independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Prince: Music and More > Why do you think Prince is reluctant to release DVDs nowdays?
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 2 of 3 <123>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #30 posted 01/10/10 7:56am

BartVanHemelen

avatar

NONSENSE said:

cborgman said:

because, as it has been said many times before, prince is a very bad business decision maker.


I wouldn't say P is a bad business decision maker. Because what he's doing obviously works.


No it doesn't. He's making a FRACTION of what he could be making.
[Edited 1/10/10 8:06am]
© Bart Van Hemelen
This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties, and confers no rights.
It is not authorized by Prince or the NPG Music Club. You assume all risk for
your use. All rights reserved.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #31 posted 01/10/10 8:05am

BartVanHemelen

avatar

Cravens said:

cborgman said:

because, as it has been said many times before, prince is a very bad business decision maker.


Well, in this particular case, with the DVD's, I'm not so sure it's necessarily a bad decision to not release live stuff (or just his post-Warner video's, which even I would buy). Is he that big in this day and age, that a world wide DVD release could possibly be worth the expenses?


Dude, ARE YOU SERIOUS?

Cravens said:

Although, yes, I admit, I have no idea, how the economy is behind a DVD release.


And there we have it.

Why not apply logic? How much would it cost to hire a professional team to film a concert (or rather: several concerts at the same place, so you can pick the best songs). How much would it cost to edit this properly, and master it? I bet that the ticket profits of those gigs alone would pay for this. Anything after that is PROFIT.

Hell, I bet that if he just puts a static camera at the mix desk and simply films the entire concert this way, encodes it and sells it as a download on his site (as xvid/dvd/mkv -- i.e. offer a CHOICE of formats) or even has some other company do this for him, he'd make a ton of money and would pleas plenty of fans. (Simply offering a soundboard recording in CD-quality would already please many fans.) Think this would be "boring" to watch? Perhaps, but many boots are barely more than this, except they wouldn't have the sound or picture quality.

Why do you worry whether this would be a hit? You're stuck in OLD MODELS. It's 2010,, it's not about having a hit, it's about CONNECTING with your fans.
© Bart Van Hemelen
This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties, and confers no rights.
It is not authorized by Prince or the NPG Music Club. You assume all risk for
your use. All rights reserved.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #32 posted 01/10/10 8:31am

Cravens

avatar

BartVanHemelen said:

said:

Well, I'd speculate, that since Prince doesn't have a big company like Warners behind him to do marketing, pressing and distribution, he would probably have to go out and find himself some unique, individual business deal for the release of a DVD.


Yeah, there are no companies that'll gladly do that for an artist. Sheesh... Amazingly, dozens/hundreds of artists do just that: hook up with a company that takes care of all the administration (for a fee).

For fuck's sake, Prince used to have a built-in sales base of hundreds of thousands. The only reason a company would refuse to handle such a task is because a) they're not up to it or b) because PRINCE is impossible to work with.

As for marketing: that's HIS part of the deal. In the past he's always worked against the marketing wishes of the companies he was working with, so if that fails, it's HIS OWN fault.

Then again, we're talking here about an idiot who a) still isn't making money from his back catalogue like he should be (*) and b) manages to kill his own website every other year and replace it by something WORSE.



Cravens said:

And I gather, that Prince's heart lies with his music, and he only cares about that enough to be bothered to involve the likes of Columbia and Sony in order to get it out to the general public, whereas I think he these days probably thinks to himself that his live shows are for the attendancees at the venues exclusively..


Yeah, his heart lies so much with his music, he can't be arsed top promote his latest release, can't be arsed to play the songs live,...


Well, my point wasn't really about the companies out there. My point was that *Prince* himself may have decided that he can't bothered, "Fight the industrty" and all that.

BartVanHemelen said:


(*)seriously, if I was running the show you lot would have at least three copies of each of his prime time albums at home, simply because I'd make sure to have an upgraded & improved remaster every couple of years. By now you'd be listening to an edition of Purple Rain which would contain FULL LENGTH versions, an alternate track list, remixed songs (because the original album mix was done for vinyl which imposed some limitations), high-def audio on blu-ray,... Trust me, you guys would be BUSY listening to new/unreleased music instead of talking about how great it would be to get crumbs.


And seriously. I wish then that you were running the show.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #33 posted 01/10/10 8:37am

Cravens

avatar

BartVanHemelen said:

[..]

Why do you worry whether this would be a hit? You're stuck in OLD MODELS. It's 2010,, it's not about having a hit, it's about CONNECTING with your fans.



I'm not worried about it being a hit at all. But if a DVD release ain't lucrative, meaning if it can't pay for itself, what's the point for an artist to release it? But as I said, I'm not in that line of business, I don't know or even slightly understand Prince's methods (does anyone?) .. so it's speculation on my part.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #34 posted 01/10/10 9:17am

NONSENSE

BartVanHemelen said:

NONSENSE said:



I wouldn't say P is a bad business decision maker. Because what he's doing obviously works.


No it doesn't. He's making a FRACTION of what he could be making.
[Edited 1/10/10 8:06am]


I'm sure Prince is perfectly content with his wealth & career. He seems well grounded. He also seems happy making music and playing concerts when he chooses. You should be happy for him.
[Edited 1/10/10 9:29am]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #35 posted 01/10/10 9:24am

NONSENSE

Prince just wants to write, record, and play music. The fanfare & celebrity isn't that important to him. Let Prince do what he does best. Be creative. Take chances. And continue to make great music.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #36 posted 01/10/10 10:04am

ernestsewell

NONSENSE said:

I'm sure Prince is perfectly content with his wealth & career. He seems well grounded. He also seems happy making music and playing concerts when he chooses. You should be happy for him.

Prince just wants to write, record, and play music. The fanfare & celebrity isn't that important to him. Let Prince do what he does best. Be creative. Take chances. And continue to make great music.

That's an oxymoron, and a bullshit argument we've heard before from a certain imp of Paisley Park. He scoffs at celebrity yet sits among the snobbery that is a fashion show in Paris, and kisses up to Jay Leno when Leno was still relatively relevant on television (and that was a stretch). If celebrity or fanfare wasn't important to him, he'd not appear on television at all. He's release music, and lay low.

Prince hasn't been really creative and interesting, nor has he taken chances, in at least 10 or 12 years. There's nothing he's written that has knocked the socks off the masses. Sure we've not heard the song before, but has it really housed anything that blew our minds? Sounds? Riffs? Hooks? Effects? ANYTHING?! I'd argue not a one. We've heard his trippy guitar, echoy guitar, quirky vocal effects, and even the Linn over and over. Prince has long lost his edge as an innovator in music. It's why people still go back to the mid 80's and mid 90's even. If the 00's had been as interesting as the previous two decades, folks wouldn't even mention Sign O The Times, or The Gold Experience, or The Black Album or 1999.

The last remotely interesting thing he did like that was some feedback on "In This Bed I Scream", or a baby's heartbeat on "Sex In The Summer". I wish he made great music again. I'm hungry for something that grips me by the fucking balls, twists them and makes me sit up, and in my own squeal-ish Camille-esque voice, say "SIR YES SIR THAT'S FUNKY!" . But so far, my balls are safe. And so is Prince's musical approach.
[Edited 1/10/10 10:05am]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #37 posted 01/10/10 11:34am

kewlschool

avatar

Not to be a buzz kill, but do you think Prince is in semi-retirement? Maybe a time in his life where he has other things in his life other than music or pleasing his fans (insert joke here). Prince hinted at that in interviews-"make room for something more in his life." Not that he is retired, but maybe having more of a personal life. So the job of musician may sometimes be secondary.

I also think the lack of DVDs release is just representative of the market. Prince (I believe-can't speak for the man), wants the "wow" affect of his live performance to stay with his live performance. It is his meal ticket and he wants to keep it that way. Part of his (IMO) strategy seems to be that every release of a Prince product is an event and since he release a new cd every year-that makes it harder to have "2" special events in the same calendar year. A DVD is a harder sell and he doesn't want low sale numbers of a DVD on the charts that would affect his one off cd sale deals. That being said, I feel we will get a new DVD with in 3 years, but it will have to contain hits in order to market it to a broader audience.

I think Prince may view his past live performances, just as that, the past. And if you want to market the new material, you don't wont the past out shining or competing with your new material. However, if he does remaster. I could see him releasing some of the concerts to DVD to coincide with the new remaster cds. But if the remaster occurs-it will probably happen after Prince gets the rights back and then resale the rights to a company who will remaster and release them and maintain them in stores.
As for Prince releasing all/most of his live footage or music from the vault that probably wont happen. And to the fans that think it will happen after he passes on, I would argue that Prince has an estate that will be designed and set up with direct orders on what to do with everything. Like a new release every year or two. Prince's music and image will be controlled by Prince in life and in after life. Again pure speculation and conjecture on my part.
99.9% of everything I say is strictly for my own entertainment
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #38 posted 01/10/10 11:40am

RodeoSchro

poetcorner61 said:

Well, I don't know about official releases but there are plenty of his 2009 performances on video in circulation! biggrin


This is where Prince is driving fans, so he shouldn't bellyache about bootleg concerts.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #39 posted 01/10/10 11:42am

RodeoSchro

cborgman said:

because, as it has been said many times before, prince is a very bad business decision maker.


I disagree with that. I think he is a very smart businessman, but his priorities aren't in line with his fans' demands, and the fans get frustrated.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #40 posted 01/10/10 11:51am

Cravens

avatar

RodeoSchro said:

cborgman said:

because, as it has been said many times before, prince is a very bad business decision maker.


I disagree with that. I think he is a very smart businessman, but his priorities aren't in line with his fans' demands, and the fans get frustrated.


.. But is a smart business man, not one who sets himself up for return-customers?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #41 posted 01/10/10 11:55am

RodeoSchro

Cravens said:

RodeoSchro said:



I disagree with that. I think he is a very smart businessman, but his priorities aren't in line with his fans' demands, and the fans get frustrated.


.. But is a smart business man, not one who sets himself up for return-customers?


He doesn't need them. He made so much money from the Musicology and 21 Nights gigs that he's set for life. He can do anything he wants, no matter what, for the rest of his life.

He breaks ground almost every time he releases something, and I think that is what interests him the most. And he gets paid up front. In that respect, he is a very good businessman.

But I agree that he doesn't make nearly as much as he could.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #42 posted 01/10/10 12:36pm

cborgman

avatar

RodeoSchro said:

Cravens said:



.. But is a smart business man, not one who sets himself up for return-customers?


He doesn't need them. He made so much money from the Musicology and 21 Nights gigs that he's set for life. He can do anything he wants, no matter what, for the rest of his life.

He breaks ground almost every time he releases something, and I think that is what interests him the most. And he gets paid up front. In that respect, he is a very good businessman.

But I agree that he doesn't make nearly as much as he could.


well, let's be honest... those ticket sales are people who are return customers. i can't imagine hardly anyone is going to see him nowdays based on his modern recorded output.

his entire career at this point is built on fans of his old stuff, some of which have kept with the new. nobody is hearing prince for the first times from any of his albums post TRC, and even that one would be stretching...

granted, he can ride on that probably for the rest of his life. no matter how tepid or craptacualr his new stuff is, the man can still sell out a concert because the sheer genius of his old stuff holds up, and because he is still a master musician, if not half the songwriter he used to be.

but he's a terrible business man. he makes terrible business choices that are often void of any real logic. he complains endlessly about the bootlegs, but only put out two tepid and preachy live albums of his new stuff, while AMAZING live stuff from his heyday gets bootlegged from his own vaults. he guts the fans for money, as in the lotuslfower.com debacle, and has the audacity to charge fans 8 times the retail price so they can watch streaming videos they already had legally bought. he sues the fansites to keep them from posting pics or videos.

the man makes insanely bad business choices. he needs management in the worst way, but his ego prevents him from it because he is convinced that his musical genius is the same as his business lunacy.
Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely. - Lord Acton
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #43 posted 01/10/10 12:47pm

ernestsewell

kewlschool said:

Not to be a buzz kill, but do you think Prince is in semi-retirement? Maybe a time in his life where he has other things in his life other than music or pleasing his fans (insert joke here). Prince hinted at that in interviews-"make room for something more in his life." Not that he is retired, but maybe having more of a personal life. So the job of musician may sometimes be secondary.

I think Prince just doesn't care as much anymore. Writing and producing is 2nd nature to him, and I don't think he gives that gift the attention and energy he once did. He takes it for granted, which shows in his lackluster recent decade's output.

I also think the lack of DVDs release is just representative of the market. Prince (I believe-can't speak for the man), wants the "wow" affect of his live performance to stay with his live performance. It is his meal ticket and he wants to keep it that way. Part of his (IMO) strategy seems to be that every release of a Prince product is an event and since he release a new cd every year-that makes it harder to have "2" special events in the same calendar year. A DVD is a harder sell and he doesn't want low sale numbers of a DVD on the charts that would affect his one off cd sale deals. That being said, I feel we will get a new DVD with in 3 years, but it will have to contain hits in order to market it to a broader audience.

Interesting ideas. But that is totally contradictory to what Prince himself has stated though. He says he doesn't care about the charts, and at this point, he could have the lion's share of sales numbers ,whether it's 50,000 or 2 million. And a lot of artists have CD/DVD combos for well under $20, so it's affordable for fans, and puts out something extra for the consumer. If the past is the past, then quit filling 90% of concerts with past music. It's hypocritical to say he doesn't live in the past because it makes him old (or whatever bullshit he's spewing on that subject), yet 90% of his shows ARE old material. Gheezus, how long did he work that "Take Me With U"/"Raspberry Beret" medley in the ground? How many times does he need to perform "Kiss" or "Purple Rain" or the sanitized and highly boring version of "DMSR"? He's not exactly hitting the charts anyway with records anymore.

As far as the "wow" factor left to the concerts, let's examine that theory: He's released
*4 LIVE concerts (LIVE, Sign O The Times, Aladdin, Rave, one of which was PPV), plus foreign-only releases like Livesexy, The Sacrifice of Victor, The Beautiful Experience, etc)
*A 3-disk live album which highly promoted the old songs (like Condition of the Heart, which was a 30 second interlude and unrecognizable as the song itself)
*Another live disk w/ a book
*Numerous one off live videos (I Would Die 4 U, Baby I'm A Star, Anotherloverholenyohead, Take Me With U, Live 4 Love, Nothing Compares 2 U, etc)
*Numerous live songs (We March, Vicki Waiting, Letitgo, Return of The Bump Squad, The War, Face Down, Rebirth of The Flesh, It's Gonna Be A Beautiful Night, I Would Die 4 U, baby I'm A Star, Purple Rain, 1+1+1=3, Jam Of the Year cassette, Controversy, Empty Room, The Ride, numerous live takes of Days of Wild).

So him wanting to leave the "wow" effect in the concerts doesn't quite float either.

I think Prince may view his past live performances, just as that, the past. And if you want to market the new material, you don't wont the past out shining or competing with your new material. However, if he does remaster. I could see him releasing some of the concerts to DVD to coincide with the new remaster cds. But if the remaster occurs-it will probably happen after Prince gets the rights back and then resale the rights to a company who will remaster and release them and maintain them in stores.

If that were the case, then 2013 will see For You remastered. We'll see about that. 2014 = Prince. 2015 = Dirty Mind (highly edited down to a single) 2016 = Controversy
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #44 posted 01/10/10 2:04pm

NONSENSE

ernestsewell said:

NONSENSE said:

I'm sure Prince is perfectly content with his wealth & career. He seems well grounded. He also seems happy making music and playing concerts when he chooses. You should be happy for him.

Prince just wants to write, record, and play music. The fanfare & celebrity isn't that important to him. Let Prince do what he does best. Be creative. Take chances. And continue to make great music.

That's an oxymoron, and a bullshit argument we've heard before from a certain imp of Paisley Park. He scoffs at celebrity yet sits among the snobbery that is a fashion show in Paris, and kisses up to Jay Leno when Leno was still relatively relevant on television (and that was a stretch). If celebrity or fanfare wasn't important to him, he'd not appear on television at all. He's release music, and lay low.


Just because Prince occasionally goes to a fashion shows or has a friend named Jay Leno doesn't mean Prince actively seeks the spotlight. A majority of time, Prince does lay low. Also, don't confuse Prince promoting his music by appearing on television shows with him wanting lots of fanfare & celebrity. Prince always promotes his music. Not himself. Since day one, Prince has wanted to maintain a private life. It's the reason he still resides in MPLS.

as for money, if Prince needed it he'd be touring. Plain and simple. He could do a farewell tour and rake up a bunch of cake. Some artist are always on tour. Prince could easily do the same thing.
[Edited 1/10/10 14:19pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #45 posted 01/10/10 2:18pm

ernestsewell

NONSENSE said:

He could do a farewell tour and rake up a bunch of cake. Some artist are always on tour. Prince could easily do the same thing.

Prince wouldn't stick to it. How many times has he said "this is the last time I'm playing these songs"? Endless, even as recently as the Musicology Tour.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #46 posted 01/10/10 2:25pm

NONSENSE

ernestsewell said:

NONSENSE said:

He could do a farewell tour and rake up a bunch of cake. Some artist are always on tour. Prince could easily do the same thing.

Prince wouldn't stick to it. How many times has he said "this is the last time I'm playing these songs"? Endless, even as recently as the Musicology Tour.


He hasn't done a farewell tour. People will pay to see him. He's legend. He could pull off a world tour and tour for years. Look how long Cher, Tina Turner et al. went during their farewell tour. Hell, BB King is always playing somewhere and he still packs them in.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #47 posted 01/10/10 2:26pm

Alej

avatar

He's too busy cleaning his vagina. Duh.
The orger formerly known as theodore
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #48 posted 01/10/10 2:58pm

ernestsewell

NONSENSE said:

ernestsewell said:


Prince wouldn't stick to it. How many times has he said "this is the last time I'm playing these songs"? Endless, even as recently as the Musicology Tour.


He hasn't done a farewell tour. People will pay to see him. He's legend. He could pull off a world tour and tour for years. Look how long Cher, Tina Turner et al. went during their farewell tour. Hell, BB King is always playing somewhere and he still packs them in.

BB King ain't selling out the Staples Center either. He's still doing the modern version of the chitterlings circuit.

Tina did 116 shows on the 24/7 tour, which was to be her last. But with prompting from Oprah (whom she actually promised years ago that she'd do something), and Sophia Loren, she had a 50th anniversary tour which housed only 90 dates.

Cher did have a long tour, but she got smart and got a spot in Vegas so she's more central, and can do whatever in her show without the rigors of touring.

KISS are the ones who are blatant in lying about stuff with "Farewell" tours.

Fact remains that Prince won't do a Farewell tour. He's not a rich as he used to be, but he's also not doing the sort of things he used to do either. So the "need" more money is coming from his deals with his albums. He's getting a lump sum up front probably, plus at least 50% of the sales. Plus he's shaking down his fans every few years for $100 or $77 or whatever. So you're right, who NEEDS to tour when you have that kind of income?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #49 posted 01/10/10 6:16pm

kewlschool

avatar

ernestsewell said:

kewlschool said:

Not to be a buzz kill, but do you think Prince is in semi-retirement? Maybe a time in his life where he has other things in his life other than music or pleasing his fans (insert joke here). Prince hinted at that in interviews-"make room for something more in his life." Not that he is retired, but maybe having more of a personal life. So the job of musician may sometimes be secondary.

I think Prince just doesn't care as much anymore. Writing and producing is 2nd nature to him, and I don't think he gives that gift the attention and energy he once did. He takes it for granted, which shows in his lackluster recent decade's output.


Interesting ideas. But that is totally contradictory to what Prince himself has stated though. He says he doesn't care about the charts, and at this point, he could have the lion's share of sales numbers ,whether it's 50,000 or 2 million. And a lot of artists have CD/DVD combos for well under $20, so it's affordable for fans, and puts out something extra for the consumer. If the past is the past, then quit filling 90% of concerts with past music. It's hypocritical to say he doesn't live in the past because it makes him old (or whatever bullshit he's spewing on that subject), yet 90% of his shows ARE old material. Gheezus, how long did he work that "Take Me With U"/"Raspberry Beret" medley in the ground? How many times does he need to perform "Kiss" or "Purple Rain" or the sanitized and highly boring version of "DMSR"? He's not exactly hitting the charts anyway with records anymore.

As far as the "wow" factor left to the concerts, let's examine that theory: He's released
*4 LIVE concerts (LIVE, Sign O The Times, Aladdin, Rave, one of which was PPV), plus foreign-only releases like Livesexy, The Sacrifice of Victor, The Beautiful Experience, etc)
*A 3-disk live album which highly promoted the old songs (like Condition of the Heart, which was a 30 second interlude and unrecognizable as the song itself)
*Another live disk w/ a book
*Numerous one off live videos (I Would Die 4 U, Baby I'm A Star, Anotherloverholenyohead, Take Me With U, Live 4 Love, Nothing Compares 2 U, etc)
*Numerous live songs (We March, Vicki Waiting, Letitgo, Return of The Bump Squad, The War, Face Down, Rebirth of The Flesh, It's Gonna Be A Beautiful Night, I Would Die 4 U, baby I'm A Star, Purple Rain, 1+1+1=3, Jam Of the Year cassette, Controversy, Empty Room, The Ride, numerous live takes of Days of Wild).

So him wanting to leave the "wow" effect in the concerts doesn't quite float either.

I think Prince may view his past live performances, just as that, the past. And if you want to market the new material, you don't wont the past out shining or competing with your new material. However, if he does remaster. I could see him releasing some of the concerts to DVD to coincide with the new remaster cds. But if the remaster occurs-it will probably happen after Prince gets the rights back and then resale the rights to a company who will remaster and release them and maintain them in stores.

If that were the case, then 2013 will see For You remastered. We'll see about that. 2014 = Prince. 2015 = Dirty Mind (highly edited down to a single) 2016 = Controversy


Ernestsewell-I'm down for the cd/dvd combo and think it's a great idea. However,
the wow factor is important. That is (IMO) one of the reasons he controls the videos on youtube, he doesn't want a specific image, look, or style of a performance to be competing with his new version of and old classic. It's like painting a picture of a flower you painted it one way years ago, now your going to repaint the same flower but this time your going to do it abstract.(I know, I know, insert joke here). From a marketing stand point, you don't want flooded images of you in one way to make the audience only think of you in that one role. That's why real actors who get known from one role-usually seek out another completely different role to break the public image of them. As for the releases you can't compare todays marketing of dvd's to anything before 2000. The "wow" factor is far more important-especially with an artist in his later years not backed by a label that will get him radio play. The "wow" factor was a big part of the musicology tour. The one off performances was to showcase his "wow" factor. As for the past being the past, it's not that he wont play past hits-it's that he is not so keen on releasing past tour performances. That means Prince appears to being living in the now, meaning his focused on the now. that doesn't mean he wont play past songs. It's just that some concert from 1980 is the past and why re-live it? I equate this with a basketball player and his play off game from 10 years ago that he wont release to DVD. Is the basketball player a hypocrite cause he still plays basketball and uses the same plays and dribbles the ball? No. (So, when I say past is past-that's what I mean.) That said, I still want my blue-ray Prince Lovesexy DVD. I know, we can dream...

If Prince sales the rights to the cds (after he regains the rights) they can be remastered as is-with all the naughty words. Cause he wouldn't own them. No contradiction with his state of affairs, dig it?
99.9% of everything I say is strictly for my own entertainment
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #50 posted 01/10/10 9:09pm

specdude

toejam said:

Back in the day, Prince used to always release some kind of 'home-video' every couple of years, whether it be a movie, concert film, video collection or whatever:

1984 Purple Rain
1985 Prince & The Revolution Live
1986 Under The Cherry Moon
1987 Sign O The Times
1989 Lovesexy Live
1990 Graffiti Bridge
1992 Diamonds & Pearls / Gett Off Video Collections
1994 3 Chains O' Gold Video Collection
1994 The Undertaker
1995 The Sacrifice Of Victor
1998 Beautiful Strange
2000 Rave Un2 The Year 2000
2003 Live At The Aladdin, Las Vegas

We've gone almost 7 whole years now without one sad

And it's not like he hasn't had the opportunity to cash-in: The Musicology tour and the London O2 shows were some of the biggest grossing tours of the decade. DVD releases of one of those soon after would have sold like hot cakes!

And now more recently, we've had the Montreux Jazz Festival appearance in August last year. And of course, anyone who knows anything about the festival knows that there's a whole series of 'Live In Montreux' DVDs that spans some of the most ecclectic and respected artists of our generation (see http://astore.amazon.com/...TF8&node=2 for a list of artists who have gone the 'Live In Montreux' route).

Yet here we are. Five months after the event and not even a peep about a possible upcoming release of that show. Hmmmm.

So my question is: Why do you think Prince is so reluctant to release DVDs nowdays? Do you think he doesn't see it as a profitable venture anymore? Has he not been happy with his performances? Does he not want to overexpose himself? Is there some kind of contract dispute? What's up Prince?!!


Because Prince thinks on a higher plane..


or at least he THINKS he does!!!!
stirthepot
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #51 posted 01/10/10 9:39pm

funkylust

avatar

ernestsewell said:


If that were the case, then 2013 will see For You remastered. We'll see about that. 2014 = Prince. 2015 = Dirty Mind (highly edited down to a single) 2016 = Controversy


Ernest, (sorry unrelated to DVDs but) if i am reading this correct, are you saying Prince IS going to start getting his masters back in chronological order from 1978 (For You) from 2013? Did I miss this? Is this a fact or an assumption or what? Where you getting this from?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


The feeling you get when...

(you squeeze your balls?) no that's not it...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #52 posted 01/10/10 9:56pm

ernestsewell

funkylust said:

ernestsewell said:


If that were the case, then 2013 will see For You remastered. We'll see about that. 2014 = Prince. 2015 = Dirty Mind (highly edited down to a single) 2016 = Controversy


Ernest, (sorry unrelated to DVDs but) if i am reading this correct, are you saying Prince IS going to start getting his masters back in chronological order from 1978 (For You) from 2013? Did I miss this? Is this a fact or an assumption or what? Where you getting this from?

No I'm not saying Prince is going to do anything. I'm saying that the ownership of his records will revert back to him after 35 years (35 to my knowledge). So For You will obviously be the first back in his ownership, in 2013, to do with what he pleases, followed by each album in succession thereafter, one a year as they come to their 35 year age.

I was responding to Kewlschool's thing about remastering, etc. I said "IF" he was to do that, he probably would wait until the records are his again, outright, then I gave the dates as an example to that end.
[Edited 1/10/10 21:56pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #53 posted 01/10/10 10:00pm

funkylust

avatar

ernestsewell said:

funkylust said:



Ernest, (sorry unrelated to DVDs but) if i am reading this correct, are you saying Prince IS going to start getting his masters back in chronological order from 1978 (For You) from 2013? Did I miss this? Is this a fact or an assumption or what? Where you getting this from?

No I'm not saying Prince is going to do anything. I'm saying that the ownership of his records will revert back to him after 35 years (35 to my knowledge). So For You will obviously be the first back in his ownership, in 2013, to do with what he pleases, followed by each album in succession thereafter, one a year as they come to their 35 year age.

I was responding to Kewlschool's thing about remastering, etc. I said "IF" he was to do that, he probably would wait until the records are his again, outright, then I gave the dates as an example to that end.
[Edited 1/10/10 21:56pm]


Yeah thats what I was asking. I didn't know this. So this great, I thought he would never own them. I thought they would remain the property of WB under contract. I didn't know about the 35 year thing. Still thats cool. It will take a long time but at least we might see a 35th anniversary edition of Purple Rain. Its exciting to think he will own his masters this decade. (many of them). I had no idea.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


The feeling you get when...

(you squeeze your balls?) no that's not it...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #54 posted 01/10/10 10:14pm

ernestsewell

funkylust said:

Yeah thats what I was asking. I didn't know this. So this great, I thought he would never own them. I thought they would remain the property of WB under contract. I didn't know about the 35 year thing. Still thats cool. It will take a long time but at least we might see a 35th anniversary edition of Purple Rain. Its exciting to think he will own his masters this decade. (many of them). I had no idea.

2019 for Purple Rain, but don't hold your breath. He'll be 61, and a bit more crotchety probably. He'll probably burn them one by one as he gets them back. flame
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #55 posted 01/11/10 1:10am

MattyJam

avatar

I wonder if he meant what he said about starting to re-record all the albums one by one in 2018?

I can see it now - "I wanna duck the taste right out of your mouth"...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #56 posted 01/11/10 1:20am

cborgman

avatar

MattyJam said:

I wonder if he meant what he said about starting to re-record all the albums one by one in 2018?

I can see it now - "I wanna duck the taste right out of your mouth"...


"you silly motherducker"
Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely. - Lord Acton
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #57 posted 01/11/10 1:20am

Cravens

avatar

MattyJam said:

I wonder if he meant what he said about starting to re-record all the albums one by one in 2018?

I can see it now - "I wanna duck the taste right out of your mouth"...


Do you get enough BREAD!? Oh yeah.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #58 posted 01/11/10 2:50am

BartVanHemelen

avatar

funkylust said:

ernestsewell said:


No I'm not saying Prince is going to do anything. I'm saying that the ownership of his records will revert back to him after 35 years (35 to my knowledge). So For You will obviously be the first back in his ownership, in 2013, to do with what he pleases, followed by each album in succession thereafter, one a year as they come to their 35 year age.

I was responding to Kewlschool's thing about remastering, etc. I said "IF" he was to do that, he probably would wait until the records are his again, outright, then I gave the dates as an example to that end.
[Edited 1/10/10 21:56pm]


Yeah thats what I was asking. I didn't know this. So this great, I thought he would never own them. I thought they would remain the property of WB under contract. I didn't know about the 35 year thing. Still thats cool. It will take a long time but at least we might see a 35th anniversary edition of Purple Rain. Its exciting to think he will own his masters this decade. (many of them). I had no idea.


I wouldn't get your hopes up. Don't forget he renewed/extended his contract with WB several times, and I wouldn't be surprised if that invalidates the "35 years" clause. And even if it's still in place, I don't expect WB to just give up those rights.

http://www.alankorn.com/a...dings.html

SCENARIO #5: RECORD DEAL

Finally, let's assume the above band recorded some fantastic demos, and finds itself signed to an exclusive contract with a major label. Unless there was a bidding war, or the band later achieves superstar status and acquires added leverage, most record companies will insist on owning the copyrights to master recordings made during the contract period. Record contracts usually stipulate that all recordings are transferred on a work-for-hire basis. This means that unlike a regular transfer of copyright, the record company's right to own the copyrighted material is not subject to termination after 35 years. (Whether or not sound recordings actually qualify as "works made for hire" under the Copyright Act is a separate question best left to a future column). Typically, record labels will also own the outtakes and alternate versions of the band's studio work.

On the other hand, if the band allows the record company to release its independently recorded material, the record label should not be granted any ownership rights to those masters. Instead, the label should retain only an exclusive (or better yet, non-exclusive) right to release the masters for a specified period. If the label is granted only a non-exclusive right, the band could try to find another label in a better position to release these same recordings in foreign territories. In addition, all rights to the masters should be returned after the license ends, enabling the band to enter into a new deal for these recordings with any label it chooses.
© Bart Van Hemelen
This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties, and confers no rights.
It is not authorized by Prince or the NPG Music Club. You assume all risk for
your use. All rights reserved.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #59 posted 01/11/10 5:25am

KoolEaze

avatar

ernestsewell said:



Fact remains that Prince won't do a Farewell tour. He's not a rich as he used to be, but he's also not doing the sort of things he used to do either. So the "need" more money is coming from his deals with his albums. He's getting a lump sum up front probably, plus at least 50% of the sales. Plus he's shaking down his fans every few years for $100 or $77 or whatever. So you're right, who NEEDS to tour when you have that kind of income?



I really thought that Prince has more money these days than he ever had before, especially after the highly successful Musicology tour and the 21 Nites shows.
Sure, he´s no longer selling hit albums but even when he still was, he wasn´t really getting that much money for them.
He made 80 million dollars in 2004, right?
" I´d rather be a stank ass hoe because I´m not stupid. Oh my goodness! I got more drugs! I´m always funny dude...I´m hilarious! Are we gonna smoke?"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 2 of 3 <123>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Prince: Music and More > Why do you think Prince is reluctant to release DVDs nowdays?