...the pictorial battlefield becomes a sea of mud mercifully veiled by the fog of war....it is evident there has been a serious defeat...even though the "General" plunges in "himself" and emerges bespattered...as "he" sometimes does.."he" will NOT RETRIEVE the day..
..mzsexybaby ..She's Just A Baby..but she's my lady..my loveR..my only friend!..true love that will last!..PEOPLE DON'T UNDERSTAND..WHAT SHE SEES IN AN OLDER MAN..they never stop 2 think that maybe i'm what she's looking 4..THEY NEVER TAKE THE TIME..2 look in her mind | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
FunkyDissCo said: Actually, the song starts like that:
"Excuse me sir, what's your family name? (Gershvin) 's not bad We gon' change your name 2night Your new name is "Blackburn" U cool with that? Ehh What's your name Madame? (Rebecca!) And what's your last name, Rebecca? ([Shechler]) Ah, we gon' give U a new name 2night, Rebecca - "Outlaw" (Whoo!) "Rebecca Outlaw"" This - to me - is the song starting as a direct conversation with people pictured as jews, no doubt about that. The tone ("U cool with that?") is implicitly offensive. "U might say, "what U mad about?" But U still got your family name Pleased 2 meet U, Mr. Rosenbloom I'll be John Blackwell, oh yes, just the same What's your family name?" .. is not something leaving to much room for interpretation. It's a fictional dialogue between the protagonist and a jew, the latter saying "what U mad about" (pointing at the Holocaust, and nothing else, cause everything else obviously is nothing to be "mad about"), and getting the response "But U still got your family name." This IS relativizing the Holocaust, and there simply is NO excuse for that, neither politically nor aesthetically... If anybody would come up and say that black history and centuries of slavery was something "better" than the destruction of Jewish people in Europe, it would be hostile and inacceptable, of course. But if somebody comes up and says it's the other way around, it's exactly the same. Misanthropic and not to be accepted in any way. My two cents.. That's how the live version on ONA live starts, not how the album version starts. In the live version, Prince is involving audience members in an effort to make them think. When he says, "You cool with that?" He's obviously being a little confrontational to that person, because why would they be cool with him just giving them a new name? Would you be happy if someone comes along and arbitrarily changes your name, without your consent, telling you that had to be your name for the rest of your life? Anyway, on the album, just before he starts singing there's a name change mentioned and it's as follows: "Come on, come on keep it moving here. What's your name boy? Abu - Abu Car Well, it ain't now. It's Tom Lynch." So the album version of the song starts with a direct reference to an African name being changed. I just don't hear any anti-semitic messages on this album. All I hear is complaints about African Americans not having their original names. I just don't see how it is considered anti-semitic just because he compares something to the Jews. On DMSR, he tells all the white people to clap on the 4, then counts it out. Is this racist, or offensive to white people? Hardly. [Edited 6/27/09 17:40pm] RIP | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
And as for the whole sexist thing, isn't that just how most religions teach things? All it's saying is God is the head of things, then man, then woman. Aren't women below men in most religious teachings? This isn't unique to JW's. Isn't it true of Muslims, Christians and many others? It's just a basic religious teaching. It might not be very politically correct today but that's hardly the point.
But don't take that to mean that the women should be slaves to the men or disrespected by them. That's not what is meant. The women should be treated with respect. Look at the lyrics in mellow: "I wanna get lost in the composition of you Learn the rhythm and play the only notes you want me to I'm a good learner and once I understand I'll stand under u and let u show me how u want your man to be" Doesn't look to sexist to me. Looks to me like he's saying he'll listen to his woman and do whatever she wants to please her. The whole sexist thing just comes about from taking something on it's own, without understanding, or considering the whole. We could have a whole thread on why Prince is pussy whipped and under the thumb, if we quote just this part. It would pass unnoticed because nobody cares if a man wants to please his woman but the thought that he might want to control her is unthinkable. If you look at the whole, you see that it isn't the case and maybe the album isn't really as horrific as you might have first thought. RIP | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ernestsewell said: First clue is on the title track when he says the Rainbow Children are flying on the wings of the "New Translation". That is the version of the Bible that JW's use. It's unlike any other translation. It debunks Christ being the son of God in being the Savior of the world. They don't fully acknowledge the trinity of God, Son, and Holy Spirit. (You can even see a pic of his New Translation bible in the 21 Nights book.)
The banished ones are those who don't believe in the JW g-d, and dispute the word of g-d. Unlike Protestant religions, JW's believe they are the ONLY ones going to heaven, and yet out of 300,000,000 people just in America, apparently only 144,000 in total are going to heaven. I've yet to find where Christ said THAT in the New Testament. It's heresy. As far as the voice...well, who knows. Maybe he just didn't want HIS voice on it, but rather a deep, more g-d like voice, telling the story. JudasLChrist was right about the Goldberg thing and the anti-Jewish statements. Yes, we know blacks had their names changed when they came here. But so did anyone else who showed up at Ellis Island 80 years ago. It's very segregated thinking on Prince's part. He chants about theocratic order and how women are below men. Well in some regards, the Bible has referred to women as the "weaker vessel", but that doesn't mean they're less able to perform any function a man can. Women are very prominent in the Bible, as teachers, preachers, apostles, etc. JW's refuse to acknowledge this. It's basically Prince saying "My way or the highway." He's even chanted about dead blood (JW's don't believe in blood transfusions) in another song not on TRC. (Slaughterhouse?) Wow. dollwoman said: I few things I have learned about the JW's;
They do not believe in the Trinity. They DO believe that Jesus is the SON of God and refer to him as the Ransom Sacrafice because they believe that he was sent by the Father to save the human race. They do not believe Father and Son are the same being. They believe that 144,000 will go to Heaven where they will be like angels in that they will not have bodies. The remander of those that accept Jesus as their Savior, according to JW's, will remain on earth. Earth will turn into the Eden that they believe Jehovah meant it to be. Jesus will be the ruler of this Earth/Eden and the 144,000 will help him rule from their posts in Heaven. Those on Earth will no longer be sick or old. They may also be sexually active; something the 144,000 will not be able to do since they like angels will be sexless. The JW's seem to also believe that the 144,000 will consist of those that lived their life on Earth as either men or woman. They also believe that the majority of these future leaders have been chosen a LONG, LONG time ago. The earth will not only exist, in their view, after the apocolypse but also florish. Once I took the time to let them explain their beliefs to me they didn't sound like a "DRINK THE KOOLAID" type of faith any longer. Thank you for your post. I took the time myself to listen to them 11 years ago, studied with them and was baptized a year later. I chose to look into the faith, to educate myself on their beliefs, so as not to form any opinions based on ignorance and hearsay as evidenced by the post previous to yours. http://prince.org/msg/105/307615
"Eternity is just one kiss away" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
TheEnglishGent said: ...Doesn't look to sexist to me. Looks to me like he's saying he'll listen to his woman and do whatever she wants to please her. The whole sexist thing just comes about from taking something on it's own, without understanding, or considering the whole... If you look at the whole, you see that it isn't the case and maybe the album isn't really as horrific as you might have first thought. Sure, but didn't you just take a song lyric out of context to prove a point? It's unavoidable. Speaking of which, the intro of the title track contains this: "The Wise One who understood the law that was handed down from God long ago reflected the true meaning 2 his woman every day. And she surrendered her discerning of it into his care and keeping She trusted he would lead in the right way. Her children in subjection 2 her, and she in subjection 2 the Wise One. All is in subjection 2 God." When you get down to brass tacks, the albums lyrics are blatantly anti-Semitic and chauvinistic. "Subjection"? "Surrender"? You can't just explain it all away. That all said, I love the album and still listen to it all the time. Imight be one of my favorite albums along with Dirty Mind and SOTT. I'm just irked by the intolerance is all. [Edited 6/27/09 20:57pm] Ur always on my mind...DAY AND NIGHT, BABY ALL THE TIME...U mean so much 2 me...A LOVE LIKE OURS... just had 2 be | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
...i L-O-V-E rainbow children...that album "started me on my path"..
...mzsexybaby ..She's Just A Baby..but she's my lady..my loveR..my only friend!..true love that will last!..PEOPLE DON'T UNDERSTAND..WHAT SHE SEES IN AN OLDER MAN..they never stop 2 think that maybe i'm what she's looking 4..THEY NEVER TAKE THE TIME..2 look in her mind | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JudasLChrist said: dollwoman said: I don't feel this way at all. To me it just means with the exception of. There is alot about African American culture that I do not know, at one point I made a remark that a black woman found racist and I didn't mean it that way. Anyway I took the time to learn more and really think about it. Unlike the holocaust, slavery went on over 100 years. People were born slaves, had children who were enslaved, and died slaves never having tasted freedom. Children were sold away from there mother routinely and as a mother I can't imagine my sanity not being challenged by that alone. People were seperated from their language and their name and would really never claim it back. People bought slaves from different parts of Africa so that the slaves could not speak in a tongue that the masters did not understand. These people were under the control of sadistic master who not only abused them physically but also mentally. When they were freed they left with nothing and they did not have justice or liberty to go along with the freedom. Lastly it all happened in America. I think whites are more comfortable pointing at the actions of the Nazi's of Germany than taking a look at our on history. All I am doing is asking my fellow European Americans to spend as much time studying African American history in America as the average African American spends studying ours. You don't counter white supremacy with anti-semitism. End of story. Be careful with your accusations. Prince isn't advocating any harm to come to Jews. He just seems to be having issue with a perceived lack of balance in what we're taught of American history. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
It's about shopping the fuck around
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Alej said: It's about shopping the fuck around
and walking it the fuck out | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
InsatiableCream said: Alej said: It's about shopping the fuck around
and walking it the fuck out omg that too | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
whodknee said: JudasLChrist said: You don't counter white supremacy with anti-semitism. End of story. Be careful with your accusations. Prince isn't advocating any harm to come to Jews. He just seems to be having issue with a perceived lack of balance in what we're taught of American history. I am very careful with my accusations. The sentiment of the song is anti-semitic. It pits blacks against Jews and seeks to minimize the holocaust. It's a travesty. One of Prince's lowest moments. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Love2tha9s said: I know a bunch of people hate it because they say its preachy and its in code about religion or jehovah witness stuff but honestly i've listened all the way through it at least once and I don't know truly the point he's trying to get across so could someone who does understand it and its ticked off by the message simply tell me wtf he's actually talking about?
No B.s. here i'm honestly confused. I wanna know. All I get is Banished Ones, Rainbow Children and a Darth Vader narration. Its as clear as mud to me. It is about Larry Graham and his beliefs. Before then, there were no banished ones and naysayers. It was about love for all. I was at that cd release party "Rainbow Children" at Paisley. I have not felt the love since. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
anniechristian1 said: It is about Larry Graham and his beliefs. Before then, there were no banished ones and naysayers. It was about love for all. I was at that cd release party "Rainbow Children" at Paisley. I have not felt the love since. So you're saying that Prince never fired anyone before Larry? Nobody was ever cast aside from his inner circle?
And there have been naysayers since long before Larry turned up! RIP | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
spiritandtruth, are you still a Jehovah's Witness? I ask this because I wonder sometimes how JW's who are prince fans deal with some of the very sexual thing in Prince's songs SINCE becoming a JW. Like that whole thing in Rainbow children about watching the Muse make"circles around the toy". He really walks along the very edge of what any JW would think is acceptable. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
dollwoman said: spiritandtruth, are you still a Jehovah's Witness? I ask this because I wonder sometimes how JW's who are prince fans deal with some of the very sexual thing in Prince's songs SINCE becoming a JW. Like that whole thing in Rainbow children about watching the Muse make"circles around the toy". He really walks along the very edge of what any JW would think is acceptable.
