independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Prince: Music and More > The Vault - Open or Closed?
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 1 of 2 12>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Author

Tweet     Share

Message
Thread started 04/30/16 4:22am

kano

The Vault - Open or Closed?

Almost immediately a lot of people began to mention the infamous 'vault' which I found a bit distasteful to be honest, now the guardian of the music has passed it was selfish to start thinking of what could be unearthed now it was no longer protected.

The question is, should it be opened at all? Prince made it clear he was the one who decided what we got to hear. It's not as if we have been starved by him. Now that he has passed, do others, his sister included, have the right to release music that he didn't want the world to hear?

That isn't saying his sister will do that but I'm just asking the question to include everyone. It's become increasingly popular to dig into secrets of those who have died and unfairly so. Being famous doesn't mean wishes shouldn't be respected.

The fact we didn't know or hear everything about this amazing musician added to the mystery around and made his music more powerful because of that. Should we now we trying to unearth everything just because we can?

Just a thought. What do you think?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1 posted 04/30/16 4:26am

bluegangsta

avatar

Prince said on The View that someone will release them. He never expressed otherwise.

Always cry 4 love, never cry 4 pain.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #2 posted 04/30/16 4:35am

kano

bluegangsta said:

Prince said on The View that someone will release them. He never expressed otherwise.


Which is fair enough but just because he knew someone would, doesn't mean he would be happy with it. I think we can safely say he wouldn't be at all.

Personally I want the vault to stay shut and for those secrets to stay as they would. Alan Leeds said a few years back that Prince would probably just burn everything - whether he was being flippant or not, I'm not sure.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #3 posted 04/30/16 4:42am

bluegangsta

avatar

But he's dead? Objectively, it's no longer his problem what happens with it.

Always cry 4 love, never cry 4 pain.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #4 posted 04/30/16 4:45am

TweetyV6

avatar

#freethemusic

I never thought I would outlive P. Now I did, I would love to hear what has been hidden from us in all those years.

It doesn't have to be evrything, I would settle for the period 1982 -1992.

The man of science has learned to believe in justification, not by faith, but by verification - Thomas Henry Huxley
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #5 posted 04/30/16 4:52am

kano

bluegangsta said:

But he's dead? Objectively, it's no longer his problem what happens with it.


But shouldn't there be an understanding of what a dead persons wishes would be, even if they're not around anymore to explicitly express them?

I think it's fair to say Prince made if abundantly clear what he thought about how his music was heard. Why should that change now if we do not know exactly if he had other plans for it?

Another example is the Nina Simone documentary where they went through her personal diary. I mean come on, why do we need to get that close? Who has the right to release that stuff to the public domain unless they are told to?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #6 posted 04/30/16 4:54am

NorthC

bluegangsta said:

Prince said on The View that someone will release them. He never expressed otherwise.


That's right. He never said anything about destroying. If that was his wish, why keep those recordings in a vault in the first place? The music should be released for a number of reasons:
-It will help us fans and the general public to remember him as the great artist he is. (Can't bring myself to say "was")
-If Tyka and the family don't do it, bootleggers will.
-What's the point of keeping those recordings locked up for all eternity? That will only cost money.
-If Paisley Park is to become a museum, then money needs to be made!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #7 posted 04/30/16 4:54am

SuperFurryAnim
al

avatar

Geraldo says "open the Vault."
What are you outraged about today? CNN has not told you yet?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #8 posted 04/30/16 4:57am

SquirrelMeat

avatar

Prince has commented that he expected it to be released by someone.

Prince never left any other instruction that we know of.

Prince never destroyed them, or left instruction to destroy them.

It's fair to say he expected them to be heard as part of his legacy.

Nothing points to the vault remaing closed.

.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #9 posted 04/30/16 5:00am

donnyenglish

Regardless, its contents have value and are an asset of the estate. The estate has a duty to maximize the value of that asset in the absense of instructions to destroy it. The only way to maximize the value of the vault is to sell the music to the fans.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #10 posted 04/30/16 5:01am

mynameisnotsus
an

There should definitely be a breathing space - but inevitably bills are going to start to mount up.

Prince could tour at short notice to generate income quite quickly. The estate can't rely on that anymore - so the logical means to create an income is to use it's most valuable asset now - legacy recordings.
I don't envy trying to make this work long term. MJs estate have been fortunate to have hooked up with Cirque de Soleil, they've generated huge revenue. Don't know that Prince would have the same kind of pull - his personal ability was the main draw.
But as far as should his songs see the light of day even though he didn't release them personally? Yes - a great artists creativity lives on much longer than they do.
I think if he truly didn't want something to exist, it would have been destroyed. And who knows - maybe he destroyed or edited a lot of material shrug
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #11 posted 04/30/16 5:01am

funksterr

Prince always said the vault would be released. He put songs in the vault for that express purpose. Otherwise he would have just deleted them. The most exciting thing I'd like made public, is a catalog of what they found in there specifically.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #12 posted 04/30/16 5:04am

kano

NorthC said:

bluegangsta said:

Prince said on The View that someone will release them. He never expressed otherwise.


That's right. He never said anything about destroying. If that was his wish, why keep those recordings in a vault in the first place? The music should be released for a number of reasons:
-It will help us fans and the general public to remember him as the great artist he is. (Can't bring myself to say "was")
-If Tyka and the family don't do it, bootleggers will.
-What's the point of keeping those recordings locked up for all eternity? That will only cost money.
-If Paisley Park is to become a museum, then money needs to be made!

Personally I think this is all more about what we want to hear, than want Prince himself would have wanted.

Just because there is no comment made before he unexpectedly passed, doesn't mean the opposite course of action should be taken. If no instruction is left, then leave it alone!

Prince spent half his career trying to gain control of his work and controlling how and where it was heard. He expected to live and long and healthy life until this tragedy. I'm sure he had his own plans but if they are not expressed, do we make our own assumptions or base them on his actions while alive?
[Edited 4/30/16 5:11am]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #13 posted 04/30/16 5:10am

kano

donnyenglish said:

Regardless, its contents have value and are an asset of the estate. The estate has a duty to maximize the value of that asset in the absense of instructions to destroy it. The only way to maximize the value of the vault is to sell the music to the fans.

That makes sense but that is very matter of fact. Music isn't an expensive ornament or piece of furniture, a persons living breathing soul went into making it and should be given different considerations I believe.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #14 posted 04/30/16 5:11am

SquirrelMeat

avatar

kano said:

NorthC said:
That's right. He never said anything about destroying. If that was his wish, why keep those recordings in a vault in the first place? The music should be released for a number of reasons: -It will help us fans and the general public to remember him as the great artist he is. (Can't bring myself to say "was") -If Tyka and the family don't do it, bootleggers will. -What's the point of keeping those recordings locked up for all eternity? That will only cost money. -If Paisley Park is to become a museum, then money needs to be made!
Personally I think this is all more about what we want to hear, than want Prince himself would have wanted. Just because there is no comment made before he unexpectedly passed, doesn't mean the opposite course of action should be taken. If no instruction is left, then leave it alone! Prince spent half his career trying to gain control of his work and controlling how and where it was heard. He expected to live and long and healthy life until this tragedy. I'm sure he had his own plans but if they are not expressed, do we make our own assumptions of base them on his actions while alive?



Its not assumptions. He already said in interviews that he expects someone to release it when he is gone. He wouldn't have kept it otherwise.

To go against what he has said would be to NOT release it.

.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #15 posted 04/30/16 5:13am

NorthC

Leave it alone? And do what? Nothing? Keep that vault closed forever? Who would benefit from that? Nobody! Then you.might as well destroy everything and nobody knows if that is what he wanted. Prince isn't here anymore and it's up to his heirs to make a decision. I say, release because of the reasons stated above, not only by me, but by others too.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #16 posted 04/30/16 5:16am

kano

SquirrelMeat said:



kano said:


NorthC said:
That's right. He never said anything about destroying. If that was his wish, why keep those recordings in a vault in the first place? The music should be released for a number of reasons: -It will help us fans and the general public to remember him as the great artist he is. (Can't bring myself to say "was") -If Tyka and the family don't do it, bootleggers will. -What's the point of keeping those recordings locked up for all eternity? That will only cost money. -If Paisley Park is to become a museum, then money needs to be made!

Personally I think this is all more about what we want to hear, than want Prince himself would have wanted. Just because there is no comment made before he unexpectedly passed, doesn't mean the opposite course of action should be taken. If no instruction is left, then leave it alone! Prince spent half his career trying to gain control of his work and controlling how and where it was heard. He expected to live and long and healthy life until this tragedy. I'm sure he had his own plans but if they are not expressed, do we make our own assumptions of base them on his actions while alive?



Its not assumptions. He already said in interviews that he expects someone to release it when he is gone. He wouldn't have kept it otherwise.

To go against what he has said would be to NOT release it.


Just because you expect something to happen does that mean that is what you want to happen? He knew it would happen because of the bootlegging that has happened across his entire career and we know he wasn't happy about that.

Him saying it would happen doesn't mean he is then giving his blessing, it's just an acceptance that he can't control it anymore. If he could, I'm sure he would given how he has previously controlled it.

I mean, I expect his music to be released too, but that's out of sad acceptance that money rules in the end, rather than me believing it is the right thing to do.
[Edited 4/30/16 5:17am]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #17 posted 04/30/16 5:19am

donnyenglish

kano said:

donnyenglish said:

Regardless, its contents have value and are an asset of the estate. The estate has a duty to maximize the value of that asset in the absense of instructions to destroy it. The only way to maximize the value of the vault is to sell the music to the fans.

That makes sense but that is very matter of fact. Music isn't an expensive ornament or piece of furniture, a persons living breathing soul went into making it and should be given different considerations I believe.


Absolutely. I think that is part of maximizing the value. I think that it must be done tastefully. It also should not be released in drips and dribbles because of the age of his fan base. There should be a 10 year plan for his releases and virtually everything should be released in that time frame. There should be 5 areas of emohasis. 1. Shelved albums that were intended for future release like Roadhouse Garden, the new album with mononeon, The Dawn, etc. 2. Live performances. 3. Collections of songs from the vault that had no album. 4. Videos and movies from the vault, especially The Second Coming. 5. Raw studion sessions.

The shelved albums should be released at a rate of about two per year. The live stuff should be released quickly and in large chunks. The collections of random songs, studio sessions and the videos/movies should be released in three or four sets according to the time frame.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #18 posted 04/30/16 5:22am

Philly76

avatar

kano said:

But shouldn't there be an understanding of what a dead persons wishes would be, even if they're not around anymore to explicitly express them?

Again and all over again:

Prince NEVER EVER said that he dont´t want the vault to open after his death.

Quite the opposite, there are several hints in recent interviews that he is okay with it

when the vault opens some day. And there is no will (atleast for now) that tells otherwise.

In my opinion, burning all the stuff or not releasing it (with respect and honor ofc)

would be ignorant towards big parts of his lifework.

Just my 2 cents.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #19 posted 04/30/16 5:23am

kano

NorthC said:

Leave it alone? And do what? Nothing? Keep that vault closed forever? Who would benefit from that? Nobody! Then you.might as well destroy everything and nobody knows if that is what he wanted. Prince isn't here anymore and it's up to his heirs to make a decision. I say, release because of the reasons stated above, not only by me, but by others too.

But again, why does anyone have to benefit from it? Don't we have forty years worth of released material to benefit from? Remember, a lot of these recordings were also made with other artists too, don't they also have a say in what is released?

And if no one knows for sure whether Prince would have wanted this material released - not expected it, that is a different thing - then who has the right to decide either way?

I'm not trying to confrontational about this but I just really believe that when someone passes on, we have to think extremely carefully about how we treat the things they leave behind. It's become increasingly common to delve into the most personal effects of celebrities that have left us and it feels unfair and intrusive in many cases.
[Edited 4/30/16 5:35am]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #20 posted 04/30/16 5:29am

kano

Philly76 said:



kano said:


But shouldn't there be an understanding of what a dead persons wishes would be, even if they're not around anymore to explicitly express them?


Again and all over again:


Prince NEVER EVER said that he dont´t want the vault to open after his death.



Quite the opposite, there are several hints in recent interviews that he is okay with it


when the vault opens some day. And there is no will (atleast for now) that tells otherwise.



In my opinion, burning all the stuff or not releasing it (with respect and honor ofc)


would be ignorant towards big parts of his lifework.



Just my 2 cents.



I'm not wanting to dismiss your point of view, I'm not saying mine is hundred percent correct either but I think it bears thinking about.

It just didn't sit well with me that within a day or two of his passing there was a swell (online) of people talking about the vault, salivating because it's guardian is no longer here to control it.
[Edited 4/30/16 5:30am]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #21 posted 04/30/16 5:34am

kano

donnyenglish said:

kano said:


That makes sense but that is very matter of fact. Music isn't an expensive ornament or piece of furniture, a persons living breathing soul went into making it and should be given different considerations I believe.


Absolutely. I think that is part of maximizing the value. I think that it must be done tastefully. It also should not be released in drips and dribbles because of the age of his fan base. There should be a 10 year plan for his releases and virtually everything should be released in that time frame. There should be 5 areas of emohasis. 1. Shelved albums that were intended for future release like Roadhouse Garden, the new album with mononeon, The Dawn, etc. 2. Live performances. 3. Collections of songs from the vault that had no album. 4. Videos and movies from the vault, especially The Second Coming. 5. Raw studion sessions.

The shelved albums should be released at a rate of about two per year. The live stuff should be released quickly and in large chunks. The collections of random songs, studio sessions and the videos/movies should be released in three or four sets according to the time frame.


There is also the key part of who decides what deserves to be released and who mixes it down. This is another big part of the problem. We know Prince had such tight quality control and while Wendy and Lisa, or Sheila E were close friends and work colleagues, the bottom line is, they are not Prince. I dunno, it just doesn't make sense to me that someone who held such tight control over what people heard, would then allow almost anything he recorded to be released to the public, without him overseeing it. Maybe that was the last project he had planned when he was in his 60/70's, who knows.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #22 posted 04/30/16 5:36am

SquirrelMeat

avatar

kano said:

SquirrelMeat said:



Its not assumptions. He already said in interviews that he expects someone to release it when he is gone. He wouldn't have kept it otherwise.

To go against what he has said would be to NOT release it.

Just because you expect something to happen does that mean that is what you want to happen? He knew it would happen because of the bootlegging that has happened across his entire career and we know he wasn't happy about that. Him saying it would happen doesn't mean he is then giving his blessing, it's just an acceptance that he can't control it anymore. If he could, I'm sure he would given how he has previously controlled it. I mean, I expect his music to be released too, but that's out of sad acceptance that money rules in the end, rather than me believing it is the right thing to do. [Edited 4/30/16 5:17am]


He's comments did not seem to indicate it was about bootlegging. He gave every indication that he expected it to be released in some form or another.

Regardless, there are only 3 things that can happen.

1. Stuff remains in limbo, stored away at great cost for no apparent reason.

2. It is destroyed so that it cannot be heard.

3. It is released, as part of his estate mangement and legacy.

Also look at it this way for an example. The vault contains the triple album version of Sign O The Times that Prince wanted released. Due to his contractual restraints, he couldn't.

The Vault contains the version Prince wanted us to hear. Do we really want to see option 1 or 2 happen, when we know it goes completely against what we know was Prince's preference?

.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #23 posted 04/30/16 5:39am

BanishedBrian

kano said:

Prince spent half his career trying to gain control of his work and controlling how and where it was heard.

To be fair, this fight was about When Will We B Paid; not trying to suppess music from being heard.

The genesis of all this was the WB years, when Prince wanted to release more material than WB would allow. SOTT would have never been only 2 albums if it were up to Prince. Come and the Gold Experience would have been released years earlier, in different configurations, if it were up to Prince. The only time that Prince kept a record from being released (as opposed to WB being the ones to suppress it) was the Black Album, but Prince ultimately relented, so that's irrelevant now.

Prince didn't spend all these years fighting for control of his masters just to keep everything locked away forever - he just wanted the Artist to be paid 100% for what the Artist created.

No Candy 4 Me
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #24 posted 04/30/16 5:40am

leecaldon

kano said:

Philly76 said:

Again and all over again:

Prince NEVER EVER said that he dont´t want the vault to open after his death.

Quite the opposite, there are several hints in recent interviews that he is okay with it

when the vault opens some day. And there is no will (atleast for now) that tells otherwise.

In my opinion, burning all the stuff or not releasing it (with respect and honor ofc)

would be ignorant towards big parts of his lifework.

Just my 2 cents.

I'm not wanting to dismiss your point of view, I'm not saying mine is hundred percent correct either but I think it bears thinking about. It just didn't sit well with me that within a day or two of his passing there was a swell (online) of people talking about the vault, salivating because it's guardian is no longer here to control it. [Edited 4/30/16 5:30am]

I think you've got it wrong on this one. Prince's comments suggested he would have no problem with the Vault material released. I find it utterly bizarre that someone who fought so hard for their legacy left no instructions as to how to go about it though. Can't get my head around that.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #25 posted 04/30/16 5:41am

keenly

kano said:

bluegangsta said:

Prince said on The View that someone will release them. He never expressed otherwise.

Which is fair enough but just because he knew someone would, doesn't mean he would be happy with it. I think we can safely say he wouldn't be at all. Personally I want the vault to stay shut and for those secrets to stay as they would. Alan Leeds said a few years back that Prince would probably just burn everything - whether he was being flippant or not, I'm not sure.

Prince left them there to be released after his death.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #26 posted 04/30/16 5:46am

kano

leecaldon said:



kano said:


Philly76 said:



Again and all over again:


Prince NEVER EVER said that he dont´t want the vault to open after his death.



Quite the opposite, there are several hints in recent interviews that he is okay with it


when the vault opens some day. And there is no will (atleast for now) that tells otherwise.



In my opinion, burning all the stuff or not releasing it (with respect and honor ofc)


would be ignorant towards big parts of his lifework.



Just my 2 cents.




I'm not wanting to dismiss your point of view, I'm not saying mine is hundred percent correct either but I think it bears thinking about. It just didn't sit well with me that within a day or two of his passing there was a swell (online) of people talking about the vault, salivating because it's guardian is no longer here to control it. [Edited 4/30/16 5:30am]


I think you've got it wrong on this one. Prince's comments suggested he would have no problem with the Vault material released. I find it utterly bizarre that someone who fought so hard for their legacy left no instructions as to how to go about it though. Can't get my head around that.


I think the bottom line is he expected to be around much longer to allow him time to put those instructions down. Tragically he was robbed of the time he expected to have to do that.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #27 posted 04/30/16 5:53am

BanishedBrian

kano said:

Just because you expect something to happen does that mean that is what you want to happen? He knew it would happen because of the bootlegging that has happened across his entire career and we know he wasn't happy about that. Him saying it would happen doesn't mean he is then giving his blessing, it's just an acceptance that he can't control it anymore.

The following interview makes pretty clear that Prince wanted Vault material released:

"Yeah, I like time capsule stuff. I have a couple Revolution albums in the vault and two Time albums, one Vanity 6 album … and tons of stuff recorded in different periods. But so much gets recorded that you don't have time to compile everything. In the future you could put all the best stuff from one particular time period together and then you can release it. It'd just be like if we found a Sly and the Family Stone album and they saved their best stuff. If that's even possible!"

Keep in mind that Prince had a huge ego. Most of us want this stuff released partly because, as Prince fans, we know it will prove a point to the world about his genius. Prince would support us in that fight! If he didn't want something kept (e.g., Wally), that material is surely destroyed now. Whatever is in the Vault is something that he'd approve of being memorialized for historical purposes.

Here are some of the reasons I believe that Prince never specified what to do with the Vault material in his life, despite wanting it to be released:

1) He always wanted to keep the focus on his current project. That was a characteristic his whole career. He once said "my only competition is, well, me in the past". If he is working on releasing a new album, the last thing he wanted was for a bunch of critics to compare that album to some new Vault release so that they could say "see, he was so much better in the 80s - this Vault material kills AOA, etc.

2) His religious beliefs made him uncomfortable with what he'd done before. Not uncomfortable to the point that he wanted material destroyed, but enough so that he didn't want to be seen as promoting/blessing it. At this point, we don't even know if the Vault contains older material that might fit this category, but if it did, I think it's safe to say he'd rather have someone other than him being seen as having ordered/directed/caused its release. He once said that they songs are his "children," so while there may be some children that he might dissapprove of, he still loved them all in some unconditional way.

3) To the extent it turns out he didn't have a will, I think this could show a subconscious desire to allow everything to be released, as that would be the practical effect, given the estate would be duty bound to maximize value.

No Candy 4 Me
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #28 posted 04/30/16 5:54am

kano

SquirrelMeat said:



kano said:


SquirrelMeat said:




Its not assumptions. He already said in interviews that he expects someone to release it when he is gone. He wouldn't have kept it otherwise.

To go against what he has said would be to NOT release it.



Just because you expect something to happen does that mean that is what you want to happen? He knew it would happen because of the bootlegging that has happened across his entire career and we know he wasn't happy about that. Him saying it would happen doesn't mean he is then giving his blessing, it's just an acceptance that he can't control it anymore. If he could, I'm sure he would given how he has previously controlled it. I mean, I expect his music to be released too, but that's out of sad acceptance that money rules in the end, rather than me believing it is the right thing to do. [Edited 4/30/16 5:17am]


He's comments did not seem to indicate it was about bootlegging. He gave every indication that he expected it to be released in some form or another.

Regardless, there are only 3 things that can happen.

1. Stuff remains in limbo, stored away at great cost for no apparent reason.

2. It is destroyed so that it cannot be heard.

3. It is released, as part of his estate mangement and legacy.

Also look at it this way for an example. The vault contains the triple album version of Sign O The Times that Prince wanted released. Due to his contractual restraints, he couldn't.

The Vault contains the version Prince wanted us to hear. Do we really want to see option 1 or 2 happen, when we know it goes completely against what we know was Prince's preference?


The Prince of late 80's/90's is also no doubt a different man to who was at 57 too. Certainly in how he views the music, the timing of its release and how it sounds too. I would have no doubt that if had decided to release the full version of SoTT, then he would've mixed it from scratch later in life. He'd have different ears, especially so many years removed from it. There are just so many variables to determine when it comes to releasing something that is so personal after that person is no longer around, I'm not sure it can be done correctly. And if it can't be done at the bare minimum of what the person would've wanted, then I think it should be left alone.
[Edited 4/30/16 5:58am]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #29 posted 04/30/16 5:57am

BanishedBrian

leecaldon said:

kano said:

Philly76 said: I'm not wanting to dismiss your point of view, I'm not saying mine is hundred percent correct either but I think it bears thinking about. It just didn't sit well with me that within a day or two of his passing there was a swell (online) of people talking about the vault, salivating because it's guardian is no longer here to control it. [Edited 4/30/16 5:30am]

I think you've got it wrong on this one. Prince's comments suggested he would have no problem with the Vault material released. I find it utterly bizarre that someone who fought so hard for their legacy left no instructions as to how to go about it though. Can't get my head around that.

To use the most extreme example, let's say there's an original/long version of Extra Loveable in the Vault. That's an amazing song, that will surely get released, as it's the cream of the crop.

If Prince were giving detailed instructions of what to do, how would he be able to cause that song to be released given the rape language at the end? There's no way he could do so.

If he simply leaves it there with no instructions what to do, the practical effect is the song gets released, but he's never blamed for authorizing it. History will say it was pulled out of his private Vault and released without his specific authorization. That's really the best outcome for him if he wanted his music released but he was in a different moral place today than he was in the mid-80s.

No Candy 4 Me
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 1 of 2 12>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Prince: Music and More > The Vault - Open or Closed?