puzzled.

So would they have to have been mp3s pressed to disc? It's not possible bad cassettes led to those spectrals?

This IDK. But it really isn't the same tech.


The thing is... collector's mainly deal in FLAC/lossless.., so why couldn't Howe&Co. just... download FLACs instead?

Thing is they had tapes in the vault, either multitrracks or mixdowns, besides Howe didn't say anything about any of these being from cassette while he admitted it for BG last year, so most likely everything comes from proper studio tapes. If it becomes lossless it means someone fucked-up along the way. But how?

[Edited 9/27/20 8:32am]

A COMPREHENSIVE PRINCE DISCOGRAPHY (work in progress ^^): https://sites.google.com/...scography/
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #25 posted 09/27/20 8:41am

djThunderfunk

avatar

funkbabyandthebabysitters said:

The sde was constructed from 128kbps rips obtained in the file sharing glory years of the early 00s


Doubtful. Nothing on the set sounds THAT low quality.

Don't hate your neighbors. Hate the media that tells you to hate your neighbors.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #26 posted 09/27/20 8:43am

djThunderfunk

avatar

lustmealways said:

i have it on good authority that michael howe typed in "youtube to mp3 converter" on google and that's where they sourced these tracks from


lol GTFOOHWTBS!! People might believe you. razz

Don't hate your neighbors. Hate the media that tells you to hate your neighbors.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #27 posted 09/27/20 11:55am

purplethunder3
121

avatar

djThunderfunk said:

lustmealways said:

i have it on good authority that michael howe typed in "youtube to mp3 converter" on google and that's where they sourced these tracks from


lol GTFOOHWTBS!! People might believe you. razz

"Music gives a soul to the universe, wings to the mind, flight to the imagination and life to everything." --Plato

https://youtu.be/CVwv9LZMah0
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #28 posted 09/27/20 11:59am

LoveGalore

Milty2 said:



LoveGalore said:


Milty2 said:

I know that the original album is brackwalled and all that and that it has been a bug bear for years but I compared the remastered album with the original on the iTunes store and to be honest, I hear better results in the original despite it just being lower in volume - U Got The Look is the best example. That track is lower in volume than the others on the original album. There is a gloss added to the remaster overall that I'm not sure I like. Same with the Purple Rain remaster. Can't speak for the vault tracks since I only have bootlegs to compare them to.



Factual information: if you compare the PR remaster to the SOTT remaster, you got peanut butter in your ears.



I didn't compare the PR remaster to the SOTT remaster. If you had correctly read what I said you will have seen that I said that there is a gloss to the PR remaster that I also don't like. Just becasue it's "louder" dosen't make it better. As for having peanut butter in my ears, you must too if you can't hear the difference but if you wish to just accept that the remaster is a better job, that's your thing. Maybe if you spent a little bit of time actually listening (doesn't seem like you care to), you might learn something instead of just lobbing insults.



Sister, no insults were lobbed your way.

But I stand by the peanut butter statement. The PR remaster and the SOTT remaster are not the "same" in any way.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #29 posted 09/27/20 1:18pm

whitesockedfun
k

avatar

Milty2 said:

I know that the original album is brackwalled and all that and that it has been a bug bear for years but I compared the remastered album with the original on the iTunes store and to be honest, I hear better results in the original despite it just being lower in volume -

Using iTunes (which is lossy!) to compare sound quality is not really representative of the actual sound quality.

Just like the white winged dove...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 1 of 3 123>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Prince: Music and More > I heard the new Sign O The Times deluxe is sourced from a lossy master.