They fucking dropped "Rhiannon"? "On the Road Again" and "Lola"? Rolling Stone magazine was relevant in the 70's, but their almost as bad as Entertainment Magazine when it comes to critical evaluation of pop music. They're scoring more points now with their non-music related articles for sure. There's no pop analysis credibility in there now, and I think they were losing it by the late 80's. Even in the late 80's the english mags like Melody Maker were so much better. Now those English magazines seem anemic of music criticism too. Outside of politics and history based articles, I don't put much water in these music rags writing. Same goes for movie related articles. It seems like interesting individual critical views have gone on the wayside for bandwagoning, money soaking vibe. My art book: http://www.lulu.com/spotl...ecomicskid
VIDEO WORK: http://sharadkantpatel.com MUSIC: https://soundcloud.com/ufoclub1977 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I guess the issue is when you have a weak argument to begin with and keep getting shut down, you dog MJ when all else fails. Prince, in you I found a kindred spirit...Rest In Paradise. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Yep. Prince, in you I found a kindred spirit...Rest In Paradise. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
You have to have an argument for it to be weak. I'm simply stating that The Beatles were important and changed music. This is the first time I've ever visited a planet where that is considered a "weak argument." Again, not really looking to discuss MJ, but if only to defend my earlier statement...
Regardless of whether you find what I said to be cold, it's a universally accepted truth that his career was at an all-time low and that he was hemorrhaging money when he died. It's also true that his back catalog sales soared after his suicide (or whatever you want to call it), plus he got a hit (albeit morbid) movie out of the deal. Not really seeing what is wrong with stating any of that, being that it's pretty much accepted fact.
The Jackson 5, Off the Wall and Thriller were awesome though. (Although Thriller has aged the least gracefully of those.) Personally, I take Janet's Jam & Lewis studio albums by leaps and bounds. Those albums album still sound off the hook, fresh and maybe even more erotic than Prince's nastiest (but maybe because I'm a straight dude).
I promise to lay off M.J. from here on in... unless asked. "There is two kinds of music, the good, and the bad. I play the good kind."
Louis Armstrong | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
moderator |
quoted for truth.
and i'm done. like i have nothing better to do than invent mythical magazines and friends... suuuure.
all i can say is, this site is long overdue for a few changes to prevent... certain idiotic debates from continuing. not as if any other people other than the OP believe that dylan or beatles have more great songs than Prince anyway, so it is what it is. [Edited 6/18/11 5:55am] |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Nope, not a one.
Let me know when you find that list that you were so insistent on throwing in my face. You know, that Rolling Stone Top 500 Songs thingy you mentioned that gave Prince more "great songs" than Dylan and The Beatles. Tell you what, as this forum is my witness, produce it and I'll Paypal you $100. Go on, boy.
[Edited 6/18/11 7:12am] "There is two kinds of music, the good, and the bad. I play the good kind."
Louis Armstrong | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Moderator moderator |
You had me @ "end this thread". Studies have shown the ass crack of the average Prince fan to be abnormally large. This explains the ease and frequency of their panties bunching up in it. |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |