flipper123 said:

Kiran being on the deed was a tax evasion thing. She, and a couple others, stripped the place of any Prince related items over the last few years unfortunately.

What was stripped and how do you know this?

poppys said:

Vannormal said:

poppys said:
- These are not photos, but drawings. Can’t you see it in the detail? -

Ok. How about you, the expert, just explain it so I don't have to ask the exact proper question. Are you saying it's empty or what?

-

(sorry for late answer, just back from holidays. )

-

Well,

The interior pictures are... '3D drawings', we call 'm renderings.

There is basically no shadow,

The cusions and the blankets on the bed are too bold,

the sea outside is 'flat', has no depth, and has the same colour everywhere,

the windows are without 'glass' (no reflection from the inside in the glass...),

the ceiling has no 'depth' in shadow and colour,

elements in the cubboard are 'flat', no depth, no shadow,

tray on the bed has no 'imprint, deep traces of weight' in the sheets,

sheets are made of 'carton' it seems,

the far corner is as white as the rest of the walls, no shadows,

Seconds interior picture has strange depth in it's far standing furniture at the left,

it's like the cross-chairs are not deep enough,

the staniding light has fake light lit up, and that even doesn't give any 'light spots' on the elements underneath,

the vase of roses, the basket with lemons, the orchid, the books, etc, are standard rendering objects you can buy online (as a drawing, that you can download); they all cost more or less 8$ (yes you have to 'buy' that stuff to use it in your design, etc)...

I can go on for hours.

These are really bad drawings. Way too flat, and lack of 'live' reflections and feel.

Cheaply done in fact.

-

I 'presume' the outside shots might be real, but then again... I'm not that sure either. Too polished.

-

Vannormal said:

poppys said:

Ok. How about you, the expert, just explain it so I don't have to ask the exact proper question. Are you saying it's empty or what?

-

(sorry for late answer, just back from holidays. )

-

Well,

The interior pictures are... '3D drawings', we call 'm renderings.

There is basically no shadow,

The cusions and the blankets on the bed are too bold,

the sea outside is 'flat', has no depth, and has the same colour everywhere,

the windows are without 'glass' (no reflection from the inside in the glass...),

the ceiling has no 'depth' in shadow and colour,

elements in the cubboard are 'flat', no depth, no shadow,

tray on the bed has no 'imprint, deep traces of weight' in the sheets,

sheets are made of 'carton' it seems,

the far corner is as white as the rest of the walls, no shadows,

Seconds interior picture has strange depth in it's far standing furniture at the left,

it's like the cross-chairs are not deep enough,

the staniding light has fake light lit up, and that even doesn't give any 'light spots' on the elements underneath,

the vase of roses, the basket with lemons, the orchid, the books, etc, are standard rendering objects you can buy online (as a drawing, that you can download); they all cost more or less 8$ (yes you have to 'buy' that stuff to use it in your design, etc)...

I can go on for hours.

These are really bad drawings. Way too flat, and lack of 'live' reflections and feel.

Cheaply done in fact.

-

I 'presume' the outside shots might be real, but then again... I'm not that sure either. Too polished.

-

Interesting, thanks. How far can they can go without misrepresenting the property for sale? The furnishings are no big deal, but what about structural wall and window placement etc?