independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Prince: Music and More > Pitchfork Lotusflow3r Review
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 5 of 6 <123456>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #120 posted 04/14/09 4:03pm

stanleylieber

avatar

Accujack said:

stanleylieber said:



nod

you won't ever see me defending p. diddy's style of sampling.


What? He don't steal right?

Oh, I guess it's what is done with it after you steal it.

So, if one criminal steals from a bank and buys a Ferrari with the money, you are cool with it?
If another steals the money and buys a Ford Taurus, not so cool. lol


have you ever listened to igor stravinsky's 'firebird suite'?
it's time for a new direction / it's time for jazz to die
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #121 posted 04/14/09 4:07pm

Accujack

stanleylieber said:

Accujack said:



What? He don't steal right?

Oh, I guess it's what is done with it after you steal it.

So, if one criminal steals from a bank and buys a Ferrari with the money, you are cool with it?
If another steals the money and buys a Ford Taurus, not so cool. lol


have you ever listened to igor stravinsky's 'firebird suite'?


yeah, what about it?
He is exactly who we thought he was
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #122 posted 04/14/09 4:10pm

stanleylieber

avatar

Accujack said:

stanleylieber said:



have you ever listened to igor stravinsky's 'firebird suite'?


yeah, what about it?


notice anything? biggrin
it's time for a new direction / it's time for jazz to die
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #123 posted 04/14/09 4:12pm

Accujack

stanleylieber said:

Accujack said:



yeah, what about it?


notice anything? biggrin


Uhhhm... it samples..Aqua Boogie? lol

No. What?
He is exactly who we thought he was
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #124 posted 04/14/09 4:16pm

stanleylieber

avatar

Accujack said:

stanleylieber said:



notice anything? biggrin


Uhhhm... it samples..Aqua Boogie? lol

No. What?


it's the source of a lot of popular music's melodies.
it's time for a new direction / it's time for jazz to die
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #125 posted 04/14/09 4:23pm

Accujack

stanleylieber said:

Accujack said:



Uhhhm... it samples..Aqua Boogie? lol

No. What?


it's the source of a lot of popular music's melodies.


Really? Cool, I didn't know that.
I'll have to take another listen.

I see what you are trying to get at, and I appreciate your take, but I'm just not gonna see it the same way. Maybe, if say Public Enemy were a real band, and sampled sparingly, or played the original compostions themselves, I would be more accepting.
But, that's not the case, and I can't give rap groups or hip-hop producers much praise for directly lifting from other's work and re-packaging it as their own.

It just doesn't work for me.
He is exactly who we thought he was
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #126 posted 04/14/09 4:29pm

stanleylieber

avatar

Accujack said:

stanleylieber said:



it's the source of a lot of popular music's melodies.


Really? Cool, I didn't know that.
I'll have to take another listen.

I see what you are trying to get at, and I appreciate your take, but I'm just not gonna see it the same way. Maybe, if say Public Enemy were a real band, and sampled sparingly, or played the original compostions themselves, I would be more accepting.
But, that's not the case, and I can't give rap groups or hip-hop producers much praise for directly lifting from other's work and re-packaging it as their own.

It just doesn't work for me.


i prefer to apply a different test:

how easy would it be to reproduce what the artist in question did?
it's time for a new direction / it's time for jazz to die
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #127 posted 04/14/09 4:48pm

Anxiety



i love internet debates in which opinion and fact get completely warped beyond comprehension. touched
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #128 posted 04/14/09 4:55pm

TwiliteKid

avatar

Anxiety said:



i love internet debates in which opinion and fact get completely warped beyond comprehension. touched


I love kitty videos!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #129 posted 04/14/09 4:58pm

squirrelgrease

avatar

Accujack said:

stanleylieber said:



nod

you won't ever see me defending p. diddy's style of sampling.


What? He don't steal right?

Oh, I guess it's what is done with it after you steal it.

So, if one criminal steals from a bank and buys a Ferrari with the money, you are cool with it?
If another steals the money and buys a Ford Taurus, not so cool. lol


Just to clarify... samples used in songs are (rightly so) cleared and paid for, sometimes retroactively and credited to the artist or copyright holder in accordance with the law. Sidestepping this has bankrupted many a group. Paul's Boutique couldn't have been remastered and released as a 20th Anniversary edition if all the papers weren't signed and initialed.

Do you have the 15-track or 16-track Goldnigga? Prince is a real musician, right? Though not a cut-and-paste job on the song Guess Who's Knockin', as an artist, Prince chose to "sample" a snippet of a song and make it his own - no harm, no fowl in my book... except Prince refused to pay for subsequent use and deleted it on the next pressing.
If prince.org were to be made idiot proof, someone would just invent a better idiot.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #130 posted 04/14/09 5:00pm

SupaFunkyOrgan
grinderSexy

avatar

squirrelgrease said:

Accujack said:



What? He don't steal right?