Yes, I still am a JW - I did not become one until I was almost 30 yrs old. This is a good question and I've had discussions in P&R about this very topic - feel free to read at: http://prince.org/msg/105/303901 In short, I elect to not listen to the explicit material. I love TRC and have always felt that it is Prince's "honeymoon" album after his baptism (in 2000 I think?) and find most of his output since then to be unobjectionable. http://prince.org/msg/105/307615
"Eternity is just one kiss away" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JudasLChrist said: whodknee said: Be careful with your accusations. Prince isn't advocating any harm to come to Jews. He just seems to be having issue with a perceived lack of balance in what we're taught of American history. I am very careful with my accusations. The sentiment of the song is anti-semitic. It pits blacks against Jews and seeks to minimize the holocaust. It's a travesty. One of Prince's lowest moments. The sentiment is frustration. Anti-Semitism comes from hate which in turn comes from fear and ignorance. Prince may be guilty of the latter, but not likely the former in this case. Was the song misguided? Yes. Hateful? I don't think so. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
whodknee said: JudasLChrist said: I am very careful with my accusations. The sentiment of the song is anti-semitic. It pits blacks against Jews and seeks to minimize the holocaust. It's a travesty. One of Prince's lowest moments. The sentiment is frustration. Anti-Semitism comes from hate which in turn comes from fear and ignorance. Prince may be guilty of the latter, but not likely the former in this case. Was the song misguided? Yes. Hateful? I don't think so. That's a pretty classic apologist argument. Listen, wherever his anti-semitism is coming from, it's hurtful and offensive and dangerous. It's not acceptable. Persons who actually care about a world without racist bullshit have no business defending it. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Graycap23 said: Love2tha9s said: I keep hearing that but noone says how it is. Cause it's NOT. Their is no Anti-Semitism in the CD why this media made up story hangs around no one knows but i guess just like the made up Anti-Gay stories the media are trying to split Prince's fan base and kill of his career as they did with the king of pop. Face Down was Prince's answer to the music media and god bless the man is still here... Da, Da, Da....Emancipation....Free..don't think I ain't..! London 21 Nights...Clap your hands...you know the rest..
James Brown & Michael Jackson RIP, your music still lives with us! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
LondonStyle said: Graycap23 said: Cause it's NOT. Their is no Anti-Semitism in the CD why this media made up story hangs around no one knows but i guess just like the made up Anti-Gay stories the media are trying to split Prince's fan base and kill of his career as they did with the king of pop. Face Down was Prince's answer to the music media and god bless the man is still here... No. Not even close. The assessments being made here have nothing todo with 'the media'. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JudasLChrist said: whodknee said: The sentiment is frustration. Anti-Semitism comes from hate which in turn comes from fear and ignorance. Prince may be guilty of the latter, but not likely the former in this case. Was the song misguided? Yes. Hateful? I don't think so. That's a pretty classic apologist argument. Listen, wherever his anti-semitism is coming from, it's hurtful and offensive and dangerous. It's not acceptable. Persons who actually care about a world without racist bullshit have no business defending it. I guess I'm a classic then. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
whodknee said: JudasLChrist said: That's a pretty classic apologist argument. Listen, wherever his anti-semitism is coming from, it's hurtful and offensive and dangerous. It's not acceptable. Persons who actually care about a world without racist bullshit have no business defending it. I guess I'm a classic then. I don't think anti-semitism is funny. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JudasLChrist said: LondonStyle said: Their is no Anti-Semitism in the CD why this media made up story hangs around no one knows but i guess just like the made up Anti-Gay stories the media are trying to split Prince's fan base and kill of his career as they did with the king of pop. Face Down was Prince's answer to the music media and god bless the man is still here... No. Not even close. The assessments being made here have nothing todo with 'the media'. Before I even heard the CD i read media reviews touching on this point, the fact is their is no anti-semitism in the music! Da, Da, Da....Emancipation....Free..don't think I ain't..! London 21 Nights...Clap your hands...you know the rest..
James Brown & Michael Jackson RIP, your music still lives with us! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |