rogifan said:

nursev said:

and your MJ comments too in case u forgot

No and I stand by them.

wildgoldenhoney said:

strawberrylova123 said:

Im just curious, why do you think Tamar has to do with anything

Many probably thought that her husband was cheating on her with Tamar. She probably made WILD ACCUSATIONS that turned out to be false. Because it turns out that he wasn't cheating, that's probably why they could file 'irreconcilable differences'. Because she couldn't claim that he was committing adultery (which would probably have gotten her more money?). AH!!! BINGO!!! MAYBE THAT'S WHY SHE DOESN'T WANT THE FILES TO BE OPENED AND PRINCE WANTED IT TO BE SEALED. HE DIDN'T WANT TO PUT TAMAR THROUGH THIS EMBARRASSMENT. AWW NOW I FEEL BAD FOR THAT...

Adultry doesnt get you mo' money.

It hasnt since the 1960's.

nursev said:

rogifan said:

No and I stand by them.

oh no no no...u say we're being unfair to tink tink so all unfairness gotta go...your comments too

lol ..."tink tink".... You crack me up.

nursev said:

NinaB said:

Each one teach one, go forth & spread the word dear children!

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:

wildgoldenhoney said:

strawberrylova123 said: Many probably thought that her husband was cheating on her with Tamar. She probably made WILD ACCUSATIONS that turned out to be false. Because it turns out that he wasn't cheating, that's probably why they could file 'irreconcilable differences'. Because she couldn't claim that he was committing adultery (which would probably have gotten her more money?). AH!!! BINGO!!! MAYBE THAT'S WHY SHE DOESN'T WANT THE FILES TO BE OPENED AND PRINCE WANTED IT TO BE SEALED. HE DIDN'T WANT TO PUT TAMAR THROUGH THIS EMBARRASSMENT. AWW NOW I FEEL BAD FOR THAT...

Adultry doesnt get you mo' money.

It hasnt since the 1960's.

What if there's a pre-nup?

Menes said:

NinaB said:

nursev said:

My work is done

nursev said:

NinaB said:

My work is done

you put in a good 8 hours today too wading through this fuckree

wildgoldenhoney said:

NinaB said:

nursev said:

you put in a good 8 hours today too wading through this fuckree

Yep, back & forth 2 the madhouse

Does anyone know if Tyka has outside counsel?

nursev said:

NinaB said:

Yep, back & forth 2 the madhouse

seems like after April it got worse

NinaB said:

nursev said:

seems like after April it got worse

Jeez, what a ride

nursev said:

NinaB said:

Jeez, what a ride

straight to the gutter in 4 months... I know P is in heaven looking like "damn"

Just read about Peter Thiel and Gawker. It reminds me of something.....

LBrent said:

wildgoldenhoney said:

Many probably thought that her husband was cheating on her with Tamar. She probably made WILD ACCUSATIONS that turned out to be false. Because it turns out that he wasn't cheating, that's probably why they could file 'irreconcilable differences'. Because she couldn't claim that he was committing adultery (which would probably have gotten her more money?). AH!!! BINGO!!! MAYBE THAT'S WHY SHE DOESN'T WANT THE FILES TO BE OPENED AND PRINCE WANTED IT TO BE SEALED. HE DIDN'T WANT TO PUT TAMAR THROUGH THIS EMBARRASSMENT. AWW NOW I FEEL BAD FOR THAT...

I think you're exactly right about Prince wanting the documents sealed to protect Tamar. But I think there's more to Manuela wanting the documents sealed. I don't know what, but it just feels like she has more of an agenda.

Do you think? This is the man who had is wife use a different name at the hospital when his baby was born and who never announced either wedding, right? I mean, I'm not saying he didn't want to protect Tamar, but he was pretty darn private about his life. Seems like it was just his natural way of being to want it sealed, especially if they were going back and forth for awhile.

[Edited 8/18/16 20:34pm]

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:

wildgoldenhoney said:

strawberrylova123 said: Many probably thought that her husband was cheating on her with Tamar. She probably made WILD ACCUSATIONS that turned out to be false. Because it turns out that he wasn't cheating, that's probably why they could file 'irreconcilable differences'. Because she couldn't claim that he was committing adultery (which would probably have gotten her more money?). AH!!! BINGO!!! MAYBE THAT'S WHY SHE DOESN'T WANT THE FILES TO BE OPENED AND PRINCE WANTED IT TO BE SEALED. HE DIDN'T WANT TO PUT TAMAR THROUGH THIS EMBARRASSMENT. AWW NOW I FEEL BAD FOR THAT...

Adultry doesnt get you mo' money.

It hasnt since the 1960's.

I didn't know that.

I think they wanted it sealed just because they didn't want their going back and forth to be fodder for the gossip mill, rather than there being some big secret or whatever involving other people. But, of course, that's just speculation on my part.

[Edited 8/18/16 20:36pm]

morningsong said:

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:

Adultry doesnt get you mo' money.

It hasnt since the 1960's.

What if there's a pre-nup?

If it states in the pre-nup you get mo' money if the spouse commits adultry, then yep.

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:

morningsong said:

What if there's a pre-nup?

If it states in the pre-nup you get mo' money if the spouse commits adultry, then yep.

[Edited 8/18/16 21:17pm]

teach49 said:

strawberrylova123 said:

zenarose said:

Yes. The ST stated in their interview that there were depos taken.

Im just curious, why do you think Tamar has to do with anything

On Dr. Funkenberry's podcast, he says that Tamar was called in to answer questions.

lwr001 said:

nursev said:

rogifan said:

Go and take that nasty family thread with it.

and your MJ comments too in case u forgot

teach49 said:

rogifan said:

teach49 said: I'm speculating that because I believe someone else posted in the estate thread that this is what the Star Tribune was after.

Manuela Testolini stated on FB last week that they were looking for evidence of drug use so that's where people are getting it from. I guess it's possible that they stated their reasons in court but we have no evidence of that outside of her comments (and I think she's just speculating at what seems reasonable to her, but I obviously don't know). I really hate to bring that up, though, since there are quite a few people on the org who can't stand her and we don't want to go down that rabbit hole again.

In the end, we'll see soon enough if they find something and report on it. In fact, if they unseal the files there are quite a few orgers who are watching the court files and I'm sure we'll know one way or the other soon. I think the most logical, straightforward reason is usually the right one. P's divorce lawyers asked the judge a few weeks ago to lift a seal on their files because their work project might shed light on on possible heirs and they wanted to send the files to Bremer Trust. Then, the ST went to court to get the seal on the divorce files lifted. I just think they're trying to find out what his lawyers were talking about. Could be a whole lot of nothing or could shed light on something.

In the end, she lost this round. Maybe her lawyers will appeal.

[Edited 8/15/16 14:18pm]

to the bolded part.

206Michelle said:

Well, this is starting to become my daily morning read, while I eat my breakfast and before I start to work. I just finished reading the last 10 or so pages.

.

Keep it up ya'all.

See you in 24 hrs.

Don't go & get the thread locked now.

Heidi said:

Well, this is starting to become my daily morning read, while I eat my breakfast and before I start to work. I just finished reading the last 10 or so pages.

.

Keep it up ya'all.

See you in 24 hrs.

Don't go & get the thread locked now.

Yeah, same here - better than reading the paper - LOL - oh yeah, thats right I dont get the paper

I can't imagine there's anything left to say after 40 pages. Everyone's given their 2 cents by now and this thread took about a million turns.

So.....when we get more information we can have another thread, but until that time comes.....