One was in it 4 the Art of music One was in it 4 the Love of money One was in it 4 the Approval of others............... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
all 3 had fathers who extremely helped the outcome of their fame
their fathers play a large part of who they are | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Because Madonna remained with a major . Point blank.
If Prince remained on a major, he would have his output marketed still, concert sponsorship, etc etc. He would not have went off the grid so to speak which would have put him up there on the "so n so has a new one and here's the first single" level of awareness. This would have proven to make several songs as top 20 hits, keeping him just as relevant as Madonna and others.
To be on Madonnas level you have to be part of the machine..all the time.
Prince had brass balls to do what he did. "Climb in my fur." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Graycap23 said: One was in it 4 the Art of music One was in it 4 the Love of money One was in it 4 the Approval of others..... No, that applies to all 3 artists, like it or not...shit, that applies to EVERY artist | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
yup | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
While I think $250/$650 million whatever the amount they're talking about is nothing but a rough estimate by so-called "experts" - (who btw, Forbes estimated her net worth to be $325 in 2007, quite impressive how she doubled the amount in only 5 years, even after the divorce settlement and all that don't u think?) - I don't think it's surprising or hard to figure out why Madonna's got more $$$ than Prince. MJ and Madonna have been making more radio friendly, commercially-oriented music than Prince which explains why they sold more albums, why their concert tickets are more expensive and actually, let's just think about the amount of money they must've earned from endorsements alone.. I tend to agree with most of the posts above - it's true they had very different approach to creating albums compared to Prince. Though a lot of people, essentially will only care about the outcome - as long as the album is excellent, they won't care too much about artist's attitude or the creative process behind.
[Edited 9/30/12 18:42pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
as a performer, Johnny Mathis is 2nd to none in one or more decades : http://www.discogs.com/ar...leases_All
about the BIG 3 : MJ will remain the #1 by far ,with only 2 albums, SURE !but on the one hand : Thriller shook the planet as an earthquake as you know (don't need to give figures) ; on the other hand , The Bad TOur included 123 concerts to 4.4 million fans across 15 countries. At the Time , he could strike 21 sold out concerts in a row only at Wembley (instead, he only did 7) The tour grossed $125 million ($247 million in 2012 currency , still the biggest grossing in the history for a single act). In the early 90s , he achieved another path with Dangerous (the best selling album in the world outside the US; still today)
when you said Big 3, big 4 ... you talk about Figures , and MJ has always Meant THE BIGGEST in this field. Long days, lonely nights : TAMBORINE | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
^
nah.. here we go again:
MJ was the true king of "pop".
Prince still is the true king of "sexual funk".
btw Prince is ranked higher, a more important artist than MJ - ranked by the Rolling StonE:
Rolling Stone: 100 Greatest Artists of All Time: The Immortals
http://www.rollingstone.c...e-19691231
http://www.rollingstone.c...n-19691231
. [Edited 10/1/12 4:02am] Prince 4Ever. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Not really shocking considering it's Rolling Stone. They say some really stupid stuff. The fact Elvis is 3 says a lot actually | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Even though I love Prince more than any artist, Madonna was able to do something after the 80's andn 90's, that Prince wasn't able to... She remained *relevant*. For a 50+ year old artist who always aimed for the charts, I think it's an amazing feet, and she doesn't deserve the disrepect she gets a lot. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Lol............2 some degree I suppose u are right. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
this is true
it reflected a lot of her being still connect and involved in 'everyday life' and social life she challenged things addressed thing exposed things and that is a big part of what 'artists' do
Michael & Prince became very detached from 'everyday life' in the 1990s... Madonna still washes her own dishes and cleans up her own house vs P & MJ having someone do it for them (not saying one is bad or good) but shes very much in living, even her spiritual/religious searchings were a lot more touchable to people doing the same
Some of this could be the result of gender
You can't be still relevant and a part of pop culture still be in high demand by the top fashion designers and photographers as well us up coming dj and underground producers and not have talent and smarts. showing boob or butt doesn't do that | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
lol I would say Michael having started out so young being a vessel 4 fame via his father was probably the one that didn't do it for the approval of others(outside 'FATHER') or for money
Who doesn't want to make money, Prince was poor and living home 2 home in Minneapolis and Madonna left home moved to NYC and lived poor ... so Money would have to be a part of it, nothing wrong with it | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Ok, Madonna managed 2 stay in the picture but what she did on this last tour could destroy that legacy....a lot of people thought it was silly 2 show "flesh" 4 a +50y old artist!!!! I think Prince gets more respect 4 his talent these days, thanx 2 his concerts and musicianship. [Edited 10/1/12 8:16am] [Edited 10/1/12 8:17am] Love4oneanother | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I'm not sure how "staying relevant" has 2 do with making good music. Madonna has 3 or 4 songs in her whole career that I'd actually listen 2. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
So my name is Endorphin The 80's are over and the time has come4 a new proclamation of love and fun Pills and thrills and daffodils will kill... If you don't believe me or don't get it, I don't have time to try to convince you, sorry. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Very interesting assessment! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I heard that! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
What does the music in this song sound like? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
So do some of you all think it really matters to own your masters? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Very sparse stripped down synth-funk. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
The Purple People on here know these tracks,ND. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Michael was quite prolific in the 70s, if you include his J5 & Jacksons work. lol...
I agree with you though, Madonna isnt quite on MJs & Prince's level. Prince was very prolific in the 80s!!! When the power of love overcomes the love of power,the world will know peace -Jimi Hendrix | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Isnt this the same people who did the same list some years ago and had Alicia Keys, Timberlake, Coldplay and other contemporary artist as the top 100 ? When the power of love overcomes the love of power,the world will know peace -Jimi Hendrix | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
"There's something about those movies, I have to say, that is very endearing . I don't think that the acting is so great a lot of the times, but it has that excitement of youth, that I go, 'Yeah I get that!'" Andrew McCarthy (St Elmo's Fire, Pretty In Pink etc)
This is who I feel about the Big 3 and the 1980s | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
"Simply put, there's a big difference between an artist and a pop star." - Very good statement IMO. Good Show Stoned! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Is there really only one women in the top 35? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Is Nirvanna seriously ranked above MJ and Prince? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
in general, i think the more naturally gifted you are, the less willing you are to compromising your talent. and so the less universal and marketable you become.
which is to say the really gifted artists are never the richest. and money really doesn't matter as far as art goes.
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Why wouldn't they? There's money involved.
Also it's not hard to see about the fortunes of the always-mentioned threesome and their outcomes. It's become a broken record to discuss this really. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |