Hmm, well, yes and no, I suppose.
Long boring post:
2) Timing is everything, and so is mainstream acclaim. Had Prince done these sounds in the 1970s I doubt the mainstream audience would have given him the success he had in the 1980s. I mean, what if Prince is a man who makes this familiar type of music that we now know as "Prince"? His musical idiosyncrasies have always been present in all of his records, regardless of style and genre, so it is not far fetched to presume that Prince (to dumb it down:) has a way of writing, thinking and playing music that would (and is) be the same regardless of the times he lived in. This means that even Prince has a limited scale or framework of artistry to work with (granted, his framework is a lot bigger than 98 percent of all the other artists out there) and to succeed he had to hit the zeitgeist at the right moment.
My claim here is, that Prince was a certain type of artist with a certain type of earth shattering talent and a certain type of investigatory musical writing, arriving at a very specific time in our history, where a such man would succeed and where the music lovers were hungry for such a man and were perceptive to Prince's specific range of sounds. Talent + timing = genius.
So... I'd claim that Prince might finally have tried out all of his abilities, years back or recently (this is probably two hundred and fifty threads worth of discussion here on the .org), and Prince continues to make the music he's always done. 20ten could probably have been released in the 1980s as a so-so follow up to Dirty Mind - and back then it surely would have been a forward moving piece of work, but since we've heard these blips and beebs and sounds before, incorporated into some near 30 years of music history by other artists who felt inspired by the old geezer and found new ways to use them and made entirely new things out of them, 20ten sounds like a blast from the past, like a nostalgia record seasoned with everything Prince has learned in his career.
Everything in the 2000s is good and solid writing, but unlike the 1980s and some of the 1990s, it no longer points forward or creates the future. Prince now seems to toy around with the things he's learned and accomplished, he's making pot stews and gumbo's from all the ingredients he has in his talent bank, rather than expanding his universe (for instance, what was N.E.W.S. that Madhouse wasn't?). Nothing is wrong with this, in my opinion, as I think all critically acclaimed artists have their heyday at some point in time, and then it's over.
So no, not by a long shot is any Prince album from the 2000s genius, nor is the man himself one. No artist could make 3121 in the 2000s and be called a genius. Why? Because critics would say he stole more than plenty from the sonic library of Prince and needed to develop a style of his own, one that wasn't retro.
(Imagine Prince is a radio that just plays in an empty room. His station plays far more styles and genres than most other stations. Then suddenly in the 1980s people accidentially enters the room and catch up with the music station that Prince is. They party for ten years, and then they move on to other rooms. Prince's radio station, more or less, keeps playing the same tunes as always. No one hears them, except a few who's still hanging around enjoying the tunes. Every once in awhile Prince's radio plays so loud that the people in the other rooms can hear him, but every time that happens, people think: "Yeah, that was cool in the 1980s, great party that was".)
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Q '2001 - 2010 - P's release by ANY other artist would be proclaimed as genius..'
A: Err, no. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Thing is any new artist would not be allowed to do what Prince has done over the last decade. He has no record company dictating what he could or should put out and in what medium. His is a unique situation sure there have been peaks and troughs but in my eyes it has never been dull and you really have to applaud the diversity if nothing else. if you've gotta pay for things that you've done wrong I've gotta big bill coming at the end of the day- Gil Scott Heron
Prince.org where fans of Prince meet and stay up too late | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I totally agree with the OP, if it were any other artist they would be claimed as genius but here the albums get slayed. Trouble is there is alot to live up to.
so in 10 years we've had, The Rainbow Children N.E.W.S One Night Alone The Chocolate Invasion Slaughterhouse C Note Musicology 3121 Planet Earth Lotusflow3r 20Ten
plus ONA live + Indigo Nights
who else has released this much in 10 years?
She Believed in Fairytales and Princes, He Believed the voices coming from his stereo
If I Said You Had A Beautiful Body Would You Hold It Against Me? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Quality > Quantity
Prince used to be able to do his whole album a year thing. It doesn't work anymore, good songs are far and fewer between each other. It's to bad he doesn't work an album for 3-4 years and take the best from that time, but I know he'll never do it.
His discography declines year after year to the casual listeners. To them, he's becoming "That guy that was good in the 80's." and nothing more.
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
It's even more shocking in the UK, with just 1. And that was not technically Prince as it was The Most Beautiful Girl In The World, which was by . Not a single one of the 'classics' made it to the top of the UK charts. RIP | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
WOW ! I did not know that. I thought that he had more in the UK than in the US. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Good songs are subjective though. For me there are less skippers on Lotusflow3r and 20Ten than there are on Dirty Mind and 1999. I'm very happy with where Prince is at these days. RIP | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
The last thing by Prince I thought was great was Scandalous Sex Suite. That last 'genius' moment for me was Adore. There have been a couple good moments since then, but nothing I'm too interested in. I enjoy newer Prince stuff in parts. There's always something interesting on a new Prince record, but not necessarily and entire song. [Edited 7/13/10 6:18am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Well, of course they are subjective, and I actually love a lot of his 2000's stuff. I'm talking more about the casual listeners. Whenever I mention Prince in my group of friends/acquaintance's they just kind of look at me with that "You listen to Prince " look..
I actually agree that some of his later work his a lot better than some of his 80's stuff. [Edited 7/13/10 6:08am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I'm sure we're all well aware of that look! RIP | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
His lead singles usually hit the top ten for a good few years, he had a pretty good chart run here overall. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Agreed. Look at Andre 3000's The Love Below. He tapped into his inner Prince and that album was massive. If Prince would have released that album, it would have been categorized as a typical Prince album.
When it comes to Prince fans, there are some who claim to have made up their own minds about Prince's music. However, the reality is that they are heavily influenced by the popular idea that chart success/radio play/popularity/sales = quality music.
[Edited 7/13/10 8:12am] "New Power slide...." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
You forgot MPLSound. Prince 4Ever. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
that's an example of his diversity & versatility, but I'm not sure about genius.
To me his genius was in the creativity, the ability to think of things that nobody else would think of--like changing your name to a symbol or inventing words & concepts like Lovesexy--not to mention creating sounds nobody had ever heard before. My Legacy
http://prince.org/msg/8/192731 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
And another reality is that these people will succumb to group think and will hate (fill in the blank) album until the "group" deems the album a classic. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
What has become apparent is that there are 3 sides to this board:
People who would eat anything up Prince does
People who will hate anything prince does because they compare it to his past work.
The 3rd group, which I feel I fall in, is people who are fans who are aware of his past genius works and pray he restores some of that glory not by repeating his past or using the same instruments but by pushing boundaries again.
There are moments that I love.... Loved the Rainbow children musically, loved Fury on SNL, loved wasted kisses on NPS, liked some of the tracks on Target release,but overall his albums have been very uneven and uneventful.
Live on any given night with any instrument he can remind you of his genius, and is the best live performer I have ever seen.
Studio in the last 15 years, he has been mediocre.
The answer to the question is no based upon his releases in that date.
Music is the best... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Not so sure that you can boil Prince fandom down by putting people into three convenient "groups". That 3rd group, the one you are in, seems very convoluted and particular. "New Power slide...." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Hey, it happened with Around the World in a Day, and Lovesexy. More recently Come. Hell, even New Power Soul is starting to be praised. "New Power slide...." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I have a question and I don't mean to be picky asking you this but how can you grade some thing 8 or 9 out of 10 and call it average? I just find that to be a bit strange but I'm sure you will clarify it to me. I'm not a fan of "old Prince". I'm not a fan of "new Prince". I'm just a fan of Prince. Simple as that | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I'm not a fan of "old Prince". I'm not a fan of "new Prince". I'm just a fan of Prince. Simple as that | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
thankyou so much for that valuable contribution! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
thats why 360k + extra copies of the Mirror were sold in the UK on 1 day is it?. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I am still trying to understand why people claim to say ATWIAD is a classic. 3121,Musicology,Lotus and even PE are better. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Condition of the Heart > than anything on those albums. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Yep I agree with this. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Well said! Absolutely true. This Post is produced, arranged, composed and performed by WetDream | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I didn't like the way the question was posed that's all. But hey, no problem! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Nonesense! ....I can think of 20 tracks from the new one's that are better. If COTH was today...then its "another boring Prince ballad." This Post is produced, arranged, composed and performed by WetDream | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I love Paisley Park,Raspberry Beret,America,& Pop Life but many of the arguements that are made against this decade's albums can be said for ATWIAD. Condition is a cute song,no doubt, but it doesn't stand up against the stronger material on any of the new millennium's CDs. That's my opinion. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |