independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Prince: Music and More > BIGOTRY, SEXISM, and ANGER on the Rainbow Children?
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 1 of 4 1234>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Author

Tweet     Share

Message
Thread started 05/23/09 10:29pm

Imago

BIGOTRY, SEXISM, and ANGER on the Rainbow Children?

I don't really listen to the Rainbow Children much, honestly. The deep 'darth vador' narration is just terribly irritating to me. One thing I've always hated in movies is when inner dialogue is spoken out loud by a character, almost patronizing the audience for being to stupid to figure out the emotional impact of a scene---or maybe showing the lack of confidence in an actor to pull of the nuances of a scene in such a way that the audience will not need the actual narration.
I feel the same way about music. It should not need to be narrated if it's a concept album. It should not need endless dialogue in it's interludes and segues (and thankful Prince had to cut out much of that on the symbol album during the early 90s). Trent Reznor's first concept album, The Downward Spiral is a perfect example of a concept album that takes you on a journey through the devolving mind of a person without the need to narrate the way through it. The songs and material speak for themselves.

And this is not the say the Rainbow Children didn't have the material. It certainly did . Yet, many of the songs are way too long and almost put me half to sleep, most of this is due to my lack of interest in the ways he blended the genres chosen together in this album--and not because the material wasn't strong. Indeed, The Rainbow Children was a refreshing break from his plastic years and sounds as organic as his NPG Club releases sounded pre-packaged and bland.

That being said, much of the message in the Rainbow Children got lost in the mix for me. Where Kevin Smith speaks of groups of people at Paisley Park ( during one of those weird cultish 'celebrations') speaking of their distaste in some of the racial and patriarchal themes presented in the albums, I got no sense of this.

To me, all I gathered from the album was that there were banished ones reading shit in 'skagazines' , banished into a digital garden were Akashic records and shit are mentioned when blacks lost their family name before everybody comes together in the name of the father in his last fucking December!!! confuse x 1 billion

And I dread the idea of listening to this thing all the way through again, so can somebody fill me in?

Is this album angry or hateful?
Is it sexist?
And is there bigotry in it?


Please present evidence or examples. Don't just give it a scathing review cause you're pissed at Prince, or a glowing review cause you want to lick his 50 year old ass.



- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

You will be judged by your actions and not your intentions. You may have
a heart of gold, but so does an egg.

3 weeks and counting...


[Edited 5/23/09 22:41pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1 posted 05/23/09 10:38pm

MyLawd

avatar

lol

i think the truth is too much for you to handle, as it obviously must be on Lotus, but, i'll first wait to hear what others have to say
Snare drum pound on the 2 & 4
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #2 posted 05/23/09 10:40pm

Imago

MyLawd said:

lol

i think the truth is too much for you to handle, as it obviously must be on Lotus, but, i'll first wait to hear what others have to say

I liked Lotusflow3r, and honestly, I don't pay much mind to his 'deep' lyrics cause it's obvious in his interviews he doesn't really think that deep. lol


chemtrails





- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

You will be judged by your actions and not your intentions. You may have
a heart of gold, but so does an egg.

3 weeks and counting...

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #3 posted 05/23/09 10:43pm

MyLawd

avatar

best get used 2 the deepness, coz he's only gonna get deeper from this point on

oops, i said i'd wait 4 others


cool
Snare drum pound on the 2 & 4
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #4 posted 05/23/09 10:49pm

utopia7

avatar

It's the last project which really let you know where his mind was ... It took me a while to get into TRC as you mentioned the Darth Vader voice was used to mask the messages he wanted to say ( theory only not factual)

There are some really good songs on there ... I have to say the only song aAI think makes some uncomfortable is Avalanche ! it was really evident during the celebrations, I felt so bad for the Caucasian people who stared blankly at the stage ---> neutral

Yes ... the past is filled with unforgettable things however to try and crack a case or audit what Abraham Lincoln did ages ago,defeats the purpose of bringing the human race together through music.

Muse to the Pharaoh ...if one wanted to dissect/analyze the lyric would ask is he being dismissive of the Holocaust? (I try to listen with an open mind )


Holocaust aside, many lived and died
But when all truth is told/Would u rather b dead or b sold?
Sold 2 the one who can now mate the displaced bloodline with the white
jailbait.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #5 posted 05/23/09 10:50pm

Imago

MyLawd said:

best get used 2 the deepness, coz he's only gonna get deeper from this point on

oops, i said i'd wait 4 others


cool

ok, great. That's a start.
What specific examples of deepness are you referring to?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #6 posted 05/23/09 10:53pm

MyLawd

avatar

utopia7 said:

It's the last project which really let you know where his mind was ... It took me a while to get into TRC as you mentioned the Darth Vader voice was used to mask the messages he wanted to say ( theory only not factual)

There are some really good songs on there ... I have to say the only song aAI think makes some uncomfortable is Avalanche ! it was really evident during the celebrations, I felt so bad for the Caucasian people who stared blankly at the stage ---> neutral

Yes ... the past is filled with unforgettable things however to try and crack a case or audit what Abraham Lincoln did ages ago,defeats the purpose of bringing the human race together through music.

Muse to the Pharaoh ...if one wanted to dissect/analyze the lyric would ask is he being dismissive of the Holocaust? (I try to listen with an open mind )


Holocaust aside, many lived and died
But when all truth is told/Would u rather b dead or b sold?
Sold 2 the one who can now mate the displaced bloodline with the white
jailbait.


In relationship to the lyrics you pointed out above, the relationship between Jews and African-Americans is a sensitive one, and Prince has spoken to it via his lyrics. Some of the main slave-holders during the colonial period of the early Americas were Jews, but this discussion is kept out of the public domain. So, to me, Prince is reminding us of what happened, as we are always reminded of the henious (sp?) acts against victims of the holocaust.
Snare drum pound on the 2 & 4
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #7 posted 05/23/09 10:54pm

Imago

utopia7 said:

It's the last project which really let you know where his mind was ... It took me a while to get into TRC as you mentioned the Darth Vader voice was used to mask the messages he wanted to say ( theory only not factual)

There are some really good songs on there ... I have to say the only song aAI think makes some uncomfortable is Avalanche ! it was really evident during the celebrations, I felt so bad for the Caucasian people who stared blankly at the stage ---> neutral

Yes ... the past is filled with unforgettable things however to try and crack a case or audit what Abraham Lincoln did ages ago,defeats the purpose of bringing the human race together through music.

Muse to the Pharaoh ...if one wanted to dissect/analyze the lyric would ask is he being dismissive of the Holocaust? (I try to listen with an open mind )


Holocaust aside, many lived and died
But when all truth is told/Would u rather b dead or b sold?
Sold 2 the one who can now mate the displaced bloodline with the white
jailbait.

I don't understand this at all.

Holocaust of who? I've only seen the word really referred to the jews during WWII.
But assuming he's referring to African Americans, is he proposing mass martyrdom as opposed to being sold to breed with 'white jailbait lol' bloodlines?

Regardless of how one interprets this, I think the title song asks you to rise above this thinking and the 'rainbow children' level. Yet in the next song he descends into this rhetoric.

It seems poorly thought out.

Anyone know what that specific lyric is talking about?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #8 posted 05/23/09 11:00pm

MyLawd

avatar

utopia7 said:

It's the last project which really let you know where his mind was ... It took me a while to get into TRC as you mentioned the Darth Vader voice was used to mask the messages he wanted to say ( theory only not factual)

There are some really good songs on there ... I have to say the only song aAI think makes some uncomfortable is Avalanche ! it was really evident during the celebrations, I felt so bad for the Caucasian people who stared blankly at the stage ---> neutral

Yes ... the past is filled with unforgettable things however to try and crack a case or audit what Abraham Lincoln did ages ago,defeats the purpose of bringing the human race together through music.

Muse to the Pharaoh ...if one wanted to dissect/analyze the lyric would ask is he being dismissive of the Holocaust? (I try to listen with an open mind )


Holocaust aside, many lived and died
But when all truth is told/Would u rather b dead or b sold?
Sold 2 the one who can now mate the displaced bloodline with the white
jailbait.


just read the lyrics to 'avalanche'...not actually on TRC, but on ONA. what's reverberating from them are

like the weight coming down from snowy mountain, no one wants to take responsiblity

who or how should people take responsibility Prince? but as some1 suggested just now, the Rainbow Children could be his suggestion of a higher consciousness...kind of like the keys on his piano.
[Edited 5/23/09 23:01pm]
Snare drum pound on the 2 & 4
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #9 posted 05/23/09 11:10pm

utopia7

avatar

MyLawd said:

utopia7 said:

It's the last project which really let you know where his mind was ... It took me a while to get into TRC as you mentioned the Darth Vader voice was used to mask the messages he wanted to say ( theory only not factual)

There are some really good songs on there ... I have to say the only song aAI think makes some uncomfortable is Avalanche ! it was really evident during the celebrations, I felt so bad for the Caucasian people who stared blankly at the stage ---> neutral

Yes ... the past is filled with unforgettable things however to try and crack a case or audit what Abraham Lincoln did ages ago,defeats the purpose of bringing the human race together through music.

Muse to the Pharaoh ...if one wanted to dissect/analyze the lyric would ask is he being dismissive of the Holocaust? (I try to listen with an open mind )


Holocaust aside, many lived and died
But when all truth is told/Would u rather b dead or b sold?
Sold 2 the one who can now mate the displaced bloodline with the white
jailbait.


In relationship to the lyrics you pointed out above, the relationship between Jews and African-Americans is a sensitive one, and Prince has spoken to it via his lyrics. Some of the main slave-holders during the colonial period of the early Americas were Jews, but this discussion is kept out of the public domain. So, to me, Prince is reminding us of what happened, as we are always reminded of the henious (sp?) acts against victims of the holocaust.



I agree completely ... I still can understand why TRC might come of as separatism (religious wise) and without getting too...too deep every race
Africans as well were/are slave owners ...no we shouldn't forget the very underlying damage 400 years set generations back, but right now we can take steps to go forward not hold on to a victim mentality which could be more harmful.There are immigrants who have managed to thrive in spite of hardship.

One thing is for certain race will never go away
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #10 posted 05/23/09 11:14pm

utopia7

avatar

here's the flip side don't let us forget racism .... but bad association spoils useful habits


confusing isn't it lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #11 posted 05/23/09 11:15pm

Imago

Does Prince address any of his bi-curious side in this album. It seems like he threw everything bu the kitchen sink into it.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #12 posted 05/23/09 11:16pm

errant

avatar

Imago said:

Does Prince address any of his bi-curious side in this album. It seems like he threw everything bu the kitchen sink into it.



I suppose in years gone by, 1+1+1=3 would be that song if, you know, it wasn't about a threesome with God.
"does my cock look fat in these jeans?"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #13 posted 05/23/09 11:17pm

Imago

errant said:

Imago said:

Does Prince address any of his bi-curious side in this album. It seems like he threw everything bu the kitchen sink into it.



I suppose in years gone by, 1+1+1=3 would be that song if, you know, it wasn't about a threesome with God.

falloff


I love General Discussion folks mushy
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #14 posted 05/24/09 12:27am

MyLawd

avatar

utopia7 said:

MyLawd said:



In relationship to the lyrics you pointed out above, the relationship between Jews and African-Americans is a sensitive one, and Prince has spoken to it via his lyrics. Some of the main slave-holders during the colonial period of the early Americas were Jews, but this discussion is kept out of the public domain. So, to me, Prince is reminding us of what happened, as we are always reminded of the henious (sp?) acts against victims of the holocaust.



I agree completely ... I still can understand why TRC might come of as separatism (religious wise) and without getting too...too deep every race
Africans as well were/are slave owners ...no we shouldn't forget the very underlying damage 400 years set generations back, but right now we can take steps to go forward not hold on to a victim mentality which could be more harmful.There are immigrants who have managed to thrive in spite of hardship.

One thing is for certain race will never go away


is it "victim" mentality though? the media dissed Prince's approach to TRC as a 'concept' album, but if you follow the theory through, he's actually suggesting something higher. for example, in one of the monologues, will state precisely where later, he speaks of how "minorities" can become the "majority" in the wink of an eye. in my perspective this does not align with the positioning of peoples as victims, but as eventual successors, aka the new breed.
Snare drum pound on the 2 & 4
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #15 posted 05/24/09 1:06am

PEJ

avatar

I've always liked the darth vader style voice.
I liked it on TRC at the beginning of 1999 in
the LOVESEXY song, Bob George, Scarlet Pussy
and it was the style he used at times as
Tora Tora. To me it was a way of Prince
trying not to sound the same in every song.
Same goes for the Camille voice or when he
would sing Let's Go Crazy the "mommy why does
everybody have a bomb" part was made to sound
like a childs voice. Pure experimentation Prince
style. Shit many artists like Dr. Dre, The Game,
George Clinton and numerous others used the
slowed down darth vader voice. I was even in
a rap group and we had a lot of fun altering
our voices when recording. I think when Prince
would do this he probably didn't expect folks to
not dig it. As far as this album containing
Bigotry, Sexism, and Anger I never disected it
that far and still don't think that is what it
consists of. It was just Prince trying to set a
jazzy tone not trying to replicate anything he
had ever done before and bringing forth his ideas
of his newfound religion at that time in his
lyrics. A lot of folks thought he was preachin
but I accepted him for what he thought and did
not judge what he was doing. People change.
To Sir, with Love
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #16 posted 05/24/09 1:56am

PharkyorLOVE

avatar

lol skagazines,,, lol

You gotta love the album just for this post.
but this is what you need to understand Mr Imago

The Jehovah Witness people do some interesting
things with a good bible verse.

If you were to lay out the bible like a big carpet,
then you'd find these guys have been having fun playing
twister for years and years.
Talk about cut a rug do the jitter bug
and oh lets hug n huddle. its party central with these guys.

I'd draw ya a picture on how they map it, but it looks
a lot like scribble to the untrained eye, unless your a
bigfriendly elder type, and I'm sure if a elder did get
his hands on it, he'd be in pleasure city blowing something
out to the loyalers toyalers and foyboolers
of his dedicated gatherings.

i aint listened to this album since the year it was made
and i probably will never listen to it again, less it
makes it to muzak in the supermarket.

Mind you, they played Raspberry Beret in the Hardware
Store today...so ya just never know.... lol

ALL PRAISE TO IMAGO bow lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #17 posted 05/24/09 1:58am

1725topp

To compare immigrants who came to America of their own will to Africans who came as slaves is a flawed and perpetually dangerous analogy. Immigrants were never sub-human, which means that they never suffered certain legal and psychological damages that are still perpetuated in the African American community, such as self hate as manifest in good and bad hair debates as well as the continued schism between light and dark members of the race. However, it is true that African tribes did work with white slavers to capture other African tribes, but we don't have time to discuss how Africa is the largest continent with more diversity in cultures and languages than any other continent so we should not view African people as a monolith and we don't have time to discuss how the second wave of European conquest set into motion African tribal warfare. (I find it interesting that it is "tribal warfare" when Fox News is discussing turmoil in Africa, but it is never "tribal warfare" when Fox News is discussing war between whites in Europe. This use of language is more psychological warfare.) Also, I always find it interesting that when African people discuss history or seek to get at the truth of history it is called embracing a victim's mentality or trying to divide people. There is no way that humanity can build a better future if we ignore history. As for Lincoln, which has been debated hundreds of times on this site and Housequake, he did not free the slaves because he wanted Africans to be first-class citizens; he freed the slaves as a military strategy because the South was winning the war due to the free "slave" labor. Remember, Lincoln did not free slaves in states that did not secede so in truth Lincoln did not end or abolish slavery. It was the Thirteenth Amendment that abolished slavery, but the Thirteenth Amendment only ended slavery; it did not make African Americans citizens--and so on and so forth with the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments. Thus, the point of "Avalanche" seems to be that one must look critically at history to know from where one has come, what battles one has fought, and to learn what solutions worked and did not work so that one can craft a better strategy for the future rather than allow someone to control you with lies.

Of course the constant refrain of needing an accurate understanding of knowledge throughout TRC has a double meaning for both Jehovah's Witnesses as well as Black Nationalists. For Jehovah's Witnesses, the goal is to witness the truth of God's message to the world so to prepare the world for God's Kingdom, which will destroy all of man's flawed kingdoms. This is their primary and exclusive mission, which is why they don't vote. For Black Nationalists, the goal is to retrain African people from what they see as a people taught to hate themselves, which makes them better slaves or servants. As Carter G. Woodson, who was not a Black Nationalist, asserts in his book, The Miseducation of the Negro, "black people are taught to hate themselves by the eleventh grade" because by then they are taught the accomplishments of all other races but themselves. Now, to some it may seem contradictory for Prince to weave JW and BN beliefs, but liberation theology (using religion to address socio-political issues), which is not exclusive to African people (David does this in "Psalm 23" and it is found throughout the Old Testament) has been a major part of the Civil Rights Movement, dating to the Abolitionist Movement with Frederick Douglass. And since Prince was mixing sex and religion as early as Dirty Mind, I always find it strange that more fans didn't see his embracing of some traditional religion coming for years. We tend to forget that the song, "The Second Coming," was played just before the band began "Uptown" during the Dirty Mind tour.

As for sexism, TRC is only sexist if one thinks that the Christian Bible is sexist, and many do. So, as with everything else, how one sees that point is based on one's background and personal beliefs.

As for the racism, I can see where whites could think that some of the statements are racist. I don't believe in telling anyone what they should feel. However, I often wonder if these same people who are offend by Prince's language understand the perpetuation of a race's inferiority by a language that views everything "black" as bad: blackmail, blackball, even black day of which Prince, himself, is guilty of using in "The Cross." So one could read into Prince's statements of the pale or banished ones as an act of what Mercer Cook called "Linguistic Liberation" where African people attempt to reverse language/words that perpetuate their inferiority. Keep in mind that many white supremacists used the mark of Cain theory to mistreat African people. However, it seems that Prince is probably using more BN rhetoric, or extreme BN rhetoric, that views whiteness as the absence of color as well as the absence of nutrients. Thus, bleach turns everything white because it is killing everything, brown sugar has more nutrients than white sugar, and wheat bread is healthier than white bread because white bread is overly processed bread. Thus, as an artistic act of linguistic liberation, some BN view whiteness as a metaphor for the negativity suffered by civilizations of color when coming into contact with whites. Of course the question is how much of this would Prince know from his own reading or exposure. While one can argue that the language on TRC is incendiary, one can also argue that people of color have not historically fared well after contact with their Caucasian brothers and sisters. And to connect all of this back to religion, Genesis 2:10 provides a geographic location for the Garden of Eden,which would be to the slight west of Egypt or the Nile River. Taking current scientific evidence into consideration, one could conclude that Adam and Eve, based solely on location, had to be people of color. Thus, Prince seems to be alluding to the BN notion that people of color where the first people on the planet and were tricked, allowed themselves to be trick, from their relationship with God. I'm writing all of this not to say that I believe in all of this, but to show that there are historical facts and religious beliefs on which Prince is basing TRC. Now whether someone accepts, likes, or dislikes the message is another discussion all together, but it seems quite unfair to discount or devalue the effort that Prince put into creating the narrative simply because one does not agree with the narrative. It is a great concept record of man's fall from grace and the need to reconnect with or regain grace by learning the Truth, which in this case is the truth according to JWs, BNs, and Prince's own weaving of the two. I'm not saying that anyone should take TRC as their mantra, but it is one hell of a concept record both lyrically and musically. I enjoy the aesthetics of it the same way that I enjoy the aesthetics of Beowulf, the Iliad, or the Odyssey, which, to me, are merely grand myths that are well written. For my personal tastes, TRC is one of my favorites, but I must admit that I am one of those people who like Prince's post-2000 work and am still jamming Lotus/MPLS.

Ultimately, TRC remains in the vein of Prince's solution for the world's problems that mankind must seek a higher solution of love and understanding, which begins as early as "Bambi" on Prince, as the speaker chooses to give the female the benefit of the doubt that she may be happy with her choice of lover rather than degrading her. "Maybe I'm really naive. Who's to say; maybe you're really having fun." And as he reaches his climax of the physical/sexual solution in Purple Rain, sexual salvation surrenders to a more metaphysical solution. By the time he gets to "Darlin' Nikki," Prince's songs seem to assert that where in the past sex could lead to liberation--"Head," "Sexuality," "Do Me, Baby," "1999," and "International Lover,"--if not salvation, now sex is seen as empty and unable to relieve or save his protagonists. Thus, "Darlin' Nikki" ends with the notion that sex ain't saving me so let me seek something higher..."Hello, how are you? I'm fine because I know that the Lord is coming soon." This is echoed by "Computer Blue" which declares that "love and lust both have four letters but entirely different meanings." All of this is elevated or expanded in ATWIAD, and spirituality replaces sex as the catch-all answer that Prince provides for humanity's problems, with "Temptation" being the the exclamation point as he says, "Now, I understand; love is more important than lust." So, if we didn't see the JW or some type of religious conversation coming, then that means that we completely missed the metaphor that culminates in Lovesexy, which is the second attempt or manifestation of TRC, with the New Breed being the first and the New Power Generation being the third. Of course, the major difference between the use of religion in TRC and Dirty Mind and Controversy is that by the time Prince's arrives at TRC, his definitions of right and wrong are more concretely and narrowly defined more on Christian doctrine rather than the more general notion of "let's just love each other and not hurt each other." In this, I can see how some who bought into or invested into this mulatto lookin' dude painting pictures of peace, love, and a multicultural Paisley Park world where sex and individuality are the only tools needed for happiness can feel ideologically betrayed. However, "Annie Christian" is rooted in Christian folklore and is a street that eventually leads to TRC. Prince is still selling a multicultural paradise; it is just that sex has been replaced with faith and the ten commandments.
[Edited 5/24/09 2:16am]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #18 posted 05/24/09 2:14am

carlcranshaw

avatar

It sounded like funked up Broadway dogma.
‎"The first time I saw the cover of Dirty Mind in the early 80s I thought, 'Is this some drag queen ripping on Freddie Prinze?'" - Some guy on The Gear Page
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #19 posted 05/24/09 2:24am

MyLawd

avatar

1725topp said:

To compare immigrants who came to America of their own will to Africans who came as slaves is a flawed and perpetually dangerous analogy. Immigrants were never sub-human, which means that they never suffered certain legal and psychological damages that are still perpetuated in the African American community, such as self hate as manifest in good and bad hair debates as well as the continued schism between light and dark members of the race. However, it is true that African tribes did work with white slavers to capture other African tribes, but we don't have time to discuss how Africa is the largest continent with more diversity in cultures and languages than any other continent so we should not view African people as a monolith and we don't have time to discuss how the second wave of European conquest set into motion African tribal warfare. (I find it interesting that it is "tribal warfare" when Fox News is discussing turmoil in Africa, but it is never "tribal warfare" when Fox News is discussing war between whites in Europe. This use of language is more psychological warfare.) Also, I always find it interesting that when African people discuss history or seek to get at the truth of history it is called embracing a victim's mentality or trying to divide people. There is no way that humanity can build a better future if we ignore history. As for Lincoln, which has been debated hundreds of times on this site and Housequake, he did not free the slaves because he wanted Africans to be first-class citizens; he freed the slaves as a military strategy because the South was winning the war due to the free "slave" labor. Remember, Lincoln did not free slaves in states that did not secede so in truth Lincoln did not end or abolish slavery. It was the Thirteenth Amendment that abolished slavery, but the Thirteenth Amendment only ended slavery; it did not make African Americans citizens--and so on and so forth with the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments. Thus, the point of "Avalanche" seems to be that one must look critically at history to know from where one has come, what battles one has fought, and to learn what solutions worked and did not work so that one can craft a better strategy for the future rather than allow someone to control you with lies.

Of course the constant refrain of needing an accurate understanding of knowledge throughout TRC has a double meaning for both Jehovah's Witnesses as well as Black Nationalists. For Jehovah's Witnesses, the goal is to witness the truth of God's message to the world so to prepare the world for God's Kingdom, which will destroy all of man's flawed kingdoms. This is their primary and exclusive mission, which is why they don't vote. For Black Nationalists, the goal is to retrain African people from what they see as a people taught to hate themselves, which makes them better slaves or servants. As Carter G. Woodson, who was not a Black Nationalist, asserts in his book, The Miseducation of the Negro, "black people are taught to hate themselves by the eleventh grade" because by then they are taught the accomplishments of all other races but themselves. Now, to some it may seem contradictory for Prince to weave JW and BN beliefs, but liberation theology (using religion to address socio-political issues), which is not exclusive to African people (David does this in "Psalm 23" and it is found throughout the Old Testament) has been a major part of the Civil Rights Movement, dating to the Abolitionist Movement with Frederick Douglass. And since Prince was mixing sex and religion as early as Dirty Mind, I always find it strange that more fans didn't see his embracing of some traditional religion coming for years. We tend to forget that the song, "The Second Coming," was played just before the band began "Uptown" during the Dirty Mind tour.

As for sexism, TRC is only sexist if one thinks that the Christian Bible is sexist, and many do. So, as with everything else, how one sees that point is based on one's background and personal beliefs.

As for the racism, I can see where whites could think that some of the statements are racist. I don't believe in telling anyone what they should feel. However, I often wonder if these same people who are offend by Prince's language understand the perpetuation of a race's inferiority by a language that views everything "black" as bad: blackmail, blackball, even black day of which Prince, himself, is guilty of using in "The Cross." So one could read into Prince's statements of the pale or banished ones as an act of what Mercer Cook called "Linguistic Liberation" where African people attempt to reverse language/words that perpetuate their inferiority. Keep in mind that many white supremacists used the mark of Cain theory to mistreat African people. However, it seems that Prince is probably using more BN rhetoric, or extreme BN rhetoric, that views whiteness as the absence of color as well as the absence of nutrients. Thus, bleach turns everything white because it is killing everything, brown sugar has more nutrients than white sugar, and wheat bread is healthier than white bread because white bread is overly processed bread. Thus, as an artistic act of linguistic liberation, some BN view whiteness as a metaphor for the negativity suffered by civilizations of color when coming into contact with whites. Of course the question is how much of this would Prince know from his own reading or exposure. While one can argue that the language on TRC is incendiary, one can also argue that people of color have not historically fared well after contact with their Caucasian brothers and sisters. And to connect all of this back to religion, Genesis 2:10 provides a geographic location for the Garden of Eden,which would be to the slight west of Egypt or the Nile River. Taking current scientific evidence into consideration, one could conclude that Adam and Eve, based solely on location, had to be people of color. Thus, Prince seems to be alluding to the BN notion that people of color where the first people on the planet and were tricked, allowed themselves to be trick, from their relationship with God. I'm writing all of this not to say that I believe in all of this, but to show that there are historical facts and religious beliefs on which Prince is basing TRC. Now whether someone accepts, likes, or dislikes the message is another discussion all together, but it seems quite unfair to discount or devalue the effort that Prince put into creating the narrative simply because one does not agree with the narrative. It is a great concept record of man's fall from grace and the need to reconnect with or regain grace by learning the Truth, which in this case is the truth according to JWs, BNs, and Prince's own weaving of the two. I'm not saying that anyone should take TRC as their mantra, but it is one hell of a concept record both lyrically and musically. I enjoy the aesthetics of it the same way that I enjoy the aesthetics of Beowulf, the Iliad, or the Odyssey, which, to me, are merely grand myths that are well written. For my personal tastes, TRC is one of my favorites, but I must admit that I am one of those people who like Prince's post-2000 work and am still jamming Lotus/MPLS.

Ultimately, TRC remains in the vein of Prince's solution for the world's problems that mankind must seek a higher solution of love and understanding, which begins as early as "Bambi" on Prince, as the speaker chooses to give the female the benefit of the doubt that she may be happy with her choice of lover rather than degrading her. "Maybe I'm really naive. Who's to say; maybe you're really having fun." And as he reaches his climax of the physical/sexual solution in Purple Rain, sexual salvation surrenders to a more metaphysical solution. By the time he gets to "Darlin' Nikki," Prince's songs seem to assert that where in the past sex could lead to liberation--"Head," "Sexuality," "Do Me, Baby," "1999," and "International Lover,"--if not salvation, now sex is seen as empty and unable to relieve or save his protagonists. Thus, "Darlin' Nikki" ends with the notion that sex ain't saving me so let me seek something higher..."Hello, how are you? I'm fine because I know that the Lord is coming soon." This is echoed by "Computer Blue" which declares that "love and lust both have four letters but entirely different meanings." All of this is elevated or expanded in ATWIAD, and spirituality replaces sex as the catch-all answer that Prince provides for humanity's problems, with "Temptation" being the the exclamation point as he says, "Now, I understand; love is more important than lust." So, if we didn't see the JW or some type of religious conversation coming, then that means that we completely missed the metaphor that culminates in Lovesexy, which is the second attempt or manifestation of TRC, with the New Breed being the first and the New Power Generation being the third. Of course, the major difference between the use of religion in TRC and Dirty Mind and Controversy is that by the time Prince's arrives at TRC, his definitions of right and wrong are more concretely and narrowly defined more on Christian doctrine rather than the more general notion of "let's just love each other and not hurt each other." In this, I can see how some who bought into or invested into this mulatto lookin' dude painting pictures of peace, love, and a multicultural Paisley Park world where sex and individuality are the only tools needed for happiness can feel ideologically betrayed. However, "Annie Christian" is rooted in Christian folklore and is a street that eventually leads to TRC. Prince is still selling a multicultural paradise; it is just that sex has been replaced with faith and the ten commandments.
[Edited 5/24/09 2:16am]


perspective is much appreciated...i think that Prince has come to this point of his philosophical evolution as a result of his personal spiritual growth, but also through more interactions with others who have influenced the way he sees the world he lives in.
Snare drum pound on the 2 & 4
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #20 posted 05/24/09 2:44am

eaglebear4839

Try decaf, Imago.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #21 posted 05/24/09 2:44am

therat

avatar

Imago said:

Does Prince address any of his bi-curious side in this album. It seems like he threw everything bu the kitchen sink into it.


No, he does not, because he does not have a bi-curious side or a gay side. The man is straight. I wish people would stop bringing up this goddamned gay shit all of the time.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #22 posted 05/24/09 2:49am

Dayclear

Yes, I think the album does have Bigotry, sexism and anger. but this is nothing new for Prince. So I don't understand why people don't get it. He has always addressed these same subjects in his music as he does today in Lotusflow3r? Listen to Colonized mind! What do you people hear????? eek
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #23 posted 05/24/09 2:50am

BriaVelveeta

Absolutely, AND???



Seriously, though, there is so much offensive about 'The Rainbow Children' and it's been discussed to the point it shut down the NPGMC.
Yet it remains a fan favorite.

Go figure.
I didn't love it them, and to me, even 'She Loves Me 4 Me' is still one of his weakest tracks.
I guess Mani deserve an 'Emancipation' though, so her & Jehovah inspired 'The Rainbow Children.'

He could have narrated it in Wilford Brimley's voice, and I'd still view the whole thing as terrible.
I don't care.

I love him for his balls, though.
A female in a male body, with gigantic cojones. That's my Prince!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #24 posted 05/24/09 2:58am

Dayclear

Prince has got some 'Deep down' racial issues and I believe a love/hate relationship with women, and we all know his anger over the CEO's of the music business, and I don't think he's ever really tried to hide them. His prejudices are often subliminal but trust me they are there. I think other Black men that have had similar experiences in they're lives and recognize this more than others.
[Edited 5/24/09 3:55am]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #25 posted 05/24/09 3:44am

IstenSzek

avatar

people read way to much into his lyrics. if you WANT them to be racist i guess
you're always going to find something to cling onto as such.

some of the stuff is harsh but beyond the overt machismo and 13th century view
on women i can't find that much wrong with the lyrics of the album.

beyond that it is still one of my favorit prince albums post lovesexy. all of
it is very well done and a million miles beyond the albums he released just
prior to it, including most of the npgmc era songs.

the rainbow children, one nite alone, the one nite alone tour, xpectation,
c-note and news.


those projects combined can stand proudly as an era next to 1986-1988 and the
1993-1995 eras.
and true love lives on lollipops and crisps
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #26 posted 05/24/09 3:59am

Dayclear

confused
[Edited 5/26/09 8:49am]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #27 posted 05/24/09 4:07am

MyLawd

avatar

Dayclear said:

Colonized mind

Wanna talk about it
Colonized Mind

Upload, the evolution principle
You see a rock on the shore and say
“It’s always been there”

Download, no responsibility
Do what you want, nobody cares

Upload, the master race idea
Genetically disposed to rule the world


Download, future full of isolated
Full of isolated, boys and girls

Upload, the 2 party system
The lesser of 2 dangers,
Illusion of choice

Download, their form of fascism
Nothing really ever changes
You never had a voice

Listen to me one time :

If you look, you’re sure gonna find
Throughout mankind’s history
A Colonized Mind


The one in power makes law
Under which the colonized fall
Without God, it’s just the blind leading the blind

Upload, a joint venture record deal
It’s just another way another man can still sleep
While he’s sticking you with the bill

Download, a temporary acquisition
of fleeting fame and fortune
Nothing to leave in your will
Hey hey hey hey



Upload, a child with no father
Download, no respect for authority
Upload, a child with no mother
Download, a hard time showing love

If you look, you’re sure gonna find
Throughout mankind’s history
A Colonized Mind
The one in power makes law
Under which the colonized fall
Without God : it’s just the blind leading the blind
[Edited 5/24/09 4:01am]


there was a time when people thought prince couldn't give a rat's anus about social issues, but the man is more conscious of what's happening in the world and is speaking truth to hegemonic power...plus he doesn't eat meat any mo'

biggrin
Snare drum pound on the 2 & 4
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #28 posted 05/24/09 4:19am

Marrk

avatar

IstenSzek said:

people read way to much into his lyrics. if you WANT them to be racist i guess
you're always going to find something to cling onto as such.

some of the stuff is harsh but beyond the overt machismo and 13th century view
on women i can't find that much wrong with the lyrics of the album.

beyond that it is still one of my favorit prince albums post lovesexy. all of
it is very well done and a million miles beyond the albums he released just
prior to it, including most of the npgmc era songs.

the rainbow children, one nite alone, the one nite alone tour, xpectation,
c-note and news.


those projects combined can stand proudly as an era next to 1986-1988 and the
1993-1995 eras.


that is an interesting point. Sorry i won't add to it, but yes, i agree.

Musicology onwards seems a bit 'poppy' to me, whereas that era spoke to the hardcore, small scale tour, interesting, challenging music.

Maybe he didn't get much bank from that and that's why he's where he is now.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #29 posted 05/24/09 4:26am

MyLawd

avatar

Marrk said:

IstenSzek said:

people read way to much into his lyrics. if you WANT them to be racist i guess
you're always going to find something to cling onto as such.

some of the stuff is harsh but beyond the overt machismo and 13th century view
on women i can't find that much wrong with the lyrics of the album.

beyond that it is still one of my favorit prince albums post lovesexy. all of
it is very well done and a million miles beyond the albums he released just
prior to it, including most of the npgmc era songs.

the rainbow children, one nite alone, the one nite alone tour, xpectation,
c-note and news.


those projects combined can stand proudly as an era next to 1986-1988 and the
1993-1995 eras.


that is an interesting point. Sorry i won't add to it, but yes, i agree.

Musicology onwards seems a bit 'poppy' to me, whereas that era spoke to the hardcore, small scale tour, interesting, challenging music.

Maybe he didn't get much bank from that and that's why he's where he is now.


if he was solely after 'bank' though, would he have taken such a different direction that many of us noticed when Lovesexy came out...he has always had a battle between the flesh and his spiritual side, but i think that the latter has dominance in the type of music he makes now
Snare drum pound on the 2 & 4
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 1 of 4 1234>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Prince: Music and More > BIGOTRY, SEXISM, and ANGER on the Rainbow Children?