independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Prince: Music and More > Prince's Masters 2012
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 2 of 2 <12
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #30 posted 06/30/09 12:04pm

mzkqueen03

avatar

.
[Edited 12/25/09 17:03pm]
..She's Just A Baby..but she's my lady..my loveR..my only friend!..true love that will last!..PEOPLE DON'T UNDERSTAND..WHAT SHE SEES IN AN OLDER MAN..they never stop 2 think that maybe i'm what she's looking 4..THEY NEVER TAKE THE TIME..2 look in her mind
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #31 posted 06/30/09 12:12pm

mzkqueen03

avatar

.
[Edited 12/25/09 17:03pm]
..She's Just A Baby..but she's my lady..my loveR..my only friend!..true love that will last!..PEOPLE DON'T UNDERSTAND..WHAT SHE SEES IN AN OLDER MAN..they never stop 2 think that maybe i'm what she's looking 4..THEY NEVER TAKE THE TIME..2 look in her mind
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #32 posted 06/30/09 12:28pm

Chas

avatar


why did the Beatles stuff go up for auction for MJ to purchase right from under McCartney's nose?

Bonnie~


Michael bought the company that owned them, ATV Music. So they didn't put the songs up for auction per se. The bidding was for ATV. Now, I think he owns only 50% of it, and Sony owns the other half. At least that's the way I understood it. If I'm wrong I'm sure somebody'll tell me ASAP. smile
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #33 posted 06/30/09 12:44pm

ernestsewell

Chas said:


why did the Beatles stuff go up for auction for MJ to purchase right from under McCartney's nose?

Bonnie~


Michael bought the company that owned them, ATV Music. So they didn't put the songs up for auction per se. The bidding was for ATV. Now, I think he owns only 50% of it, and Sony owns the other half. At least that's the way I understood it. If I'm wrong I'm sure somebody'll tell me ASAP. smile


In fairness, Paul turned MJ onto publishing. MJ "joked", "I'm going to buy your songs." And my God he did!

You are correct about SOny owning half. That happened roughly 10 years ago. He was hard up for cash, and finally struck a deal with Sony to own half of it to generate some immediate cash for himself. He still spent WAY too much and now...if the numbers are correct, he's almost half-billion in debt as a dead man.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #34 posted 06/30/09 2:46pm

bonniewaiting

wow, i have so much to learn about the music business....lol

so when all these new artists are striking up deals to get noticed im sure plenty of them have no idea about owning rights and masters and such? or they are just willing to take anything to get known. makes for a rough industry and thats just the beginning, im sure!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #35 posted 06/30/09 2:53pm

Se7en

avatar

ernestsewell said:

Chas said:



Michael bought the company that owned them, ATV Music. So they didn't put the songs up for auction per se. The bidding was for ATV. Now, I think he owns only 50% of it, and Sony owns the other half. At least that's the way I understood it. If I'm wrong I'm sure somebody'll tell me ASAP. smile


In fairness, Paul turned MJ onto publishing. MJ "joked", "I'm going to buy your songs." And my God he did!

You are correct about SOny owning half. That happened roughly 10 years ago. He was hard up for cash, and finally struck a deal with Sony to own half of it to generate some immediate cash for himself. He still spent WAY too much and now...if the numbers are correct, he's almost half-billion in debt as a dead man.



Paul turning MJ onto publishing has nothing to do with "fairness". What he did was inexcusable, but I don't think he saw it that way. Be that naivete, or just shrewd business sense.

The "fairness" argument comes into play because MJ outbid Paul McCartney. Paul had the money to reciprocate and outbid Michael. He didn't.

Michael did sell off half of it to Sony many years ago.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #36 posted 07/01/09 11:30am

jethrouk

avatar

BorisFishpaw said:

WB can't issue remasters without Prince's agreement. Their "ownership" of
Prince's back catalogue is only the ownership of the right to manufacture and
distribute the released albums "as is". They cannot make changes to those
albums without Prince's permission (so they can't add tracks or remaster them).
They also don't have the right to issue any previously unreleased tracks or
albums.


cheers
"Sisters and brothers in the purple underground, find peace of mind in the pop sound!"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #37 posted 07/01/09 12:23pm

Love2tha9s

avatar

Just curious how did people decide that a long as hell 35 years was the time they should have control of something before it reverted back to the owner?
[Edited 7/1/09 19:35pm]
"Why'd I waste my kisses on you baby?" R.I.P. Prince You've finally found your way back home. Well Done.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #38 posted 07/01/09 3:00pm

utopia7

avatar

Love2tha9s said:

Just curious how did people decide that a long ass hell 35 years was the time they should have control of something before it reverted back to the owner?



good question ! that's half of a lifetime a fair number would be 10 years then again I don't know the logistics of what goes into the contracts.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #39 posted 07/01/09 3:02pm

utopia7

avatar

I think it would be a disservice to future projects for Prince to re-visit and re-record his back catalog. I steered clear of the new 1999 version because it's just not the same imo it didn't age as well as the original.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 2 of 2 <12
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Prince: Music and More > Prince's Masters 2012