and true love lives on lollipops and crisps | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
laurarichardson said: rogifan said: What was/is their alternative? Well WSJ report no other companies even got a shot at bidding. So will no what other offers could have been avaliable or if the WB makes any offer moot. It is a giant fuck up and the lawsuits will be flying. Yeah well both Londell and Koppelman went on the record saying that story wasn't accurate. Just because the Wall Street Journal reports it doesn't make it true. I'm not defending anyone here, and that includes Tyka and Omarr. Paisley Park is in your heart
#PrinceForever 💜 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
donnyenglish said:
I am certain that the Universal required a disclosure of any rights to the material. Assuming that no such disclosure was made then they should be able to terminate the contract and get their money back.
Again, this is some amateur stuff on the seller's side? It seems rushed and sloppy. Maybe that is why it was only for $30M. It was an "as is" purchase, but we assumed that related to the contents of the vault. If he had 300 finished albums that were all masterpieces, then they got a great deal. If the vault just has material like unfinished demos, extended stuff, mediocre quality live recordings, outtakes, etc., that only us diehards on this site would purchase, then the deal may be better for the heirs. But, Universal didn't go into this thinking that the rights to 20 years of the vault material that they purchased the rights belonged to someone else.
Matter of time before the heirs file a malpractice lawsuit. This thing is a mess. And with the release of the investigation file on Monday, it is going to be a tough time for fans. I swear, I wish we were in charge. McMillan and Koppelman were interviewed in Billboard when this deal was announced. They made sure it happened right before the Grammys. If Universal ends up terminating this deal it's going to make the two of them look like incompetent buffoons. I have a feeling there's more to the story that we don't know. Paisley Park is in your heart
#PrinceForever 💜 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Universal must didn't want the masters to "Poom Poom" and "Purple & Gold". | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Oh this is perfect.
Prince is Prince even in the after life. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
NewpowerScarfo said: Universal must didn't want the masters to "Poom Poom" and "Purple & Gold". ---- Maybe they want go get what they paid for. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
rogifan said: donnyenglish said:
I am certain that the Universal required a disclosure of any rights to the material. Assuming that no such disclosure was made then they should be able to terminate the contract and get their money back.
Again, this is some amateur stuff on the seller's side? It seems rushed and sloppy. Maybe that is why it was only for $30M. It was an "as is" purchase, but we assumed that related to the contents of the vault. If he had 300 finished albums that were all masterpieces, then they got a great deal. If the vault just has material like unfinished demos, extended stuff, mediocre quality live recordings, outtakes, etc., that only us diehards on this site would purchase, then the deal may be better for the heirs. But, Universal didn't go into this thinking that the rights to 20 years of the vault material that they purchased the rights belonged to someone else.
Matter of time before the heirs file a malpractice lawsuit. This thing is a mess. And with the release of the investigation file on Monday, it is going to be a tough time for fans. I swear, I wish we were in charge. McMillan and Koppelman were interviewed in Billboard when this deal was announced. They made sure it happened right before the Grammys. If Universal ends up terminating this deal it's going to make the two of them look like incompetent buffoons. I have a feeling there's more to the story that we don't know. ____ Do you think a company like UMG is going ask for their money back for no reason? Something is wrong with this deal. Anyone know matter of what their background can be crooked and Londell had problems when he worked for the Jacksons and he offered Tkya a 10 million dollar low cost loan and was stupid enough to put it in writing. I am not so sure how much Koppelman was involved he could be clueless. All I know is that for years everyone said Prince was paranoid and controlling maybe he knew their were crooks looking to steal. he Jackson | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
That's assuming they had an clue on what exactly they're paying for. Clearly there was miscommunication. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
How can the record company own the music that is in his personal vault????? I totally do not understand that!! He never released it. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Misty48 said: How can the record company own the music that is in his personal vault????? I totally do not understand that!! He never released it. I think when he signed his deal with WB to get back the masters a part of the deal was that WB would get the right to license out the material. WB is going to put out greatest hits, remaster the WB albums, put out box sets, and take care of the marketing and promotion. Basically he had to give up some control to the master tapes and realize that putting out the vault material would require a outlay of cash with no gurranteed of a profit. I think he thought that working WB would be a good way to get the music out. According to the media report the rights that WB have internationaly are forever. Media reports said that the deal domestically would end in 2018. Now I am thinking that is not true and the WB deal domestically may forever as well. If this true it means Prince's wish will be honored no matter what greedy lawyers, sibs, probate court, or greedy ass ex-mangers have to say. We see soon enough to what happened but I think Prince got the last laugh. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
What company would pay $30 million without doing their due dilligence first? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Misty48 said: How can the record company own the music that is in his personal vault????? I totally do not understand that!! He never released it. Thought Prince used to say when you are under contract all the music an artist makes is owned by that record company. Someone correct me if that's not it.. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
rogifan said: laurarichardson said: Well WSJ report no other companies even got a shot at bidding. So will no what other offers could have been avaliable or if the WB makes any offer moot. It is a giant fuck up and the lawsuits will be flying. Yeah well both Londell and Koppelman went on the record saying that story wasn't accurate. Just because the Wall Street Journal reports it doesn't make it true. I'm not defending anyone here, and that includes Tyka and Omarr. The fact that WB owns distribution right to Prince's back catalogue is a common industry practice that is in almost everyone's contract, so I don't understand how verifying that these songs weren't recorded during a contract period wasn't the first thing Universal did. That sounds like a major rookie mistake which means it likely didn't happen the way it's being told. The thing is Prince worked, and was basically, creatively owned by WB so anything he produced during the contract period, whether it was released or not, is owned by WB if that material is ever sold publicly. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Prince traded the non-US rights to his albums forever along with giving Warner to right to block any pre-1995 vault release so he could get his masters back? -edit What a mess. I can't believe he gave up the rights to Purple Rain and Parade in perpetuity.
[Edited 4/15/17 10:25am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Look on the bright side, if the Purple Rain deluxe actually pans out, we might get one for Parade too, most likely long before the estate gets it's house in order. Paisley Park is in your heart - Love Is Here! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
charismatic said: rogifan said: Yeah well both Londell and Koppelman went on the record saying that story wasn't accurate. Just because the Wall Street Journal reports it doesn't make it true. I'm not defending anyone here, and that includes Tyka and Omarr. The fact that WB owns distribution right to Prince's back catalogue is a common industry practice that is in almost everyone's contract, so I don't understand how verifying that these songs weren't recorded during a contract period wasn't the first thing Universal did. That sounds like a major rookie mistake which means it likely didn't happen the way it's being told. The thing is Prince worked, and was basically, creatively owned by WB so anything he produced during the contract period, whether it was released or not, is owned by WB if that material is ever sold publicly. This is what I don't get and why I have a hard time treating Universal as the victim here. Even if Londell and Koppelman were totally incompetent or attempting something shady for personal financial gain how does Universal not do the proper due diligence to make sure they know what they're getting? Paisley Park is in your heart
#PrinceForever 💜 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I was wondering the same thing after I read this portion of the article in Variety
"The problem, sources say, may lie in the complexity of Prince’s 2014 deal with Warner. That deal, negotiated by Warner Bros. Records chairman/CEO Cameron Strang, was struck as the rights to albums from Prince’s Warner catalog were becoming eligible to revert to him. (A 1976 revision to U.S. copyright law allows creators of intellectual property to reclaim ownership 35 years after a work is first released or published; the first of Prince’s 18 albums for the label was released in 1978.) The 2014 deal, for which Prince was represented by attorney and CNN commentator Van Jones, had different terms for certain albums: Warner retained the rights to soundtrack albums to Warner Bros. films — including Prince’s biggest-selling albums, “Purple Rain,” “Parade,” and “Batman “– in perpetuity"
Sorry if this was discussed previously, but why (speculation I know) would P agree to permitting WB to retain the rights to those albums given that he could have gotten the rights to Purple Rain in about 5 more years (i.e. if it was released in 1984, 35 years after would have been 2019). | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I don't understand it either.
Ok, I don’t know anything about the music industry. Does it saythat Prince himself gave up (licensed all use) all control to all his music to WB internationally? As in the entire world except for domestically? Forever???? And Prince gave up rights to the albums listed above? And the vault stuff recoreded while at WB?
What did Prince get out of this?
Sorry to be dense, I just don’t understand. Please give me the Prince WP licensing for dummies version. thank you. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Wow, that is quite a deal if WB did get the right to block any pre-1995 release from the vault! That's HUGE. But I guess it depend on how much was written/there from 1995-2016. That's another two decades after all - and those which included some tumultuous times for him. I imagine there were lots of writing through them.
I just wish someone who could properly manager these type of affairs was at the helm so that all parties are handled correctly and so that Paisley Park is left on positive ground. And so the items that are there are finally shared with us fans who would cherish it Dance where y'are, just groove y'all.
Commemorative Guitar Picks, Buttons & Magnets - check Marketplace 4 info | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
What the holy fuck.. THIS STINKS... Prince 4Ever. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I gotta hand it to you Laura..You are one smart cookie..
U THink like Prince.. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
In other words The estate tried to sell, something that actualy belonged with Warners all along ? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
His Genius continues..
Its a canny move on his behalf because it also guaratnees that his Music will be well circulated
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Guarantee that his music will be circulated
Warners have control of it, and you can be dam sure they will try and make as mouch money as they can.. And what will Prince get ?
More Fame,
and the fortune ?
Final Gift to warners,
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Let's not be too harsh on the estate. [Edited 4/16/17 7:51am] The Colors R brighter, the Bond is much tighter
No Child's a failure Until the Blue Sailboat sails him away from his dreams Don't Ever Lose, Don't Ever Lose Don't Ever Lose Your Dreams | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
bonatoc said: Let's not be too harsh on the estate. [Edited 4/16/17 7:51am] --This actually sounds like a good idea. At this fans and collectors could do a better job of getting the music out. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Asenath0607 said:
I was wondering the same thing after I read this portion of the article in Variety
"The problem, sources say, may lie in the complexity of Prince’s 2014 deal with Warner. That deal, negotiated by Warner Bros. Records chairman/CEO Cameron Strang, was struck as the rights to albums from Prince’s Warner catalog were becoming eligible to revert to him. (A 1976 revision to U.S. copyright law allows creators of intellectual property to reclaim ownership 35 years after a work is first released or published; the first of Prince’s 18 albums for the label was released in 1978.) The 2014 deal, for which Prince was represented by attorney and CNN commentator Van Jones, had different terms for certain albums: Warner retained the rights to soundtrack albums to Warner Bros. films — including Prince’s biggest-selling albums, “Purple Rain,” “Parade,” and “Batman “– in perpetuity"
Sorry if this was discussed previously, but why (speculation I know) would P agree to permitting WB to retain the rights to those albums given that he could have gotten the rights to Purple Rain in about 5 more years (i.e. if it was released in 1984, 35 years after would have been 2019). By rights do they mean licensing or master tapes. If it is licensing then he made have had no choice since he wanted the master tapes. Sometimes you have to give up something to something. Anyway it means his wishes will be honored. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I wonder if the time he made the deal with WB was along the line of time Tyka said he told her he did what all he was meant to do (paraphrasing I don't remember word for word). Dance where y'are, just groove y'all.
Commemorative Guitar Picks, Buttons & Magnets - check Marketplace 4 info | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
is the label going to write 'slave' across their emblem? "Climb in my fur." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |