In my opinion Prince was Religious and Political. Religoins are intensely political. Politics is not a dirty word. Clunky as it is, it's the way people decide how to proceed as a group. - I love the song Baltimore and feel it is a shining example of his response to community and his legacy to us. Brand new boogie without the hero. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
The Jehovah's Witnesses are not. Which is why most nations they were a part of persecuted them. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
One side of my family came to the US because the Pope was killing them all. They were Mennonite Amish, there are none left in Europe. They do not believe in bearing arms. That is a very political stance. Brand new boogie without the hero. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
purplepoppy said: One side of my family came to the US because the Pope was killing them all. They were Mennonite Amish, there are none left in Europe. They do not believe in bearing arms. That is a very political stance. PP you're family history sounds very interesting. It seems they were pacifists. I love that because our last few posts made me think of how MLK was. He was very aware of what was going on societally including politically, but his was a mission of peace and unity. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
the whole persecuation of the Mennonites / Amish was one of 'religious' denominational doctrine. They were extremely big on seperation from the State. . The stance can only be defined from the standpoint of the person making the stance is coming from. That would be their hearts intentions. Some people 'do not believe in bearing arms' based directly on political reasons. Others from religioius/spiritual. And of course we all live in a world where politics is all around us. But that doesn't mean a person lives a political life, or politically charged life.
.
Not bearing arms for many also is about fear, internal issues of violence etc The Mennonite Amish belief in not bearing arms is hardly political. Because regular people do not have to bear arms. Their belief in not bearing arms existed whether or not the state expected anyone to bear arms ie military. Are the Amish political in that they do not want to use electricity... The stance can only be defined from the standpoint of the person making the stance, is coming from. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
That does seem to be the way of the org...and not just on this thread. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
uh, my gifs are responding to:Politics does not divide people anymore than celebrating life does . that's why purplepoppy got the face, POLITICS DOES NOT DIVIDE PEOPLE? Seriously?? Look at what is happening right now in the country:USA. Are U 2 so intent on disagreeing that you believe that? Purplepoppy, in the othe thread you equated what the Pope/Catholic church was doing to the Mennonites was political... so you don't think what the pope was doing was divisive? So it was equal to celebrating life?
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I didn't read purplepoppy's comments about being "judge and juror" as having to do with your LSA-ish face GIFs. I think it is a continuation of his/her "dictatorship" on the org observation. Specifically, it has to do with, on the one hand, participating in a debate, while, at the same time, purportedly acting as a moderator. And then turning around, as the "moderator," and snipping comments that you don't like because they show up the fatal flaws in your argument. I've never seen anything like it. [Edited 2/11/17 10:15am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
U R opening a door you won't be able to close... If people cannot handle a disagreement in a debate... look up strawmen. People usually do that when they get frustrated in a debate... And my name isn't Luv4u, I did not snip the comments. I added the face asap after it was opened. I opened it. And so? that was the face I was originally looking for.
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
get an understanding of the difference between freedom and dictatorship
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Is that a threat? This thread is not about religion. It is about an article written by Lilly Workneh about Prince. It explores his political side that we are discussing in this thread, hopefully in peace. You are a participant AND the mod, we all know that. Brand new boogie without the hero. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Oh we know the difference alright...... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
it is a fact of truth to show how silly the idea of something being a dictatorship is. If it was a dictatorship, we would not be debating back in forth. Come back to reality. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
U cannot know the difference if equating something you don't like with a dictatorship. U joined the org for free and of your own free will. You agreed to rules of the org. The org does not force you to pay or log in, we all can leave whenever we feel like it. That is not a dictatorship.
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I have a different thought as it relates to the hip hop reference. I dont know to what degree some Orgers understand the true aesthetic of hip hop devoid of commercial interests. In its purest sense it has an antiestablishment bent that Prince clearly had regardless of his 'grasp' or 'success' with the actual genre from a musical standpoint. Of course hip hop is not the ONLY genre with such a bent, some would argue that art in general does/should but long b4 ghost writers and hit machine conformity, he offered a different possibility (hip hop emerging when/how it did) for black (male) artists. So its the aesthetic more so than his fluidity or prowess WITHIN the genre that Questlove is alluding to [Edited 2/11/17 22:32pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SNIP - OF4S Brand new boogie without the hero. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SNIP | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
dupe
[Edited 2/12/17 11:36am] Brand new boogie without the hero. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Brand new boogie without the hero. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
The American flag is yet another reminder of Prince's political nature. Anyone who thinks he was apolitical should take another listen to "America." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
means nothing. Prince 1985 is not the same Prince 2005 or 2015 in beliefs
patriotic vs political not the same | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
yes massa Brand new boogie without the hero. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
In 2015 he was political with Baltimore, in 1985 he was political with America. And the 2015 Grammy's: “Like books and black lives, albums still matter." . Nobody got in nobody's way | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Social Commentary. He was not political.
Social Commentary... promoting 'Albums Still Matter'
That song is everyones cry for peace. It is not political. And appealing to God, is definately taking it right where he goes.
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
datdude said: I have a different thought as it relates to the hip hop reference. I dont know to what degree some Orgers understand the true aesthetic of hip hop devoid of commercial interests. In its purest sense it has an antiestablishment bent that Prince clearly had regardless of his 'grasp' or 'success' with the actual genre from a musical standpoint. Of course hip hop is not the ONLY genre with such a bent, some would argue that art in general does/should but long b4 ghost writers and hit machine conformity, he offered a different possibility (hip hop emerging when/how it did) for black (male) artists. So its the aesthetic more so than his fluidity or prowess WITHIN the genre that Questlove is alluding to [Edited 2/11/17 22:32pm] Thank you for sharing. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Whether you want to believe it or not, Prince was political. From some of his songs, to him working for causes behind the scenes, such as BLM & Trayvon Martin's family, amoung MANY others. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
OldFriends4Sale said:
Social Commentary. He was not political.
Social Commentary... promoting 'Albums Still Matter'
That song is everyones cry for peace. It is not political. And appealing to God, is definately taking it right where he goes.
Amen. The lyrics to Baltimore only back up what you and I have been saying: that Prince's heart was asking for peace and unity, in a gentle, sweet, non-abrasive, take-no-sides way. Even when asked about Barack Obama, the first black president, he stayed far away from responding with any opinion whatsoever, only saying about politics: "I got no dog in that race". | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I think it has become clear on this thread that not everyone understands that political activity is not limited to the electoral realm. It can include producing artistic works that espouse political messages, delivering social commentary that speaks truth to power (and that encourages others to do likewise), donating to causes that reflect one's worldview, etc. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |