Author | Message |
NME magazine 100 most influential artists right now
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
hm, i'm not really suprised at Radiohead being no 1. It is the shitme after all. Not saying Radiohead havent been influential, just that there are just other, bigger artists that could of gotten no.1 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Bowie I can see in the top two, but Radiohead is rated WAY WAY WAY too high IMO. I can easily think of 20-30 or more big name artists that Prince has influenced, Radiohead I have to struggle to think of 10 minor names/bands. Change it one more time.. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
lezama said: Bowie I can see in the top two, but Radiohead is rated WAY WAY WAY too high IMO. I can easily think of 20-30 or more big name artists that Prince has influenced, Radiohead I have to struggle to think of 10 minor names/bands. I agree, but what you must understand is that the NME is a very peculiarly British institution, whose tastes reflect an increasingly small subset of the population. You and I might find that it hardly reflects properly our taste in music, but for, say, my uncle (who was of this particular musical generation), I can pretty much assure you that the two most important artists within his musical "canon" would be Bowie and Radiohead, whom I personally find a tad overrated by British people anyway. Basically what I'm trying to say is that the NME is only relevant to very few people in Britain, so their lists should be taken with a pinch of salt. Excuse me for being not as erudite on this matter as I should, I am somewhat drunk Heavenly wine and roses seems to whisper to me when you smile...
Always cry for love, never cry for pain... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
The Cure and Slint are in there but right at the back end of 100 artists!!!! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
This kind of music "journalism" is a waste of time. But hey, they need to sell magazines to earn some money, so they do another of these totally subjective lists. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Oh I see. I was wondering why I'd never heard of this mag. Change it one more time.. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I found myself agreeing with you....until you said Bowie was "over-rated". He's a bona-fide musical legend and boundary-pusher (his androgynous presence far preceeding Prince) and quite unique in terms of style and song-writing - on a par with Prince. No-one can over-rate his contribution to popular music. And it's not only the Brits who laud Bowie, he has global status and respect.
With regard to the NME, they had their day - there was a time when they were an important music publication, but lost their way at the beginning of the noughties. It is essentially Britain's version of Rolling Stone. Furthermore, lists like these are utterly meaningless. ...we have only scratched the surface of what the mind can do...
My dance project; www.zubzub.co.uk Listen to any of my tracks in full, for free, here; www.zubzub.bandcamp.com Go and glisten | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Well I did say I was drunk, my judgement was obviously impaired to the point where I failed to recognise Bowie's genius Nah, what you say is fair enough, I'm sure most people would agree with you. "Over-rated" was the wrong word to use really (I say, backpedalling furiously ), I can't deny the profound effect he's had on pop music over the last 40+ years, all I meant was that I don't enjoy his stuff as much as some others. I mean, Hunky Dory's pretty damn great (mostly) and he has recorded some of the best pop songs of all time, but often I'm hard pressed to sustain my interest throughout a whole album. Again you're right in saying he's not just appreciated by British audiences, but I do find that they tend to be the ones who afford him a huge amount of cultural capital, for many here he's not just a great pop musician but a pop artiste par excellence. I tend to find such veneration a bit grating so maybe I'm just kicking against a sacred cow. I mean, you probably remember that Bowie thing that was at the V&A about a year ago (maybe you went). After a while I just got a bit tired of publications like The Guardian and Time Out bandying about adjectives like "unmissable" and stuff like that, made me roll my eyes a bit. But yeah, I definately respect Bowie a great deal, just not as crazy about him as many on this here fair isle. Anyway, to drag this post slightly back on topic, I definately agree with you regarding the Rolling Stone comparison with the NME, they're both magazines that used to have a huge amount of influence on their respective pop cultures, but have become increasingly out of touch as the years go by. I do think however, that the NME still maintains something of a unique culture, as irrelevant as it is to people not still in thrall to British guitar pop. Rolling Stone seems to me like it's now just a media mag that is really rather jack of all trades when it comes to covering popular culture. Finally, your last sentence is bang on, but they're kinda fun to pick apart, despite the sheer pointlessness of such a task. [Edited 8/11/14 12:58pm] Heavenly wine and roses seems to whisper to me when you smile...
Always cry for love, never cry for pain... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
This is about the 100 most influential artists RIGHT NOW. Im surprised Prince even made the list. If it was "of all time" then sure, Prince should be on the list. But I dont think he is influencing many artists right now, as we speak. If anything, he is showing the industry how NOT to market yourself. So, I guess that is influential I suppose, just for the wrong reasons. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I am not surprised he is there. Many of the current artists call him an influence. If he would allow, he would have been sampled on many many records or countless people would work with him... Pharell just said he woud love to make a record with him or David Guetta. Rita Ora just made some songs with him... Arcade Fire covered controversy recently... Lorde cited Prince as an major influence... Or take the Frozen soundtrack...one of the songs came out from Prince`s LETITGO The list is endless;) | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
100. Deerhunter | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
No, that was a joke. http://blog.thecurrent.org/2014/05/sorry-prince-did-not-actually-inspire-disneys-let-it-go/ | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Well, that is a more considered and erudite response....and fair play! (Although, I still like the drunk you too!).
I cannot fault your appreciation of him and suspected that perhaps you didn't necessarily dig everything he has put out (neither do I for that matter - I've enjoyed many albums....Diamond Dogs and Ziggy being among my favourites), but there's others that don't caress my ear so well. I wasn't at the V&A either, but was aware of it.
I agree with your assessmnent of NME and Rolling Stone, though I pay so little attention to them these days (far from the days of the late 80/s and early 90s when I bought them regularly), that I don't feel in a position to really say what they are anymore. Like most other paper publications though, I guess they're really having to work out a new identity as they adapt to the modern digitial world.....as well as a new business model - hey, much like us musicians!
And, yeah....I can think of much worse ways to waste time
[Edited 8/13/14 15:49pm] ...we have only scratched the surface of what the mind can do...
My dance project; www.zubzub.co.uk Listen to any of my tracks in full, for free, here; www.zubzub.bandcamp.com Go and glisten | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
There's nothing in Kanye West's "music" that I've heard that I could identify as being influenced by Prince.
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
He was much more than most 70s British rock - he blended genres and styles in a way that is similar to Prince - Bowie didn't necessarily revolutionise music, or invent a new genre, but he effectively absorbed a broad range of styles and mades it sound like it was all his anyway!
And then he could also just sound unique - can't think of anything much that sounds like Space Oddity (certainly back when it was released and perhaps even in all the time that has passed since). And put something on like Sound and Vision today and it still sounds really fresh.
Anyhow, it's no biggie, natch ...we have only scratched the surface of what the mind can do...
My dance project; www.zubzub.co.uk Listen to any of my tracks in full, for free, here; www.zubzub.bandcamp.com Go and glisten | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
this list is literally all over the place and makes little sense to my head.. Change it one more time.. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Rebeljuice said: This is about the 100 most influential artists RIGHT NOW. Im surprised Prince even made the list. If it was "of all time" then sure, Prince should be on the list. But I dont think he is influencing many artists right now, as we speak. If anything, he is showing the industry how NOT to market yourself. So, I guess that is influential I suppose, just for the wrong reasons. Prince does have a lot of influence on artist today from Pharrell to Justin Timberlake. For many producers and musicians. The usage of Linn drum sounds, artist writing and producing themselves. Most may not be blatantly showing their influence but yet his impact on the music industry has some kind of influence on many artist of today. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |