Gav said:

The whole idea of PFU was to support HQ, and other sites against the partly unfounded claims by a certain mr P and/or his 'websheriff'.
It never came to a court case.
So mr P can continue to claim whatever he wants and due to the nature of how litigation currently goes, especially in the US of A, people are trying to avoid that instead of standing for their rights.
So P is limiting our freedoms and rights. This can be noticed here at the org.
That is why someone, PFU or otherwise, needs to kick P's ass so far as needed to correct certain ideas about rights.

So I am not saying he has NO rights. Just that certain ideas of him about his rights need checking and perhaps correction.