independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Prince: Music and More > The Estate Discussion - Part 9 ... Continued
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 24 of 32 « First<202122232425262728>Last »
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #690 posted 08/01/17 4:40pm

fortuneandsere
ndipity

1Sasha said:

The same history books that talk about Jimi Hendrix and Jim Morrison, for example. In a similar but not the same fashion: Kurt Cobain. Nirvana changed music, but what people remember is the gun blast. I personally don't know one person whose first thought of Prince is "great music" - they all think "drug overdose." They don't care why or how: that is the period at the end of that sentence.

The history books will change. In 200 years, they will reflect he was 'the Mozart of pop', but he lived 22 years longer.


Further, from a musical point of view, if you're that prolific at age 57 then you're done.

The world's problems like climate change can only be solved through strategic long-term thinking, not expediency. In other words all the govts. need sacking!

If you can add value to someone's life then why not. Especially if it colors their days...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #691 posted 08/01/17 5:16pm

laurarichardso
n

fortuneandserendipity said:



1Sasha said:




laurarichardson said:



Well you think like you do because you are decent person. What normal person would think anything that is going on is something to laugh at. eek



Thank you, L0.



No thank you. Laughter is the best medicine.





Not when you laughter is at expense of others or done in a demeaning manner
[Edited 8/1/17 17:25pm]
[Edited 8/1/17 17:25pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #692 posted 08/01/17 5:19pm

laurarichardso
n

Bodhitheblackdog said:



disch said:


if Prince wanted to guarantee his money went to charity (or any other specific purposes) he could have worked with qualified lawyers to set up a solid plan to make that happen. I don't personally buy the idea that setting up a clear estate plan is pointless because his relatives would just ignore it. The law is the law and his relatives have never given me the impression that they have access to such legal wizardry that they could find a way to negate a well-formulated estate plan crafted by qualified lawyers (key words: well-formalated, and qualified)



Bodhitheblackdog said:



I agree, LR, let this saga be a lesson to us all: 'It is better to receive gifts from a warm hand than a cold one.' It would be ironic if, at the end, Prince's truest memorial were to exist in the fulfillment of the talk in Minnie that some of the estate tax windfall will be earmarked for music education. Hold that thought. yes prince eye





You are so right, disch, but every time I tell MY truth, that Prince was a careless guy, careless with his heart and those of others, careless with his money and artistic legacy (where's the plan for the orderly, professional curation and release of the contents of the vault?), careless with the truth and, in the end, his health and life....my musings have a statistically improbable propensity for getting a thread locked or 'disappeaed' like the Mods are channeling members of the Argentine junta. But I digress. The 'need' here on the Org. to 'protect' Prince by banishing, shutting-off or stifiling free expression is counter-productive as I know other 'versions' of the Prince story are about to burst onto the culture at large and it's a disservice TO THE ORG. to shut up those who want to explore those avenues here because it allows 'not MY Prince' members to live in a La La Land of denial.Not a good look. Never works long haul. Is silly and immature. Bottom line: this great , much-loved musical savant died without a will, alone,weighing 112 lbs. of a drug overdose. That's what the history books will say.


--You do not know enough about the man's life to know how careless he was he made it almost 40 years in a tough ass business he did not do it by being careless. Also if he had health issue no amount of careful behavior would have changed the stituation he lived the way he wanted to live = free.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #693 posted 08/01/17 5:23pm

laurarichardso
n

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:



laurarichardson said:




CandyCool said:


laurarichardson said: I think that could be possible. However, would that silent member, having become active, then not be listed as an active member? Right now only Comerica is listed as an active member. https://www.corporationwi...llc#people

What if members want to remain anonymous? You can have members who are not known and remember Tyka and Omarr were the ones trying to kept Van in the loop and now Van is in charge of a charity arm of Tidal.



I am not a big believer in concidences and in the case of Prince's death we have seen about 100 concidences.




I know you really want Ps money to go to a charity.




The Court documents show P was the "sole member" of NPG LLC.

As I indicated up above silent members (partners) to a LLC provide capital to the LLC but do not want to be involved in the day to day business management. Silent members (partners) own a % of the LLC. If P wanted to leave money to a charity having the charity be a silent member is not a legally sound way to go. Furthermore, do you really think P would make a charity a silent member to his Masters, Copyrights, and Compositions after he fought so hard to get them returned to him, and the charity would be able to dictate to him what he did with his work?


How do you explain the registration paperwork? How do you explain Tidal's claims that someone had POA for Prince. I think his stituation changed and he had to make some changes.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #694 posted 08/01/17 5:29pm

Lovejunky

laurarichardson said:

CandyCool said:

laurarichardson said: I think that could be possible. However, would that silent member, having become active, then not be listed as an active member? Right now only Comerica is listed as an active member. https://www.corporationwi...llc#people

What if members want to remain anonymous? You can have members who are not known and remember Tyka and Omarr were the ones trying to kept Van in the loop and now Van is in charge of a charity arm of Tidal.

I am not a big believer in concidences and in the case of Prince's death we have seen about 100 concidences.

nod

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #695 posted 08/01/17 6:02pm

206Michelle

So I'm really not in the mood to read pages of Estate-related legal filings because most of them are about as exciting as watching paint dry. Having said that, a company called S&S Designs made some petitions earlier in July. S&S wanted Comerica to pay some unpaid invoices relating to lighting services that S&S Designs provided for Prince/NPG touring back in 2015. Comerica asked Judge Eide to dismiss S&S's claim on July 27, 2017, and Judge Eide granted Comerica's request to dismiss S&S's claim.
.
All I can say is, Why did S&S wait so freaking long to file the claim? You snooze, you lose.
Live 4 Love ~ Love is God, God is love, Girls and boys love God above
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #696 posted 08/01/17 6:07pm

206Michelle

I had to chuckle lol when I read the Affadavit of Service I hat the court filed today because Patrick Cousins is the attorney for that kook Carlin Q. Williams.
Live 4 Love ~ Love is God, God is love, Girls and boys love God above
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #697 posted 08/01/17 6:19pm

morningsong

laurarichardson said:

CandyCool said:

laurarichardson said: I think that could be possible. However, would that silent member, having become active, then not be listed as an active member? Right now only Comerica is listed as an active member. https://www.corporationwi...llc#people

What if members want to remain anonymous? You can have members who are not known and remember Tyka and Omarr were the ones trying to kept Van in the loop and now Van is in charge of a charity arm of Tidal.

I am not a big believer in concidences and in the case of Prince's death we have seen about 100 concidences.

[Edited 8/1/17 11:49am]

[Edited 8/1/17 12:19pm]



confuse ok I'm looking at the link. Signed up, found a couple of interesting things, like what's still active.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #698 posted 08/01/17 6:22pm

206Michelle

1Sasha said:

The same history books that talk about Jimi Hendrix and Jim Morrison, for example. In a similar but not the same fashion: Kurt Cobain. Nirvana changed music, but what people remember is the gun blast. I personally don't know one person whose first thought of Prince is "great music" - they all think "drug overdose." They don't care why or how: that is the period at the end of that sentence.


Sasha, I disagree. People remember him as much for Purple Rain and the love symbol. He was the best-selling musician on 2016. Mainstream media coverage of him since 4/21/16 has been quite reverent, especially considering the beating that the press gave him in the mid-90s during the dispute with WB. Of course there has been coverage of his death by overdose because he was a celebrity. I think that his death has actually caused the press to focus more on how the opiate epidemic is affecting everyday people, and caused politicians to devote more resources to fighting the epidemic. Having said all of that, there is virtually universal agreement that Prince is a music legend who made major contributions to modern music. I think that the press and people on social media have been very good about remembering him for his musical legacy.
Live 4 Love ~ Love is God, God is love, Girls and boys love God above
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #699 posted 08/01/17 6:46pm

ISaidLifeIsJus
tAGame

avatar

laurarichardson said:

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:

I know you really want Ps money to go to a charity.


The Court documents show P was the "sole member" of NPG LLC.

As I indicated up above silent members (partners) to a LLC provide capital to the LLC but do not want to be involved in the day to day business management. Silent members (partners) own a % of the LLC. If P wanted to leave money to a charity having the charity be a silent member is not a legally sound way to go. Furthermore, do you really think P would make a charity a silent member to his Masters, Copyrights, and Compositions after he fought so hard to get them returned to him, and the charity would be able to dictate to him what he did with his work?

How do you explain the registration paperwork? How do you explain Tidal's claims that someone had POA for Prince. I think his stituation changed and he had to make some changes.

What specifically are you referring to when you speak of the registration papers?

The attorneys for Tidal never once mention a POA in any filings, documents, emails, or letters filed in the Probate claim.

The only time I saw a POA mentioned was in a news article after NPG Music and NPG Publishing filed a lawsuit against Tidal in Federal Court for copyright infringement. Tidal was the source of this information to the news organization from what I recall.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #700 posted 08/01/17 7:15pm

Lovejunky

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:

laurarichardson said:

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said: How do you explain the registration paperwork? How do you explain Tidal's claims that someone had POA for Prince. I think his stituation changed and he had to make some changes.

What specifically are you referring to when you speak of the registration papers?

The attorneys for Tidal never once mention a POA in any filings, documents, emails, or letters filed in the Probate claim.

The only time I saw a POA mentioned was in a news article after NPG Music and NPG Publishing filed a lawsuit against Tidal in Federal Court for copyright infringement. Tidal was the source of this information to the news organization from what I recall.

Can you decipher the bolded ISLIJAG ?

from page 33 http://www.mncourts.gov/m...randum.pdf

To me this reads Power Of Attorney goes to whoever is/was running NPGMP

In my mind..Phaedra was in that position as Manager of NPGMP and on April 27 she was somehow edged out .....

Given that NPGMP and NPGM are both Linked to Dream Corps anyone with Half a Brain can see that Prince was setting something up that would create a secure and ongoing revenue Stream.

I think that some one didnt like that idea, but Im betting that there is something very water tight

in place that we may never get to know about..

Helping people was what United Van and Prince...Vans gone to Tidal...hes Helping People from there....VAn once said..Its very easy to be Robin when you have someone Like Prince behind you as Batman.

6. POWER OF ATTORNEY:: Writer hereby irrevocably authorizes, empowers and appoints Publisher or any of its officers Writer’s true and lawful attorney (with full power of substitution and delegation), in Writer's name, and in Writer’s place and stead, or in Publisher‘s name, to take and do such action, and to make, sign, execute, acknowledge and deliver any and all instruments or documents, which Publisher from time to time may deem desirable or necessary to vest in Publisher, its successors and assigns, all of the rights or interests granted by Writer hereunder, including, without limitation, such documents as Publisher shall deem desirable or necessary to secure to Publisher, its successors and assigns, the worldwide copyrights for all Compositions for the entire term of copyright and for any and all renewals and extensions under any present or future laws throughout the Universe. The foregoing Power of Attorney is irrevocable and deemed coupled with an interest.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #701 posted 08/01/17 7:36pm

ISaidLifeIsJus
tAGame

avatar

There is nothing in the Court records/documents that show NPG Music or NPG Publishing gave Tidal or anyone else POA.

Lovejunky said:

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:

Can you decipher the bolded ISLIJAG ?

from page 33 http://www.mncourts.gov/m...randum.pdf

To me this reads Power Of Attorney goes to whoever is/was running NPGMP

In my mind..Phaedra was in that position as Manager of NPGMP and on April 27 she was somehow edged out .....

Given that NPGMP and NPGM are both Linked to Dream Corps anyone with Half a Brain can see that Prince was setting something up that would create a secure and ongoing revenue Stream.

I think that some one didnt like that idea, but Im betting that there is something very water tight

in place that we may never get to know about..

Helping people was what United Van and Prince...Vans gone to Tidal...hes Helping People from there....VAn once said..Its very easy to be Robin when you have someone Like Prince behind you as Batman.

6. POWER OF ATTORNEY:: Writer hereby irrevocably authorizes, empowers and appoints Publisher or any of its officers Writer’s true and lawful attorney (with full power of substitution and delegation), in Writer's name, and in Writer’s place and stead, or in Publisher‘s name, to take and do such action, and to make, sign, execute, acknowledge and deliver any and all instruments or documents, which Publisher from time to time may deem desirable or necessary to vest in Publisher, its successors and assigns, all of the rights or interests granted by Writer hereunder, including, without limitation, such documents as Publisher shall deem desirable or necessary to secure to Publisher, its successors and assigns, the worldwide copyrights for all Compositions for the entire term of copyright and for any and all renewals and extensions under any present or future laws throughout the Universe. The foregoing Power of Attorney is irrevocable and deemed coupled with an interest.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #702 posted 08/01/17 7:54pm

Lovejunky

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:

There is nothing in the Court records/documents that show NPG Music or NPG Publishing gave Tidal or anyone else POA.

Lovejunky said:

and yet Tidal claims that someone had POA

and according to the bolded POA was given by the WRITER to NPGMP or any of its officers

and it is signed by Prince (writer) and PRN (Publisher ).

Wait and watch

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #703 posted 08/01/17 7:55pm

disch

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame, the Exhibit A agreement on page 33 of this document reads to me as between NPG Music (which, as you've noted, was managed exclusively by Prince) and Prince, as an individual person. And the first page of the document says "Prince Rogers Nelson (Individual/Writer) executed an Exclusive Songwriter Agreement with Prince Rogers Nelson (Manager/Member of NPG Music Publishing, LLC) on or about April 4, 2014, titled ‘Exclusive Songwriter Agreement (Exhibit A)."

-

I assume such a contract-with-himself would be for legal/liability reasons that I don't know about but I'm sure you oould shed light on.

-

(The document as a whole is such a nonsensical attempt of this guy to claim ownership of Prince's catalog that I don't know if any statements in it can be trusted.)

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:

There is nothing in the Court records/documents that show NPG Music or NPG Publishing gave Tidal or anyone else POA.

Lovejunky said:

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #704 posted 08/01/17 8:06pm

Bodhitheblackd
og

1) People here seem DESPERATE to believe Prince wanted/intended part of his estate to go to the charities he believed in;

2) People here seem DESPERATELY unhappy at the thought that his hard-earned millions will go ONLY to family members, several of whom he wasn't close to (didn't one even mention that she had never been to PP?!?);

3) Many people here are determined to believe, in the face of no evidence, that Prince had a brilliant master plan put in place for his estate that far surpassed anything a competant, experienced legal team could have designed specifically for him;

4) People here believe that because he put 'Slave' on his face and talked obsessively about regaining control of his 'masters' that he cared enough about his masters to protect them in the event of his death.

5) Many people believe that because he spoke of his songs as his "children" that he would be a protective 'parent' to them.

Maybe it's time to face reality.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #705 posted 08/01/17 8:16pm

laurarichardso
n

This is suppose to be Prince's agreement to become a songwriter working for NPG LLC. I believe Rodney got this via discovery and his point was that the document was not valid because Rodney was suppose to have rights to all of the publishing based off of Prince selling every thing to him for a dollar back in the mid 90s.
I do not think this document is fake since Rodney was trying to use it show how he had been cheated.

Are you missing that points that Livejunky is making?
--

said:

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame, the Exhibit A agreement on page 33 of this document reads to me as between NPG Music (which, as you've noted, was managed exclusively by Prince) and Prince, as an individual person. And the first page of the document says "Prince Rogers Nelson (Individual/Writer) executed an Exclusive Songwriter Agreement with Prince Rogers Nelson (Manager/Member of NPG Music Publishing, LLC) on or about April 4, 2014, titled ‘Exclusive Songwriter Agreement (Exhibit A)."


-


I assume such a contract-with-himself would be for legal/liability reasons that I don't know about but I'm sure you oould shed light on.


-


(The document as a whole is such a nonsensical attempt of this guy to claim ownership of Prince's catalog that I don't know if any statements in it can be trusted.)



ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:


There is nothing in the Court records/documents that show NPG Music or NPG Publishing gave Tidal or anyone else POA.



Lovejunky said:






  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #706 posted 08/01/17 8:17pm

laurarichardso
n

Bodhitheblackdog said:

1) People here seem DESPERATE to believe Prince wanted/intended part of his estate to go to the charities he believed in;


2) People here seem DESPERATELY unhappy at the thought that his hard-earned millions will go ONLY to family members, several of whom he wasn't close to (didn't one even mention that she had never been to PP?!?);


3) Many people here are determined to believe, in the face of no evidence, that Prince had a brilliant master plan put in place for his estate that far surpassed anything a competant, experienced legal team could have designed specifically for him;


4) People here believe that because he put 'Slave' on his face and talked obsessively about regaining control of his 'masters' that he cared enough about his masters to protect them in the event of his death.


5) Many people believe that because he spoke of his songs as his "children" that he would be a protective 'parent' to them.



Maybe it's time to face reality.



No to all five. Some people can't see that things are not clear cut.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #707 posted 08/01/17 8:21pm

laurarichardso
n

Tidal made the claim of documents not being signed by Prince because someone had POA. We will find out when the Tidal case comes to trial. What I do know is that if Tidal has not rights to the WB material why after a year is it still all up on Tidal? They have some legal document which is allowing that music to stay up on that site.


said:

There is nothing in the Court records/documents that show NPG Music or NPG Publishing gave Tidal or anyone else POA.



Lovejunky said:




ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:



Can you decipher the bolded ISLIJAG ?




from page 33 http://www.mncourts.gov/m...randum.pdf





To me this reads Power Of Attorney goes to whoever is/was running NPGMP



In my mind..Phaedra was in that position as Manager of NPGMP and on April 27 she was somehow edged out .....



Given that NPGMP and NPGM are both Linked to Dream Corps anyone with Half a Brain can see that Prince was setting something up that would create a secure and ongoing revenue Stream.



I think that some one didnt like that idea, but Im betting that there is something very water tight


in place that we may never get to know about..



Helping people was what United Van and Prince...Vans gone to Tidal...hes Helping People from there....VAn once said..Its very easy to be Robin when you have someone Like Prince behind you as Batman.





6. POWER OF ATTORNEY:: Writer hereby irrevocably authorizes, empowers and appoints Publisher or any of its officers Writer’s true and lawful attorney (with full power of substitution and delegation), in Writer's name, and in Writer’s place and stead, or in Publisher‘s name, to take and do such action, and to make, sign, execute, acknowledge and deliver any and all instruments or documents, which Publisher from time to time may deem desirable or necessary to vest in Publisher, its successors and assigns, all of the rights or interests granted by Writer hereunder, including, without limitation, such documents as Publisher shall deem desirable or necessary to secure to Publisher, its successors and assigns, the worldwide copyrights for all Compositions for the entire term of copyright and for any and all renewals and extensions under any present or future laws throughout the Universe. The foregoing Power of Attorney is irrevocable and deemed coupled with an interest.




  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #708 posted 08/01/17 8:30pm

Mumio

avatar

Bodhitheblackdog said:

1) People here seem DESPERATE to believe Prince wanted/intended part of his estate to go to the charities he believed in;

2) People here seem DESPERATELY unhappy at the thought that his hard-earned millions will go ONLY to family members, several of whom he wasn't close to (didn't one even mention that she had never been to PP?!?);

3) Many people here are determined to believe, in the face of no evidence, that Prince had a brilliant master plan put in place for his estate that far surpassed anything a competant, experienced legal team could have designed specifically for him;

4) People here believe that because he put 'Slave' on his face and talked obsessively about regaining control of his 'masters' that he cared enough about his masters to protect them in the event of his death.

5) Many people believe that because he spoke of his songs as his "children" that he would be a protective 'parent' to them.

Maybe it's time to face reality.



And certain other people here obsessively knock Prince every time they refer to anything about him, desperate to drag him as much and as often as possible. I've faced that reality wink

Welcome to "the org", Mumio…they can have you, but I'll have your love in the end nod
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #709 posted 08/01/17 8:37pm

ISaidLifeIsJus
tAGame

avatar

disch said:

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame, the Exhibit A agreement on page 33 of this document reads to me as between NPG Music (which, as you've noted, was managed exclusively by Prince) and Prince, as an individual person. And the first page of the document says "Prince Rogers Nelson (Individual/Writer) executed an Exclusive Songwriter Agreement with Prince Rogers Nelson (Manager/Member of NPG Music Publishing, LLC) on or about April 4, 2014, titled ‘Exclusive Songwriter Agreement (Exhibit A)."

-

I assume such a contract-with-himself would be for legal/liability reasons that I don't know about but I'm sure you oould shed light on.

-

(The document as a whole is such a nonsensical attempt of this guy to claim ownership of Prince's catalog that I don't know if any statements in it can be trusted.)

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:

There is nothing in the Court records/documents that show NPG Music or NPG Publishing gave Tidal or anyone else POA.

In a nutshell everything disch says is correct.

Also, we have no idea where this document originated. It was not certified.

And it is a piss poor copy of a document.

I dont trust anything Dixon filed.
Just because Tidal says its so doesnt mean it is so.

The Estate thought they had enough ammo to file a copyright infringement lawsuit against Tidal.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #710 posted 08/01/17 8:42pm

disch

Unfortunately the law IS based on things being clear-cut. Convoluted, mysterious, enigmatic "plans" aren't a smart way to prepare things that are going to be adjudicated in a court setting. In music and lyrics, sure. In the court and law, no.

laurarichardson said:

Bodhitheblackdog said:

1) People here seem DESPERATE to believe Prince wanted/intended part of his estate to go to the charities he believed in;

2) People here seem DESPERATELY unhappy at the thought that his hard-earned millions will go ONLY to family members, several of whom he wasn't close to (didn't one even mention that she had never been to PP?!?);

3) Many people here are determined to believe, in the face of no evidence, that Prince had a brilliant master plan put in place for his estate that far surpassed anything a competant, experienced legal team could have designed specifically for him;

4) People here believe that because he put 'Slave' on his face and talked obsessively about regaining control of his 'masters' that he cared enough about his masters to protect them in the event of his death.

5) Many people believe that because he spoke of his songs as his "children" that he would be a protective 'parent' to them.

Maybe it's time to face reality.

No to all five. Some people can't see that things are not clear cut.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #711 posted 08/01/17 10:02pm

laurarichardso
n

I never said anything about the law not being clear cut. I think the docs we have are pretty damm clear granted we are missing some info but you seemed to have missed the memo altoghter.


said:

Unfortunately the law IS based on things being clear-cut. Convoluted, mysterious, enigmatic "plans" aren't a smart way to prepare things that are going to be adjudicated in a court setting. In music and lyrics, sure. In the court and law, no.



laurarichardson said:


Bodhitheblackdog said:

1) People here seem DESPERATE to believe Prince wanted/intended part of his estate to go to the charities he believed in;


2) People here seem DESPERATELY unhappy at the thought that his hard-earned millions will go ONLY to family members, several of whom he wasn't close to (didn't one even mention that she had never been to PP?!?);


3) Many people here are determined to believe, in the face of no evidence, that Prince had a brilliant master plan put in place for his estate that far surpassed anything a competant, experienced legal team could have designed specifically for him;


4) People here believe that because he put 'Slave' on his face and talked obsessively about regaining control of his 'masters' that he cared enough about his masters to protect them in the event of his death.


5) Many people believe that because he spoke of his songs as his "children" that he would be a protective 'parent' to them.



Maybe it's time to face reality.




No to all five. Some people can't see that things are not clear cut.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #712 posted 08/01/17 10:11pm

laurarichardso
n

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:



disch said:


ISaidLifeIsJustAGame, the Exhibit A agreement on page 33 of this document reads to me as between NPG Music (which, as you've noted, was managed exclusively by Prince) and Prince, as an individual person. And the first page of the document says "Prince Rogers Nelson (Individual/Writer) executed an Exclusive Songwriter Agreement with Prince Rogers Nelson (Manager/Member of NPG Music Publishing, LLC) on or about April 4, 2014, titled ‘Exclusive Songwriter Agreement (Exhibit A)."


-


I assume such a contract-with-himself would be for legal/liability reasons that I don't know about but I'm sure you oould shed light on.


-


(The document as a whole is such a nonsensical attempt of this guy to claim ownership of Prince's catalog that I don't know if any statements in it can be trusted.)



ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:


There is nothing in the Court records/documents that show NPG Music or NPG Publishing gave Tidal or anyone else POA.





In a nutshell everything disch says is correct.


Also, we have no idea where this document originated. It was not certified.


And it is a piss poor copy of a document.


I dont trust anything Dixon filed.
Just because Tidal says its so doesnt mean it is so.


The Estate thought they had enough ammo to file a copyright infringement lawsuit against Tidal.


--And if there was any power in that ammo why is the WB material still up on Tidal's website after all these months. How come the estate did not have the material removed much like they did with Ian Boxhill. Perhaps it is because Tidal had enough evidence to show that Prince wanted that material up on that site and there are contracts or some docs to prove it. I know Jay-Z did not steal away in the night and steal the files. As for Rodney and this document what would make you think it was fake? If he submitted something fake why not something like a phoney contract between him and Prince with Rodney getting all of the publishing. That sort of document would have made sense for his case.
What are the chances that Rodney would doctor a document that discusses POA while concidently it comes up in the Tidal case and some how the Dreamcorps get thrown into this. Too many coincidences.
[Edited 8/1/17 22:14pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #713 posted 08/01/17 10:34pm

moonsister

laurarichardson said:

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:



disch said:


ISaidLifeIsJustAGame, the Exhibit A agreement on page 33 of this document reads to me as between NPG Music (which, as you've noted, was managed exclusively by Prince) and Prince, as an individual person. And the first page of the document says "Prince Rogers Nelson (Individual/Writer) executed an Exclusive Songwriter Agreement with Prince Rogers Nelson (Manager/Member of NPG Music Publishing, LLC) on or about April 4, 2014, titled ‘Exclusive Songwriter Agreement (Exhibit A)."


-


I assume such a contract-with-himself would be for legal/liability reasons that I don't know about but I'm sure you oould shed light on.


-


(The document as a whole is such a nonsensical attempt of this guy to claim ownership of Prince's catalog that I don't know if any statements in it can be trusted.)



ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:


There is nothing in the Court records/documents that show NPG Music or NPG Publishing gave Tidal or anyone else POA.





In a nutshell everything disch says is correct.


Also, we have no idea where this document originated. It was not certified.


And it is a piss poor copy of a document.


I dont trust anything Dixon filed.
Just because Tidal says its so doesnt mean it is so.


The Estate thought they had enough ammo to file a copyright infringement lawsuit against Tidal.


--And if there was any power in that ammo why is the WB material still up on Tidal's website after all these months. How come the estate did not have the material removed much like they did with Ian Boxhill. Perhaps it is because Tidal had enough evidence to show that Prince wanted that material up on that site and there are contracts or some docs to prove it. I know Jay-Z did not steal away in the night and steal the files. As for Rodney and this document what would make you think it was fake? If he submitted something fake why not something like a phoney contract between him and Prince with Rodney getting all of the publishing. That sort of document would have made sense for his case.
What are the chances that Rodney would doctor a document that discusses POA while concidently it comes up in the Tidal case and some how the Dreamcorps get thrown into this. Too many coincidences.
[Edited 8/1/17 22:14pm]

Is Rodney well known to anyone in the Prince world?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #714 posted 08/02/17 12:53am

Lovejunky

Thanks for this Mumio.you are right

Phaedra was essentially thrown out !

Now that we are seeing that the LLC is seperate to probate, I wonder what will happen

becasue technically Bremer had no right to step in and even if they did have the right

why on earth would you Get Rid of Phaedra when she is the person who knows more than anyone

what Prince was doing with his LLC

Mumio said:

Lovejunky, I am not a lawyer so I could be wrong, hopefully ISLIJAG comes along and corrects if needed, but I don't believe that Phaedra Ellis-Lamkins stepped aside of her own volition. Prince's death is what dictated that move because the estate became responsible for NPG Music and the estate (Bremer) notified her that her position was terminated as a result. I believe she indicated she never received that initial letter from Bremer and there may have been actions she took in the role she still thought she was in that caused her concern. I believe that was why she needed that confirmation that she faced no potential liability. I can't blame her for wanting that confirmation.


ETA: Here is the document which includes a copy of the letter Bremer sent Phaedra in May 2016: http://www.mncourts.gov/m...s-1-3).pdf




Lovejunky said:

[Edited 7/31/17 9:31am]

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #715 posted 08/02/17 4:20am

rogifan

Bodhitheblackdog said:

1) People here seem DESPERATE to believe Prince wanted/intended part of his estate to go to the charities he believed in;


2) People here seem DESPERATELY unhappy at the thought that his hard-earned millions will go ONLY to family members, several of whom he wasn't close to (didn't one even mention that she had never been to PP?!?);


3) Many people here are determined to believe, in the face of no evidence, that Prince had a brilliant master plan put in place for his estate that far surpassed anything a competant, experienced legal team could have designed specifically for him;


4) People here believe that because he put 'Slave' on his face and talked obsessively about regaining control of his 'masters' that he cared enough about his masters to protect them in the event of his death.


5) Many people believe that because he spoke of his songs as his "children" that he would be a protective 'parent' to them.



Maybe it's time to face reality.



Not sure about 4 & 5 but yes to 1, 2 & 3.
Paisley Park is in your heart
#PrinceForever 💜
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #716 posted 08/02/17 4:49am

laurarichardso
n

moonsister said:

laurarichardson said:


--And if there was any power in that ammo why is the WB material still up on Tidal's website after all these months. How come the estate did not have the material removed much like they did with Ian Boxhill. Perhaps it is because Tidal had enough evidence to show that Prince wanted that material up on that site and there are contracts or some docs to prove it. I know Jay-Z did not steal away in the night and steal the files. As for Rodney and this document what would make you think it was fake? If he submitted something fake why not something like a phoney contract between him and Prince with Rodney getting all of the publishing. That sort of document would have made sense for his case.
What are the chances that Rodney would doctor a document that discusses POA while concidently it comes up in the Tidal case and some how the Dreamcorps get thrown into this. Too many coincidences.
[Edited 8/1/17 22:14pm]

Is Rodney well known to anyone in the Prince world?

The only thing I found out about him is that he filed the same lawsuit back in 1995 in California and it was thrown out back then. He could just be another person with mental health issues who concocted the idea in his mind that Prince sold all of his publishing to him for a dollar but you know some people on this board probaly think P was so stupid he did sell it all for a buck as they are incapable of seeing that the NPG agreement was filed with the copyright office and is not something Rodney invented. Rodney just went and got a copy.
[Edited 8/2/17 4:58am]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #717 posted 08/02/17 5:22am

laurarichardso
n

One you are assuming he was planning to drop dead. You also are not reading one single solitary thing I wrote about the Ray Charles stituation. Your relatives do not have to be evil genius just assholes because any asshole can tie things up in court. I believe that Once Prince obtained all of the masters and sat up this LLC he was doing it to keep publishing out of probate which is what has occurred. He left a business structure in place that can continue to generate revenue. It is not a will but it might be better than will for continuing to generate revenue while the probate is going on. This is actually factual wheater you like it or not Prince did have competent lawyers and obviously real estate agents. He did not leave a rack of debts and the lawsuits generated after his death are due to Londell you know a competent attorney.

said:

Well, I'm sure Prince isn't the first rich person on earth with "greedy relatives." But most other rich people put the effort into planning their estates and don't say, "why bother? my greedy relatives --who are also apparently secret legal geniusus -- will somehow find a way to negate my legally sound plans. So whatever."



laurarichardson said:


Once again you ignore facts because you think you know everything. The only thing that would have assurred that money went to charity would have been a trust and even those can be tied up in court. This has happened with the Ray Charles estate. Ray had a will and he put some money into a trust for charities for blind children. His greedy children and baby mammas have kept the trust tied up in court for a little over a decade. Most people and I am sure Ray as well do obtain competent people for estate planning it does not mean greedy relatives and outsiders will not try and disrupt proceedsing for the sole purpose of being spitful.



If Prince had a will whoever he choose to leave anything to is free to do as they please once they inherit and whoever inherits can certainly obtain legal advice to run the LLC as an ongoing business enterprise or disolve it.



We know one so-called competent lawyer who has already disrupted contracts to put money in his pocket and greedy relatives who are happy were happy to let him do it. So much for competent how about we find someone ethical.



You kept babbling about well informend. Prince used Rhonda Trotter to work on the LLC she gets $800.00 dollars an hour and is the tops in the IP field so he had competent people.



The world and nothing in it is black and white. Not for Prince and not for anyone.




disch said:


if Prince wanted to guarantee his money went to charity (or any other specific purposes) he could have worked with qualified lawyers to set up a solid plan to make that happen. I don't personally buy the idea that setting up a clear estate plan is pointless because his relatives would just ignore it. The law is the law and his relatives have never given me the impression that they have access to such legal wizardry that they could find a way to negate a well-formulated estate plan crafted by qualified lawyers (key words: well-formalated, and qualified)






  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #718 posted 08/02/17 6:00am

Highonpurple

rogifan said:

Bodhitheblackdog said:

1) People here seem DESPERATE to believe Prince wanted/intended part of his estate to go to the charities he believed in;

2) People here seem DESPERATELY unhappy at the thought that his hard-earned millions will go ONLY to family members, several of whom he wasn't close to (didn't one even mention that she had never been to PP?!?);

3) Many people here are determined to believe, in the face of no evidence, that Prince had a brilliant master plan put in place for his estate that far surpassed anything a competant, experienced legal team could have designed specifically for him;

4) People here believe that because he put 'Slave' on his face and talked obsessively about regaining control of his 'masters' that he cared enough about his masters to protect them in the event of his death.

5) Many people believe that because he spoke of his songs as his "children" that he would be a protective 'parent' to them.

Maybe it's time to face reality.

Not sure about 4 & 5 but yes to 1, 2 & 3.

Prince2Elohim,

Song snippets on words from Prince;

Better X survive, No need to hide, Music never lies, Your words not mine, Maybe you have no business writing on my wall, Through you the ball, Sacred is the prayer that ask for nothing, It was part of the plan, To the truth we most often shared, Living up to what people said, 2 drops of water from the same sea, Your gonna see me, Expect me to freak on you a little more, Through the bridle path door, Remedy for sorrow, when I'm alone I dream about you, Loving you in silence never ending kiss, Your tong is a great persuader, You've come a long way, Grace any stage, Could pass some weight,

I'm writing from the depth of my heart let Van Jones distribute Prince wealth !!!

Please, by 2021 make him President of the United States of America !!!

Van Jones alway's gives more then he takes, even the fakes who flaunt will not flake out

I'm content with nothing called bliss

Hilversum or Hollywood take note, as the story unfolds

My pain runs deeper then a black hole

Questions folks?

No Comment !!!

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #719 posted 08/02/17 6:09am

Lovejunky

morningsong said:

So everything that's happening with NPG Music is not in the court docs, so nobody knows the full story of what's going on there?

Correct...

some of us are specualting by tryyna think like Prince smile

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 24 of 32 « First<202122232425262728>Last »
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Prince: Music and More > The Estate Discussion - Part 9 ... Continued