independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Prince: Music and More > Why Do you Feel RAVE Un2/In2 bombed?
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 1 of 4 1234>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Author

Tweet     Share

Message
Thread started 05/13/10 9:49pm

TheVoid

Why Do you Feel RAVE Un2/In2 bombed?

In my opinion it wasn't as bad as the critics said it was.
And it was promoted pretty well.


Prince even appeared on TRL, though he got his ass served to him by
Carson when he tried to call Carson out on something immediately
after Carson handed him a compliment. I've seldom ever seen Prince
put in his place by an interviewer--certainly Tavis lick-my-ass
Smily wouldn't do it. But Carson served him right.


But it was promoted. It wasn't a 'terrible' record. And all the songs
were relatively radio-friendly.


It even had guest performers and musicians on the CD, much in the fashion
of Carlos Santana's album--but Carlos feature those musicians while Prince
sort of buried them the fuck down in the mix. lol
But regardless, it was promoted as such.


So, why did his return to commercially backed pop fail with Rave?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1 posted 05/13/10 9:54pm

nursev

Besides Greatest I really don't think it was radio friendly and those hair bows didn't help lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #2 posted 05/13/10 9:56pm

TheVoid

nursev said:

Besides Greatest I really don't think it was radio friendly and those hair bows didn't help lol

falloff!!!!


U didn't think "So Far, So Pleased" or "Pretty Man" had a shot?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #3 posted 05/13/10 9:56pm

nursev

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #4 posted 05/13/10 9:57pm

TheVoid

nursev said:


I feel like my eyes have gonorrhea! disbelief
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #5 posted 05/13/10 9:58pm

nursev

TheVoid said:

nursev said:

Besides Greatest I really don't think it was radio friendly and those hair bows didn't help lol

falloff!!!!


U didn't think "So Far, So Pleased" or "Pretty Man" had a shot?



Prettyman is a cool song,but it definitely would have made him alittle suspect to this younger generation-but still a cool ass song! Hell no to So Far lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #6 posted 05/13/10 9:58pm

nursev

TheVoid said:

nursev said:


I feel like my eyes have gonorrhea! disbelief



lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #7 posted 05/13/10 10:03pm

TheVoid

nursev said:

TheVoid said:


falloff!!!!


U didn't think "So Far, So Pleased" or "Pretty Man" had a shot?



Prettyman is a cool song,but it definitely would have made him alittle suspect to this younger generation-but still a cool ass song! Hell no to So Far lol

falloff


The Sun The Moon and stars?
Man'o'war? lol


I found the songs to be by-the-numbers and safe, but still catchy enough for radio play. lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #8 posted 05/13/10 10:07pm

nursev

TheVoid said:

nursev said:




Prettyman is a cool song,but it definitely would have made him alittle suspect to this younger generation-but still a cool ass song! Hell no to So Far lol

falloff


The Sun The Moon and stars?
Man'o'war? lol


I found the songs to be by-the-numbers and safe, but still catchy enough for radio play. lol


Man O War is great but that still smell thing woulda killed that lol Seriously, the album is nice-I think what really killed it was Prince hanging out with Ananda Lewis lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #9 posted 05/13/10 10:12pm

PicklesMcMilla
n

i always wondered how prince managed to use the restroom in that blue jumpsuit, he must have always had someone unzip the back or maybe there was some type of zipper in the private area
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #10 posted 05/13/10 10:17pm

errant

avatar

Weak lead single. Terrible album. No video. No tour. Stupid outfit. Ridiculous interviews. Boring TV performances.
"does my cock look fat in these jeans?"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #11 posted 05/13/10 10:24pm

nursev

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #12 posted 05/13/10 10:24pm

xlr8r

avatar

He had been out of the mainstream too long at the time. His return to an actual label even it being lead by ClivezzzzDavis, was not enough time to have him fully welcomed back.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #13 posted 05/13/10 10:25pm

anthonyxanzald
o

avatar

TheVoid said:

In my opinion it wasn't as bad as the critics said it was.
And it was promoted pretty well.


Prince even appeared on TRL, though he got his ass served to him by
Carson when he tried to call Carson out on something immediately
after Carson handed him a compliment. I've seldom ever seen Prince
put in his place by an interviewer--certainly Tavis lick-my-ass
Smily wouldn't do it. But Carson served him right.


But it was promoted. It wasn't a 'terrible' record. And all the songs
were relatively radio-friendly.


It even had guest performers and musicians on the CD, much in the fashion
of Carlos Santana's album--but Carlos feature those musicians while Prince
sort of buried them the fuck down in the mix. lol
But regardless, it was promoted as such.


So, why did his return to commercially backed pop fail with Rave?


I haven't seen that interview in over 10 years, but I remember Prince owning Carson Daly. Am I totally off on this one ? Is this interview anywhere to be found ?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #14 posted 05/13/10 10:26pm

TheVoid

errant said:

Weak lead single. Terrible album. No video. No tour. Stupid outfit. Ridiculous interviews. Boring TV performances.




I was STUNNED at the weak lead single.


I love TGRES, but it's one of those songs that, despite having a cool melody, take way way way too long to deliver the goods. The music environment at the time could never tolerate you having to sit through 60 seconds of a song before the hook.



But promotion is everything, and it was certainly promoted.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #15 posted 05/13/10 10:30pm

TheVoid

anthonyxanzaldo said:

TheVoid said:

In my opinion it wasn't as bad as the critics said it was.
And it was promoted pretty well.


Prince even appeared on TRL, though he got his ass served to him by
Carson when he tried to call Carson out on something immediately
after Carson handed him a compliment. I've seldom ever seen Prince
put in his place by an interviewer--certainly Tavis lick-my-ass
Smily wouldn't do it. But Carson served him right.


But it was promoted. It wasn't a 'terrible' record. And all the songs
were relatively radio-friendly.


It even had guest performers and musicians on the CD, much in the fashion
of Carlos Santana's album--but Carlos feature those musicians while Prince
sort of buried them the fuck down in the mix. lol
But regardless, it was promoted as such.


So, why did his return to commercially backed pop fail with Rave?


I haven't seen that interview in over 10 years, but I remember Prince owning Carson Daly. Am I totally off on this one ? Is this interview anywhere to be found ?


yes, you are.

Prince got PWNED like hell.


Carson introduced him, then cmoplimented him.
IN his compliment, Carson said something to the affect that in a time of plastic throwaway music, his music stood the test of time because it was real.

Prince, probably misunderstanding him said, "what?" and looked at him all diva like and asked him to explain.

So Carson explained again.

The Prince said, "I suppose you don't have anything to do with that do you?"


At which point most hosts would have just laughed it off or nodded to Prince, but Carson PWNED his ass. Carson said, "Look, it's like being a bartender. I may not like the drinks I'm serving, but that's what my customers are asking for."

Essentially, he said, don't point your fey ass fingers at me, fool.


Prince response was a very weak, self-concious, and idiotic shrug and "If yo say so."

The atmosphere was very tense and Carson seemed in control, but Prince looked nervous and mousy. It really didn't go well for Prince.

It was even commented on in the Press and I saw a snippet on VH-1, none of which painted Prince as the WINNAR.



Seriously, it was brilliant. Prince had gone so many years being an ass publicly, it was nice to see him put in his place.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #16 posted 05/13/10 10:31pm

TheVoid

xlr8r said:

He had been out of the mainstream too long at the time. His return to an actual label even it being lead by ClivezzzzDavis, was not enough time to have him fully welcomed back.



But so was Carlos Santana.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #17 posted 05/13/10 10:38pm

stillwaiting

Uh, maybe a combination of a few things:

1. By 1995, very few Artists over 30 had major hits, as the N Synchs, and Brittknee Speers of the world had cookie cutter lifeless hits. Rappers were given signing bonuses provided the lyrics were about Guns and Weed or full of Drug and Violence references. (Santana had a huge hit with a song he didn't write, didn't sing on, didn't produce....oh yeah, Rob Thomas was under 30 at the time....big shock.) And it wasn't 1995, it was 1999.

2. So Far So Pleased was the most radio friendly thing on the project, and either there were licensing/permission issues with Gwen being on the song, or just more poor marketing by Prince.(Remember...Jughead, Life O The Party, and the Wedding Feast have been released, Moonbeam Levels, Witness, Wonderful Ass, and the original Old Friends 4 Sale have NOT!!!!)

3. Prince probably should have gone the U2 and Michael Jackson road of making fans wait so they would be very hungry for new music...he went the road of releasing tons of stuff. This was great for us die-hards. If you don't think this was a career killer, think of it like this: Sign "O" The Times is probably his best work, but is not even among his 10 best selling releases.(It is if you count the sales DOUBLE, like the RIAA does for it being a "double" release...but in sheer numbers, it was a very very poor seller.) The best of both worlds would have been for Prince to have a major release every 2-4 years, but have HUGE and I mean HUGE box sets every 10-15 years with TONS of discs. By Tons, I mean 30-50 disc sets...but that is Utopia, not Prince reality.

4.Watching Tony M, Damon D, and Kirk Johnson roam around on stage in those Star Trek Next Generation outfits probably scared away potential fans who saw any TV appearence from 1991-1993.

5. Are there any mistakes in my post? If there are mistakes, is it me being a moron, or am I hoping that I am lucky enough for Bart Van Halen to catch them and give me a "For Fuck's Sake.." smile razz
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #18 posted 05/13/10 10:42pm

xlr8r

avatar

TheVoid said:

xlr8r said:

He had been out of the mainstream too long at the time. His return to an actual label even it being lead by ClivezzzzDavis, was not enough time to have him fully welcomed back.



But so was Carlos Santana.


Carlos never left the industry. Prince lost his momentum for half a decade. Plus Prince was demed a weirdo since forever. It was a weirdo's "slight" return.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #19 posted 05/13/10 10:48pm

errant

avatar

TheVoid said:

xlr8r said:

He had been out of the mainstream too long at the time. His return to an actual label even it being lead by ClivezzzzDavis, was not enough time to have him fully welcomed back.



But so was Carlos Santana.




but Carlos' album was practically a compilation mixtape with the hottest artists that year with Carlos getting in here and there there with a guitar riff.

Prince had, what, 3 audible guest stars on his? only 2 of which had hit potential at that time.
"does my cock look fat in these jeans?"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #20 posted 05/13/10 10:50pm

errant

avatar

TheVoid said:

errant said:

Weak lead single. Terrible album. No video. No tour. Stupid outfit. Ridiculous interviews. Boring TV performances.




I was STUNNED at the weak lead single.


I love TGRES, but it's one of those songs that, despite having a cool melody, take way way way too long to deliver the goods. The music environment at the time could never tolerate you having to sit through 60 seconds of a song before the hook.



But promotion is everything, and it was certainly promoted.



I like the song too, but in 1999 it sounded like yet another retread/remix of The Most Beautiful Girl In The World to me. But without the pop spark.
"does my cock look fat in these jeans?"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #21 posted 05/13/10 10:52pm

Christopher

avatar

i really liked the whole project and his look during this era lol

but i think it bombed because of the single choices and ppl werent ready for the ponytails
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #22 posted 05/13/10 11:04pm

squirrelgrease

avatar

Am I the only one who thinks the blue suit and hair bows were cool?
If prince.org were to be made idiot proof, someone would just invent a better idiot.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #23 posted 05/14/10 12:37am

fms

avatar

TheVoid said:

anthonyxanzaldo said:



I haven't seen that interview in over 10 years, but I remember Prince owning Carson Daly. Am I totally off on this one ? Is this interview anywhere to be found ?


yes, you are.

Prince got PWNED like hell.


Carson introduced him, then cmoplimented him.
IN his compliment, Carson said something to the affect that in a time of plastic throwaway music, his music stood the test of time because it was real.

Prince, probably misunderstanding him said, "what?" and looked at him all diva like and asked him to explain.

So Carson explained again.

The Prince said, "I suppose you don't have anything to do with that do you?"


At which point most hosts would have just laughed it off or nodded to Prince, but Carson PWNED his ass. Carson said, "Look, it's like being a bartender. I may not like the drinks I'm serving, but that's what my customers are asking for."

Essentially, he said, don't point your fey ass fingers at me, fool.


Prince response was a very weak, self-concious, and idiotic shrug and "If yo say so."

The atmosphere was very tense and Carson seemed in control, but Prince looked nervous and mousy. It really didn't go well for Prince.

It was even commented on in the Press and I saw a snippet on VH-1, none of which painted Prince as the WINNAR.



Seriously, it was brilliant. Prince had gone so many years being an ass publicly, it was nice to see him put in his place.

^ I thought that was not too bright of Carson to use the example of bartender/drinks. Prince caught that - like, a bartender just pours drinks and takes no responsibility if someone gets sick, drunk, becomes dependent, etc. Prince was like, Oh man, you didn't just suggest that...but I'm not sure if Carson even realized it. Prince didn't lose, imo, he just didn't need to go there. He would have gotten all preachy, for sure, and he had an album to promote.

Why did Rave fail? Combination of factors, most of them have been mentioned. Regardless, I still think it is a very good record, had potential and didn't fulfill it. Sometimes it's nobody's fault. Prince made a strong album, the record company promoted it, and the Prince fans bought it and supported it. Did it outsell Chaos and Disorder? Yes, but no one asks why that album bombed. Expectations were probably too high.
Stand at the crossroads, and look, and ask for the ancient paths...(Jeremiah 6:16) www.ancientfaithradio.com

dezinonac eb lliw noitulove ehT
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #24 posted 05/14/10 1:40am

EmancipationLo
ver

avatar

1) The lead single was not strong enough to make a real impact on the radio. He would have needed a second "Cream" or "TMBGITW". "TGRES" was just a nice song trying to satisfy people's R'n'B taste of the late 90's. O.k. for someone who is seen as the next hot thing anyway, but not for making a comeback.

2) The collaborations could not be marketed as collaborations, simply because you couldn't hear the damn collaborators in the mix.

3) The whole Symbol thing was played out in 1999. It was seen as weird by the major public right from the start, but at least it was somehow fresh up until ca. 1995-1996. People were bored of the name change thing in 1999. Prince knew why he reclaimed his old name in 2000.
prince
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #25 posted 05/14/10 1:59am

erik319

avatar

squirrelgrease said:

Am I the only one who thinks the blue suit and hair bows were cool?


Not the only one, no.

blah blah blah
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #26 posted 05/14/10 2:03am

TheVoid

ok, so everybody agrees that the lead single was not appropriate.


And, I agree. It simple wasn't the right single at the right time.
He needed something with real 'pop' to it. As bland and by-the-numbers
as "So Far, So Pleased" was, it still is his catchiest rock-rift
since "I could Never Take the Place of Ur Man". It should have been the single.


However, He released 'Te Amo Corezan', a dreadfully aweful choice for a lead
single for 3121 (in my opinion one of the best albums of his career--maybe not
best artistically, but best as far as pop savvy), and 3121 still managed
to grace the charts at the top during it's release.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #27 posted 05/14/10 2:33am

SoulAlive

As is the case with many Prince albums,the wrong singles were released.

"The Greatest Romance Ever Sold" is a snoozefest,and then he follows up with another slow song "Man O War"? disbelief What was Clive Davis thinking? Or did Prince have final say?

These songs should have been the singles,in this order...

"So Far,So Pleased"
"Baby Knows"
"Wherever U Go,Whatever U Do"


That's three strong singles right there."Silly Game" could have been a fourth single,aimed at R&B radio.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #28 posted 05/14/10 2:37am

BorisFishpaw

avatar

Rave bombed because there was no cohesive solid promotion
and there was also no follow-up.

The Greatest Romance wasn't the best choice as lead single IMO. However, any
chance it did have was wasted because there was no video! The video wasn't
completed until 2 months after the single had been released! Plus, Prince didn't
promote the song at all either. On every TV show I saw him on around that time,
he'd play 'Baby Knows' instead!

...And people wonder why it didn't do well?

Then to cap it all, that was that. No further singles were released and no
further promotion or appearances happened.

Another factor was the sequencing of the album itself. Though this was a lesser
factor as it would only affect people who had actually bought or heard the
album. The song order on Rave is messy and random. It lacks a cohesive flow,
particularly the first half. Plus I was never a fan of album version of the
title track. The stripped down delivery seems at odds with the lyrics. The Rave
In2 version was an improvement, but still lacked something IMO.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #29 posted 05/14/10 3:16am

NouveauDance

avatar

Personally, I think the material itself is (mostly) fucking awful, but that never stopped an album being a commercial success - so I'd put it down to the promotion, Prince's half-assed attempts at it, and the fact he rarely ever plays that game for the long haul.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 1 of 4 1234>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Prince: Music and More > Why Do you Feel RAVE Un2/In2 bombed?