independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Prince: Music and More > Autotune on Incense & Candles?
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 3 of 3 <123
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #60 posted 04/13/10 7:32am

CallMeCarrie

avatar

^I agree...and the fact is, he shouldn't have used it (IMO), whether it is autotune or vocoder or singing into a fan. <--ya'll remember doing that when you were kids to make your voice sound crazy?!?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #61 posted 04/13/10 7:33am

Mindflux

avatar

CallMeCarrie said:

^I agree...and the fact is, he shouldn't have used it (IMO), whether it is autotune or vocoder or singing into a fan. <--ya'll remember doing that when you were kids to make your voice sound crazy?!?


So, are you saying that Prince should never use effects on his voice? Or, just certain kinds of effects?
...we have only scratched the surface of what the mind can do...

My dance project;
www.zubzub.co.uk

Listen to any of my tracks in full, for free, here;
www.zubzub.bandcamp.com

Go and glisten wink
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #62 posted 04/13/10 7:40am

CallMeCarrie

avatar

Mindflux said:

CallMeCarrie said:

^I agree...and the fact is, he shouldn't have used it (IMO), whether it is autotune or vocoder or singing into a fan. <--ya'll remember doing that when you were kids to make your voice sound crazy?!?


So, are you saying that Prince should never use effects on his voice? Or, just certain kinds of effects?



I think it serves no purpose as it is used in this song. It's not his Camille effect, where he is making a purposeful change. To me it sounds like he is using it like those artist who can't sing well and we know he does, so why use it?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #63 posted 04/13/10 9:51am

Purpracer2

Well, personally for me I like the songs, and it doesn't matter how or why or what for... I'll take them as they come as long as they're good tunes. He could sing through a water hose and it will still sound cool. cool
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #64 posted 04/14/10 4:42am

Mindflux

avatar

CallMeCarrie said:

Mindflux said:



So, are you saying that Prince should never use effects on his voice? Or, just certain kinds of effects?



I think it serves no purpose as it is used in this song. It's not his Camille effect, where he is making a purposeful change. To me it sounds like he is using it like those artist who can't sing well and we know he does, so why use it?


But he's not using it as a correction to his voice, he's using it as an effect. Its fashionable for producers to overuse and exaggerate the effect of autotune to get that robotic, staggered and stepped pitch that you hear. That is not how autotune is intended to sound. If you're using it to mask a lack of talent, it should be almost invisible (although, most people with a good set of ears would be able to find where its used).

There's nothing wrong with musicians pushing boundaries and doing something originally unintended with an instrument or an effects unit - its how music evolves. You know, the Beatles introduced many groundbreaking ideas regarding studio production (multi-track recording, backwards guitars etc) all of which were copied by everyone else and are now used as an industry standard. Should artists not use the discoveries of others to colour their own art? You wouldn't tell a painter not to use that particular brush because its the same one that one of his contemporaries uses. Artists from all media should be free to work from the palette of their choosing.

Autotune, in this example, is altering Prince's voice in a way that he is not able to do otherwise - he would not be able to just sing it as it is in the track. You may not like it as much as the Camille effect, you may think that he is following a popular current trend (which he is), but to suggest that this is one particular effect in any producer's arsenal that he shouldn't use is just silly.I'm not that keen on the effect myself, but at least Prince does use it intelligently. The trills and runs he achieves with it are far more musical in his works than the employment of it by other producer's I've heard.
...we have only scratched the surface of what the mind can do...

My dance project;
www.zubzub.co.uk

Listen to any of my tracks in full, for free, here;
www.zubzub.bandcamp.com

Go and glisten wink
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #65 posted 04/14/10 12:01pm

CallMeCarrie

avatar

Mindflux said:[quote]

CallMeCarrie said:




I think it serves no purpose as it is used in this song. It's not his Camille effect, where he is making a purposeful change. To me it sounds like he is using it like those artist who can't sing well and we know he does, so why use it?


But he's not using it as a correction to his voice, he's using it as an effect. Its fashionable for producers to overuse and exaggerate the effect of autotune to get that robotic, staggered and stepped pitch that you hear. That is not how autotune is intended to sound. If you're using it to mask a lack of talent, it should be almost invisible (although, most people with a good set of ears would be able to find where its used).

There's nothing wrong with musicians pushing boundaries and doing something originally unintended with an instrument or an effects unit - its how music evolves. You know, the Beatles introduced many groundbreaking ideas regarding studio production (multi-track recording, backwards guitars etc) all of which were copied by everyone else and are now used as an industry standard. Should artists not use the discoveries of others to colour their own art? You wouldn't tell a painter not to use that particular brush because its the same one that one of his contemporaries uses. Artists from all media should be free to work from the palette of their choosing.

Autotune, in this example, is altering Prince's voice in a way that he is not able to do otherwise - he would not be able to just sing it as it is in the track. You may not like it as much as the Camille effect, you may think that he is following a popular current trend (which he is), but to suggest that this is one particular effect in any producer's arsenal that he shouldn't use is just silly.I'm not that keen on the effect myself, but at least Prince does use it intelligently. The trills and runs he achieves with it are far more musical in his works than the employment of it by other producer's I've heard.[/quote]


Mindflux, you are one of the reasons why I love the org. Great insight! I guess to my inexperienced ears, I heard the autotune and thought it was Prince tapping into another trend that didn't bring any value to the track. I didn't realize that taking the autotune effect out of this song would detract from it! I'm going to listen to it again with your perspective in mind and see if my opinion has changed. I'm guessing you are in the music industry...thanks for helping me grow! wink
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #66 posted 04/14/10 12:45pm

DreZone

avatar

Militant said:

OK, time for the lesson.


1) Antares Auto-Tune


Looks like this:



Auto-mated (although there is a manual option) pitch-correction software. Set the "Retune Speed" to Fast and "Tracking" to choosy to get the "T-Pain" effect. Popularized in the late 90's from Cher's song "Believe". Picked up by hip-hop and R&B artists a couple of years later, most notably by the aforementioned T-Pain.

Sounds like this (Since everybody in the world knows what the original vocal of this sounds like I figured it would be a good example)



This is what Prince used on "Incense & Candles" although to my ears he used a combination of that and this:

2) Vocoder




My cousin has this exact synth and we use it in our live shows.

There are various kinds of vocoder, both hardware and software, but in layman's terms, what you're doing with a vocoder is blending your voice and words with the sound of the synthesizer.

KORG make the best hardware vocoders. Here's one of their original ones:



German electronic music pioneers Kraftwerk really popularized the vocoder in their music and I believe even invented several of their own. If some of you guys aren't familiar with Kraftwerk, Afrika Bambataa sampled their track "Trans Europe Express" for "Planet Rock". Here's Kraftwerk member Florian Schneider's "Electronic Poem" - it's just vocals on a vocoder, no music, so you guys can really get a feel of what a vocoder sounds like:



One of the more popular software vocoders is one called "Orange Vocoder" - I know the sound of this vocoder very well, and to my ears, Prince's vocal on "Incense & Candles" was first autotuned and then processed with this:



I could be wrong with that, but that's what it sounds like to me.

and finally, saving the best for last:

3) Talkbox

One name defines Talkbox more than any other - ROGER TROUTMAN.

Before Roger, Stevie Wonder and Peter Frampton had used the talkbox to a degree. But Roger used it almost exclusively on all 5 albums by his band "Zapp", and his solo albums also, such as "The Many Facets of Roger", and "Unlimited!"

All of you reading this, I'm sure must be familiar with at least one of the following songs:

Zapp's "Computer Love", "More Bounce To The Ounce", "Dance Floor", "Be Alright", "I Can Make You Dance", "Heartbreaker"

Roger's "So Ruff, So Tuff", "I Wanna Be Your Man", "Do It Roger"....

2Pac, Dr. Dre and Roger's "California Love".

Well, that's a talkbox and it looks like this:



That is just one brand. Here's another:



I believe my cousin has both kinds of those. (We're talkbox junkies smile )

It was designed to be used with a guitar. However, the defining "Roger" sound came from hooking it together with a Moog synthesizer. That's how you get it to sound like this:



Roger generally had custom-built setups with Moog keyboards and talkboxes, one on each side of the stage so he could switch positions at different points.

This is the hardest out of the three to master - because it requires you to play the actual notes of the connected instrument whilst mouthing the words with the tube in your mouth. It also has the best sound of the three, when done properly.

School's out!!!! biggrin
[Edited 4/8/10 19:09pm]


The Definitive post which deciphers and dispells any misconceptions for the layman no doubt!

I have a 'dreBox which I use on some of my recordings (I guess it's akin to the Ghetto Talkbox but it DOES use a midrange horn driver!)

'dre
Tried many flavours - but sooner or later, always go back to the Purple Kool-aid!

http://facebook.com/thedrezoneofficial
Http://Twitter.com/thedrezone
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 3 of 3 <123
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Prince: Music and More > Autotune on Incense & Candles?