Author | Message |
Timeless... PARADE. I know there have been a couple threads on PARADE these last few weeks... Just can't help but saying I feel PARADE is one of his albums that has aged the best. It's so short, the Euro-Funk has aged very well than most of his 80's albums, even though most of his 80's albums are still timeless masterpieces...
There's this consistancy about PARADE that makes it sound so fresh. I personally this is his best "aged" Prince album of all time. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I think albums like 1999 and PARADE were more re-defining albums in Prince's 80's catalogues, even though Purple Rain is an iconic album and SOTT is a brilliant masterpiece, I feel overall as an ALBUM 1999 and PARADE were much more influential in terms of popular music.
While obviously 1999 sounds a little more "dated" due to the synthesizer and his Gary Newman influence for the 1999 album... PARADE just sounds so clear and sounds so fresh. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
YES. Absolutely one of his best albums and even better than Sign O The Times | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
It moves and flows beautifully, not that being able to tell what period a song/album was made is bad, but this is probably the #1 Prince album that is timeless and dateless
it begins and ends so quickly, it leaves U wanting more... so you create a playlist and add the long versions and B sides
and then that isn't enough and you add some unreleased pieces | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
OldFriends4Sale said:
It moves and flows beautifully, not that being able to tell what period a song/album was made is bad, but this is probably the #1 Prince album that is timeless and dateless
it begins and ends so quickly, it leaves U wanting more... so you create a playlist and add the long versions and B sides
and then that isn't enough and you add some unreleased pieces And then you watch the movie. What? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
lol Yep and then the videos and then the 6.7.1986 Birthday show
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
BoraBora said:
+1 "We just let people talk & say whatever they want 2 say. 9 times out of 10, trust me, what's out there now, I wouldn't give nary one of these folks the time of day. That's why I don't say anything back, because there's so much that's wrong" - P, Dec '15 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
+2 "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence." - Carl Sagan | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
It's beyond an album,beyond a Soundtrack; it stands up as a singular work of art. It's ironic that such colorful flourishes of sound, are packaged in Black and White photography--yet it's perfect. My only wish is that he furthered the sound for just one more album (Dream Factory?). I think the Revolution had at least one more great album ahead of them | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I agree it is a work of art, that could not be limited as an album or a soundtrack
They had more than one great album ahead of them. 1983-1986 was just a touch of possibility of music. For the next 4-5 years at least, they could have just released the music that was not released on a album of those years and just concentrate on touring, doing shows, videos etc | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
BoraBora said:
Why do you call this a trilogy? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
NorthC said: BoraBora said:
Why do you call this a trilogy? I've always looked at it that way too, it sure felt like it at the time "We just let people talk & say whatever they want 2 say. 9 times out of 10, trust me, what's out there now, I wouldn't give nary one of these folks the time of day. That's why I don't say anything back, because there's so much that's wrong" - P, Dec '15 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
That Stockholm show is just fantastic. Great CD. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
NorthC said: BoraBora said:
Why do you call this a trilogy? Because it consists of 3 items. More specifically, 3 items in a similar vein. ATWIAD and Batman on each end don't seem to fit into the narrative. Chili Sauce. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
PopcornFetus said: NorthC said: Why do you call this a trilogy? Because it consists of 3 items. More specifically, 3 items in a similar vein. ATWIAD and Batman on each end don't seem to fit into the narrative. They do. It makes much more sense to look at Around-Parade-Sign O'the Times as a trilogy. Here he is exploring the artistic freedom he got after Purple Rain and he is looking at the world, first in an idealistic, then a romantic and finally in a realistic sense with Sign o'the Times as its climax. And we can see Lovesexy-Batman-Graffiti Bridge as a trilogy where he is exploring the fight between good and evil. And both SOTT and GB are double albums that feature a lot of older songs so you can see them as albums that close an era. On Diamonds & Pearls he was on a totally different path again. [Edited 10/22/15 3:09am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Totally agree! This is a flawless album that is timeless. Of all his albums this is the one that gets the most play and its been this way since its release in 86. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I personally feel Parade has aged the best out of all his albums... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
And the correct thing to do was eventually talk of 4, because on the effective sequence there is also "The Black Album", maybe musically minor than the 3 but historically important the same. 2) 1999 - Purple Rain - Around The World In A Day 3) Parade - Sign - The Black Album - Lovesexy
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Sure. I just have a different view. Next to the ones I mentioned above, I think we can see Dirty Mind-Controversy-1999 as a trilogy. Let's call it the sex trilogy. And every time a double album to round it off. Yes, I really see a pattern there. [Edited 10/22/15 8:59am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
or maybe it would have been impossible to keep that quality of songwriting up forever?
Wendy and Lisa were good musicians who co wrote some great songs with him, but they are given excessive amount of credit just because they were there. They should not be given credit for songs that they did not help write just because they were part of the band.
I mean we are talking about a guy who wrote stuff like When Doves Cry and The Beautiful Ones by himself (according to his bandmates). Clearly, he is capable of writing great songs by himself. Infact, Wendy and Lisa have never claimed to have co written many of his songs- its simply some W&L fans that give them credit for stuff they had nothing to do with. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
duccichucka said:
I don't need to protect a guy's genius who has written gems like WDC, Nothing Compares 2 u, anna stesia etc. Obviously his band members have made several amazing and significant contributions. As far as pop music is concerned, i don't think it is a co incidence that other great artists also made their best records in their 20's/ early 30's and have failed to replicate that since. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Sound wise... I dare to say this album has aged better than Purple Rain and SOTT... Not saying it's musically better, it's just without a lot of the lynn drum and synths on PARADE, the sound still sounds and feels so fresh... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Yes, those Linn drum machines sound kind of old fashioned now. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Yes it was a very MATURE album, and the direction he started going into during this 1985-1986 period I could easily see Prince soaring above the need to do something he's done in the 1990s that just was not worthy of someone of his status. . Once the Revolution fell away we see an immediate drop off. SOTT of course being a part of the Dream Factory, the magic of the later 1987/88 period is the result of the nearness of that previous period. And that most of the people in the camp then were still from that 1983-1986 period most were a part of that Purple Rain-Parade era . He had a very intimate connection with Lisa from 1980 and then Wendy and Susannah, not to mention Jonathan(Melvoin) and David(Coleman). Prince in 1998 even called that period a 'community'. The more open a person is and interconnected to the people in their life the more creative and expressive. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
To me, the Purple Rain sound is still very ahead of it's time, it has a more futuristic feel to it, that they don't sound old fashioned now. . Some years ago Sheila E did a Prince spoof where the did some linn drum beats. and there was nothing old fashioned about it, it sound so fresh and live | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Are there any fresh new listeners to Prince here that can evaluate how they like "Parade" as an album?Nostalgia and being a teenager is a powerful thing that affects perception. My art book: http://www.lulu.com/spotl...ecomicskid
VIDEO WORK: http://sharadkantpatel.com MUSIC: https://soundcloud.com/ufoclub1977 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
good point. Except, I rediscovered a lot of Prince music after having fallen out of Prince for a long period of time. I've bought albums, paid the money and got home to find out it was Sugar and I tried to make myself like it because I paid/lost that money I tried to like Graffiti Bridge... it's just crap.
. I've also relistened to music and watch shows years later and wondered why I like it then.
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |