Kick drum! I didn't call shit! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Musician here, can confirm. It isn't a huge thing that ruins the integrity of the music but it is def really noticeable to me and I noticed it straight away. [Edited 9/30/20 14:31pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I think a good idea could be applying like musical Occam's Razor to it, which would be the more plausible explanation:
or... [Edited 9/30/20 14:43pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Fandangouk2014 said: To my untrained and ignorant ears the whole concert sounds flat and lifeless. It may be because the crowd is barely audible, or something about the sharpness of the drums, I dunno. Like I said, I'm no expert, but the whole thing sounds lacking any energy. Loving the set though, feels like Xmas came early. Quite enjoyed the dvd too, a strange little gig but with plenty of genuinely charming glimpses into Prince's personality. This is a fair assessment in my opinion. Also, for such an incredibly tight band, the Utrecht show is littered with performance errors. What was the reason given, if any, for choosing this particular show for the release? You'll never know a girl called Nikki and you'll never find Erotic City | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
PRNelson said: Fandangouk2014 said: To my untrained and ignorant ears the whole concert sounds flat and lifeless. It may be because the crowd is barely audible, or something about the sharpness of the drums, I dunno. Like I said, I'm no expert, but the whole thing sounds lacking any energy. Loving the set though, feels like Xmas came early. Quite enjoyed the dvd too, a strange little gig but with plenty of genuinely charming glimpses into Prince's personality. This is a fair assessment in my opinion. Also, for such an incredibly tight band, the Utrecht show is littered with performance errors. What was the reason given, if any, for choosing this particular show for the release? There is no reason. I'm sure there are better shows our there worth comparable sound quality (esp as this one just sounds like any sound board bootleg) You can find livelier shows on YouTube. [Edited 9/30/20 15:12pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
funkbabyandthebabysitters said: PRNelson said: This is a fair assessment in my opinion. Also, for such an incredibly tight band, the Utrecht show is littered with performance errors. What was the reason given, if any, for choosing this particular show for the release? There is no reason. I'm sure there are better shows our there worth comparable sound quality (esp as this one just sounds like any sound board bootleg) Comparing it to the Paris bootleg was a mistake I made. The performance of that Paris show really highlights how listless this Utrecht performance is. Here’s what Howe said about why it was chosen: “ How did you select the live stuff that’s on there? And what’s with the absence of anything from the movie? We had a number of different possibilities. We couldn’t really use anything that was contemplated for use in the Sign O’ the Times theatrical film, because there were all kinds of rights issues wrapped up in that which are basically too involved for me to disentangle on this call. We tried many, many different ways to include the theatrical release of the film, and couldn’t really do it in a way that we thought was complete and had the sort of integrity that Prince would have demanded for it. So we had to look at some other possibilities from a live standpoint, and the one that jumped out at us was the [June 20th, 1987] Utrecht [Netherlands] show, which was a particularly beloved show in the fan community and had never to my knowledge circulated as a finished stereo mix. I think there’s kind of a substandard audience recording that has floated around for a while. It was an incendiary show and shone a light on his live artistry at that point. And we chose the Paisley Park, New Year’s Eve [1987] DVD because it’s such an unbelievable performance, and also because, of course, it has the Miles Davis appearance.” [Edited 9/30/20 15:16pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Hes just good at talking shit in a way that sounds like the work of painstaking research and decision making
There are better shows, more dynamic, more fun, more audience atmosphere, just fiercer performances on YouTube alone, never mind on bootleg. Shame as this tour and band should be better represented [Edited 9/30/20 15:28pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Kares confirms the Utrecht show is below normal pitch. Says Blanche and a couple of other studio tracks, too. A COMPREHENSIVE PRINCE DISCOGRAPHY (work in progress ^^): https://sites.google.com/...scography/ | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
databank said: Kares confirms the Utrecht show is below normal pitch. Says Blanche and a couple of other studio tracks, too. What a shame. At least it’s correctable, but still. What are the other tracks? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
. So for mere mortals, how can we find out? Pills and thrills and daffodils will kill... If you don't believe me or don't get it, I don't have time to try to convince you, sorry. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
udo said:
. So for mere mortals, how can we find out? When a professional confirms something is incorrect is all I’ve been depending on. That and hearing how it sounds off. Don’t think there’s a way to do what you’re asking. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
parker said: databank said: Kares confirms the Utrecht show is below normal pitch. Says Blanche and a couple of other studio tracks, too. What a shame. At least it’s correctable, but still. What are the other tracks? It must be one of the not widely circulating tracks. None sound off to me, I can hear the sluggishness on Blanche, which I kinda like...maybe Wally? Still sounds a little fast... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
He didn't say (but I didn't ask). A COMPREHENSIVE PRINCE DISCOGRAPHY (work in progress ^^): https://sites.google.com/...scography/ | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
databank said:
He didn't say (but I didn't ask). Damn. Ignorance is bliss, but now I’ll be suspecting every track lol | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
What do u mean by professional? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Who cares about the pitch! Guys & Boys is on! I'm singing along. Now it's Slow Love. I'm still singing! FREE THE 29 MAY 1993 COME CONFIGURATION!
FREE THE JANUARY 1994 THE GOLD ALBUM CONFIGURATION | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Guys & Boys.... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
scififilmnerd said: Who cares about the pitch! Guys & Boys is on! I'm singing along. Now it's Slow Love. I'm still singing! . Yeah! Who cares if highly-skilled professionals bother to master the music properly before issuing it as an expensive collectors edition! . Yay for insultingly poor quality control! . Three cheers for the consumer getting screwed! I’ve been informed that my opinion is worth less than those expressed by others here. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Holy shit. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
dualboot said:
Guys & Boys.... Yikes | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
herb4 said:
That last bit is subjective but as for the rest... No. I'm not saying we burn down Paisley over this stuff but please don't think that stifling this discussion would somehow help improve either the product or the consumer's enjoyment of the product. In fact, this is the kind of shit companies do all the time - in a rush to secure the bag, they release subpar products and either use the consumers unwittingly as beta testers or at worst they think subpar product is acceptable to them. Again, no. Do the quibbles matter much on their own? Depends. But as they pile up? Fuck yeah! Each individual grain of sand builds a whole ass beach and while it doesn't take the beauty out of the scenery if the grains of sand are razor sharp and cut your feet, it sure as shit means I ain't enjoying the beach the way I could if it were ready for public enjoyment. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
OK, man. I know it;s ALL subjective. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
herb4 said:
I agree with everything you said.This set is amazing! The estate are doing an incredible job.You won’t hear any nitpicking from me | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Yeah, my bad. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Putting aside outtakes and shows selection, which will always be subject to everyone's personal wishlist and thus cannot be assessed with much objectivity, how is doing a job with flaws incredible? "Decent", OK, "good", if you will, but incredible? . I'm very sorry, but the fact that, for the third time (after P&AM83 and IFFY), we're facing speed tape issues isn't exactly what I would call incredible (what I DO find incredible is that WB's professional engineers haven't, in month of planning, been able to identify a problem that fans identified in a matter of days!!). Audience level, maybe there wasn't anything to do about it if all they had was an "on the spot" mix without the multitracks, which is very possible. I'll take that. But tape speed? . The fact that some tracks are lossy, while I do not care personally about it, is also far from incredible when your product is aimed at a community of people who are mostly audiophiles. And I do not see any reason why this would happen. It's not like all they could find was mp3 files in P's computer (or if so, they should tell us). . The fact that one edit, one remix and one OST song that belong there aren't included is also quite problematic for the many completists among the target audience. . And I'm not even going to go into the myriad of other problems we've had with each and every previous Estate release. Each. And. Every. One. Of. Them. . So no, I'm sorry. Yes, this box-set is good overall and yes, we should be happy to have everything that's on it, flaws or not, I certainly am. But incredible? No. There are several people here that'd have done a better job, I'm sorry. A COMPREHENSIVE PRINCE DISCOGRAPHY (work in progress ^^): https://sites.google.com/...scography/ | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
herb4 said:
OK, man. I know it;s ALL subjective. Are you kidding? I'm in love with the set, lol. I just know that I can both love it and be critical of where it does not at all meet basic QC standards. Correct me if I'm wrong, but prince never released music with warbles and fucked up pitch on his standard albums... Right? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |