On a sidenote I don't believe there's any recorded case where anyone ever sued Prince over credits, were there? A COMPREHENSIVE PRINCE DISCOGRAPHY (work in progress ^^): https://sites.google.com/...scography/ | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
laurarichardson said: databank said:
Why can't people care to check Princevault? It's explained black on white over there. She sent him demos and he freely reworked them as he pleased, adding both music and lyrics to each track. Only thing is he didn't ask her for permission before releasing Souls Sanctuary and Eye'll Never Be Another Fool and since she didn't know, she wasn't able to tell him that other people had helped her writing the tracks, and those other people got ripped off their credit and share of royalties (though she did receive credits and royalties). Even worse, Prince omitted St. Victor from the royalties of Van Gogh when he gave it to the band of the same name, so she didn't get anything at all for that one (I suspect he just forgot, I don't see why he would try and rip her off credits or royalties from a minor release by an obscure band, given that the album musn't have sold more than a few thousand copies to this day, and that he probably made little more than a few hundred bucks outta it). -/- But she did get credit for the songs!!! So where is the theft? As far as the other people he has no way of knowing if they were really involved with writing the songs? Also why don't people copyright the songs. If music was copyright and the others writers were listed they could go after Prince at seems like their beef is with Sandra. I agree. What? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
databank said:
On a sidenote I don't believe there's any recorded case where anyone ever sued Prince over credits, were there? His sister sued him over U Got The Look. She lost. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I forgot that one, my bad. A COMPREHENSIVE PRINCE DISCOGRAPHY (work in progress ^^): https://sites.google.com/...scography/ | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Can you direct me to the Josh thread? [Edited 2/15/16 7:39am] The wooh is on the one! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I stand corrected then regarding André, though then I can't help wondering why the info was never corrected on Princevault. Thing is who knows who may have an agenda when. For all we know maybe ANdré lied in 1995 when talking to Nilsen, then changed his maind. Or maybe someone lied to Nilsen and André corrected the info. Or maybe even it's true but André wants to make peace with prince and decided to deny. A proper approach, the way historians work, would then be to say: the song was copyrighted by Prince at such date. X later claimed that he has stolen such song or bassline from André. Y later claimed X's claims were inaccurate. Same goes with Well Done or Power Fantastic and so on then: Song copyrighted by Prince. A source later claimed that the truth is that blah blah blah. Let the reader decide. We can't discard testimonies from third parties but I agree than caution may justify being less definitive about the infos at hand. In the case of Sandra St. Victor's songs though, there's little room for doubt when it come to credits since we have her original demos. But still OK, things should be sourced and put in context. . However I'm very surprised about David and Kiss. I clearly remember an article I've read not so long ago (maybe 2011 or 2012) where David himself described his recording session with much precision, including gear, and said he worked only based on the demo we have of the song with only one verse and chorus on guitar, and wrote the additional lyrics. It was not hearsay, it was him speaking, and it was very specific. So I'm VERY confused here if he later said this was utter BS. . Regarding the research we have it may be outdated and all but the problem is that we need a place where inaccurate infos can be corrected. I've spotted a lot of things that are on Princevault or the Vault book that have been contradicted since by other statements and research but the problem is that we all work separately, Princevault isn't always aware of that stuff (they're doing an amazing work but there's a small team it seems and I guess they also have jobs and families), and no one shares infos except in a complete random manner here. It's about time there's a board or a community where people can share/discuss sourced infos infos about recording sessions and discography and ONLY do that (i.e. it's not lost in between opinions about albums, "what if" tracklists, nonsense, Prince's haircut and other stuff). I'd like to think of a way of doing that if other people showed any interest. There's a LOT that could be uncovered, discovered and solved working that way. For example I often created threads with very specific questions in the past, for my discography research, but because they were lost in a jungle, most of the people that could have had maybe shared the information I was looking for probably never even found the thread before it was swallowed by page 2. . My infos regarding Josh and Hannah come from public statements made by Hannah and Josh themselves saying that she first heard from Prince, ever, in Summer 2012 and that Josh only met Prince later, through her. I can't think of a secret agenda here like Hannah and Josh plotting with Prince saying "OK let's pretend we met a year after we really met so people won't suspect Josh was the mastermind behing Extraloveable 2011". This is silly. This is real time infos about current events, not old testimonies by former collaborators who may hold a grudge. . And just to be clear in case I wasn't: I've always defended the fact that as far as we know Prince is, and always was, the main creative force behind his work. People will tell he stole everything from others, that most of his songs were the result of collective jam sessions, or that he wouldn't have been Prince withgout W&L and so on. This is BS. I wanted to quote the VERY RARE cases where credits were disputed. Maybe it should be done with more caution, as explained above, but my original purpose was to say there's doubt about 15 songs among a thousand, so the whole debate regarding Prince being a thief is gross propaganda by people with an agenda. . And finally I apologize if I'm sometimes too harsh in my replies. I'm just TOTALLY FED-UP because I'm trying to live-up my passion with commitment and there's lot of irresponsible trolling and nonsense over here, that in the end prevent this community from being what it could be: a community where people seriously discuss their passion with a desire to learn, not just a desire to spread their holy gospel or spill their guts about how they feel about said passion. I could of course go elsewhere except... there's no elsewhere: the Org AFAIK is the only truly active and international online Prince fans community. . Peace. A COMPREHENSIVE PRINCE DISCOGRAPHY (work in progress ^^): https://sites.google.com/...scography/ | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Ah yes, the crumbling of a fan base....
Anyway, I think that back in the day Prince was somewhat naive about songwriting credits and what it all means in the grand scheme of things. Just like he was naive in signing those WB contracts that gave them ownership of his masters... Now I think he is much more savvy, but back then he just didnt seem to care about all that stuff. Hence, he got it wrong sometimes. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
You're smarter than this. Where is Prince's side to your argument? Why did Sandra not sue? . Yeah sure, the poor struggling artist can take on the rich pop star. Go ask Levi how that works out. . Prince has written 1,000+ songs...doesn't he deserve the benefit of the doubt instead of being labeled a fraud or thief. It is common for there to be songwriting beefs due to the tension between commercialism and art. Every major songwriter has had their share of credit disagreements. . The FACT of the matter is there are at least FIVE songs where SSV gets credited as a writer. We've heard her story and it sounds very plausible since Prince has pulled the same shit with other artists (taking their music and "improving" it). © Bart Van Hemelen
This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties, and confers no rights. It is not authorized by Prince or the NPG Music Club. You assume all risk for your use. All rights reserved. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
. I suggest you try to do the same with a Prince outtake: record and release your version of it. And then when Prince complains, tell him that you did credit him. . Let's see how that works out. © Bart Van Hemelen
This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties, and confers no rights. It is not authorized by Prince or the NPG Music Club. You assume all risk for your use. All rights reserved. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |