independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Prince: Music and More > My Purple Rain copy is here
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 7 of 12 « First<34567891011>Last »
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #180 posted 06/21/17 7:20am

BoraBora

KlyphIsBackAgain said:

BoraBora said:



Very well, thanks.

So this is only on the file I have and not on the CD itself.

Will replace the file ripping directly my CD when it will arrive.


Just to make sure I'm listening in the right place. Before the drum machines kick in, or before the drums come in after the "huh huh" in the intro?



Difficult to say, I have not the file here in this moment.

Listened to it twice hours ago, if my memory serves well there is the "suspended" intro and the dropouts (minimal, with headphones on) came right before the last P scream and the start of the drum pattern.

Hope this make sense, tonight I will check it again.


  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #181 posted 06/21/17 7:22am

fen

avatar

“We Can Fuck” is every bit as good as I’d hoped. The way that he builds and sustains the drama during the middle section is masterful. “Love and Sex” is great, “Possessed” is interesting. I actually became quite choked – I miss the little genius more than ever listening to this stuff. x

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #182 posted 06/21/17 7:23am

KlyphIsBackAga
in

avatar

BoraBora said:



KlyphIsBackAgain said:


BoraBora said:




Very well, thanks.

So this is only on the file I have and not on the CD itself.

Will replace the file ripping directly my CD when it will arrive.




Just to make sure I'm listening in the right place. Before the drum machines kick in, or before the drums come in after the "huh huh" in the intro?



Difficult to say, I have not the file here in this moment.



Listened to it twice hours ago, if my memory serves well there is the "suspended" intro and the dropouts (minimal, with headphones on) came right before the last P scream and the start of the drum pattern.

Hope this make sense, tonight I will check it again.




Ok. I'm not listening with headphones right now so I'll check it out.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #183 posted 06/21/17 7:23am

KlyphIsBackAga
in

avatar

fen said:

“We Can Fuck” is every bit as good as I’d hoped. The way that he builds and sustains the drama during the middle section is masterful. “Love and Sex” is great, “Possessed” is interesting. I actually became quite choked – I miss the little genius more than ever listening to this stuff. x



I especially like the ending of Possessed.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #184 posted 06/21/17 7:26am

BoraBora

KlyphIsBackAgain said:

fen said:

“We Can Fuck” is every bit as good as I’d hoped. The way that he builds and sustains the drama during the middle section is masterful. “Love and Sex” is great, “Possessed” is interesting. I actually became quite choked – I miss the little genius more than ever listening to this stuff. x

I especially like the ending of Possessed.



I still have to listen to the ending.

From the "here and there" portions I listened to, it is a solid version missing a great bass (a.l.a. Cloreen, to say one).


  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #185 posted 06/21/17 7:27am

djThunderfunk

avatar

I'm disappointed with We Can Fuck, not the version as much as the sound quality. Add this one to the "not from master" list. No?

Don't hate your neighbors. Hate the media that tells you to hate your neighbors.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #186 posted 06/21/17 7:29am

IstenSzek

avatar

..

[Edited 6/21/17 7:31am]

and true love lives on lollipops and crisps
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #187 posted 06/21/17 7:29am

BoraBora

djThunderfunk said:

I'm disappointed with We Can Fuck, not the version as much as the sound quality. Add this one to the "not from master" list. No?



Again, listened only to some portions but for me the sound quality of WCF was OK.

Maybe not clear like EI, but still better than OD/RG.



  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #188 posted 06/21/17 7:30am

mbdtyler

Is "Wonderful Ass" the same as this version? https://www.youtube.com/w...3-JLuHYBjw

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #189 posted 06/21/17 7:31am

KlyphIsBackAga
in

avatar

djThunderfunk said:

I'm disappointed with We Can Fuck, not the version as much as the sound quality. Add this one to the "not from master" list. No?



Well, I don't agree with the whole "not from the master" theory. I do agree the sound quality is lacking on it, for whatever reason.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #190 posted 06/21/17 7:34am

kremlinshadow

avatar

mbdtyler said:

Is "Wonderful Ass" the same as this version? https://www.youtube.com/w...3-JLuHYBjw

yes but quality x100

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #191 posted 06/21/17 7:36am

fen

avatar

KlyphIsBackAgain said:

fen said:

“We Can Fuck” is every bit as good as I’d hoped. The way that he builds and sustains the drama during the middle section is masterful. “Love and Sex” is great, “Possessed” is interesting. I actually became quite choked – I miss the little genius more than ever listening to this stuff. x

I especially like the ending of Possessed.

Yes, the brief chant of “Someone’s in my body” caught me off guard for some reason – Prince at his strange, surreal, libidinous best.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #192 posted 06/21/17 7:36am

lynx

OD / RG seems to be only track that "sounds" like it's a boot to me, everything else is steller for the most part - especially the Hallway Speech which on headphones is definitely thrilling.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #193 posted 06/21/17 7:43am

PurpleMedley12
2

Just as I unfortunately predicted, the Paisley Park Remaster sounds HORRIBLE. Very compressed and horribly brickwalled to the point that you can hear the audio clip in some parts (ending of Let's Go Crazy for example). Here's a sample of the waveform of LGC. Top is the 2015 Remaster, bottom is the from the 2011 Reissue mastered by Kevin Gray (ripped from my personal vinyl copy).


As you can see, there's a night and day difference. Then again, i'm not surprised considering how compressed and brickwalled Prince's music has been since the mid 90's that the remaster he supervised would sound this bad. But I hoped it wouldn't. Oh well.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #194 posted 06/21/17 7:49am

tishal

Silvertongue7 said:

Genesia said:

I thought I was doing the right thing by ordering from the official site. I'll probably get mine last. rolleyes

In the Spanish forum I read they were saying that Amazon Spain is going to deliver it on the 29th...

Me too Genesia. I am hoping to at least have it by Tuesday...not sure how long it will take if they ship them all out on Friday.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #195 posted 06/21/17 7:50am

KlyphIsBackAga
in

avatar

PurpleMedley122 said:

Just as I unfortunately predicted, the Paisley Park Remaster sounds HORRIBLE. Very compressed and horribly brickwalled to the point that you can hear the audio clip in some parts (ending of Let's Go Crazy for example). Here's a sample of the waveform of LGC. Top is the 2015 Remaster, bottom is the from the 2011 Reissue mastered by Kevin Gray (ripped from my personal vinyl copy).





As you can see, there's a night and day difference. Then again, i'm not surprised considering how compressed and brickwalled Prince's music has been since the mid 90's that the remaster he supervised would sound this bad. But I hoped it wouldn't. Oh well.



When I saw "overseen by Prince" I expected it too. But, to play devil's advocate Prince definitely wasn't the only offender in the category and still isn't.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #196 posted 06/21/17 7:51am

djThunderfunk

avatar

Overall, I'm pleased with the vault disc. Most sounds better than I expected, only a handful sound like they're from "inferior" sources. Sure, it's all too "hot" but this I did expect. It's why I'm not excited about the album remaster.

I'll be happy to drop my $ on this Friday and look forward to future vault releases.

That said, I'm already late for an appointment. I don't expect that "sorry sir, I had to listen to the new Prince CD on my good speakers" will go over so I have to motivate. Thanks to those that shared the leak, I'm sure I'll be spinning these tracks on repeat awhile. Now when I get home Friday I can focus on the DVD!! wink

Don't hate your neighbors. Hate the media that tells you to hate your neighbors.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #197 posted 06/21/17 7:51am

KlyphIsBackAga
in

avatar

I'm hoping the vinyl will be less offensive, as in the case with the recent Sgt. Peppers remaster.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #198 posted 06/21/17 7:54am

BoraBora


OK. As I wrote on the other thread, the inclusion of this version of "Wonderful Ass" confused me so I checked a thing.

I got somewhere a CD bootleg titled "Princesex" that contains a longer version of WA (lenght 9:50, as confirmed on Discogs), and to my knowledge that was indicated as the original 1983 version.

I don't listen to it from a lot and I can't remember well, but from what I remember it was more stripped.

Now here we have what we indicated for all this time as the 1986 version included on a 1983/1984 tracks selection.

So we can assume that the so called "1986 version" is simply an 1983/1984 version revamped as it was in 1986 for inclusion in some project (like JIR from 1986 included without variations on GB in 1990, for example). Am I wrong?!?!?

On a side note, someone here remember or have access to the "Princesex" 9:50 version I'm talkin' about to confirm is different?!?!?

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #199 posted 06/21/17 7:55am

laurarichardso
n

When will some of you figure out the masses could less about the sound quality. eek

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #200 posted 06/21/17 7:57am

djThunderfunk

avatar

BoraBora said:


OK. As I wrote on the other thread, the inclusion of this version of "Wonderful Ass" confused me so I checked a thing.

I got somewhere a CD bootleg titled "Princesex" that contains a longer version of WA (lenght 9:50, as confirmed on Discogs), and to my knowledge that was indicated as the original 1983 version.

I don't listen to it from a lot and I can't remember well, but from what I remember it was more stripped.

Now here we have what we indicated for all this time as the 1986 version included on a 1983/1984 tracks selection.

So we can assume that the so called "1986 version" is simply an 1983/1984 version revamped as it was in 1986 for inclusion in some project (like JIR from 1986 included without variations on GB in 1990, for example). Am I wrong?!?!?

On a side note, someone here remember or have access to the "Princesex" 9:50 version I'm talkin' about to confirm is different?!?!?


I do, but as I said, have to go. If nobody beats me to it, I'll check it later today for you.

Don't hate your neighbors. Hate the media that tells you to hate your neighbors.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #201 posted 06/21/17 7:58am

djThunderfunk

avatar

laurarichardson said:

When will some of you figure out the masses could less about the sound quality. eek


Five minutes after you figure out that WE do! wink

Don't hate your neighbors. Hate the media that tells you to hate your neighbors.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #202 posted 06/21/17 7:59am

BoraBora

djThunderfunk said:

BoraBora said:


OK. As I wrote on the other thread, the inclusion of this version of "Wonderful Ass" confused me so I checked a thing.

I got somewhere a CD bootleg titled "Princesex" that contains a longer version of WA (lenght 9:50, as confirmed on Discogs), and to my knowledge that was indicated as the original 1983 version.

I don't listen to it from a lot and I can't remember well, but from what I remember it was more stripped.

Now here we have what we indicated for all this time as the 1986 version included on a 1983/1984 tracks selection.

So we can assume that the so called "1986 version" is simply an 1983/1984 version revamped as it was in 1986 for inclusion in some project (like JIR from 1986 included without variations on GB in 1990, for example). Am I wrong?!?!?

On a side note, someone here remember or have access to the "Princesex" 9:50 version I'm talkin' about to confirm is different?!?!?


I do, but as I said, have to go. If nobody beats me to it, I'll check it later today for you.



Thank you very much.

I have the CD lost in some store boxes.


  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #203 posted 06/21/17 8:05am

KlyphIsBackAga
in

avatar

BoraBora said:



djThunderfunk said:




BoraBora said:



OK. As I wrote on the other thread, the inclusion of this version of "Wonderful Ass" confused me so I checked a thing.

I got somewhere a CD bootleg titled "Princesex" that contains a longer version of WA (lenght 9:50, as confirmed on Discogs), and to my knowledge that was indicated as the original 1983 version.


I don't listen to it from a lot and I can't remember well, but from what I remember it was more stripped.

Now here we have what we indicated for all this time as the 1986 version included on a 1983/1984 tracks selection.

So we can assume that the so called "1986 version" is simply an 1983/1984 version revamped as it was in 1986 for inclusion in some project (like JIR from 1986 included without variations on GB in 1990, for example). Am I wrong?!?!?

On a side note, someone here remember or have access to the "Princesex" 9:50 version I'm talkin' about to confirm is different?!?!?





I do, but as I said, have to go. If nobody beats me to it, I'll check it later today for you.





Thank you very much.

I have the CD lost in some store boxes.




I remember the version you're talking about but I don't have it anymore. I think the version on PRDeluxe is the 86 version, plain and simple. It shouldn't be included on this project (although I'm glad it is). In 83 I don't think W & L would be screaming "The Revolution will be heard!"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #204 posted 06/21/17 8:06am

injuredpinky

avatar

Adorecream said:

I think we have already heard "We can Fuck". On the Work/Testament series is a song in the 1983 called "Moral majority" which sounds like the 2nd half of We can funk/We can fuck. There is female backing vocals and Pirnce and a Linn beat and it starts with the "You pour the water on me baby" and you can hear the line "We can fuck one another". It is very muddy though and only a part song, but suspect it is we can fuck.

.

Wow, great call! You were dead on (it). smile

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #205 posted 06/21/17 8:08am

PurpleMedley12
2

KlyphIsBackAgain said:

PurpleMedley122 said:

Just as I unfortunately predicted, the Paisley Park Remaster sounds HORRIBLE. Very compressed and horribly brickwalled to the point that you can hear the audio clip in some parts (ending of Let's Go Crazy for example). Here's a sample of the waveform of LGC. Top is the 2015 Remaster, bottom is the from the 2011 Reissue mastered by Kevin Gray (ripped from my personal vinyl copy).


As you can see, there's a night and day difference. Then again, i'm not surprised considering how compressed and brickwalled Prince's music has been since the mid 90's that the remaster he supervised would sound this bad. But I hoped it wouldn't. Oh well.

When I saw "overseen by Prince" I expected it too. But, to play devil's advocate Prince definitely wasn't the only offender in the category and still isn't.

Strangely, the compression and brickwalling isn't as much of a problem on the vault tracks, which sound better.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #206 posted 06/21/17 8:09am

OldFriends4Sal
e

laurarichardson said:

When will some of you figure out the masses could less about the sound quality. eek

R U serious? U cannot B serious...

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #207 posted 06/21/17 8:10am

KlyphIsBackAga
in

avatar

PurpleMedley122 said:



KlyphIsBackAgain said:


PurpleMedley122 said:

Just as I unfortunately predicted, the Paisley Park Remaster sounds HORRIBLE. Very compressed and horribly brickwalled to the point that you can hear the audio clip in some parts (ending of Let's Go Crazy for example). Here's a sample of the waveform of LGC. Top is the 2015 Remaster, bottom is the from the 2011 Reissue mastered by Kevin Gray (ripped from my personal vinyl copy).





As you can see, there's a night and day difference. Then again, i'm not surprised considering how compressed and brickwalled Prince's music has been since the mid 90's that the remaster he supervised would sound this bad. But I hoped it wouldn't. Oh well.



When I saw "overseen by Prince" I expected it too. But, to play devil's advocate Prince definitely wasn't the only offender in the category and still isn't.

Strangely, the compression and brickwalling isn't as much of a problem on the vault tracks, which sound better.



Not that strange really. I don't believe P had anything to do with their mastering. I think I read B. Grundman was mastering the unreleased songs.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #208 posted 06/21/17 8:13am

leadline

avatar

PurpleMedley122 said:

Just as I unfortunately predicted, the Paisley Park Remaster sounds HORRIBLE. Very compressed and horribly brickwalled to the point that you can hear the audio clip in some parts (ending of Let's Go Crazy for example). Here's a sample of the waveform of LGC. Top is the 2015 Remaster, bottom is the from the 2011 Reissue mastered by Kevin Gray (ripped from my personal vinyl copy).

VI56lsz.jpg


As you can see, there's a night and day difference. Then again, i'm not surprised considering how compressed and brickwalled Prince's music has been since the mid 90's that the remaster he supervised would sound this bad. But I hoped it wouldn't. Oh well.


What a shame, the waveforms say it all, if Prince "oversaw" this, he certaintly did not oversee the remastering. Pick any random person off the street and they could have done a better job.


Apparantly louder = remastered these days.







[Edited 6/21/17 8:17am]

"You always get the dream that you deserve, from what you value the most" -Prince 2013
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #209 posted 06/21/17 8:16am

KlyphIsBackAga
in

avatar

leadline said:



PurpleMedley122 said:


Just as I unfortunately predicted, the Paisley Park Remaster sounds HORRIBLE. Very compressed and horribly brickwalled to the point that you can hear the audio clip in some parts (ending of Let's Go Crazy for example). Here's a sample of the waveform of LGC. Top is the 2015 Remaster, bottom is the from the 2011 Reissue mastered by Kevin Gray (ripped from my personal vinyl copy).



VI56lsz.jpg



As you can see, there's a night and day difference. Then again, i'm not surprised considering how compressed and brickwalled Prince's music has been since the mid 90's that the remaster he supervised would sound this bad. But I hoped it wouldn't. Oh well.




What a shame, the waveforms say it all, if Prince "oversaw" this, he certaintly did not oversee the remastering. Pick any random person off the street and they could have done a better job.


Apparantely louder = remastered these days.



[Edited 6/21/17 8:13am]



Wasn't Josh around during this time? Lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 7 of 12 « First<34567891011>Last »
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Prince: Music and More > My Purple Rain copy is here