Reply #30 posted 03/29/17 6:47am
rogifan |
donnyenglish said: rogifan said: Who is leaking this to the WSJ and how do we know it's true? I'm not suggesting the WSJ is making it up but Londell and Koppelman are the only ones going on record about this stuff. Everything else is from anonymous sources. So are members of the family leaking this and do we trust they're telling the whole & accurate story? Why is it that only Londell and Koppelman will go on record?
If this were another mees source I would question it. But the WSJ is not fakw news and does their research before reporting. I'm not questioning what they reported, I'm talking about who leaked it and why. I doubt the WSJ really knows the inner workings of how these deals went down. Like I said if Londell and Charles Koppelman got a cut of these deals it would be in their interested to make the best deal possible. And they're the only ones going on record. I tend to trust named sources more than unnamed. Paisley Park is in your heart
#PrinceForever 💜 |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #31 posted 03/29/17 7:47am
DarkKnight1
|
luvsexy4all said:
people wont even buy his hits...they gonna buy unreleased songs??? only freaks on THIS site will
You mustve missed all of last year....... (Insert something clever here) |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #32 posted 03/29/17 8:15am
Genesia |
jjam said:
Bear in mind that this is a licensing deal.
There is not as much money in reissues as you'd think, having been involved in some behind the scenes. People just don't buy physical product as much as they used to. So $30 million's not that bad, and sounds about right.
Exactly. Nobody bought the vault for $30 million - they bought the licensing. This isn't just about Prince's recordings - it's about recordings that will (potentially) be made by others and about the use of vault material for other purposes. We don’t mourn artists because we knew them. We mourn them because they helped us know ourselves. |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #33 posted 03/29/17 9:21am
jcurley |
sonshine said: luvsexy4all said: people wont even buy his hits...they gonna buy unreleased songs??? only freaks on THIS site will This is my concern/fear. I dont think its a slam dunk that vault releases are going to gain him a lot of new fans. All of us here of course want more of his music and will likely gobble it up. Because we are already familiar with his genius thanks to years in the trenches being Prince fans, and while it was all happening in real time. We got to see the corresponding music videos and the live performances of his music that we owned. New fans arent going to have that important piece of the total experience. I think for new and maybe especially younger listeners they need that visual reinforcement if that makes sense? Personally over the years there have been songs i was just meh about. But then you see a live version that just blows your mind and suddenly that song gets deeper appreciation. (Sorry if this strayed too far off topic but it's something ive been thinking about more as we see baby steps in progress towards vault releases.) I understand what you're saying. However I think with proper marketing Prince could sell shit loads. I feel guilty saying it but Prince was the biggest negator of commercial success. However much I respect his standpoint. If proper people get involved this could be a revelation. There is so much archived imagery of Prince to release with new music God look at songs like Open Book... Without mr arsey around ,people may just let them flow over them. |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #34 posted 03/29/17 1:14pm
Se7en
|
$30 Million is a lot of money, especially considering that a lot of what's in there is "speculation".
Add to that a possibility of tape deterioration, the risk is a bit higher.
I don't think it would cost "millions" to salvage the music that is salvagable and bring it up to a releasable condition. You could hire a dedicated team of sound engineers who did nothing but this day in, day out. How much do they cost? |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #35 posted 03/29/17 1:27pm
klick2me |
Genesia said:
jjam said:
Bear in mind that this is a licensing deal.
There is not as much money in reissues as you'd think, having been involved in some behind the scenes. People just don't buy physical product as much as they used to. So $30 million's not that bad, and sounds about right.
Exactly. Nobody bought the vault for $30 million - they bought the licensing. This isn't just about Prince's recordings - it's about recordings that will (potentially) be made by others and about the use of vault material for other purposes.
Does anyone see what these two ppl have said? Thank you for clarifying this. But will it calm the masses? Good God. klick |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #36 posted 03/29/17 3:33pm
Reply #37 posted 03/29/17 7:54pm
crimesofparis |
morningsong said:
Billboard offered $40mil, JayZ offered $35mil, so somebody had access to bidding. But they settled on $30mil? Some information has to missing in this.
Money isn't everything when it comes to these deals. Just like how you might be the high bidder for a house but lose to someone who foregoes an inspection. Who knows what else sweetened the deal -- it could have been anything. Maybe they had the most favored plan for how the vault material would be treated and promoted. |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #38 posted 03/29/17 8:00pm
crimesofparis |
jjam said:
Bear in mind that this is a licensing deal.
There is not as much money in reissues as you'd think, having been involved in some behind the scenes. People just don't buy physical product as much as they used to. So $30 million's not that bad, and sounds about right.
You're totally right. That's what, 10-15% of his entire estimated estate? Hell, the deal Warner Bros gave him when he was near the height of his fame could have been worth something like $100 million, and that was when people still bought records and when he could still actively promote his own music via touring, etc. $30mil is a hefty sum of money for a product whose true demand is relatively unknown. |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #39 posted 03/30/17 2:45am
BartVanHemelen |
laurarichardson said:
luvsexy4all said:
wheres the real value?? he doesnt have that many rich fans who will pay for everything...
--Speak for yourself.
.
Yes, let's pretend there weren't massive business failures, e.g. that super-expensive book that nobody bought or that Prince's final album was originally only offered through amateur fan-run websites. Clearly indicative of the many millionaires that were heavy Prince fans willing to invest lots of their capital. © Bart Van Hemelen
This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties, and confers no rights.
It is not authorized by Prince or the NPG Music Club. You assume all risk for
your use. All rights reserved. |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #40 posted 03/30/17 2:51am
BartVanHemelen |
Se7en said:
I don't think it would cost "millions" to salvage the music that is salvagable and bring it up to a releasable condition. You could hire a dedicated team of sound engineers who did nothing but this day in, day out. How much do they cost?
.
They cost a lot. Just read http://www.superdeluxeedi...cbs-years/ for an example of the work involved. And then realise that video is even costlier and less profitable.
.
The first task was to compile at list of everything to transfer from the original tapes to digital, for listening/reviewing purposes. I spent quite a few weeks going through the archive reports with a fine tooth comb and highlighting anything that looked promising and I came back with a LONG list. This is where the commercial realities of a project like this kick in. The cost of transferring everything was deemed too expensive and I was asked to prioritise. This was probably the hardest part of the project. Tapes that almost certainly had something of interest on them were put in an ‘A-list’, while others which perhaps had vague or ambiguous labelling – but still might have contained gems – were in the B and C lists. There was also a lot of unreleased live material in the C-list. I had a suspicion that we’d only transfer what was in the A-list and so it turned out. Anything unreleased on the four-CD set would come from these transfers.
. © Bart Van Hemelen
This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties, and confers no rights.
It is not authorized by Prince or the NPG Music Club. You assume all risk for
your use. All rights reserved. |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #41 posted 03/30/17 2:53am
BartVanHemelen |
crimesofparis said:
Hell, the deal Warner Bros gave him when he was near the height of his fame could have been worth something like $100 million
.
That was a number Prince invented by adding up all kinds of figures he was unlikely to ever get, in order to present his deal as "the biggest deal ever". See also: http://musicfans.stackexc...m/a/89/129 . © Bart Van Hemelen
This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties, and confers no rights.
It is not authorized by Prince or the NPG Music Club. You assume all risk for
your use. All rights reserved. |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #42 posted 03/30/17 2:49pm
precioux |
Going from memory, wasn't the deal hinged on minimum sales of 5million copies sold per album and then and only then he would receive 10 million per album, but he was only selling maybe 250k copies per album?(10 albums/500 million copies=$100 million..pretty sure that was the deal?)
BartVanHemelen said:
crimesofparis said:
Hell, the deal Warner Bros gave him when he was near the height of his fame could have been worth something like $100 million
.
That was a number Prince invented by adding up all kinds of figures he was unlikely to ever get, in order to present his deal as "the biggest deal ever". See also: http://musicfans.stackexc...m/a/89/129 . [Edited 3/30/17 14:52pm] |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #43 posted 03/30/17 3:03pm
jjam |
BartVanHemelen said:
Se7en said:
I don't think it would cost "millions" to salvage the music that is salvagable and bring it up to a releasable condition. You could hire a dedicated team of sound engineers who did nothing but this day in, day out. How much do they cost?
.
They cost a lot. Just read http://www.superdeluxeedi...cbs-years/ for an example of the work involved. And then realise that video is even costlier and less profitable.
.
The first task was to compile at list of everything to transfer from the original tapes to digital, for listening/reviewing purposes. I spent quite a few weeks going through the archive reports with a fine tooth comb and highlighting anything that looked promising and I came back with a LONG list. This is where the commercial realities of a project like this kick in. The cost of transferring everything was deemed too expensive and I was asked to prioritise. This was probably the hardest part of the project. Tapes that almost certainly had something of interest on them were put in an ‘A-list’, while others which perhaps had vague or ambiguous labelling – but still might have contained gems – were in the B and C lists. There was also a lot of unreleased live material in the C-list. I had a suspicion that we’d only transfer what was in the A-list and so it turned out. Anything unreleased on the four-CD set would come from these transfers.
.
That's a case of being deemed too expensive in terms of the budget allocated for this particular project and the projected profit that would be made from the Tomb Of Memories box set - this is Paul Young we're talking about, not Prince.
I would expect that most of what's in the vault has already been transferred - for example, I have previously mentioned how the multis for his albums in the early 2000s were transferred digitally. |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #44 posted 03/30/17 4:07pm
morningsong |
crimesofparis said:
morningsong said:
Billboard offered $40mil, JayZ offered $35mil, so somebody had access to bidding. But they settled on $30mil? Some information has to missing in this.
Money isn't everything when it comes to these deals. Just like how you might be the high bidder for a house but lose to someone who foregoes an inspection. Who knows what else sweetened the deal -- it could have been anything. Maybe they had the most favored plan for how the vault material would be treated and promoted.
I'm just basing it on all the hubbub a few months ago when folks were tweeting they wouldn't do this or that. A lot of smoke screening it looks like to me. But at the end of the day it really isn't my business and not a thing I could do about it. It just goes to the fact that reading a bunch of cyptic tweets is pretty much a waste of time since there is no true information ever trickling our way.
|
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #45 posted 03/31/17 12:20pm
luvsexy4all |
BartVanHemelen said:
laurarichardson said:
luvsexy4all said: --Speak for yourself.
.
Yes, let's pretend there weren't massive business failures, e.g. that super-expensive book that nobody bought or that Prince's final album was originally only offered through amateur fan-run websites. Clearly indicative of the many millionaires that were heavy Prince fans willing to invest lots of their capital.
should i feel honored that bart stood up for me? |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #46 posted 04/01/17 12:33am
sro100 |
BartVanHemelen said:
crimesofparis said:
Hell, the deal Warner Bros gave him when he was near the height of his fame could have been worth something like $100 million
.
That was a number Prince invented by adding up all kinds of figures he was unlikely to ever get, in order to present his deal as "the biggest deal ever". See also: http://musicfans.stackexc...m/a/89/129 .
[Snip - luv4u] |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #47 posted 04/01/17 5:08am
Guitarhero |
sro100 said:
BartVanHemelen said:
.
That was a number Prince invented by adding up all kinds of figures he was unlikely to ever get, in order to present his deal as "the biggest deal ever". See also: http://musicfans.stackexc...m/a/89/129 .
[Snip - luv4u]
[Snip - luv4u] |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #48 posted 04/01/17 7:14am
milesb
|
This might be selfish, but makes no difference to as long as I get to enjoy the music My password is what |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #49 posted 04/01/17 2:46pm
TrivialPursuit
|
Guitarhero said:
sro100 said:
[Snip - luv4u]
[Snip - luv4u]
Bart's favorite Prince song is "Graffiti Bridge". His favorite album is Larry Graham's GCS2000.
Sorry, it's the Hodgkin's talking. |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #50 posted 04/01/17 9:10pm
Lovejunky |
TrivialPursuit said:
Guitarhero said:
[Snip - luv4u]
Bart's favorite Prince song is "Graffiti Bridge". His favorite album is Larry Graham's GCS2000.
awwwwwwwwww.....
That Makes Perfect sense
Everybody wants to find graffiti bridge Something to believe in, a reason to believe that there's a heaven above Everybody wants to find graffiti bridge Everybody's looking for love |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
copyright © 1998-2024 prince.org. all rights reserved.