Reply #180 posted 06/21/17 7:20am
BoraBora |
KlyphIsBackAgain said:
BoraBora said:
Very well, thanks.
So this is only on the file I have and not on the CD itself.
Will replace the file ripping directly my CD when it will arrive.
Just to make sure I'm listening in the right place. Before the drum machines kick in, or before the drums come in after the "huh huh" in the intro?
Difficult to say, I have not the file here in this moment.
Listened to it twice hours ago, if my memory serves well there is the "suspended" intro and the dropouts (minimal, with headphones on) came right before the last P scream and the start of the drum pattern.
Hope this make sense, tonight I will check it again.
|
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #181 posted 06/21/17 7:22am
fen |
“We Can Fuck” is every bit as good as I’d hoped. The way that he builds and sustains the drama during the middle section is masterful. “Love and Sex” is great, “Possessed” is interesting. I actually became quite choked – I miss the little genius more than ever listening to this stuff. x |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #182 posted 06/21/17 7:23am
KlyphIsBackAga in |
BoraBora said:
KlyphIsBackAgain said: BoraBora said:
Very well, thanks.
So this is only on the file I have and not on the CD itself.
Will replace the file ripping directly my CD when it will arrive.
Just to make sure I'm listening in the right place. Before the drum machines kick in, or before the drums come in after the "huh huh" in the intro?
Difficult to say, I have not the file here in this moment.
Listened to it twice hours ago, if my memory serves well there is the "suspended" intro and the dropouts (minimal, with headphones on) came right before the last P scream and the start of the drum pattern.
Hope this make sense, tonight I will check it again.
Ok. I'm not listening with headphones right now so I'll check it out. |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #183 posted 06/21/17 7:23am
KlyphIsBackAga in |
fen said: “We Can Fuck” is every bit as good as I’d hoped. The way that he builds and sustains the drama during the middle section is masterful. “Love and Sex” is great, “Possessed” is interesting. I actually became quite choked – I miss the little genius more than ever listening to this stuff. x I especially like the ending of Possessed. |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #184 posted 06/21/17 7:26am
BoraBora |
KlyphIsBackAgain said:
fen said:
“We Can Fuck” is every bit as good as I’d hoped. The way that he builds and sustains the drama during the middle section is masterful. “Love and Sex” is great, “Possessed” is interesting. I actually became quite choked – I miss the little genius more than ever listening to this stuff. x
I especially like the ending of Possessed.
I still have to listen to the ending.
From the "here and there" portions I listened to, it is a solid version missing a great bass (a.l.a. Cloreen, to say one).
|
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #185 posted 06/21/17 7:27am
djThunderfunk
|
I'm disappointed with We Can Fuck, not the version as much as the sound quality. Add this one to the "not from master" list. No?
Don't hate your neighbors. Hate the media that tells you to hate your neighbors. |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #186 posted 06/21/17 7:29am
IstenSzek |
.. [Edited 6/21/17 7:31am] and true love lives on lollipops and crisps |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #187 posted 06/21/17 7:29am
BoraBora |
djThunderfunk said:
I'm disappointed with We Can Fuck, not the version as much as the sound quality. Add this one to the "not from master" list. No?
Again, listened only to some portions but for me the sound quality of WCF was OK.
Maybe not clear like EI, but still better than OD/RG.
|
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #188 posted 06/21/17 7:30am
Reply #189 posted 06/21/17 7:31am
KlyphIsBackAga in |
djThunderfunk said: I'm disappointed with We Can Fuck, not the version as much as the sound quality. Add this one to the "not from master" list. No?
Well, I don't agree with the whole "not from the master" theory. I do agree the sound quality is lacking on it, for whatever reason. |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #190 posted 06/21/17 7:34am
Reply #191 posted 06/21/17 7:36am
fen |
KlyphIsBackAgain said:
fen said:
“We Can Fuck” is every bit as good as I’d hoped. The way that he builds and sustains the drama during the middle section is masterful. “Love and Sex” is great, “Possessed” is interesting. I actually became quite choked – I miss the little genius more than ever listening to this stuff. x
I especially like the ending of Possessed.
Yes, the brief chant of “Someone’s in my body” caught me off guard for some reason – Prince at his strange, surreal, libidinous best. |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #192 posted 06/21/17 7:36am
lynx |
OD / RG seems to be only track that "sounds" like it's a boot to me, everything else is steller for the most part - especially the Hallway Speech which on headphones is definitely thrilling. |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #193 posted 06/21/17 7:43am
PurpleMedley12 2
|
Just as I unfortunately predicted, the Paisley Park Remaster sounds HORRIBLE. Very compressed and horribly brickwalled to the point that you can hear the audio clip in some parts (ending of Let's Go Crazy for example). Here's a sample of the waveform of LGC. Top is the 2015 Remaster, bottom is the from the 2011 Reissue mastered by Kevin Gray (ripped from my personal vinyl copy).
As you can see, there's a night and day difference. Then again, i'm not surprised considering how compressed and brickwalled Prince's music has been since the mid 90's that the remaster he supervised would sound this bad. But I hoped it wouldn't. Oh well.
|
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #194 posted 06/21/17 7:49am
tishal |
Silvertongue7 said:
Genesia said:
I thought I was doing the right thing by ordering from the official site. I'll probably get mine last.
In the Spanish forum I read they were saying that Amazon Spain is going to deliver it on the 29th...
Me too Genesia. I am hoping to at least have it by Tuesday...not sure how long it will take if they ship them all out on Friday. |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #195 posted 06/21/17 7:50am
KlyphIsBackAga in |
PurpleMedley122 said: Just as I unfortunately predicted, the Paisley Park Remaster sounds HORRIBLE. Very compressed and horribly brickwalled to the point that you can hear the audio clip in some parts (ending of Let's Go Crazy for example). Here's a sample of the waveform of LGC. Top is the 2015 Remaster, bottom is the from the 2011 Reissue mastered by Kevin Gray (ripped from my personal vinyl copy). As you can see, there's a night and day difference. Then again, i'm not surprised considering how compressed and brickwalled Prince's music has been since the mid 90's that the remaster he supervised would sound this bad. But I hoped it wouldn't. Oh well.
When I saw "overseen by Prince" I expected it too. But, to play devil's advocate Prince definitely wasn't the only offender in the category and still isn't. |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #196 posted 06/21/17 7:51am
djThunderfunk
|
Overall, I'm pleased with the vault disc. Most sounds better than I expected, only a handful sound like they're from "inferior" sources. Sure, it's all too "hot" but this I did expect. It's why I'm not excited about the album remaster.
I'll be happy to drop my $ on this Friday and look forward to future vault releases.
That said, I'm already late for an appointment. I don't expect that "sorry sir, I had to listen to the new Prince CD on my good speakers" will go over so I have to motivate. Thanks to those that shared the leak, I'm sure I'll be spinning these tracks on repeat awhile. Now when I get home Friday I can focus on the DVD!! Don't hate your neighbors. Hate the media that tells you to hate your neighbors. |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #197 posted 06/21/17 7:51am
KlyphIsBackAga in |
I'm hoping the vinyl will be less offensive, as in the case with the recent Sgt. Peppers remaster. |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #198 posted 06/21/17 7:54am
BoraBora |
OK. As I wrote on the other thread, the inclusion of this version of "Wonderful Ass" confused me so I checked a thing.
I got somewhere a CD bootleg titled "Princesex" that contains a longer version of WA (lenght 9:50, as confirmed on Discogs), and to my knowledge that was indicated as the original 1983 version.
I don't listen to it from a lot and I can't remember well, but from what I remember it was more stripped.
Now here we have what we indicated for all this time as the 1986 version included on a 1983/1984 tracks selection.
So we can assume that the so called "1986 version" is simply an 1983/1984 version revamped as it was in 1986 for inclusion in some project (like JIR from 1986 included without variations on GB in 1990, for example). Am I wrong?!?!?
On a side note, someone here remember or have access to the "Princesex" 9:50 version I'm talkin' about to confirm is different?!?!?
|
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #199 posted 06/21/17 7:55am
laurarichardso n |
When will some of you figure out the masses could less about the sound quality. |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #200 posted 06/21/17 7:57am
djThunderfunk
|
BoraBora said:
OK. As I wrote on the other thread, the inclusion of this version of "Wonderful Ass" confused me so I checked a thing.
I got somewhere a CD bootleg titled "Princesex" that contains a longer version of WA (lenght 9:50, as confirmed on Discogs), and to my knowledge that was indicated as the original 1983 version.
I don't listen to it from a lot and I can't remember well, but from what I remember it was more stripped.
Now here we have what we indicated for all this time as the 1986 version included on a 1983/1984 tracks selection.
So we can assume that the so called "1986 version" is simply an 1983/1984 version revamped as it was in 1986 for inclusion in some project (like JIR from 1986 included without variations on GB in 1990, for example). Am I wrong?!?!?
On a side note, someone here remember or have access to the "Princesex" 9:50 version I'm talkin' about to confirm is different?!?!?
I do, but as I said, have to go. If nobody beats me to it, I'll check it later today for you.
Don't hate your neighbors. Hate the media that tells you to hate your neighbors. |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #201 posted 06/21/17 7:58am
djThunderfunk
|
laurarichardson said:
When will some of you figure out the masses could less about the sound quality.
Five minutes after you figure out that WE do!
Don't hate your neighbors. Hate the media that tells you to hate your neighbors. |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #202 posted 06/21/17 7:59am
BoraBora |
djThunderfunk said:
BoraBora said:
OK. As I wrote on the other thread, the inclusion of this version of "Wonderful Ass" confused me so I checked a thing.
I got somewhere a CD bootleg titled "Princesex" that contains a longer version of WA (lenght 9:50, as confirmed on Discogs), and to my knowledge that was indicated as the original 1983 version.
I don't listen to it from a lot and I can't remember well, but from what I remember it was more stripped.
Now here we have what we indicated for all this time as the 1986 version included on a 1983/1984 tracks selection.
So we can assume that the so called "1986 version" is simply an 1983/1984 version revamped as it was in 1986 for inclusion in some project (like JIR from 1986 included without variations on GB in 1990, for example). Am I wrong?!?!?
On a side note, someone here remember or have access to the "Princesex" 9:50 version I'm talkin' about to confirm is different?!?!?
I do, but as I said, have to go. If nobody beats me to it, I'll check it later today for you.
Thank you very much.
I have the CD lost in some store boxes.
|
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #203 posted 06/21/17 8:05am
KlyphIsBackAga in |
BoraBora said:
djThunderfunk said:
BoraBora said:
OK. As I wrote on the other thread, the inclusion of this version of "Wonderful Ass" confused me so I checked a thing.
I got somewhere a CD bootleg titled "Princesex" that contains a longer version of WA (lenght 9:50, as confirmed on Discogs), and to my knowledge that was indicated as the original 1983 version.
I don't listen to it from a lot and I can't remember well, but from what I remember it was more stripped.
Now here we have what we indicated for all this time as the 1986 version included on a 1983/1984 tracks selection.
So we can assume that the so called "1986 version" is simply an 1983/1984 version revamped as it was in 1986 for inclusion in some project (like JIR from 1986 included without variations on GB in 1990, for example). Am I wrong?!?!?
On a side note, someone here remember or have access to the "Princesex" 9:50 version I'm talkin' about to confirm is different?!?!?
I do, but as I said, have to go. If nobody beats me to it, I'll check it later today for you.
Thank you very much.
I have the CD lost in some store boxes.
I remember the version you're talking about but I don't have it anymore. I think the version on PRDeluxe is the 86 version, plain and simple. It shouldn't be included on this project (although I'm glad it is). In 83 I don't think W & L would be screaming "The Revolution will be heard!" |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #204 posted 06/21/17 8:06am
injuredpinky
|
Adorecream said:
I think we have already heard "We can Fuck". On the Work/Testament series is a song in the 1983 called "Moral majority" which sounds like the 2nd half of We can funk/We can fuck. There is female backing vocals and Pirnce and a Linn beat and it starts with the "You pour the water on me baby" and you can hear the line "We can fuck one another". It is very muddy though and only a part song, but suspect it is we can fuck.
.
Wow, great call! You were dead on (it). |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #205 posted 06/21/17 8:08am
PurpleMedley12 2
|
KlyphIsBackAgain said:
PurpleMedley122 said:
Just as I unfortunately predicted, the Paisley Park Remaster sounds HORRIBLE. Very compressed and horribly brickwalled to the point that you can hear the audio clip in some parts (ending of Let's Go Crazy for example). Here's a sample of the waveform of LGC. Top is the 2015 Remaster, bottom is the from the 2011 Reissue mastered by Kevin Gray (ripped from my personal vinyl copy).
As you can see, there's a night and day difference. Then again, i'm not surprised considering how compressed and brickwalled Prince's music has been since the mid 90's that the remaster he supervised would sound this bad. But I hoped it wouldn't. Oh well.
When I saw "overseen by Prince" I expected it too. But, to play devil's advocate Prince definitely wasn't the only offender in the category and still isn't.
Strangely, the compression and brickwalling isn't as much of a problem on the vault tracks, which sound better. |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #206 posted 06/21/17 8:09am
OldFriends4Sal e |
laurarichardson said:
When will some of you figure out the masses could less about the sound quality.
R U serious? U cannot B serious... |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #207 posted 06/21/17 8:10am
KlyphIsBackAga in |
PurpleMedley122 said:
KlyphIsBackAgain said: PurpleMedley122 said:
Just as I unfortunately predicted, the Paisley Park Remaster sounds HORRIBLE. Very compressed and horribly brickwalled to the point that you can hear the audio clip in some parts (ending of Let's Go Crazy for example). Here's a sample of the waveform of LGC. Top is the 2015 Remaster, bottom is the from the 2011 Reissue mastered by Kevin Gray (ripped from my personal vinyl copy).
As you can see, there's a night and day difference. Then again, i'm not surprised considering how compressed and brickwalled Prince's music has been since the mid 90's that the remaster he supervised would sound this bad. But I hoped it wouldn't. Oh well.
When I saw "overseen by Prince" I expected it too. But, to play devil's advocate Prince definitely wasn't the only offender in the category and still isn't.
Strangely, the compression and brickwalling isn't as much of a problem on the vault tracks, which sound better. Not that strange really. I don't believe P had anything to do with their mastering. I think I read B. Grundman was mastering the unreleased songs. |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #208 posted 06/21/17 8:13am
leadline |
PurpleMedley122 said:
Just as I unfortunately predicted, the Paisley Park Remaster sounds HORRIBLE. Very compressed and horribly brickwalled to the point that you can hear the audio clip in some parts (ending of Let's Go Crazy for example). Here's a sample of the waveform of LGC. Top is the 2015 Remaster, bottom is the from the 2011 Reissue mastered by Kevin Gray (ripped from my personal vinyl copy).
As you can see, there's a night and day difference. Then again, i'm not surprised considering how compressed and brickwalled Prince's music has been since the mid 90's that the remaster he supervised would sound this bad. But I hoped it wouldn't. Oh well.
What a shame, the waveforms say it all, if Prince "oversaw" this, he certaintly did not oversee the remastering. Pick any random person off the street and they could have done a better job.
Apparantly louder = remastered these days.
[Edited 6/21/17 8:17am] "You always get the dream that you deserve, from what you value the most" -Prince 2013 |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #209 posted 06/21/17 8:16am
KlyphIsBackAga in |
leadline said:
PurpleMedley122 said:
Just as I unfortunately predicted, the Paisley Park Remaster sounds HORRIBLE. Very compressed and horribly brickwalled to the point that you can hear the audio clip in some parts (ending of Let's Go Crazy for example). Here's a sample of the waveform of LGC. Top is the 2015 Remaster, bottom is the from the 2011 Reissue mastered by Kevin Gray (ripped from my personal vinyl copy).
As you can see, there's a night and day difference. Then again, i'm not surprised considering how compressed and brickwalled Prince's music has been since the mid 90's that the remaster he supervised would sound this bad. But I hoped it wouldn't. Oh well.
What a shame, the waveforms say it all, if Prince "oversaw" this, he certaintly did not oversee the remastering. Pick any random person off the street and they could have done a better job.
Apparantely louder = remastered these days.
[Edited 6/21/17 8:13am] Wasn't Josh around during this time? Lol |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
copyright © 1998-2024 prince.org. all rights reserved.