independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Prince: Music and More > Eye Records: A Complaint
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 2 of 2 <12
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #30 posted 05/02/10 10:07am

udo

avatar

elmer said:

I'm surprised anyone would pay for boots nowadays.

If you think an ipod or a pc is 'storage' then yes your remark's context is right.
Pills and thrills and daffodils will kill... If you don't believe me or don't get it, I don't have time to try to convince you, sorry.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #31 posted 05/02/10 10:23am

elmer

udo said:

elmer said:

I'm surprised anyone would pay for boots nowadays.

If you think an ipod or a pc is 'storage' then yes your remark's context is right.

I never intend spending on music digitally, want something tangible so my ipod is a try-before-I-buy/storage gadget.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #32 posted 05/02/10 11:07am

NouveauDance

avatar

elmer said:

NouveauDance said:

I really don't approve of putting officially released material on bootlegs, especially considering the sources for some of these tracks are low quality mp3s, that's pretty scuzzy.

tbf their WOW release was A+ quality, and disc2 here comprises the BOC and the pulled I'll Do Anything EP which're as good as you're gonna find.

I was referring specifically to the tracks only available on mp3 and no other source, i.e. the non-CD released NPGMC tracks and lf.com tracks etc.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #33 posted 05/02/10 11:22am

unique

avatar

i've knewn a few people who prefer pressed discs of boots, with the artwork as one of the main reasons for wanting them, rathern than being on pressed disc specifically. the people in question could all get the music for free, and they can get the artwork as jpgs and the original photos etc used as the artwork, so i suggest they just use the money on buying a printer instead and just print out louds of photos, but those folks just don't understand common sense. and really, how many times do they really listen to the cd or look at the artwork?

and ironically most if not all of them don't even have all the official releases, they'll have most of the normal albums, but not all the singles and not all the related artists stuff, and they are usually far from having a comprehensive collection of bootlegs, and they aren't that financially sound

so there is a market for this rehashed stuff unfortunately. perhaps as cd fades and ipods and mp3 players become more popular then things will fade more. there are a lot of people who purchase music legally, such as from cds, but will only play back from HD sources, such as ipods and streamers. i rarely stick a cd in the player, i have my music on pc's that i can stream around the house or put on usb stick or iphone/mp3 player to listen to elsewhere. i don't give two shits about the artwork. it's music by musicians, they didn't create the fucking artwork in the first place
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #34 posted 05/02/10 11:42am

vc40

avatar

unique said:

i don't give two shits about the artwork. it's music by musicians, they didn't create the fucking artwork in the first place


Exactly, content is what matters.
You can create some great package for a turd, but that won't change the content.
Busy doin' something close to nothing
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #35 posted 05/02/10 12:13pm

Chrisebabey

avatar

vc40 said:

elmer said:

disc2 here comprises the BOC and the pulled I'll Do Anything EP which're as good as you're gonna find.


Not sure if I understand this?
You're basicly saying this release is justified, because they ripped-off FREE releases and are charging money for it???
Except the odd 2 D4Me Remixes, NOTHING on this set is new or an upgrade.
But it's alright to charge crazy money for it, only because it's pressed?
What a joke of a release. (and so was WOW for the record)




How much of Vegas would we have had if Eye didn't make money to fund those kinda trips?

The moralistic fallacy.....
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #36 posted 05/02/10 12:26pm

vc40

avatar

Chrisebabey said:


How much of Vegas would we have had if Eye didn't make money to fund those kinda trips?


And your point is??
I didn't read anything about Vegas in this topic?
And I couldn't care less about those Vegas shows tbh.
Busy doin' something close to nothing
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #37 posted 05/02/10 12:32pm

Chrisebabey

avatar

vc40 said:

Chrisebabey said:


How much of Vegas would we have had if Eye didn't make money to fund those kinda trips?


And your point is??
I didn't read anything about Vegas in this topic?
And I couldn't care less about those Vegas shows tbh.



Chill, stand back and look at all the points of view.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #38 posted 05/02/10 12:54pm

Flaunt

avatar

Chrisebabey said:

How much of Vegas would we have had if Eye didn't make money to fund those kinda trips?

The moralistic fallacy.....


That's their choice. Doesn't justify selling the bootlegs. Many free labels release their own recordings from shows they paid to go to, travel, entry, hotels etc etc. They don't feel the need to 'reimburse' themselves. It's a crap justification and besides, they weren't the only people recording those shows AND they didn't record all the ones they released themselves either. There's many ways to obtain a recording..
[Edited 5/2/10 12:55pm]
[Edited 5/2/10 12:56pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #39 posted 05/02/10 12:58pm

vitriol

Chrisebabey said:




Chill, stand back and look at all the points of view.


So, the fact that they invested some money (with expected returns) to pay for all the Vegas recordings does entitle these wankers to charge money for already existing and circulating recordings that in the first place were mainly available for free? I don't want to sound rude but that can only be called a load of bullshit!

I'm afraid it's YOU who must consider other points of view because that one is pointless.

Particularly regarding Vegas, I wish they hadn't done anything thus preventing us from listening to that horror.

Regarding this (and other) LAME Eye Records 'efforts'... well I didn't need to have a crystal ball to say that but I told you all in this thread (http://prince.org/msg/7/333643?&pg=2) that this would happen.
[Edited 5/2/10 12:59pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #40 posted 05/02/10 1:01pm

Flaunt

avatar

I gather you're responding to 'Chrisebabey' and not me wink

edit: Ignore that, seen you added the quote now biggrin
[Edited 5/2/10 13:01pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #41 posted 05/02/10 1:05pm

vc40

avatar

Chrisebabey said:

look at all the points of view.


I'll give you my point of view: you should never pay for unauthorized recordings, simple.
Busy doin' something close to nothing
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #42 posted 05/02/10 3:35pm

ravein2thejoy

Heres the review from thedigitalgarden.org

I think the last paragraph sums it up nicely

here’s a number of reasons you don’t see outtake sets anymore. The fact that there really isn’t anything new out there is the most obvious one (with the rare exception of FBG’s recent release listed here but more on that later). In truth, what a set like this really amounts to is just a ‘collection’ of tracks put together by people with little or no imagination left. It’s the equivalent of going through your hard drive, chucking a few tracks into a favourites folder then charging an obscene amount of money to people for the privilege of listening to it. Of course, the carefully chosen wording dotted around the accompanying artwork for this set would have you believe otherwise but once you start sifting through the contents you soon realise that’s a bit of a con actually.

There’s a lot of stuff on here so I won’t talk about each track individually. Suffice to say, there is nothing new and what you have to decide is whether you can be bothered to go and get any of the tracks you need yourself (really not hard in the majority of examples) or actually buy this release to save you the bother. Well, you have a think about that while I talk about the content.....



The title ‘Lotus Box’ would suggest that we’re looking at a collection of mostly recent material and whilst that is true of Disc 1, the remainder of this box set amount’s to little more than uncredited theft and random filler material from related artists. I can’t abide these monstrous 3 or 4 CD sets that have no structure or purpose, seemingly being little more than being a pressed version of somebody’s iTunes folder. Anyway, let’s look at the first disc. This one comprises mainly of newer material from Prince. Everything from Discojellyfish and Ambient Loop ripped from Lotusflow3r.com to recent atrocities Purple & Gold and Cause and Effect. The Morning After is also just a rip from the downloadable version of the Lotusflow3r album and we’re also ‘treated’ to a couple of other tracks grabbed from the (now defunct) website. Great start....



As we progress we start to see the worrying trend of website pillaging continue as various Ahdio shows from the NPGMC days are raped of content for no logical reason whatsoever and the odd 3121.com download thrown in for good measure. Actually, truth be known, it’s a good job they put these tracks onto disc for me as I’d been living under a rock for the last 10 years. The only saving grace on this opening disc for me is that there is a chance the Dance 4 Me remixes are taken from the original acetates so we may have true lossless versions of them finally and seeing as these promo discs are extremely rare, this could be perceived as a positive inclusion. It would have been useful, of course, if Eye Records could have confirmed the source on their liner notes but they didn’t so we may never know for sure.



And so to Disc 2 (takes a large gulp of whisky....). The opening portion consists of the snippets collection that saw the light of day early in 2009 and are basically one and half minute teasers of a bunch of songs Prince recorded for possible use by other artists. The tape was passed around various studios for consideration and is a mixed bag but was certainly great for fans at the time, finally getting hold of the ‘legendary’ unreleased songs like ‘Cosmic Day’ and ‘Adonis & Bathsheeba’. There’s a good chance you may have missed these so their inclusion here isn’t all that bad.....shame the same can’t be said for what follows.....



Hey look, we’ve got a selection of Dream Factory era outtakes here....and WOW, they’re in new and improved quality. Where on earth did Eye scoop these gems from. They must have some real great contacts to have got.....oh wait, sorry I’ve just realised they stole them from FBG’s ‘Box O’ Chocolates’ release. Hey, at least they did the honourable thing and mentioned the source of the tracks on the artwork... They didn’t? Wait, let me just check the covers again.....err, nope, you’re right they didn’t. They did, however put a truly reprehensible quote on one part of the inlay cover with the words ‘Life is like a box of chocolates....’. Not sure they could sink much lower than that, do you? I’ve said all I need to say about these new versions in the original review I did (link further up) so I won’t waste any time repeating myself. I’m sure you get the general idea of my feelings about their inclusion here. The remainder of the songs also throw up some glaring errors with the liner notes. For instance, we have ‘Joy In Repetition’ billed as the ‘full intro’ version when in actual fact it is the segued version from ‘The Ball’ and ‘Rebirth Of The Flesh’ is described as “When the 3-LP [referring to Crystal Ball] was rejected, Prince included the song on the Camille album and it remains the only track from that album to be released” Well, that’s just all kinds of wrong. As for the rest of the disc we’re presented with the ‘I’ll Do Anything’ session tracks.....again. Bravo.



Disc 3 is material from related artists and its appeal is limited to whether you actually like these people’s music or not. Pop My Clutch is just the album version and I’m told that 'Exploding All Over Europe (Junior Vasquez Dance Mix)' and 'Hit U In The Socket (2001 Version)' are available to purchase officially from Rosie Gaines’ own website. Nothing else on this portion of this set does it for me personally, but that’s just my opinion as I don’t hold any real interest in these artists.



So I’m guessing it’s pretty clear by now that I don’t like this release. I don’t care for the content and I don’t care for the hefty price tag that accompanies it. It’s a lazy effort designed to attract the casual collectors or ill-informed. Eye Records need to get their act together and soon as they’re rapidly becoming the bootlegging equivalent of a bad cover band who waits around for someone to write a good song, then makes some money off it by playing it to others on the small club circuit. In the modern age of file sharing, releases like this are not going to win them any new fans or new customers for that matter and anyone who really feels the need to own this set will more than likely seek to download a free copy from any number of places around the internet. There’s still hope left with the upcoming Prince shows in Europe and maybe a small chance that Eye can redeem themselves with a quality release. However, they would do well in taking stock of their current output and thinking long and hard about whether any of it is truly worth it. You can only pull the wool over peoples ‘eyes’ so many times before they start to see you for what you truly are and with the recent slew of lacklustre releases, now might be a good time.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #43 posted 05/03/10 2:16am

BoraBora

To be honest, I never understood what's the problem.

In my vision, every effort like the FAB free release "BOC" is worth of every kind of thanks. When I listened to it, it was heaven for an old fan like me.
And still listen to it.

But if someone bring me the possibility to have all that sublime tracks pressed on factory pressed cd, it's only my decision to pay for it or not.
It's just a matter of paying a service, like when you have some tapes that you really care for it and you pay a professional service to have a regular pressed CD for preservation.

I don't know if I was the one here, but I still prefer to have music I care for on CD that on a PC.

Some time ago I lost a lot of audiotracks for a crash on my old PC.
With CDs I've got no worries.

So I'm happy for all people that are happy with MP3, Flac and every kind of audiofile.

But I feel no guilty to prefer to have my favourite outtakes on regularly pressed CD, if I can have the chance.
I don't pay for the music because music is still free.
I simply pay for the chance to have like I prefer.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #44 posted 05/03/10 2:56am

vitriol

^You can always decode these flacs and properly store them in a Cd or a DVD. It's just what losers like Eye Records do.

Have you ever thought that if free releasers hadn't put Box O'Chocolates out those grand signeurs from Eye Records would've never got hold of those tracks in that quality?

I'm not telling you what you should do, but I find it so sad that people have the guts to defend thieves and justify their actions.

In such a case, I'm happy you have to pay crazy money for something that everybody got for free.

So, enjoy your pressed discs ...if that 90min crap finally plays properly on EVERY player. I'm sure they always use that kind of medium because it 'should' be more difficult to pirate ( lol ) but when they ROB stuff put out by others FOR FREE they don't even have the decency to say where they got that from. Maybe they prefer their customers not to exactly know everything can be obtained with no money involved.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #45 posted 05/03/10 2:58am

Flaunt

avatar

BoraBora said:

Some time ago I lost a lot of audiotracks for a crash on my old PC.
With CDs I've got no worries


Not really considering CD's have a very limited life span before the contents start to deteriorate. What do you think is in a HD?
wink smile
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #46 posted 05/03/10 3:04am

vitriol

Oh, and they definitely should tell the retarded chimpanzee that writes their liner notes to learn his lessons well before typing.

I had a big laugh when I read the Lotus Box booklet.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #47 posted 05/03/10 6:53am

aintnoboutadou
btit

avatar

purpledoveuk said:

You've taken it to a whole new level...voicing disatisfactuon about Prince ripping you off whilst you rip him off.

The rose-coloured glasses brigade are goingbtonhwve to come up with a whole new category of distane for you


Ditto.
Funk is its own reward.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #48 posted 05/03/10 7:21am

udo

avatar

Flaunt said:

BoraBora said:

Some time ago I lost a lot of audiotracks for a crash on my old PC.
With CDs I've got no worries


Not really considering CD's have a very limited life span before the contents start to deteriorate. What do you think is in a HD?

25 years+ and counting.
Do you still remember what harddisks looked like 25 years ago?
Pills and thrills and daffodils will kill... If you don't believe me or don't get it, I don't have time to try to convince you, sorry.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #49 posted 05/03/10 9:53am

ws345

Flaunt said:



Not really considering CD's have a very limited life span before the contents start to deteriorate. What do you think is in a HD?
wink smile


Pressed cd's certainly have a longer life span than cdr's. And I don't think fan-made cd's will ever be pressed. So these bootleg labels still have something extra.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #50 posted 05/03/10 1:52pm

groovement

avatar

^ yeah they do...they got your $$$

If my cdr goes bad I can just download another copy.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #51 posted 05/03/10 2:01pm

vitriol

In x years' time, CDs will become museum articles. Before that happens your only option will be ripping the stuff onto your computer (or equivalent device) in the best possible format.

...Exactly the same as if you only had a CDr.

But don't worry, someone will be there to do the same Eye Records are doing now: get your money doing the 'work' for you.

As I said earlier in this thread, I can't feel sorry about someone taking your money for what you could get for free if it's that what you want.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #52 posted 05/03/10 4:03pm

MikeyB71

vitriol said:

In x years' time, CDs will become museum articles. Before that happens your only option will be ripping the stuff onto your computer (or equivalent device) in the best possible format.

...Exactly the same as if you only had a CDr.

But don't worry, someone will be there to do the same Eye Records are doing now: get your money doing the 'work' for you.

As I said earlier in this thread, I can't feel sorry about someone taking your money for what you could get for free if it's that what you want.


Museum articles? Same thing was said about vinyl 20+ years ago, its still around.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #53 posted 05/03/10 6:34pm

errant

avatar

MikeyB71 said:

vitriol said:

In x years' time, CDs will become museum articles. Before that happens your only option will be ripping the stuff onto your computer (or equivalent device) in the best possible format.

...Exactly the same as if you only had a CDr.

But don't worry, someone will be there to do the same Eye Records are doing now: get your money doing the 'work' for you.

As I said earlier in this thread, I can't feel sorry about someone taking your money for what you could get for free if it's that what you want.


Museum articles? Same thing was said about vinyl 20+ years ago, its still around.



there will always be hipsters around to cause a minor retro-inspired blips.
"does my cock look fat in these jeans?"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #54 posted 05/04/10 10:36am

squirrelgrease

avatar

EYE can steal this cover art for their next release if they want to.

If prince.org were to be made idiot proof, someone would just invent a better idiot.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #55 posted 05/04/10 10:42am

udo

avatar

falloff
Pills and thrills and daffodils will kill... If you don't believe me or don't get it, I don't have time to try to convince you, sorry.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #56 posted 05/04/10 5:54pm

NAMOR3000

avatar

I'm still gonna buy it anyway. And so will all other Prince "completists"...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #57 posted 05/04/10 7:54pm

Christopher

avatar

NAMOR3000 said:

I'm still gonna buy it anyway. And so will all other Prince "completists"...

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #58 posted 05/12/10 1:47pm

PurpleLove7

avatar

moderator

unique said:


so there is a market for this rehashed stuff unfortunately.


My sentiments exactly ...
Peace ... & Stay Funky ...

~* The only love there is, is the love "we" make *~

www.facebook.com/purplefunklover
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 2 of 2 <12
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Prince: Music and More > Eye Records: A Complaint