Author | Message |
Graffiti Bridge as a Play Last night I watched Graffiti Bridge. I noticed the movie had a theatrical feel to it moreso than traditional film works.
I believe its more closely related to a Gospel Play than a movie? Would you agree/disagree, why? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I don't know about a Gospel play but I think it would do better as a Broadway musical. Just like they remade another bomb, Xanadu. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ernestsewell said: exit stage left pursued by an ernest Just somewhere in the middle,
Not too good and not too bad. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
sweething said: Last night I watched Graffiti Bridge. I noticed the movie had a theatrical feel to it moreso than traditional film works.
I believe its more closely related to a Gospel Play than a movie? Would you agree/disagree, why? On stage with the right cast and production team behind it, I have a feeling that it would have worked better, But then, I don't think we would have seen the same people that are in the movie since they were not real actors who could perform a play eight or nine times a week. A theatre production is a whole lot different than staging a play, so I can see why it never emerged. To Prince, the movie is probably still one of his best work. At the time I remember him commenting about the commercial failure, "They didn't get it." Visually, it's very nice and the music is good. Some scenes work and some don't. I know plenty of other films that are worse than this. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
MrGravyLumps said: sweething said: Last night I watched Graffiti Bridge. I noticed the movie had a theatrical feel to it moreso than traditional film works.
I believe its more closely related to a Gospel Play than a movie? Would you agree/disagree, why? On stage with the right cast and production team behind it, I have a feeling that it would have worked better, >>>>>Yes, that's my feeling as well. There were only 3-4 sets in the film which could be manageable on the live stage. But then, I don't think we would have seen the same people that are in the movie since they were not real actors who could perform a play eight or nine times a week. >>>>>Deffinately. A theatre production is a whole lot different than staging a play, so I can see why it never emerged. >>>>>In what way? To Prince, the movie is probably still one of his best work. At the time I remember him commenting about the commercial failure, "They didn't get it." >>>>>They didn't get the message? What sort of reception did it get? I wonder if it is now considered a "cult classic"? Visually, it's very nice and the music is good. Some scenes work and some don't. I know plenty of other films that are worse than this. >>>>>Agreed. The music is good. I hadn't recognized the spritual nature of the lyrics and music previously (aside from Mavis Staple's choral solo) but this time it seemed rather obvious. Several scenes are nicely executed like the scene in the club with Morris and Ingrid. And there are many funny moments in the film as well. I liked it, again. I'm sure each time I watch there'll be something different to notice. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
On a totally different note, why is the outlook of my reply totally screwed up? What am I doing wrong? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
mine too, I dont know. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
[Edited 6/6/10 12:24pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
it pretty much is a play, considering how it was made. which is what makes it a poor film. it's really bad, but it's better than like, say, Rent or something (which I've only seen as a film). | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |