"Keep on shilling for Big Pharm!" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - ![]() |
Yea you know what are you gonna do......I normally dont have the time or energy to get into lengthy conversations or arguments with folks on the internet no less... or take time outta my day to start lecturing people but after reading his speech...I'm like "Come ON man...Are you for real right now". I joined this site to have fun, not to fight with people but I just had to say what I said.
Whatever. He's probably cussing someone out or telling them how mentally challenged they are because they had a few typos in their thread right this minute.
Rant over.
Now i'm done | |
- E-mail - orgNote - ![]() |
fuck id hate 4 sum1 like u 2 be moderator
"writing inadequately"
what about people with learning difficulties...or those who cant speak, nor write good english???
"I wish I could be a moderator here"
Neva happen!, ur r far too self-righteous and should understand more...like what i mentioned above ^...ur not god!...get ova urself!......and those sites u mention above that u r used 2...why dont u stay there in ur "comfort zone"? and leave us well be? and how dare u critize mods on this org!!!...who do u think u r?...and let me make this clear.....u will NEVA EVA EVA be a mod on this org....cuz of teh first case i mentioned above ALONE!!! C U Next Tuesday!!!
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - ![]() |
I sold mine for $25.00 here locally. I dont even have one anymore. lol | |
- E-mail - orgNote - ![]() |
Are you kidding me? This is not my endorsement for a Jake For Moderator campaign, but puh-leez. People have lively opinions about the current mods (there's, like, 4 despite it showing about 11 million above every subforum). I ain't gonna name names, but... I'm just gonna say that if some dude correcting your grammar is the worst of your moderator troubles, you'll do fine. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - ![]() |
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - ![]() |
Jakeasaurus, what is this super-secret forum you mentioned?
I've read your posts throughout the years. Some are on-point; most are civil but some are just outright arrogant and mean. You're not going to change the world (or even this website) with that kind of attitude.
Blasting someone for not finding 20Ten on eBay? Granted, it's easy to find there but you could've (should've) just offered up the links you found as a helpful gesture.
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - ![]() |
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - ![]() |
I get what you're saying, but that's really not turning the other cheek. Turning the other cheek refers to someone who has wronged you in some way . . . the analogy of getting slapped in the cheek, and instead of retaliating you offer them your other cheek to slap.
This thread started off with someone inquiring about 20Ten and turned into something nasty. Even if the OP was not sincere in their request, at least their post was not malicious.
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - ![]() |
Some people take offense to blatant ignorance, I guess? I know some people are offended by stupidity (or rather, their perception of what "stupidity" is). Admittedly, this is devil's advocate.
Anyway, the point is that people get sick and tired of the same posts, the same kind of stupdity, and the lack of moderation. Some people have criticized the mods on Prince.org for being fickle or obsessive or malicious and they don't even moderate at all like I've seen other forum moderators. (For instance, it's pretty customary for mods to be example posters and I can tell you that that is for sure not the case with some mods.) A lot of stupid shit that runs roughshod over this forum should be culled. The bolded and highlighted notices above are NOT taken seriously, they're moderated by what seems like ONLY luv4u here in P:M&M, and then we have threads like this where someone's laziness was encouraged at the expense of the sanity of others or the credibility of the forum.
This sort of issue happened a lot on Alt.Music.Prince. Why? Because of the lack of any moderation. Incessant posts that have been answered tons of times before (hi, Princepedia! what's happening with you?!), posts that trail off into bizarre crap about egypt or lord of the rings and Prince's relation to them, etc. Truthfully, I think we need a new subforum for just the creepy people to post in and they can run on incessantly about shit that makes no sense and post their annoying poems and pictures of random girls there as opposed to here where we get so few worthwhile threads.
You think that the environment here has not suffered because of the lack of moderation causing stupid threads like this to litter the top of the forum? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - ![]() |
Optimus2 said: fuck id hate 4 sum1 like u 2 be moderator
"writing inadequately"
what about people with learning difficulties...or those who cant speak, nor write good english???
"I wish I could be a moderator here"
Neva happen!, ur r far too self-righteous and should understand more...like what i mentioned above ^...ur not god!...get ova urself!.....and those sites u mention above that u r used 2...why dont u stay there in ur "comfort zone"? and leave us well be? and how dare u critize mods on this org!!!...who do u think u r?...and let me make this clear.....u will NEVA EVA EVA be a mod on this org....cuz of teh first case i mentioned above ALONE!!! C U Next Tuesday!!!
When I say inadequate writing, I am not necessarily talking about spelling and grammar, unless it's extremely illegible. And let me pose a question to everyone: Is being self-righteous such a bad thing when everything you're being self-righteous about is completely true and correct? [Edited 1/15/11 5:19am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - ![]() |
Self-righteousness, by its very definition, negates your assertion that it can be "completely true and correct"... To further aid you in your quest for martyrdom, I shall educate you.
Definition of SELF-RIGHTEOUS: convinced of one's own righteousness especially in contrast with the actions and beliefs of others : narrow-mindedly moralistic
http://www.merriam-webste...0righteous
Let's not even mention that it is entirely incorrect to be narrow-minded, ever. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - ![]() |
I absolutely agree that the environment here has suffered from a lack of moderation.
There are far too many silly threads (e.g. "What kind of cereal does Prince eat"), too many duplicate threads (e.g. "How many instruments does Prince play") and threads, like this current one, that really don't need to exist at all. Some of the threads (like the aforementioned Instruments thread) are covered in FAQ; the problem is that new thread submissions seem to be set to auto-approval. Instead, they should be pointed to the FAQ and their thread submission declined.
I also think that the option of quoting a previous post (with entire text and photos) should be limited. I can't tell you how frustrating it is to scroll through hundreds of duplicate photos to find the one-sentence reply. Even with high-speed Internet, some of these threads get bogged down very quickly with photos. I would almost venture to remove photos within threads entirely, but we're not at that point yet. I think with a fuller gallery section, we'd see fewer and fewer "Post images of Prince during XXXXX-era" threads.
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - ![]() |
eh, I'm not a fan of arguing semantics, but I would say that I am convinced of my own righteousness (how a forum should be run) , in contrast with the actions (shit posting, poor moderation) and beliefs (defending shit posting, poor moderation) of others. You're an odd dude, Spin. On my side one post, trynna argue with me the next post. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - ![]() |
I believe they call that "neutrality" in your language of choice.
Se7en said:
I also think that the option of quoting a previous post (with entire text and photos) should be limited. I can't tell you how frustrating it is to scroll through hundreds of duplicate photos to find the one-sentence reply. Even with high-speed Internet, some of these threads get bogged down very quickly with photos. I would almost venture to remove photos within threads entirely, but we're not at that point yet. I think with a fuller gallery section, we'd see fewer and fewer "Post images of Prince during XXXXX-era" threads.
Agreed. I have never understood the Image threads. Unless I was looking for a specific picture of Prince, why is Google not enough? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - ![]() |
Stated as simply as possible; there is a difference between being self-righteous and being a self-righteous asshole. You have yet to learned that difference. Your heavy handed belittling of others because you don't like the way they post is mean-spirited, rude and mannerless. There is no place for it here, on any other board, or in any situation in the world of face to face human interaction, as it adds nothing to the quality of the discussions you are supposedly so concerned with. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - ![]() |
Ok let me just sum this up, I see some of you are angry about the post allowed on this forum.. ok understandable, but let me just allow you to see it everyone elses' way... If you want to act like an ass because you think you got it like that on the org, as much as you love it and think it's the best thing on the Earth, to the rest of the world you plain and simply look like an ass. Nice nice nice, but you know what?? that shit only makes you look more stupid, and proves everyone right... There is nothing wrong with people having their own opinion, but if you expect to be respected you have to give respect in return. I normally don't like to comment on situations like this, but you can not measure my or anyone elses' intelligence on this org and by the way it looks, you can't even measure your own. Don't care who the hell you think you are Take Care Everyone | |
- E-mail - orgNote - ![]() |