Reply #60 posted 01/13/17 9:08am
NorthC |
CandyCool said: Thanks djThunderfunk! I enjoy listening to your stuff!! Sorry if my message wasn't all clear, but this was SELLING (i.e. $$ or more precisely:EURO) and not SHARING. The whole thing was super aggressive. Perhaps it just set me off. And yes, I have watched a lot of stuff on YouTube and listened to shared bootlegs. The first one being the Black Album in 1988 as shared with me by my friend from down the street when I was in highschool. Happy memories. I got a note like that too with a link to a bootleg site. |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #61 posted 01/13/17 9:17am
NorthC |
databank said: I stopped buying bootlegs when they TOTALLY disappeared from French wreckas stows after police raids in 96. I had maybe 50 at that point. I had just moved from the city I was in high skool where I had fellow Prince fans who were in touch with boots dealers, and the next thing I know u can't find them in stores no more. I managed to find one 97 show once on a trip to Paris in 97 or 98 and that's all after early 96. I would get free cassettes of T's releases from my old pals every once in a while when I'd meet them again and that's it. Then in 2004 I got an internet connection for good and didn't have to worry about it no more. Yeah, there was a time when it was completely normal for CD shops to sell bootlegs, so Prince's point that he was losing income isn't completely wrong: if you didn't know his music very well and were going through all those CDs, you might end up buying a bootleg without realizing it. My first Jimi Hendrix CD was called Fire. I thought it was an original album. Only when I got home I realized they were live recordings. The record label was called Swinging Pig. I know now that it was a bootleg label, but back then (it was 25 years ago, I was just beginning to collect records), I had no idea. |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #62 posted 01/13/17 9:37am
djThunderfunk
|
NorthC said:
databank said:
I stopped buying bootlegs when they TOTALLY disappeared from French wreckas stows after police raids in 96. I had maybe 50 at that point. I had just moved from the city I was in high skool where I had fellow Prince fans who were in touch with boots dealers, and the next thing I know u can't find them in stores no more. I managed to find one 97 show once on a trip to Paris in 97 or 98 and that's all after early 96. I would get free cassettes of T's releases from my old pals every once in a while when I'd meet them again and that's it. Then in 2004 I got an internet connection for good and didn't have to worry about it no more.
Yeah, there was a time when it was completely normal for CD shops to sell bootlegs, so Prince's point that he was losing income isn't completely wrong: if you didn't know his music very well and were going through all those CDs, you might end up buying a bootleg without realizing it. My first Jimi Hendrix CD was called Fire. I thought it was an original album. Only when I got home I realized they were live recordings. The record label was called Swinging Pig. I know now that it was a bootleg label, but back then (it was 25 years ago, I was just beginning to collect records), I had no idea.
You make a good point, but usually those bootlegs in shops used to cost $25-$35 for single disc bootlegs and $50+ for double discs. Most casual listeners would not opt for that when most CDs were selling at $10-$18. Not to mention that many of the shops had the bootlegs behind the counter or in a special "import" section further reducing the problem.
Don't hate your neighbors. Hate the media that tells you to hate your neighbors. |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #63 posted 01/13/17 10:52am
FlyOnTheWall |
djThunderfunk said:
NorthC said:
databank said: Yeah, there was a time when it was completely normal for CD shops to sell bootlegs, so Prince's point that he was losing income isn't completely wrong: if you didn't know his music very well and were going through all those CDs, you might end up buying a bootleg without realizing it. My first Jimi Hendrix CD was called Fire. I thought it was an original album. Only when I got home I realized they were live recordings. The record label was called Swinging Pig. I know now that it was a bootleg label, but back then (it was 25 years ago, I was just beginning to collect records), I had no idea.
You make a good point, but usually those bootlegs in shops used to cost $25-$35 for single disc bootlegs and $50+ for double discs. Most casual listeners would not opt for that when most CDs were selling at $10-$18. Not to mention that many of the shops had the bootlegs behind the counter or in a special "import" section further reducing the problem.
"Imports," huh? That's rich. |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #64 posted 01/13/17 11:00am
djThunderfunk
|
FlyOnTheWall said:
djThunderfunk said:
You make a good point, but usually those bootlegs in shops used to cost $25-$35 for single disc bootlegs and $50+ for double discs. Most casual listeners would not opt for that when most CDs were selling at $10-$18. Not to mention that many of the shops had the bootlegs behind the counter or in a special "import" section further reducing the problem.
"Imports," huh? That's rich.
Oh, yes. I used to work in one of these shops. Terminology was drilled into us. Nobody, on either side of the counter, could use the word bootleg. It was always "Import". At some stores it was as shady as buying drugs from a street dealer.
[Edited 1/13/17 11:00am] Don't hate your neighbors. Hate the media that tells you to hate your neighbors. |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #65 posted 01/13/17 12:55pm
databank
|
djThunderfunk said:
NorthC said:
databank said: Yeah, there was a time when it was completely normal for CD shops to sell bootlegs, so Prince's point that he was losing income isn't completely wrong: if you didn't know his music very well and were going through all those CDs, you might end up buying a bootleg without realizing it. My first Jimi Hendrix CD was called Fire. I thought it was an original album. Only when I got home I realized they were live recordings. The record label was called Swinging Pig. I know now that it was a bootleg label, but back then (it was 25 years ago, I was just beginning to collect records), I had no idea.
You make a good point, but usually those bootlegs in shops used to cost $25-$35 for single disc bootlegs and $50+ for double discs. Most casual listeners would not opt for that when most CDs were selling at $10-$18. Not to mention that many of the shops had the bootlegs behind the counter or in a special "import" section further reducing the problem.
It's certain that the bootleg explosion of 1993-1995 was becoming a threat to the music industry: bootlegs as a black market are one thing, bootlegs being in mass in every record store, including the mainstream stores, as if they were regular releases becomes plain piracy and a dangerous competition given that indeed, a lot of customers aren't necessarily aware of what's what. I remember even seeing one record store selling only bootlegs in a holiday beach resort in Summer 94! The music industry had to react and they did. I remember that in 91-92 when I first discovered boots, they were usually only available in speciality stores, where people knew what they were purchasing. Then the next thing you know they're everywhere. God those were the days of wild |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #66 posted 01/13/17 1:17pm
CandyCool |
databank said:
djThunderfunk said:
NorthC said: databank said: Yeah, there was a time when it was completely normal for CD shops to sell bootlegs, so Prince's point that he was losing income isn't completely wrong: if you didn't know his music very well and were going through all those CDs, you might end up buying a bootleg without realizing it. My first Jimi Hendrix CD was called Fire. I thought it was an original album. Only when I got home I realized they were live recordings. The record label was called Swinging Pig. I know now that it was a bootleg label, but back then (it was 25 years ago, I was just beginning to collect records), I had no idea.
You make a good point, but usually those bootlegs in shops used to cost $25-$35 for single disc bootlegs and $50+ for double discs. Most casual listeners would not opt for that when most CDs were selling at $10-$18. Not to mention that many of the shops had the bootlegs behind the counter or in a special "import" section further reducing the problem.
It's certain that the bootleg explosion of 1993-1995 was becoming a threat to the music industry: bootlegs as a black market are one thing, bootlegs being in mass in every record store, including the mainstream stores, as if they were regular releases becomes plain piracy and a dangerous competition given that indeed, a lot of customers aren't necessarily aware of what's what. I remember even seeing one record store selling only bootlegs in a holiday beach resort in Summer 94! The music industry had to react and they did. I remember that in 91-92 when I first discovered boots, they were usually only available in speciality stores, where people knew what they were purchasing. Then the next thing you know they're everywhere. God those were the days of wild I saw some P bootlegs in a very well known store in London UK just last summer. Sure it didn't fill the place but there were plenty in there.... |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #67 posted 01/13/17 2:24pm
callimnate |
FlyOnTheWall said:
NorthC said: I've read that text. In the booklet of a bootleg CD.
|
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #68 posted 01/13/17 3:44pm
XSX |
CandyCool said:
I saw some P bootlegs in a very well known store in London UK just last summer. Sure it didn't fill the place but there were plenty in there....
Prince bootlegs were always turning up in regular retail stores, right throughout his career. But Prince was actively courting the black market with The Black Album having got funky with the remix and promo markets during Sign O The Times. He wanted to be funky across the entire spectrum of music and marketing culture and in this case it worked because when he withdrew The Black Album when it already was in promo copies, there was a humour in that which he expected to be appreciated by retailers. It was and they then saw Prince as somebody whose genius had straddled the black market and artfully played with the legalities of promos (which are not for sale). There's no doubt that the unusual marketing was odd enough not to have been of Warners' devising and since Prince was directing every aspect of his 'offer' from instrumentation through choreography and even sound mixing at venues, there was definitely some kind of 'in the know' thing about selling dubious Prince items blatantly in retail shops.
This was even influential, I'd say. The mixtapes market opened up shortly afterwards in hip hop circles and artists consciously wanted tapes 'under the counter' as The Black Album had been.
Dis anybody else here get their initial cassette of TBA at a retail store by asking about it? I know I did. Didn't come from no 'bootlegger' “I don't believe anything, but I have many suspicions.”
-Robert Anton Wilson |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #69 posted 01/13/17 4:21pm
databank
|
XSX said:
CandyCool said:
I saw some P bootlegs in a very well known store in London UK just last summer. Sure it didn't fill the place but there were plenty in there....
Prince bootlegs were always turning up in regular retail stores, right throughout his career. But Prince was actively courting the black market with The Black Album having got funky with the remix and promo markets during Sign O The Times. He wanted to be funky across the entire spectrum of music and marketing culture and in this case it worked because when he withdrew The Black Album when it already was in promo copies, there was a humour in that which he expected to be appreciated by retailers. It was and they then saw Prince as somebody whose genius had straddled the black market and artfully played with the legalities of promos (which are not for sale). There's no doubt that the unusual marketing was odd enough not to have been of Warners' devising and since Prince was directing every aspect of his 'offer' from instrumentation through choreography and even sound mixing at venues, there was definitely some kind of 'in the know' thing about selling dubious Prince items blatantly in retail shops.
This was even influential, I'd say. The mixtapes market opened up shortly afterwards in hip hop circles and artists consciously wanted tapes 'under the counter' as The Black Album had been.
Dis anybody else here get their initial cassette of TBA at a retail store by asking about it? I know I did. Didn't come from no 'bootlegger'
It looks like you are among those few fans who believe the whole TBA fiasco was some sort of marketing ploy from Prince. While he certainly was smart enough to take advantage of, and build on the TBA mythos from 1988 on, it was nothing of the sort: the story happened as it was told. |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #70 posted 01/13/17 7:35pm
FlyOnTheWall |
djThunderfunk said:
FlyOnTheWall said:
"Imports," huh? That's rich.
Oh, yes. I used to work in one of these shops. Terminology was drilled into us. Nobody, on either side of the counter, could use the word bootleg. It was always "Import". At some stores it was as shady as buying drugs from a street dealer.
[Edited 1/13/17 11:00am]
Wow. |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #71 posted 01/13/17 9:24pm
Iamtheorg |
paid $60 for Return Of The Bumpsquad boot from Cyberseekers |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
copyright © 1998-2024 prince.org. all rights reserved.