independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Prince: Music and More > Sound problems with CD
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 2 of 3 <123>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #30 posted 07/10/16 7:45pm

udo

avatar

Noodled24 said:

The SOTT CD sounds like shit. It always has. The volume very low.

.

Just turn it up.

And do not be surprised when the louder parts rattle the ceiling.

Pills and thrills and daffodils will kill... If you don't believe me or don't get it, I don't have time to try to convince you, sorry.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #31 posted 07/10/16 8:20pm

WhisperingDand
elions

avatar

anangellooksdown said:

breakdown2k14 said:
There's a sign of the times album coming out on vinyl august 23rd .its suppose to be remastered
Thanks. And thank you to all who educated me so much more about all this.

I meant to also say, your car stereo can probably adjust the max output volume. Toggle around with the settings a bit, I know I've used vehicles where you could increase it.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #32 posted 07/11/16 5:55am

Noodled24

udo said:

Noodled24 said:

The SOTT CD sounds like shit. It always has. The volume very low.

.

Just turn it up.

And do not be surprised when the louder parts rattle the ceiling.


SOTT on max volume is equal to to Purple Rain on half volume. But that's not really the issue. It's been a known issue with the album for decades. The version on Tidal is much better.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #33 posted 07/11/16 6:14am

udo

avatar

Noodled24 said:

The version on Tidal is much better.

.

Because it has been normalised?

Becaused it has been compressed a bit more?

Or why?

Pills and thrills and daffodils will kill... If you don't believe me or don't get it, I don't have time to try to convince you, sorry.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #34 posted 07/11/16 8:18am

UncleJam

avatar

I "remastered" it myself, years ago. Well...I evened out the levels and raised the volume...sounds very good, though the bass is a little too much, but I just EQ it down.

Make it so, Number One...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #35 posted 07/11/16 8:40am

Genesia

avatar

Yeah...of all the Prince CDs that were just direct transfers from analog, SOTT sounds the absolute worst. Not sure why that should be, but it be.

We don’t mourn artists because we knew them. We mourn them because they helped us know ourselves.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #36 posted 07/11/16 8:48am

KingSausage

avatar

The Black Album sounds like ass too.
"Drop that stereo before I blow your Goddamn nuts off, asshole!"
-Eugene Tackleberry
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #37 posted 07/11/16 12:40pm

Noodled24

udo said:

Noodled24 said:

The version on Tidal is much better.

.

Because it has been normalised?

Becaused it has been compressed a bit more?

Or why?


The version on Tidal sounds louder certainly. Also brighter from what I remember.

Didn't someone contact Tidal and establish almost everything had been remastered?

[Edited 7/11/16 12:42pm]

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #38 posted 07/11/16 2:26pm

eyewishuheaven

avatar

KingSausage said:

The Black Album sounds like ass too.


I'd say TBA sounds worse than SOTT, but they both sound criminally bad, for an artist of Prince's stature.

Much as I want vault tracks, I agree with Alan Leeds that this is the material that must be revisited first, because the majority of those 80s cds sound like a fart in a jar.

PRINCE: the only man who could wear high heels and makeup and STILL steal your woman!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #39 posted 07/11/16 3:19pm

WhisperingDand
elions

avatar

... just to clarify, for a fair amount of you, "good" or "bad" sound is basically determined by how loud something is or isn't?

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #40 posted 07/11/16 3:33pm

djThunderfunk

avatar

WhisperingDandelions said:

... just to clarify, for a fair amount of you, "good" or "bad" sound is basically determined by how loud something is or isn't?


falloff It's funny 'cause it's true! lol


Also, all the songs on an album being the same volume is good. Having both quiet and loud songs on an album is bad. Or so it seems... biggrin


Not dead, not in prison, still funkin'...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #41 posted 07/11/16 5:07pm

Noodled24

WhisperingDandelions said:

... just to clarify, for a fair amount of you, "good" or "bad" sound is basically determined by how loud something is or isn't?


No.

It's specifically the SOTT album on CD. The overall loudness of the CD is an issue but it's nothing to do with the loudness war. The albums before and after SOTT are fine. However the SOTT CD itself is abnormally quiet.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #42 posted 07/11/16 5:38pm

WhisperingDand
elions

avatar

Noodled24 said:

WhisperingDandelions said:

... just to clarify, for a fair amount of you, "good" or "bad" sound is basically determined by how loud something is or isn't?


No.

It's specifically the SOTT album on CD. The overall loudness of the CD is an issue but it's nothing to do with the loudness war. The albums before and after SOTT are fine. However the SOTT CD itself is abnormally quiet.

Okay, but, you said "no," then your following reason ("abormally quiet") relates to volume.

Do you have any other issues with the SOTT CD other than it not being loud, comparatively or otherwise? I'm just trying to learn, I always see this album pointed out as the worst "sounding", but it always sounded fine to me? And I've heard the vinyl, the sound itself is very similar...

[Edited 7/11/16 17:39pm]

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #43 posted 07/11/16 5:57pm

KingSausage

avatar

WhisperingDandelions said:

... just to clarify, for a fair amount of you, "good" or "bad" sound is basically determined by how loud something is or isn't?




No. The Black Album on CD just lacks low end. It's tinny and pathetic. Have you heard the version of Rockhard in a Funky Place from the leaked Crystal Ball tapes? It's funky as hell. Deep, crazy bass. I want the CD to sound like that.
"Drop that stereo before I blow your Goddamn nuts off, asshole!"
-Eugene Tackleberry
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #44 posted 07/11/16 6:05pm

EddieC

I learned SOTT from cassette, so that's the version that I think of as "the right one"--my cassette's now long gone, so I can't compare, but the CD's always sounded "weak" in comparison, and I don't mean just the volume. I don't think it's an accurate representation of what I used to hear, as far as all the sounds that used to be there. But, you know, I could be remembering wrong.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #45 posted 07/11/16 6:38pm

luvsexy4all

graffiti bridge dont sound so good either

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #46 posted 07/11/16 7:28pm

udo

avatar

luvsexy4all said:

graffiti bridge dont sound so good either

.

Turn it up!

Pills and thrills and daffodils will kill... If you don't believe me or don't get it, I don't have time to try to convince you, sorry.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #47 posted 07/12/16 8:31am

luvsexy4all

udo said:

luvsexy4all said:

graffiti bridge dont sound so good either

.

Turn it up!

doesnt work.....

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #48 posted 07/12/16 9:23am

Noodled24

WhisperingDandelions said:

Noodled24 said:


No.

It's specifically the SOTT album on CD. The overall loudness of the CD is an issue but it's nothing to do with the loudness war. The albums before and after SOTT are fine. However the SOTT CD itself is abnormally quiet.

Okay, but, you said "no," then your following reason ("abormally quiet") relates to volume.


No - I don't judge how good or bad an album is purely by how loud it is.

The overall loudness of the SOTT CD has been a known issue for decades. If you can't hear it then your CD is either from a different source or you've never heard the CD.

Do you have any other issues with the SOTT CD other than it not being loud, comparatively or otherwise? I'm just trying to learn, I always see this album pointed out as the worst "sounding", but it always sounded fine to me? And I've heard the vinyl, the sound itself is very similar...


Put on Parade, and it sounds fine. Put on Lovesexy and it sounds fine. Put on SOTT and don't touch the volume dial - it's abnormally quiet compared to the albums which came before and after it. Which suggests there is an issue with the CD.


  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #49 posted 07/12/16 9:23am

Noodled24

luvsexy4all said:

graffiti bridge dont sound so good either


Can't say I've ever noticed a problem with that album.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #50 posted 07/12/16 1:03pm

WhisperingDand
elions

avatar

Noodled24 said:

WhisperingDandelions said:


No - I don't judge how good or bad an album is purely by how loud it is.

The overall loudness of the SOTT CD has been a known issue for decades. If you can't hear it then your CD is either from a different source or you've never heard the CD.

Put on Parade, and it sounds fine. Put on Lovesexy and it sounds fine. Put on SOTT and don't touch the volume dial - it's abnormally quiet compared to the albums which came before and after it. Which suggests there is an issue with the CD.


No, no, no, I'm not saying anything about the quality of the album's musical content. I think we can assume at least 95% of Prince fans think SOTT is a great album, that's not what I'm talking about. I'm talking about good or bad as it relates to the sound quality.

And yeah, I know it's the quietest Prince CD, I'm not disputing that, I'm just asking if anyone has any other reasons why they think it "sounds bad" and.... based on your response again talking about volume, I don't think anyone does have any other reasons.


ha, I wouldn't call it an "issue" though, unless your volume knob is broken.... I mean there's catalogues on disc put out from third generation copies of the masters with wonky smley-face technicolor EQ... Prince's early discog is good... and certainly better than that ear-bleeding brickwall mastering he favored in the late 90s and 00s, no?

I think it's probably something simple as perhaps SOTT was the first album put out on CD in tandem with the vinyl, maybe? And the others (the louder ones) were maybe released after the fact as volume progressively increased. Does anyone know what was the first album to come out in all three formats at once?

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #51 posted 07/12/16 1:22pm

djThunderfunk

avatar

WhisperingDandelions said:

Prince's early discog is good... and certainly better than that ear-bleeding brickwall mastering he favored in the late 90s and 00s, no?


This is a point I've tried to make many times. I can work with SOTT, a little EQ & volume adjustment and is sounds great, on vinyl AND CD.

I can't do anything to improve the sound of say HitNRun Phase One. It's so brickwalled it just sounds bad. No amount of EQ or volume adjustments can improve it.

Most of you want the 80s albums remastered. I want the ones from the last 20 years remastered. Just sayin'... cool


Not dead, not in prison, still funkin'...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #52 posted 07/12/16 1:26pm

Guitarhero

djThunderfunk said:

WhisperingDandelions said:

Prince's early discog is good... and certainly better than that ear-bleeding brickwall mastering he favored in the late 90s and 00s, no?


This is a point I've tried to make many times. I can work with SOTT, a little EQ & volume adjustment and is sounds great, on vinyl AND CD.

I can't do anything to improve the sound of say HitNRun Phase One. It's so brickwalled it just sounds bad. No amount of EQ or volume adjustments can improve it.

Most of you want the 80s albums remastered. I want the ones from the last 20 years remastered. Just sayin'... cool


Ok can we have all remastered biggrin

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #53 posted 07/12/16 1:27pm

WhisperingDand
elions

avatar

djThunderfunk said:

WhisperingDandelions said:

Prince's early discog is good... and certainly better than that ear-bleeding brickwall mastering he favored in the late 90s and 00s, no?


This is a point I've tried to make many times. I can work with SOTT, a little EQ & volume adjustment and is sounds great, on vinyl AND CD.

I can't do anything to improve the sound of say HitNRun Phase One. It's so brickwalled it just sounds bad. No amount of EQ or volume adjustments can improve it.

Most of you want the 80s albums remastered. I want the ones from the last 20 years remastered. Just sayin'... cool


That was what I was trying to get at it with the last post.... I think a lot of people actually want his 80s stuff to be mastered like his modern stuff.

Like, that intense intro to "MPLS" came on my playlist the other night. Wow.... Just wow. I'd rather have to gently reach to turn up my volume than have to spazzily dart across the room like the Flash to immediately turn it down.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #54 posted 07/12/16 1:41pm

PliablyPurple

Have never had this problem with mine, either. But this thread inspired me to listen to The Ballad of Dorothy Parker while reading the Susan Rogers interview about the recording of it. Highly recommended, it really puts you in the room. I've been sitting at the bottom of the stairs while Prince works his way around me. So far, I haven't gotten up. Just kinda sitting there watching.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #55 posted 07/12/16 3:21pm

djThunderfunk

avatar

Guitarhero said:

djThunderfunk said:


This is a point I've tried to make many times. I can work with SOTT, a little EQ & volume adjustment and is sounds great, on vinyl AND CD.

I can't do anything to improve the sound of say HitNRun Phase One. It's so brickwalled it just sounds bad. No amount of EQ or volume adjustments can improve it.

Most of you want the 80s albums remastered. I want the ones from the last 20 years remastered. Just sayin'... cool


Ok can we have all remastered biggrin

That would be great but won't happen. They'll remaster the first 20 years and keep the rest I'm sure.

Not dead, not in prison, still funkin'...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #56 posted 07/12/16 4:23pm

KingSausage

avatar

The sound on that leaked original Crystal Ball cassette is so much better than on SOTT. More low end. Punchier sound. Sometimes I even hear more separation of instruments. There's just something lacking on SOTT on CD. It's not about volume. It just lacks oomph, if I'm gonna get all technical and shit.
"Drop that stereo before I blow your Goddamn nuts off, asshole!"
-Eugene Tackleberry
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #57 posted 07/13/16 5:31pm

ksgemini63

I hope if it is remastered they don't lose all the dynamic. After years of denial I went for quieter Zep and Abba original pressings and they are undoubtedly the best on cd. I'd hate to see Prince become victim of loudness wars. Maybe sign is better off the way it is.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #58 posted 07/13/16 6:04pm

luvsexy4all

our lifetime wont get any of this stuff.....

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #59 posted 07/13/16 6:41pm

ksgemini63

Agreed 100%

luvsexy4all said:

our lifetime wont get any of this stuff.....

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 2 of 3 <123>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Prince: Music and More > Sound problems with CD