Thread started 05/04/17 4:14amleadline |
Article: Prince estate ordered to pay 1 million if they want to continue blocking Deliverence EP. "You always get the dream that you deserve, from what you value the most" -Prince 2013 |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #1 posted 05/04/17 4:25am
PurpleYoda3121 |
This is getting crazy. U fall in love 2 fast and hate 2 soon
And take 4 granted the feeling’s mutual |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #2 posted 05/04/17 6:10am
luv4u Moderatormoderator |
Ohh purple joy oh purple bliss oh purple rapture!
REAL MUSIC by REAL MUSICIANS - Prince
"I kind of wish there was a reason for Prince to make the site crash more" ~~ Ben |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #3 posted 05/04/17 6:15am
Ugot2shakesumt hin |
leadline said:
http://www.billboard.com/...ep-release
Courts makin them pay now to continue to block the release of this EP, I wonder if they will pony up.
[Edited 5/4/17 4:15am]
Someone is getting their reality check. I wonder if they have the funds to cover it. |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #4 posted 05/04/17 6:28am
leadline |
Ugot2shakesumthin said:
leadline said:
http://www.billboard.com/...ep-release
Courts makin them pay now to continue to block the release of this EP, I wonder if they will pony up.
[Edited 5/4/17 4:15am]
Someone is getting their reality check. I wonder if they have the funds to cover it.
I know right? Man if I was advising them, I would tell them to just let it go, I mean shoot, the estate will get money from the sales anyway, and it is like 6 songs gone out of thousands they can release in the future. It's almost a non event in that respect. But who knows in these scenarios, ego gets in the way in situations like this all the time.
"You always get the dream that you deserve, from what you value the most" -Prince 2013 |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #5 posted 05/04/17 6:31am
OperatingTheta n |
If the estate had any intelligence they'd just release Prince's original versions without additions now. Instead, they'll likely continue fighting among themselves and making tacky novelty items hardly anyone wants. [Edited 5/4/17 6:32am]
|
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #6 posted 05/04/17 7:07am
Ugot2shakesumt hin |
leadline said:
Ugot2shakesumthin said:
Someone is getting their reality check. I wonder if they have the funds to cover it.
I know right? Man if I was advising them, I would tell them to just let it go, I mean shoot, the estate will get money from the sales anyway, and it is like 6 songs gone out of thousands they can release in the future. It's almost a non event in that respect. But who knows in these scenarios, ego gets in the way in situations like this all the time.
We've all listened to it and maybe even have it.
I have no strong opinion on the litigation end, other than to say that the recordings released on the anniversary of his death were the most healing a lot of us have had. A beautiful gesture and beautiful song. They could have handled it a lot better. And got money from the streaming end too if they are so hard up for cash.
|
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #7 posted 05/04/17 7:10am
leadline |
Ugot2shakesumthin said:
leadline said:
I know right? Man if I was advising them, I would tell them to just let it go, I mean shoot, the estate will get money from the sales anyway, and it is like 6 songs gone out of thousands they can release in the future. It's almost a non event in that respect. But who knows in these scenarios, ego gets in the way in situations like this all the time.
We've all listened to it and maybe even have it.
I have no strong opinion on the litigation end, other than to say that the recordings released on the anniversary of his death were the most healing a lot of us have had. A beautiful gesture and beautiful song. They could have handled it a lot better. And got money from the streaming end too if they are so hard up for cash.
Exactly, they are out there. To pay 1 million to stop something that is already out there is crazy as well. But like I said, ego, bad judgement seem to be ruling the estate. The one year mark should have had something very special from them, a missed opportunity they can never recapture.
"You always get the dream that you deserve, from what you value the most" -Prince 2013 |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #8 posted 05/04/17 7:20am
TrevorAyer |
Yeah deliverence is like a planet earth out take ... NOT worth a million bucks ... maybe the guy selling it will make a couple hundred bucks tops ... rubbish song .. the estate should let it go and focus on monetizing the WB years and maybe a solid post wb hits package |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #9 posted 05/04/17 7:26am
Reply #10 posted 05/04/17 7:29am
IstenSzek |
it's probably not just about this EP for the estate, they want to go to court over this to make it clear that they won't accept anyone doing similar releases.
but i wonder how many similar cases there could possibly be, since the whole credit thing for these songs is pretty muddy -according to boxill anyway.
it'll be interesting to see what happens with this.
meanwhile, blocked in future or not, every prince fan already has these songs now.
and true love lives on lollipops and crisps |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #11 posted 05/04/17 7:32am
alxndrstff |
IstenSzek said:
it's probably not just about this EP for the estate, they want to go to court over this to make it clear that they won't accept anyone doing similar releases.
but i wonder how many similar cases there could possibly be, since the whole credit thing for these songs is pretty muddy -according to boxill anyway.
it'll be interesting to see what happens with this.
meanwhile, blocked in future or not, every prince fan already has these songs now.
I haven't got round to it yet - waaaaaah!
Was waiting on the outcome of this in truth. I prefer to pay for stuff if that option exists, and I missed the site going up before it was pulled. So look into the mirror, do u recognise some1? Is it who u always hoped u would become, when u were young? |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #12 posted 05/04/17 8:01am
rdhull |
IstenSzek said:
it's probably not just about this EP for the estate, they want to go to court over this to make it clear that they won't accept anyone doing similar releases.
Exactly. They are possibly trying to set a precedent. "Climb in my fur." |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #13 posted 05/04/17 8:05am
OnlyNDaUsa
|
rdhull said:
IstenSzek said:
it's probably not just about this EP for the estate, they want to go to court over this to make it clear that they won't accept anyone doing similar releases.
Exactly. They are possibly trying to set a precedent.
the only way this case could set a citable precedent is if the case were to go to a court of appeals and was upheld. The first ruling, in any case, can not set precedent. "Keep on shilling for Big Pharm!" |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #14 posted 05/04/17 8:13am
rdhull |
OnlyNDaUsa said:
rdhull said:
Exactly. They are possibly trying to set a precedent.
the only way this case could set a citable precedent is if the case were to go to a court of appeals and was upheld. The first ruling, in any case, can not set precedent.
Is that what may happen here? "Climb in my fur." |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #15 posted 05/04/17 8:15am
OnlyNDaUsa
|
rdhull said:
OnlyNDaUsa said:
the only way this case could set a citable precedent is if the case were to go to a court of appeals and was upheld. The first ruling, in any case, can not set precedent.
Is that what may happen here?
if there is an actual case and it is appealed then yes. but so far it was just a few hearings. not a full blown case. "Keep on shilling for Big Pharm!" |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #16 posted 05/04/17 8:17am
rdhull |
OnlyNDaUsa said:
rdhull said:
Is that what may happen here?
if there is an actual case and it is appealed then yes. but so far it was just a few hearings. not a full blown case.
ok then..maybe thats what they are trying to do as i said...it may not happen or it may get that far..either way maybe thats what theyre TRYING to do :kanyshrug: "Climb in my fur." |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #17 posted 05/04/17 8:20am
OnlyNDaUsa
|
rdhull said:
OnlyNDaUsa said:
if there is an actual case and it is appealed then yes. but so far it was just a few hearings. not a full blown case.
ok then..maybe thats what they are trying to do as i said...it may not happen or it may get that far..either way maybe thats what theyre TRYING to do :kanyshrug:
i think the estate will lose in the end. unless there is a contract in the estate's possession or unless the songs are filed for copyright or publishing by Prince... if this guy has the most original source tape he owns it and may very well have full rights to it.
it can boil down to who pressed PLAY on the tape deck. "Keep on shilling for Big Pharm!" |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #18 posted 05/04/17 8:20am
OnlyNDaUsa
|
and let's face it...these songs are not worth fighting over "Keep on shilling for Big Pharm!" |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #19 posted 05/04/17 8:23am
rdhull |
OnlyNDaUsa said:
rdhull said:
ok then..maybe thats what they are trying to do as i said...it may not happen or it may get that far..either way maybe thats what theyre TRYING to do :kanyshrug:
i think the estate will lose in the end. unless there is a contract in the estate's possession or unless the songs are filed for copyright or publishing by Prince... if this guy has the most original source tape he owns it and may very well have full rights to it.
it can boil down to who pressed PLAY on the tape deck.
They may lose but I understand their stnce and why they did what they did. "Climb in my fur." |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #20 posted 05/04/17 8:23am
rdhull |
OnlyNDaUsa said:
and let's face it...these songs are not worth fighting over
Not about the songs. "Climb in my fur." |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #21 posted 05/04/17 8:35am
purplethunder3 121 |
OnlyNDaUsa said:
and let's face it...these songs are not worth fighting over
I wouldn't pay it. The music is out there already anyway... "Music gives a soul to the universe, wings to the mind, flight to the imagination and life to everything." --Plato
https://youtu.be/CVwv9LZMah0 |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #22 posted 05/04/17 9:22am
OnlyNDaUsa
|
Deliverance was just played on a Dallas tx radio station 91.7 "Keep on shilling for Big Pharm!" |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #23 posted 05/04/17 10:12am
PurpleDiamonds 1 |
OnlyNDaUsa said: Deliverance was just played on a Dallas tx radio station 91.7 Nice! JMO...I think this is what Prince would have wanted....everyone listening to his music, I doubt he'd care if the siblings make $$ off him. |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #24 posted 05/04/17 10:17am
PurpleDiamonds 1 |
Ugot2shakesumthin said:
leadline said:
Ugot2shakesumthin said:
Someone is getting their reality check. I wonder if they have the funds to cover it.
I know right? Man if I was advising them, I would tell them to just let it go, I mean shoot, the estate will get money from the sales anyway, and it is like 6 songs gone out of thousands they can release in the future. It's almost a non event in that respect. But who knows in these scenarios, ego gets in the way in situations like this all the time.
We've all listened to it and maybe even have it.
I have no strong opinion on the litigation end, other than to say that [b]the recordings released on the anniversary of his death were the most healing a lot of us have had. A beautiful gesture and beautiful song.[/b] They could have handled it a lot better. And got money from the streaming end too if they are so hard up for cash.
I feel this way too.. |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #25 posted 05/04/17 10:20am
luv4u Moderatormoderator |
OnlyNDaUsa said:
Deliverance was just played on a Dallas tx radio station 91.7
Somebody gave it to them
Maybe they will get a cease and desist
Would not be surprised if other radio stations start playing it.
Ohh purple joy oh purple bliss oh purple rapture!
REAL MUSIC by REAL MUSICIANS - Prince
"I kind of wish there was a reason for Prince to make the site crash more" ~~ Ben |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #26 posted 05/04/17 10:24am
laurarichardso n |
rdhull said:
OnlyNDaUsa said:
and let's face it...these songs are not worth fighting over
Not about the songs.
Exactly, it is about copyright infringement and ownership. The court has ordered Ian to turn over the tapes which means he does not own them. If has copyrights on the songs all he has to do is produce the documentation. If any of you think he is going to turn the money over to the estate without being ordered to so you are dreaming.
In addtion, Prince already has licensing deals with WB and the estate has deals with UMG. So Ian may have to tangle with those companies as well as the estate.
Some of you do not realize that the estate needs to be income generating or everything will get sold off in a fire sale. Music could land in the hands of people who never get out to the public while the estate will have to generate income.
We do not need the Ian' s of the world putting out P's music and keeping the profits for himself. Next bootleggers will be setting up sites to openly sell their collections.
|
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #27 posted 05/04/17 10:25am
paulludvig |
OperatingThetan said:
If the estate had any intelligence they'd just release Prince's original versions without additions now. Instead, they'll likely continue fighting among themselves and making tacky novelty items hardly anyone wants. [Edited 5/4/17 6:32am]
Yup. Game over. The wooh is on the one! |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #28 posted 05/04/17 10:25am
laurarichardso n |
luv4u said:
OnlyNDaUsa said:
Deliverance was just played on a Dallas tx radio station 91.7
Somebody gave it to them
Maybe they will get a cease and desist
Would not be surprised if other radio stations start playing it.
Then they all will get cease and desist letters. I love how the radio stations will play this but nothing from his last couple of CDs you know when the money would have went into his hands. |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #29 posted 05/04/17 10:27am
laurarichardso n |
OnlyNDaUsa said:
rdhull said:
ok then..maybe thats what they are trying to do as i said...it may not happen or it may get that far..either way maybe thats what theyre TRYING to do :kanyshrug:
i think the estate will lose in the end. unless there is a contract in the estate's possession or unless the songs are filed for copyright or publishing by Prince... if this guy has the most original source tape he owns it and may very well have full rights to it.
it can boil down to who pressed PLAY on the tape deck.
The estate is stating they do have a contract and that million is only a bond. The estate will get the money back. |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
copyright © 1998-2024 prince.org. all rights reserved.