independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Prince: Music and More > Prince may appear in Dublin Court this week.
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 6 of 14 « First<2345678910>Last »

This is a "featured" topic! — From here you can jump to the « previous or next » featured topic.

  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #150 posted 02/23/10 3:01pm

Vendetta1

unique said:

Tremolina said:



You mean as in never having any sort of agreement to begin with?

I guess that's also still possible but from what I am reading it seems the case is court is already past that question.

It seems he was sufficiently represented and it seems at least some sort of deal was made in february 2008, 4 months before the planned show. Then there was money transferred and a lot of promotion and publicity made, the org was hot on it too for months and there were 55.000 tickets sold through official channels.

Then he cancelled without citing a reason and as far as I can see he never denied doing that either.

He simply said NOTHING. So it's kind hard but still interesting to guess what made this happen. lol

Please, check this article out:

http://www.irishtimes.com...ml?via=rel

and do also notice how he or his lawyers manage to piss the court off

-
[Edited 2/23/10 11:35am]



so basically you have no idea how a court works, and don't care about hearing sides, and just want to skip to the judgement without the details as to how to arise at that point?

that's why you aren't working in a court
falloff

He's a lawyer.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #151 posted 02/23/10 5:25pm

pennylover

avatar

1p1p1i3 said:

Heart-warming to see just how many Prince fans are also part-time lawyers.

wink

lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #152 posted 02/23/10 6:41pm

PurpleRain747

avatar

When will they stop suing Prince, already?!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #153 posted 02/23/10 7:04pm

Lotus2unfld

Mars23 said:

squirrelgrease said:



confuse So which side you on?



That question is DANGEROUS.



falloff
this is the time of the first fast.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #154 posted 02/23/10 7:12pm

Lotus2unfld

andrewm7 said:

Gav said:



Bingo

mmm... an email from someone writing on behalf of someone who may or may not be representing or acting for Prince.

I tremble with anticipation lol cool



yep you make a good point.

...and folks don't do signatures in email. generally. shoot there is even a rukus about notaries no longer doing computerized notarizations...cuz it causes problems. it's unreliable way of of signing anything important.
this is the time of the first fast.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #155 posted 02/23/10 7:30pm

Lotus2unfld

lezama said:

Rebeljuice said:


Prince may not have signed a contract with said company, but he did accept the gig as he himself was promoting it. Therefore I would argue that the emails between the two parties can constitute an agreement to perform. I submit items one through 24 as evidence - the emails exchanged.

Also, the insurance company has already made its statement and states that the claim will not be paid as there was no reason for cancellation contained within its terms and conditions. I submit item 25 as evidence, the on-a-whim clause contained within said insurance contract.

This may prove to be something ol' Princey boy may have to face up to. In this case it is the law of the ROI, not the USA. So it may prove harder to defend than he is used to. Especially if he is due to show up as a witness and doesnt show up. He has provided no reason for him not to show up or reschedule so it sounds like he is expected.
[Edited 2/22/10 1:31am]


Where did he promote the gig?

Emails can be legally binding but he or someone authorized to represent him in his camp would have had to have explicitly agreed to everything with pretty specific legal language, otherwise his lawyers will have huge opportunities in proving he had no legal binding to the agreement with the William Morris people. My guess, without of course seeing the emails, but knowing the nature of average email discussions, is that non-specific language was used and that will basically mean P's legal team will have an easy time with this case.



Wow now there's somebody that talks like an attorney or at least knows something about the law. great points, lezama.
this is the time of the first fast.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #156 posted 02/23/10 10:26pm

unique

avatar

Vendetta1 said:

unique said:




so basically you have no idea how a court works, and don't care about hearing sides, and just want to skip to the judgement without the details as to how to arise at that point?

that's why you aren't working in a court
falloff

He's a lawyer.


sounds like one. out of touch with reality. could make a great friend for prince
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #157 posted 02/24/10 12:26am

Gav

avatar

Rorywan said:

the one thing that did puzzle me about this is the promotion. There were official tv spots using his videos, logos etc and of course posters around the city. Where did this material come from if not authorized?


Rather strangely, concert promoters are responsible for concert promotion.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #158 posted 02/24/10 1:31am

Acrylic

avatar

Mars23 said:

squirrelgrease said:

This could be juicy.



An early peek:

Prince:

eye no eye said yes, but eye cry when eye jet.

Morris:

What the fuck are you trying to say? I'm not going to be out 1.6 mil cause you can't type like an adult.



spit falloff
batting eyes ACRYLIC batting eyes
I do nothing professionally.
I only do things for fun.

johnart: Acrylic's old bras is where tits of all sizes go to frolic after they die. Tit Heaven.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #159 posted 02/24/10 2:07am

colm

avatar

Prince cancelled concert on whim, claims promoter

MUSIC PROMOTER Denis Desmond has told the Commercial Court he has never been given a reason why a concert by pop superstar Prince at Croke Park in the summer of 2008 was cancelled.

It seemed to have been done “on a whim”, he added.

Mr Desmond was giving evidence in the action by his company, MCD Productions, against the singer and his alleged agents for €1.7 million damages over the cancellation of the June 16th, 2008, concert.

The case opened yesterday before Mr Justice Peter Kelly who was told Prince would not be giving evidence in the case.

Paul Sreenan SC, for the artist, said Prince and his personal assistant Ruth Arzate had supplied witness statements but would not be giving evidence.

The action is against Price Rogers Nelson and his alleged agents, William Morris Endeavour Entertainment LLC (WMEE), Beverly Hills, California. WMEE was joined by MCD to the case after Prince alleged it had no authority to bind him to the concert but they have rejected those claims.

WMEE, one of the world’s largest entertainment managements companies, pleads its servants or agents engaged in negotiations with MCD regarding a concert to be performed by Prince in Dublin and acted at all times as agents for Prince under an agreement of August 2005, with express authority to negotiate on Prince’s behalf for the purpose of securing bookings.

On February 26th, 2008, WMEE claims it entered into a contract with MCD for Prince to perform at Croke Park on June 16th, 2008, for “an artists’ guaranteed fee of three million dollars”. MCD transferred $1.5 million, half the agreed fee, to an account of William Morris, it is pleaded.

WMEE also admits, that about June 6th, 2008, MCD was notified by it that Prince wished to cancel the concert. WMEE alleges Prince refused to travel to Dublin and gave “no reason of substance” to it for the cancellation.

WMEE claims the decision to cancel was outside its control and it had returned $1.5 million to MCD. The company denies negligence, breach of duty or misrepresentation.

Mr Desmond told Maurice Collins SC, for MCD, that he had had previous dealings with WMEE and had a good relationship with it. He had entered into negotiations with WMEE in 2007 and early 2008 to bring Prince to Ireland.

The artist had played 21 concerts in London in 2007 and while efforts to bring him to Ireland did not work out, he later confirmed Prince for Croke Park in June 2008. The concert would not have been announced and tickets would not have gone on sale had he not received WMEE’s confirmation in February 2008.

He said “rumblings” about the concert being cancelled came very late and only arose because his production staff could not get any information from Prince’s production staff.

There was no indication before June 6th, 2008, that the concert would be cancelled, but his side knew something was up when, three weeks before the show, the required production information was not forthcoming.

Promoters could take out cancellation insurance and dates could be rescheduled in the event of a performer being genuinely ill but, in this case, there was no reason given for the cancellation, he said.

Asked if he now knew why the concert was cancelled, he said he did not, it seemed to be “on a whim”.

There was damaging media speculation at the time that MCD had cancelled due to poor ticket sales but that was not the case as more than 55,000 tickets had been sold, he said. Prince had also been told he could earn $500,000 extra for the show on the basis of ticket sales, Mr Desmond added.

As the date drew closer and concerns arose, MCD also offered to provide lighting and production services and the artist was told he would simply have “to arrive with his band”.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #160 posted 02/24/10 3:24am

Rorywan

avatar

unique said:

colm said:



WWhat the hell is this "official confirmation" and "rumour" BS? The concert was announced thru all the usual channels thru which a concert is announced - In the press, radio ads, TV ads, increased radio airplay, ticket competitions. What do you expect, a personalised invitation from Prince to arrive in the post? The OFFICIAL tickets were on sale on Ticketmaster along with a diagram of the seating chart on their website. Whenever I see a concert advertised in the national press, on TV, radio and on billboards I take it as read that the concert will be taking place unless something unforeseen happens to the artist or band who are scheduled to perform.
MCD thought he was coming, William Morris thought he was coming. William Morris represent Prince. He pays them to do this. Prince told William Morris he wasn't coming, William Morris tols MCD he wasn't coming. He didn't come. Whether or not he ever had any intention of coming or not is the million dollar question.
The whole event was promoted and pushed the same way any concert would be, no different. It was not a "rumoured" show and I had all the "official" confirmation I needed to convince me it was a bona fide event. Lets hope we can find out for once and for all what the fuck happened!


MCD promoted the show on the understanding that prince would attend, but the case revolves around prince saying he didn't confirm he would attend, yet the promoter went on with advertising and selling tickets to the show

the issue of "authorised" relates to one party selling tickets that another didn't authorise, according to the other party

i think prince's point is that he didn't confirm the show, yet the promoter went ahead and took it so far without proper confirmation from the artist, in the hope he would give in and play the show so as not to upset his fans. but i think we all know that's not the way you try and deal with prince



Well the Main news here last night doesn't agree with you i'm afraid. His defense have stated that he was contracted to play the gig and that it was confirmed. They said that Prince contacted his agent on June 6th to tell them that he wanted to cancel (note the wording). He did not give a reason of any substance. William Morris then contacted MCD to tell them that their client had decided to cancel the gig. MCD had not any insurance in place for a situation like this (impossible to get commercial insurance against the whim of a performer rather than insurable circumstances). The defense said they "would do their best" to protect prince's interests but he had refused to provide them with a written verification of the events.

Sounds like this might cost P a few $. Which is good for all of us, he will have to play a few more gigs to make up. just not in ireland anytime soon.


confused
"My God it's full of Stars"
Indigo Club, September 21st 2008, 4.24am
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #161 posted 02/24/10 3:28am

MrsGoodnight

avatar

I'm sorry, but I really don't believe that prince would allow such a gross misrepresentation of himself - don't forget, this is the man who went around slapping cease and desist orders on people for posting his image and music online within hours of them being uploaded, threatend to sue YouTube, managed to brow-beat the owners of Housequake into closing, etc, etc. How long was it between the announcement of the concerts and prince saying that he wasn't going to be playing the concert. You'd better believe that if these agencies were announcing a concert in his name, that he hadn't agreed to, he'd have been onto his lawyers faster than you can say "Where's my $77, you thieving pikey bitch?!".

I agree with the Colm with regards to how 'official' the concert was - if tickets are up for sale on TicketMaster, then in my opinion you can pretty much assume that the concert is official.

Questions: What was the seating capacity for the concert at Croke Park and how many tickets were actually sold? hmmm
I'm not stopping. I haven't even taken my coat off

C'mon and dance while you, while you still have your cherry babe, cherry babe..

www.KerrysCakes.org.uk
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #162 posted 02/24/10 3:33am

Rorywan

avatar

Gav said:

Rorywan said:

the one thing that did puzzle me about this is the promotion. There were official tv spots using his videos, logos etc and of course posters around the city. Where did this material come from if not authorized?


Rather strangely, concert promoters are responsible for concert promotion.



God, thats witty. Sorry was that sarcasm? it didn't work. To make my point clearer for you:
Prince is notoriously protective about his image (e.g bye bye HQ)

So who supplied THE CONCERT PROMOTER with all the official material to promote the gig? And why was it allowed to air. Obviously William Morris and P were fully aware of the situation. Every piece of promo material is passed under his purple nose. Again a perfect example is the removal of the HQ logo on his programme at the o2. So we are to believe he did not veto 30 & 60 second TV spots and a poster campaign? I think not.

dunce
"My God it's full of Stars"
Indigo Club, September 21st 2008, 4.24am
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #163 posted 02/24/10 3:36am

Rorywan

avatar

MrsGoodnight said:

I'm sorry, but I really don't believe that prince would allow such a gross misrepresentation of himself - don't forget, this is the man who went around slapping cease and desist orders on people for posting his image and music online within hours of them being uploaded, threatend to sue YouTube, managed to brow-beat the owners of Housequake into closing, etc, etc. How long was it between the announcement of the concerts and prince saying that he wasn't going to be playing the concert. You'd better believe that if these agencies were announcing a concert in his name, that he hadn't agreed to, he'd have been onto his lawyers faster than you can say "Where's my $77, you thieving pikey bitch?!".

I agree with the Colm with regards to how 'official' the concert was - if tickets are up for sale on TicketMaster, then in my opinion you can pretty much assume that the concert is official.

Questions: What was the seating capacity for the concert at Croke Park and how many tickets were actually sold? hmmm


Yes you are correct.
nod
"My God it's full of Stars"
Indigo Club, September 21st 2008, 4.24am
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #164 posted 02/24/10 3:37am

udo

avatar

MrsGoodnight said:

Questions: What was the seating capacity for the concert at Croke Park and how many tickets were actually sold? hmmm

http://prince.org/msg/12/...p=241&pg=9
82000
Pills and thrills and daffodils will kill... If you don't believe me or don't get it, I don't have time to try to convince you, sorry.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #165 posted 02/24/10 3:42am

colm

avatar

MrsGoodnight said:

I'm sorry, but I really don't believe that prince would allow such a gross misrepresentation of himself - don't forget, this is the man who went around slapping cease and desist orders on people for posting his image and music online within hours of them being uploaded, threatend to sue YouTube, managed to brow-beat the owners of Housequake into closing, etc, etc. How long was it between the announcement of the concerts and prince saying that he wasn't going to be playing the concert. You'd better believe that if these agencies were announcing a concert in his name, that he hadn't agreed to, he'd have been onto his lawyers faster than you can say "Where's my $77, you thieving pikey bitch?!".

I agree with the Colm with regards to how 'official' the concert was - if tickets are up for sale on TicketMaster, then in my opinion you can pretty much assume that the concert is official.

Questions: What was the seating capacity for the concert at Croke Park and how many tickets were actually sold? hmmm



The Colm thanks you.
55,000 of the 66,000 tickets were sold. With a week of most likely intense promotion to go before showtime, I reckon they would have sold a couple more thousand.
The concerts were announced 2 and a half months before the concert date.
The promoters were not using his name or image or anything Prince related without permission. They were given the go ahead by Prince's Management Agency, William Morris. If there was ever a breakdown in communication it was between Prince and his people.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #166 posted 02/24/10 4:33am

roseberet

Tremolina said:

unique said:

who says prince cancelled the gig btw?

maybe he just confirmed he wasn't going to attend


You mean as in never having any sort of agreement to begin with?

I guess that's also still possible but from what I am reading it seems the case is court is already past that question.

It seems he was sufficiently represented and it seems at least some sort of deal was made in february 2008, 4 months before the planned show. Then there was money transferred and a lot of promotion and publicity made, the org was hot on it too for months and there were 55.000 tickets sold through official channels.

Then he cancelled without citing a reason and as far as I can see he never denied doing that either.

He simply said NOTHING. So it's kind hard but still interesting to guess what made this happen. lol

Please, check this article out:

http://www.irishtimes.com...ml?via=rel

and do also notice how he or his lawyers manage to piss the court off

-
[Edited 2/23/10 11:35am]

Hi unique been a long time since...Why dont we all go over to the Irish court and do a GIG lol !! May even Prince might turn up WOW

beret beret beret lol lol
kissberry
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #167 posted 02/24/10 4:54am

roseberet

Lotus2unfld said:

andrewm7 said:


mmm... an email from someone writing on behalf of someone who may or may not be representing or acting for Prince.

I tremble with anticipation lol cool



yep you make a good point.

...and folks don't do signatures in email. generally. shoot there is even a rukus about notaries no longer doing computerized notarizations...cuz it causes problems. it's unreliable way of of signing anything important.



Don't have to be sollicers or lawyers to know that said it further up in reply quoters who is taking Prince and his fans for
dunce beret
kissberry
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #168 posted 02/24/10 5:06am

citrus

i think he may have had concussion that week from knocking his head between bria's boobs
2039 all treasures retrieved
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #169 posted 02/24/10 5:08am

Gav

avatar

Rorywan said:


So who supplied THE CONCERT PROMOTER with all the official material to promote the gig?


The booking agents (in this case WMEE)

Rorywan said:

And why was it allowed to air. Obviously William Morris and P were fully aware of the situation. Every piece of promo material is passed under his purple nose.


Who told you that ? It's simply untrue. Do you have any evidence to back this up ?

Rorywan said:

Again a perfect example is the removal of the HQ logo on his programme at the o2.


Actually that wasn't realised until I told his PA myself. It got past P first time around because his art director was in charge - it didn't go "under his purple nose" at all.

Rorywan said:

So we are to believe he did not veto 30 & 60 second TV spots and a poster campaign? I think not.


No he didn't - I was heavily involved in all this madness (remember my tons of posts warning people about cancellation that many (including yourself) rubbished and can categorically say that the TV spots and posters were commissioned and produced without Prince's personal involvement.

Rorywan said:

dunce


"Dunce" - What an absolute childish response when someone merely answered your question.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #170 posted 02/24/10 5:10am

colm

avatar

Here's the latest...

Court hears of Prince concert booking
Wednesday, 24 February 2010 12:50
The Commercial Court has been hearing details of dinner dates with the pop superstar Prince in a legal action over a cancelled concert.

An executive with the William Morris Endeavor Entertainment (WME), which acted for the singer, has described how the popstar never mentioned cancelling the Croke Park concert during two dinner dates he had with him in 2008.

The executive was giving evidence in the second day of an action by promoters MCD for €1.7m in compensation against Prince and his agents.

Prince, whose full name is Prince Rogers Nelson, claims the agents had no authority to confirm the concert.

Keith Sarkisian was asked by Mr Justice Peter Kelly about the atmosphere at one of the dinners, which took place a short time after tickets went on sale for the Croke Park concert.

Mr Sarkisian said there was no indication from the singer that there was any problem with the plans.

At the second dinner in the singer's home he said the opportunity to discuss the concerts did not arise, as the singer left the room after dinner and his security guard returned to thank him and tell him the dinner was over.

Asked by his counsel if he asked him to return to discuss matters, Mr Sarkisian said: 'You don't tell Prince to come back'.

Mr Sarkisian outlined a number of emails to Prince's personal assistant Ruth Arzate during which he says the Dublin concert was clearly confirmed.

As they started to have difficulty getting a final say on other European dates he was advised by Ms Arzate to send a note to Prince.

He said he had to be careful how to write the note and normally took direction from Ms Arzate who would 'interpret' for them.

He said he was told not to try to force an answer from the artist as it would probably make him do the opposite.

However he said at no stage in the process was it mentioned that Dublin would be cancelled and he was sending regular updates on tickets sales to Prince's personal assistant.

The first time he was definitively told that Prince would not be going to Dublin was at a meeting on 3 June.

He said at this meeting Prince was agitated when presented with his options on canceling the concert and said 'you guys got me into this'.

He was also willing to speak to Denis Desmond and said: 'tell him he'll have to chill'.


During cross-examination by counsel for MCD, Mr Sarkisian said at all times they acted as agents for Prince.

Asked if he was still the singer's agent he said: 'technically yes'.

It was put to him that Prince's name was still on WME's website and he replied: 'well I think Elvis is still on our website'.

However he said at all times WME acted on Prince's behalf and with his consent and everyone understood this both before and after tickets for the Dublin gig went on sale.
[Edited 2/24/10 5:10am]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #171 posted 02/24/10 5:15am

colm

avatar

At the second dinner in the singer's home he said the opportunity to discuss the concerts did not arise, as the singer left the room after dinner and his security guard returned to thank him and tell him the dinner was over.

Asked by his counsel if he asked him to return to discuss matters, Mr Sarkisian said: 'You don't tell Prince to come back'.

Hilarious!



Asked if he was still the singer's agent he said: 'technically yes'.

It was put to him that Prince's name was still on WME's website and he replied: 'well I think Elvis is still on our website'.


http://www.ticketmaster.i...ist/990438
[Edited 2/24/10 5:16am]
[Edited 2/24/10 5:16am]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #172 posted 02/24/10 5:16am

Rorywan

avatar

Gav said:

Rorywan said:


So who supplied THE CONCERT PROMOTER with all the official material to promote the gig?


The booking agents (in this case WMEE)



No he didn't - I was heavily involved in all this madness (remember my tons of posts warning people about cancellation that many (including yourself) rubbished and can categorically say that the TV spots and posters were commissioned and produced without Prince's personal involvement.

Rorywan said:

dunce


"Dunce" - What an absolute childish response when someone merely answered your question.



haha, let it go Gav.. let it go..


falloff
"My God it's full of Stars"
Indigo Club, September 21st 2008, 4.24am
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #173 posted 02/24/10 5:27am

Gav

avatar

Rorywan said:

Gav said:



"Dunce" - What an absolute childish response when someone merely answered your question.



haha, let it go Gav.. let it go..


falloff


I'll take that as an apology - thanks

By the way - I thought you had me on ignore ?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #174 posted 02/24/10 5:47am

Rorywan

avatar

Gav said:

Rorywan said:




haha, let it go Gav.. let it go..


falloff


I'll take that as an apology - thanks

By the way - I thought you had me on ignore ?



Don't. "ignore" doesn't work on threads.
ta ta now.

dunce
"My God it's full of Stars"
Indigo Club, September 21st 2008, 4.24am
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #175 posted 02/24/10 5:49am

Rorywan

avatar

eireboy34 said:

Rorywan said:




lol



Don't worry Rory....anyone using that photo as an avatar can't be taken seriously wink wink wink



Hey eireboy, thanks!
thumbs up!
"My God it's full of Stars"
Indigo Club, September 21st 2008, 4.24am
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #176 posted 02/24/10 5:57am

Rorywan

avatar

colm said:

Here's the latest...

Court hears of Prince concert booking
Wednesday, 24 February 2010 12:50
The Commercial Court has been hearing details of dinner dates with the pop superstar Prince in a legal action over a cancelled concert.

An executive with the William Morris Endeavor Entertainment (WME), which acted for the singer, has described how the popstar never mentioned cancelling the Croke Park concert during two dinner dates he had with him in 2008.

The executive was giving evidence in the second day of an action by promoters MCD for €1.7m in compensation against Prince and his agents.

Prince, whose full name is Prince Rogers Nelson, claims the agents had no authority to confirm the concert.

Keith Sarkisian was asked by Mr Justice Peter Kelly about the atmosphere at one of the dinners, which took place a short time after tickets went on sale for the Croke Park concert.

Mr Sarkisian said there was no indication from the singer that there was any problem with the plans.

At the second dinner in the singer's home he said the opportunity to discuss the concerts did not arise, as the singer left the room after dinner and his security guard returned to thank him and tell him the dinner was over.

Asked by his counsel if he asked him to return to discuss matters, Mr Sarkisian said: 'You don't tell Prince to come back'.

Mr Sarkisian outlined a number of emails to Prince's personal assistant Ruth Arzate during which he says the Dublin concert was clearly confirmed.

As they started to have difficulty getting a final say on other European dates he was advised by Ms Arzate to send a note to Prince.

He said he had to be careful how to write the note and normally took direction from Ms Arzate who would 'interpret' for them.

He said he was told not to try to force an answer from the artist as it would probably make him do the opposite.

However he said at no stage in the process was it mentioned that Dublin would be cancelled and he was sending regular updates on tickets sales to Prince's personal assistant.

The first time he was definitively told that Prince would not be going to Dublin was at a meeting on 3 June.

He said at this meeting Prince was agitated when presented with his options on canceling the concert and said 'you guys got me into this'.

He was also willing to speak to Denis Desmond and said: 'tell him he'll have to chill'.


During cross-examination by counsel for MCD, Mr Sarkisian said at all times they acted as agents for Prince.

Asked if he was still the singer's agent he said: 'technically yes'.

It was put to him that Prince's name was still on WME's website and he replied: 'well I think Elvis is still on our website'.

However he said at all times WME acted on Prince's behalf and with his consent and everyone understood this both before and after tickets for the Dublin gig went on sale.
[Edited 2/24/10 5:10am]



Thats brilliant reading!

I suppose the main point to be taken from all this is that prince knew nearly 60k of his fans had bought tickets to this gig and he did not act. Why did he not say no when the concert was first announced? He was obviously considering it if not, why the delay?
[Edited 2/24/10 5:57am]
"My God it's full of Stars"
Indigo Club, September 21st 2008, 4.24am
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #177 posted 02/24/10 6:31am

unique

avatar

Rorywan said:

unique said:



MCD promoted the show on the understanding that prince would attend, but the case revolves around prince saying he didn't confirm he would attend, yet the promoter went on with advertising and selling tickets to the show

the issue of "authorised" relates to one party selling tickets that another didn't authorise, according to the other party

i think prince's point is that he didn't confirm the show, yet the promoter went ahead and took it so far without proper confirmation from the artist, in the hope he would give in and play the show so as not to upset his fans. but i think we all know that's not the way you try and deal with prince



Well the Main news here last night doesn't agree with you i'm afraid. His defense have stated that he was contracted to play the gig and that it was confirmed. They said that Prince contacted his agent on June 6th to tell them that he wanted to cancel (note the wording). He did not give a reason of any substance. William Morris then contacted MCD to tell them that their client had decided to cancel the gig. MCD had not any insurance in place for a situation like this (impossible to get commercial insurance against the whim of a performer rather than insurable circumstances). The defense said they "would do their best" to protect prince's interests but he had refused to provide them with a written verification of the events.

Sounds like this might cost P a few $. Which is good for all of us, he will have to play a few more gigs to make up. just not in ireland anytime soon.


confused


the "news media" would never be wrong, as they've never been wrong before, have they?

if you read the rest of the news reports, it seems to confirm what i said, such as the quote "you got me into this"

it might not cost prince at all, it may cost william morris agency, and then it's up to them to pursue it with prince

prince can make $3m or $4m with one gig in one night, so i doubt he'll be losing too much sleep over it. jehova is on his side, not some bloody orangemobilephone men. prince's god is better than theirs
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #178 posted 02/24/10 6:33am

unique

avatar

colm said:


He said he had to be careful how to write the note and normally took direction from Ms Arzate who would 'interpret' for them.

He said he was told not to try to force an answer from the artist as it would probably make him do the opposite.



dear prince, don't ever release any bootlegs. don't put anything good on your official website, and don't make it free, or else there will be trouble
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #179 posted 02/24/10 6:46am

Rorywan

avatar

unique said:

Rorywan said:




Well the Main news here last night doesn't agree with you i'm afraid. His defense have stated that he was contracted to play the gig and that it was confirmed. They said that Prince contacted his agent on June 6th to tell them that he wanted to cancel (note the wording). He did not give a reason of any substance. William Morris then contacted MCD to tell them that their client had decided to cancel the gig. MCD had not any insurance in place for a situation like this (impossible to get commercial insurance against the whim of a performer rather than insurable circumstances). The defense said they "would do their best" to protect prince's interests but he had refused to provide them with a written verification of the events.

Sounds like this might cost P a few $. Which is good for all of us, he will have to play a few more gigs to make up. just not in ireland anytime soon.


confused


the "news media" would never be wrong, as they've never been wrong before, have they?

if you read the rest of the news reports, it seems to confirm what i said, such as the quote "you got me into this"

it might not cost prince at all, it may cost william morris agency, and then it's up to them to pursue it with prince

prince can make $3m or $4m with one gig in one night, so i doubt he'll be losing too much sleep over it. jehova is on his side, not some bloody orangemobilephone men. prince's god is better than theirs


This was not the news media, it was an interview with Princes defence lawyers. That is what they said. Which is strange is it not? I didn't think they would be allowed to comment like that in the middle of a court case?
wink
[Edited 2/24/10 6:49am]
"My God it's full of Stars"
Indigo Club, September 21st 2008, 4.24am
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 6 of 14 « First<2345678910>Last »
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)

This is a "featured" topic! — From here you can jump to the « previous or next » featured topic.

« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Prince: Music and More > Prince may appear in Dublin Court this week.