I was being sarcastic BOB4theFUNK | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I don't understand the OPs point. A song like "Jughead" is very very bad, shockingly bad, not just bad for Prince. He got embarrassing, quick. A lot of Grafitti Bridge is embarrassing. "Pope", from 93, is hard to listen to. Again, not "this music is worse than Purple Rain", but "I will now pretend this awful music doesn't exist".
. and "la la la he he hee (highly explosive)" is amazing. [Edited 4/2/17 15:27pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
So are you insinuating that every single song he did in the 90's was the equivalent of Jughead, The Pope and the Graffiti Bridge song. Because also on the Graffiti Bridge album are the question of u", "Joy in Repetition" and "Thieves in the Temple"--all Prince staples that he played constantly live. So, we are too chicken shit to peruse through songs like the Pope to get to the good songs. He was human. He wasn't perfect..but la la la he he hee is no masterpiece in my opinon even if it is not as embarrassing as Jughead.
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
rusty1 said: purplerabbithole said: Thanks Rusty for doing exactly what I disagree with. Giving individual songs the benefit of the doubt as long as they are from the 80's while judging albums in their entirety for the later periods.
No one said he was hitting on all cylinders or that he hadn't lost his way in some ways later in his career, but I would much rather listen to Black Sweat (the electro-funk single he released from 3121 that you hate) than la la he he hee (with its dog barking) or Better stop messing around from the 80's.
I am exposing my kids to Prince music (somewhat carefully because it is dirty). they are very young so their likes/loves are instinctic/pure rather than rooted in narrative or stupid name change/symbols. My daughter loves Black Sweat (she's nine). She can stand Cream (even though she doesn't get it at all.) Music is subjective obviously but perhaps because we know its subjective, we should acknowledge that 30 years of music should be given some respect and people should at least attempt to give P the benefit of the doubt for each individual song.
BTW, my daughter also loves the song "LOVE". I mean really really loves it. My son can't stand Girls and Boys but loves most of everything else from Prince--especially Delirious. Taste is obviously subjective no matter what period it comes from.
By the way, who cares why Prince released Come or Chaos and Disorder. If you like songs like "DarK" or "I like it there" or "Dinner for Delores"..that's what matters. I too dislike New Power Soul but I find strengths in the other two albums.
[Edited 4/2/17 12:40pm] [Edited 4/2/17 12:41pm] The bottom line is his 80's era is why Prince is a legend. He did nothing great after 1988. He could do no wrong & had no filler albums, During his heyday. The people on this site are unreal. Ok everything Prince did was great Boy, did i take sh*t the other night for making similar observations, tho I probably have a bit more love for his later work than rusty1 does. He makes some very good points tho and I tend to agree. Some of his 90's music is right up there in my mind with his 80's work, or could have been with a bit more focus rather than slapping a record together with no rhyme or reason. He could have been a bit more choosey, and we still would have gotten plenty of new music from him on the regular. It's important to add tho that he did things his way and as long as he was happy with the way things turned out who am I to disagree? It doesn't pay to waste energy getting mad at critics who point out that some of his stuff he released wasn't that great. That's their opinion and we need to respect that just like we need to respect the way he did things even if we don't think they were the best career decisions or whatever. However you feel about his musical output is right. There is no wrong. Enjoy what you enjoy and dont get angry if others dont enjoy the same things. [Edited 4/2/17 17:11pm] It's a hurtful place, the world, in and of itself. We don't need to add to it. We all need one another. ~ PRN | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I'm not going to lie though, the interviews and performances with the veil over his face was entertaining and hilarious. Now that slave shit on his face made me cringe because this was during the golden gangsta rap era and I was like lawd Mr. Nelson please don't do nothing crazy and also remember that OJ Simpson shit was going on to and the tension was so high during 1990-1997 you can wear hit or cut it with a knife. But back on subject every new artist is accepted during their prime and unfortunately leave their prime due to now being the public eye. Trust me you can hire all the security you want if your name sells TMZ kind of people will get you by all means necessary. So instead of having that freedom to be focus completely on your art you are busy jingling two different lifestyles your celebrity ego lifestyle, and your personal lifestyle. Whereas you only worried about your artistry and making it out the ghetto which was your personal lifestyle. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
No, I'm not insinuating that. I think I get your point; to reclaim 90s Prince from people who think it's all shit? Well, their loss: of course there's tons of good stuff in the 90s. But I also don't think critical perception of the decade is that far off the mark, or in need of reevaluating, with the possible exception of "come". Most albums have a few good ones, a few bad ones, and a few in the middle. It results in what we've got: a lukewarm appreciation. . This is why I think the fan compilation "the dawn 4.1" is so essential. It rescues the best songs from 93 - 96, and presents them on one 3 disk album. purplerabbithole said: So are you insinuating that every single song he did in the 90's was the equivalent of Jughead, The Pope and the Graffiti Bridge song. Because also on the Graffiti Bridge album are the question of u", "Joy in Repetition" and "Thieves in the Temple"--all Prince staples that he played constantly live. So, we are too chicken shit to peruse through songs like the Pope to get to the good songs. He was human. He wasn't perfect..but la la la he he hee is no masterpiece in my opinon even if it is not as embarrassing as Jughead.
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Sorry to split hairs (and also sound like a broken record), but several posts were characterizing not just the '90s, but 1989 - 2016.
As far as the Come album goes, I'm also one of those who thinks there's some great stuff on there. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Damn, I'm really old...I've forgotten more about this debate than I care to remember. Imma just oil down with some Bengay or some IcyHot and let y'all young folks duke it out. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
[Edited 4/3/17 12:06pm] [Edited 4/3/17 12:07pm] The Colors R brighter, the Bond is much tighter
No Child's a failure Until the Blue Sailboat sails him away from his dreams Don't Ever Lose, Don't Ever Lose Don't Ever Lose Your Dreams | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
^ You do know that Hide the Bone isn't a Prince/ Artist original, right? I see your point about P trying to get away from his image, but he wasn't exactly moving forward in those years. He went back to the music of his youth, playing Graham Central Station, Santana and Sly & the Family Stone covers. I didn't have any problem with that, I love that music, but it also meant that P's mid 90s music was nowhere near as original as his 80s music.
[Edited 4/3/17 14:19pm] [Edited 4/3/17 14:21pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
He has some great songs after the eighties, the eighties it's not the end of everything. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
[Edited 4/3/17 16:57pm] The Colors R brighter, the Bond is much tighter
No Child's a failure Until the Blue Sailboat sails him away from his dreams Don't Ever Lose, Don't Ever Lose Don't Ever Lose Your Dreams | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
People look through roase colored glasses.
IMO ATWIAD was a horrible album with three good songs and three good B-sides.
Another thing that folk tend to forget is that Prince's classic albums outside of Purple Rain and 1999 didn't sell.SOTT which is his GOAT album didn't sell. Lovesexy really didn't sell. Parade didn't sell.
Also Prince's music is like wine in may ways it gets better with age. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Going to have to mainly disagree with you on this.
That 80s period was certainly when he was trailblazing (although it wasn't ALL amazing). His later work had some exceptional stuff in it. If you were to consider only his work from the last couple of decades of his career, he would still be considered an exceptional artist, just not the all-time great that the first decade makes him. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
tired of this crap...some of the BEST artists have 5 years of "quality" material in them....he had 2 decades..shut the F up already [Edited 4/3/17 18:33pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
BINGO
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
gandorb said:
That was exactly my point. The 1978 to 88 period made him a legend BOB4theFUNK | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
But wasn't your point also that he stopped making great music after that period? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I am probably on the younger end of the Prince demographic as I did not become a huge fan until ~1997. The best way I know to put it is the proportion of songs written prior to 93 blow me away as opposed to post 93. He has some good songs after 93. But after 93 the cringe worthy to amazing songs certainly swing toward cringeworthy. It has to do with hunger and age. All artists hit a peak. I accept that. Also, many songs that were considered amazing in the 90s were actually written in that peak period (i.e Joy in Repetition). It happens with many artists. Stevie Wonder, Paul McCartney are two that come to mind. It takes nothing away from Prince. I still consider him the greatest of all time even though I don't consider anything he did after I became a huge fan as good as some stuff he created in the 80s. This is especially true for casual fans. Very little of the stuff in his latter career hits that amazing nerve, where as many of the songs in the 80s did. IMO | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Thank you purplerabbithole for starting this discussion. I read article after article where someone says something like "Prince was a singular artist. Just listen to 1999, When Doves Cry, or Adore", as if post-1988 didn't exist. I think the 1989-2016 period was full of incredible music and is ripe for exploration. My way of engaging with this was to start a discussion thread about a sequel to The Hits / The B-Sides, a compilation covering 1994-2015 (http://prince.org/msg/7/440468). Best Of discs from this period are incredible listens. . There's a stunning amount of fantastic music and entire albums from post 1988. Constantly comparing it to the 80s output makes the experience less enjoyable and prevents us enjoying the music on its own merits, rather than, for instance, disliking Dolphin because it's not Computer Blue. Because the post-1994 music isn't as popular and overplayed I actually listen to it much more than the 80s stuff (which is still mindblowing of course). . One exciting possibility is that someone going through the post-1988 vault will have the time (unlike Prince who worked at breakneck speed) to make better song choices and produce better compilations than Prince did. Even already released tracks might be reworked into new and superior compilations. For instance, maybe there's a whole album of 1996-era gems that I Like It There might better fit into than Chaos And Disorder. [Edited 4/4/17 11:01am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I dont' think there can be a discussion about Prince after the 80s without a parallel discussion about his record contract(s) and battles. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
luvsexy4all said: tired of this crap...some of the BEST artists have 5 years of "quality" material in them....he had 2 decades..shut the F up already [Edited 4/3/17 18:33pm] 1979 to 88 was quality material.. It was touch & go the rest of his career. Many albums had filler material & much more half baked ideas. It wasn't as if Prince put out 7 solid albums In a row in the 1990's or the 2000's. Let's be objective here. Two decades of quality material? I think that's reaching a bit BOB4theFUNK | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
lrpro said: I am probably on the younger end of the Prince demographic as I did not become a huge fan until ~1997. The best way I know to put it is the proportion of songs written prior to 93 blow me away as opposed to post 93. He has some good songs after 93. But after 93 the cringe worthy to amazing songs certainly swing toward cringeworthy. It has to do with hunger and age. All artists hit a peak. I accept that. Also, many songs that were considered amazing in the 90s were actually written in that peak period (i.e Joy in Repetition). It happens with many artists. Stevie Wonder, Paul McCartney are two that come to mind. It takes nothing away from Prince. I still consider him the greatest of all time even though I don't consider anything he did after I became a huge fan as good as some stuff he created in the 80s. This is especially true for casual fans. Very little of the stuff in his latter career hits that amazing nerve, where as many of the songs in the 80s did. IMO Agree 100% Elton john had his window of greatness Billy Joel etc. There's that connection for that 8 to 10 yr period. Then the music still might be good at times But no longer classic BOB4theFUNK | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Prince ended up with his own unique music, in the 80's. "The Minneapolis Sound" that put Minnesota on the map. Prince was chasing other styles & trends around 1991 or so. He didn't connect with the musical Audience on the same level, For the rest of his career. Two months before Prince died, i told a good friend that i really liked Prince. His response was " he hasn't been relevant in years". Let's be fair here. Prince's last sucessful release was "Diamonds & Pearls". "Get Off" had descent success. "Cream" went to #1 on the charts etc. It sold 3 million in the US as well. But the huge negative of that was having an awful rapper in the band. Then the symbol album used more of Tony M's rapping & struggled to sell 1 million. After the name change, Prince became slowly Less relevant to the general public. BOB4theFUNK | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
gubbins4ever said: Thank you purplerabbithole for starting this discussion. I read article after article where someone says something like "Prince was a singular artist. Just listen to 1999, When Doves Cry, or Adore", as if post-1988 didn't exist. I think the 1989-2016 period was full of incredible music and is ripe for exploration. My way of engaging with this was to start a discussion thread about a sequel to The Hits / The B-Sides, a compilation covering 1994-2015 (http://prince.org/msg/7/440468). Best Of discs from this period are incredible listens. . There's a stunning amount of fantastic music and entire albums from post 1988. Constantly comparing it to the 80s output makes the experience less enjoyable and prevents us enjoying the music on its own merits, rather than, for instance, disliking Dolphin because it's not Computer Blue. Because the post-1994 music isn't as popular and overplayed I actually listen to it much more than the 80s stuff (which is still mindblowing of course). . One exciting possibility is that someone going through the post-1988 vault will have the time (unlike Prince who worked at breakneck speed) to make better song choices and produce better compilations than Prince did. Even already released tracks might be reworked into new and superior compilations. For instance, maybe there's a whole album of 1996-era gems that I Like It There might better fit into than Chaos And Disorder. [Edited 4/4/17 11:01am] That the general public didn't care about at all. Especially from 1994 on. He couldn't sell 1 million albums from that point on. TGE might've sold 500,000? Release after release, albums falling out of the Top 200 very quickly. BOB4theFUNK | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
How to best study Prince's post-80s musical creations? With good cocktails, fun companions, maybe some incense and pillows, your favorite mood-lighting, and a nice bite to eat. That'd do nicely.
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Hit it right out the box. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
He certainly did. Maybe not full albums but a LOT of individual tracks are on par with anything he did on Purple Rain or SOTT. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |