independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Prince: Music and More > PURPLE DRAIN: UMG-PRINCE DEAL HEADING SOUTH
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 2 of 2 <12
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #30 posted 04/21/17 10:31am

Astasheiks

avatar

charismatic said:

30 million seems like a low figure anyway. They need to hire Michael Jackson's estate management who pulled in nearly billion dollars, unless of course y'all don't think Prince could pull in a billion. Hell Michael Jackson got a 50 million dollar deal in the 90s. Yes, 30 million is low balling.

Thank You! razz biggrin

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #31 posted 04/21/17 4:42pm

NME01

charismatic said:

30 million seems like a low figure anyway.

They need to hire Michael Jackson's estate management who pulled in nearly billion dollars, unless of course y'all don't think Prince could pull in a billion.

Hell Michael Jackson got a 50 million dollar deal in the 90s. Yes, 30 million is low balling.


MJ estate owned 50% of ATV Publishing (look it up). It was worth an absolute fortune. Different league.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #32 posted 04/21/17 11:35pm

jaypotton

NME01 said:

charismatic said:

30 million seems like a low figure anyway.

They need to hire Michael Jackson's estate management who pulled in nearly billion dollars, unless of course y'all don't think Prince could pull in a billion.

Hell Michael Jackson got a 50 million dollar deal in the 90s. Yes, 30 million is low balling.


MJ estate owned 50% of ATV Publishing (look it up). It was worth an absolute fortune. Different league.


Yep that included Most/all of the Lennnon/Mcartney Beatles songs! Totally different league. Buying ATV was what caused Paul McCartney and MJ to fall out and stop being friends because MJ outbid PM.
'I loved him then, I love him now and will love him eternally. He's with our son now.' Mayte 21st April 2016 = the saddest quote I have ever read! RIP Prince and thanks for everything.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #33 posted 04/23/17 6:12am

nonesuch

charismatic said:

30 million seems like a low figure anyway. They need to hire Michael Jackson's estate management who pulled in nearly billion dollars, unless of course y'all don't think Prince could pull in a billion. Hell Michael Jackson got a 50 million dollar deal in the 90s. Yes, 30 million is low balling.

$ 30 million IS A LOT of money for a bunch of special interest-material. The idea of the mass market keenly welcoming the re-release of Prince's catalogue is ludicrous. Even the most brilliant vault-material will never ever provoke interest in people outside the fan-communities we're debating in.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #34 posted 04/23/17 9:18am

luvsexy4all

nonesuch said:

charismatic said:

30 million seems like a low figure anyway. They need to hire Michael Jackson's estate management who pulled in nearly billion dollars, unless of course y'all don't think Prince could pull in a billion. Hell Michael Jackson got a 50 million dollar deal in the 90s. Yes, 30 million is low balling.

$ 30 million IS A LOT of money for a bunch of special interest-material. The idea of the mass market keenly welcoming the re-release of Prince's catalogue is ludicrous. Even the most brilliant vault-material will never ever provoke interest in people outside the fan-communities we're debating in.

thats my theory....however a little ingenuity and theyll recoup all that amd more

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #35 posted 04/23/17 1:31pm

nonesuch

luvsexy4all said:

nonesuch said:

$ 30 million IS A LOT of money for a bunch of special interest-material. The idea of the mass market keenly welcoming the re-release of Prince's catalogue is ludicrous. Even the most brilliant vault-material will never ever provoke interest in people outside the fan-communities we're debating in.

thats my theory....however a little ingenuity and theyll recoup all that amd more

Anyone in charge could recoupe that $ 30 million advance. Let's just hope that it will eventually be done with taste and in style, which I very much doubt unless some from the "old guard" like Alan Leeds or a musician like Questlove is going to be appointed Vaultmeister.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #36 posted 04/23/17 7:11pm

Strive

Does the vault deal also include video? You'd think they'd be able to get big $$$ from Netflix or Amazon for Montreux 2009 & 2013.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #37 posted 04/24/17 11:12am

luvsexy4all

they need a "fan" who has been around long enough to oversee this

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #38 posted 04/25/17 3:24am

MiceElfAgin

.
I think it's about time someone creates a sticky for this forum on music business 101. I don't mean no disrespect, but let's be honest: a lot of people here obviously have no clue what publishing means, how licensing works or how record companies sign artists and put out releases.
.
I just saw people comparing these multimillion-dollar deals when they are comparing apples to oranges. Record deals, publishing deals and licensing deals are entirely different beasts, they cannot be compared.
.

Based on what was reported in the press, the estate obviously did NOT sell the vault for 30 million. Nor did they sell Prince's publishing rights of course. (They have signed a deal with Universal Music Publishing earlier to administer Prince's publishing, but that doesn't mean selling those rights.)
.
The reportedly 30 million dollar deal was signed with Universal Music Group for the licensing rights of the recordings in the vault. It doesn't mean the recordings in the vault were sold for 30 million. It doesn't mean the estate won't make a lot more money on future releases by UMG. This is only about licensing rights. The estate is still the owner of the recordings, but they will license recordings to UMG for future releases – but every time something is released, the estate will still be paid an undisclosed portion (the so-called mechanical royalties) of every single copy UMG sells, and Prince's heirs will still receive their share of Prince's publishing royalties (as well as performance royalties every time a composition is played on radio or TV or performed on stage, for example).
.
So please stop comparing apples to oranges.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #39 posted 04/25/17 10:24am

jaypotton

MiceElfAgin said:

.
I think it's about time someone creates a sticky for this forum on music business 101. I don't mean no disrespect, but let's be honest: a lot of people here obviously have no clue what publishing means, how licensing works or how record companies sign artists and put out releases.
.
I just saw people comparing these multimillion-dollar deals when they are comparing apples to oranges. Record deals, publishing deals and licensing deals are entirely different beasts, they cannot be compared.
.


Based on what was reported in the press, the estate obviously did NOT sell the vault for 30 million. Nor did they sell Prince's publishing rights of course. (They have signed a deal with Universal Music Publishing earlier to administer Prince's publishing, but that doesn't mean selling those rights.)
.
The reportedly 30 million dollar deal was signed with Universal Music Group for the licensing rights of the recordings in the vault. It doesn't mean the recordings in the vault were sold for 30 million. It doesn't mean the estate won't make a lot more money on future releases by UMG. This is only about licensing rights. The estate is still the owner of the recordings, but they will license recordings to UMG for future releases – but every time something is released, the estate will still be paid an undisclosed portion (the so-called mechanical royalties) of every single copy UMG sells, and Prince's heirs will still receive their share of Prince's publishing royalties (as well as performance royalties every time a composition is played on radio or TV or performed on stage, for example).
.
So please stop comparing apples to oranges.



It never changes on here. A music industry 101 is a good idea in theory but most people won't read it same as they don't even bother doing a Google search or look on Wikipedia to find out how things actually work!
[Edited 4/25/17 10:25am]
'I loved him then, I love him now and will love him eternally. He's with our son now.' Mayte 21st April 2016 = the saddest quote I have ever read! RIP Prince and thanks for everything.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #40 posted 04/25/17 6:14pm

laurarichardso
n

jaypotton said:

MiceElfAgin said:

.
I think it's about time someone creates a sticky for this forum on music business 101. I don't mean no disrespect, but let's be honest: a lot of people here obviously have no clue what publishing means, how licensing works or how record companies sign artists and put out releases.
.
I just saw people comparing these multimillion-dollar deals when they are comparing apples to oranges. Record deals, publishing deals and licensing deals are entirely different beasts, they cannot be compared.
.


Based on what was reported in the press, the estate obviously did NOT sell the vault for 30 million. Nor did they sell Prince's publishing rights of course. (They have signed a deal with Universal Music Publishing earlier to administer Prince's publishing, but that doesn't mean selling those rights.)
.
The reportedly 30 million dollar deal was signed with Universal Music Group for the licensing rights of the recordings in the vault. It doesn't mean the recordings in the vault were sold for 30 million. It doesn't mean the estate won't make a lot more money on future releases by UMG. This is only about licensing rights. The estate is still the owner of the recordings, but they will license recordings to UMG for future releases – but every time something is released, the estate will still be paid an undisclosed portion (the so-called mechanical royalties) of every single copy UMG sells, and Prince's heirs will still receive their share of Prince's publishing royalties (as well as performance royalties every time a composition is played on radio or TV or performed on stage, for example).
.
So please stop comparing apples to oranges.



It never changes on here. A music industry 101 is a good idea in theory but most people won't read it same as they don't even bother doing a Google search or look on Wikipedia to find out how things actually work!
[Edited 4/25/17 10:25am]

--Maybe someone can make a sticky to explain the licensing deal.
[Edited 4/25/17 18:15pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #41 posted 05/08/17 1:11am

charismatic

MiceElfAgin said:

.
I think it's about time someone creates a sticky for this forum on music business 101. I don't mean no disrespect, but let's be honest: a lot of people here obviously have no clue what publishing means, how licensing works or how record companies sign artists and put out releases.
.
I just saw people comparing these multimillion-dollar deals when they are comparing apples to oranges. Record deals, publishing deals and licensing deals are entirely different beasts, they cannot be compared.
.


Based on what was reported in the press, the estate obviously did NOT sell the vault for 30 million. Nor did they sell Prince's publishing rights of course. (They have signed a deal with Universal Music Publishing earlier to administer Prince's publishing, but that doesn't mean selling those rights.)
.
The reportedly 30 million dollar deal was signed with Universal Music Group for the licensing rights of the recordings in the vault. It doesn't mean the recordings in the vault were sold for 30 million. It doesn't mean the estate won't make a lot more money on future releases by UMG. This is only about licensing rights. The estate is still the owner of the recordings, but they will license recordings to UMG for future releases – but every time something is released, the estate will still be paid an undisclosed portion (the so-called mechanical royalties) of every single copy UMG sells, and Prince's heirs will still receive their share of Prince's publishing royalties (as well as performance royalties every time a composition is played on radio or TV or performed on stage, for example).
.
So please stop comparing apples to oranges.



I understand Music 101 clearly however the article wasn't clear on exactly what the 30 million deal included or the amount paid to others. I did forget that Michael's deal included his publishing rights to the beatles and others catalogs.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #42 posted 05/08/17 1:54am

LBrent

AnnaSantana said:

leadline said:

It will all come together eventually when the suits get past their ego and greed.

So, it will never come together then.

I agree that it'll all come together...eventually.

After nearly losing the opportunity, I think it's not outside the realm of possibility that WB will making a much larger offer than the original UMG offer was, especially since all industry eyes are watching this go down.

WB is definitely in the spotlight. If they screw over the estate, the entire industry will be remembering what P had been saying all along and watch WB be repositioning themselves negatively through their following actions if they don't act fairly with the estate.

Also, having these things happen brings attention to P's work due to public curiosity. Folks can't help being curious about what the fuss is...and they'll buy up P's stuff and memorabilia out of morbid curiosity. So what?

Some who buy out of curiosity will become loyal fans.

This is gonna cause a fear that folks who've never paid much attention to P won't be able to buy his music, so the reaction will be "I gotta hurry and buy it all now before I miss out!" It's human nature.

And between that buying making P's music chart again...Voila~...It's all publicity.

Don't worry. It may take fans who are already familiar with P's stuff a bit longer to get the pristine stuff or new vault releases, but WB's pride is on the line and they'll act out of not wanting to appear as foolish as they feel.

I'm getting the feeling that P deliberately orchestrated things so that something like this would happen and jam WB up.

wink cool

[Edited 5/8/17 2:00am]

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #43 posted 05/08/17 4:18am

luvgirl

jaypotton said:

NME01 said:



MJ estate owned 50% of ATV Publishing (look it up). It was worth an absolute fortune. Different league.


Yep that included Most/all of the Lennnon/Mcartney Beatles songs! Totally different league. Buying ATV was what caused Paul McCartney and MJ to fall out and stop being friends because MJ outbid PM.



yeahthat
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 2 of 2 <12
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Prince: Music and More > PURPLE DRAIN: UMG-PRINCE DEAL HEADING SOUTH