Oh, I guess it's what is done with it after you steal it.

So, if one criminal steals from a bank and buys a Ferrari with the money, you are cool with it?
If another steals the money and buys a Ford Taurus, not so cool. lol


Just to clarify... samples used in songs are (rightly so) cleared and paid for, sometimes retroactively and credited to the artist or copyright holder in accordance with the law. Sidestepping this has bankrupted many a group. Paul's Boutique couldn't have been remastered and released as a 20th Anniversary edition if all the papers weren't signed and initialed.

Do you have the 15-track or 16-track Goldnigga? Prince is a real musician, right? Though not a cut-and-paste job on the song Guess Who's Knockin', as an artist, Prince chose to "sample" a snippet of a song and make it his own - no harm, no fowl in my book... except Prince refused to pay for subsequent use and deleted it on the next pressing.


fucking cheater.
2010: Healing the Wounds of the Past.... http://prince.org/msg/8/325740
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #131 posted 04/14/09 5:06pm

stanleylieber

avatar

SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:

squirrelgrease said:



Just to clarify... samples used in songs are (rightly so) cleared and paid for, sometimes retroactively and credited to the artist or copyright holder in accordance with the law. Sidestepping this has bankrupted many a group. Paul's Boutique couldn't have been remastered and released as a 20th Anniversary edition if all the papers weren't signed and initialed.

Do you have the 15-track or 16-track Goldnigga? Prince is a real musician, right? Though not a cut-and-paste job on the song Guess Who's Knockin', as an artist, Prince chose to "sample" a snippet of a song and make it his own - no harm, no fowl in my book... except Prince refused to pay for subsequent use and deleted it on the next pressing.


fucking cheater.


you can call him a dreamer too
it's time for a new direction / it's time for jazz to die
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #132 posted 04/14/09 5:08pm

squirrelgrease

avatar

Accujack said:

stanleylieber said:



it's the source of a lot of popular music's melodies.


Really? Cool, I didn't know that.
I'll have to take another listen.

I see what you are trying to get at, and I appreciate your take, but I'm just not gonna see it the same way. Maybe, if say Public Enemy were a real band, and sampled sparingly, or played the original compostions themselves, I would be more accepting.
But, that's not the case, and I can't give rap groups or hip-hop producers much praise for directly lifting from other's work and re-packaging it as their own.

It just doesn't work for me.


Prince has used analog samplers since the dawn of his career. All sounds that could have been recreated on traps or with other "real" instruments. He chose not to, and most hold those recordings in high regard.
If prince.org were to be made idiot proof, someone would just invent a better idiot.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #133 posted 04/14/09 5:09pm

xlr8r

avatar

SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:

squirrelgrease said:



Just to clarify... samples used in songs are (rightly so) cleared and paid for, sometimes retroactively and credited to the artist or copyright holder in accordance with the law. Sidestepping this has bankrupted many a group. Paul's Boutique couldn't have been remastered and released as a 20th Anniversary edition if all the papers weren't signed and initialed.

Do you have the 15-track or 16-track Goldnigga? Prince is a real musician, right? Though not a cut-and-paste job on the song Guess Who's Knockin', as an artist, Prince chose to "sample" a snippet of a song and make it his own - no harm, no fowl in my book... except Prince refused to pay for subsequent use and deleted it on the next pressing.


fucking cheater.


If anything he did the right thing by removing the sample.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #134 posted 04/14/09 5:09pm

SupaFunkyOrgan
grinderSexy

avatar

xlr8r said:

SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:



fucking cheater.


If anything he did the right thing by removing the sample.

If anything he wouldn't have been doing wrong shit trying to get away with it in the first place exclaim And look what a fucking cheap ass he is. He'd rather desecrate his own creation than pay rightfully someone else for using their work disbelief

Prince would never have the balls to have a real conversation with someone like me lol
[Edited 4/14/09 17:10pm]
2010: Healing the Wounds of the Past.... http://prince.org/msg/8/325740
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #135 posted 04/14/09 5:11pm

squirrelgrease

avatar

SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:

squirrelgrease said:



Just to clarify... samples used in songs are (rightly so) cleared and paid for, sometimes retroactively and credited to the artist or copyright holder in accordance with the law. Sidestepping this has bankrupted many a group. Paul's Boutique couldn't have been remastered and released as a 20th Anniversary edition if all the papers weren't signed and initialed.

Do you have the 15-track or 16-track Goldnigga? Prince is a real musician, right? Though not a cut-and-paste job on the song Guess Who's Knockin', as an artist, Prince chose to "sample" a snippet of a song and make it his own - no harm, no fowl in my book... except Prince refused to pay for subsequent use and deleted it on the next pressing.


fucking cheater.



biggrin

I'm sure that Paul McCartney is missing that six bucks he could have made off of Goldnigga sales.
If prince.org were to be made idiot proof, someone would just invent a better idiot.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #136 posted 04/14/09 5:11pm

SupaFunkyOrgan
grinderSexy

avatar

squirrelgrease said:

SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:



fucking cheater.



biggrin

I'm sure that Paul McCartney is missing that six bucks he could have made off of Goldnigga sales.

That's even worse that Prince couldn't step up off a goddamn happy meal lol
2010: Healing the Wounds of the Past.... http://prince.org/msg/8/325740
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #137 posted 04/14/09 5:13pm

gubbins4ever

avatar

I really dislike this review. The reviewer's reliance on comparisons to Prince's older music irritates me. Such comparisons could be made with every Prince album now until the end of his career and would make reviews dull and repetitive. Certainly, the reviewer is at liberty to go this route but, despite the objectivity illusion of music journalism, isn't the best approach to music to enjoy it? By this yardstick, the reviewer has chosen a poor path. By making comparisons with earlier work, the reviewer turns listening into a chore and bogs his down his mind with pessimism. I bet the experience would be different if he listened free of such psychological encumberments. This style of review also creates a bias against newer music since the first time any kind of music is encountered is going to count for more than latter iterations.

The whiny, snobbish tone of the review is also annoying, though of course that is my personal reaction. Who is this reviewer to say that Prince is trying to join the elite music club even though he is already a member? How does the reviewer know this? If Prince wasn't making music like this, would this reviewer complain that Prince wasn't taking his place along the greats? No matter what an artist puts out, the kind of mindset embodied by this reviewer creates opportunities for complaining, no matter what music is produced.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #138 posted 04/14/09 5:14pm

squirrelgrease

avatar

xlr8r said:

SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:



fucking cheater.


If anything he did the right thing by removing the sample.


He removed the whole damn song. Ironically, there are probably more copies of the 16-track album floating around since it became an instant collectable and was handily counterfeited.
If prince.org were to be made idiot proof, someone would just invent a better idiot.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #139 posted 04/14/09 5:15pm

errant

avatar

my problems with the reviewer's vocabulary isn't that it's overly impressive. my problems with the reviewer's vocabulary is that he thinks it's overly impressive.
"does my cock look fat in these jeans?"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #140 posted 04/14/09 5:15pm

xlr8r

avatar

SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:

xlr8r said:



If anything he did the right thing by removing the sample.

If anything he wouldn't have been doing wrong shit trying to get away with it in the first place exclaim And look what a fucking cheap ass he is. He'd rather desecrate his own creation than pay rightfully someone else for using their work disbelief

Prince would never have the balls to have a real conversation with someone like me lol
[Edited 4/14/09 17:10pm]


A 'real' conversation?

Would you have a luandry list of things to yell at him about?

And its not a desecration. For you to use these terms is kind of interesting lol

I don't think youd have the balls to say half the things you say on here to him (at least not with even 1/4 the zeal you do hear). I saw you dancing at Musicology opener lol and you were NOT mad.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #141 posted 04/14/09 5:15pm

squirrelgrease

avatar

gubbins4ever said:

I really dislike this review. The reviewer's reliance on comparisons to Prince's older music irritates me. Such comparisons could be made with every Prince album now until the end of his career and would make reviews dull and repetitive. Certainly, the reviewer is at liberty to go this route but, despite the objectivity illusion of music journalism, isn't the best approach to music to enjoy it? By this yardstick, the reviewer has chosen a poor path. By making comparisons with earlier work, the reviewer turns listening into a chore and bogs his down his mind with pessimism. I bet the experience would be different if he listened free of such psychological encumberments. This style of review also creates a bias against newer music since the first time any kind of music is encountered is going to count for more than latter iterations.

The whiny, snobbish tone of the review is also annoying, though of course that is my personal reaction. Who is this reviewer to say that Prince is trying to join the elite music club even though he is already a member? How does the reviewer know this? If Prince wasn't making music like this, would this reviewer complain that Prince wasn't taking his place along the greats? No matter what an artist puts out, the kind of mindset embodied by this reviewer creates opportunities for complaining, no matter what music is produced.



We stopped discussing the review.
If prince.org were to be made idiot proof, someone would just invent a better idiot.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #142 posted 04/14/09 5:16pm

xlr8r

avatar

squirrelgrease said:

xlr8r said:



If anything he did the right thing by removing the sample.


He removed the whole damn song. .


Still, he did the right thing then.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #143 posted 04/14/09 5:16pm

SupaFunkyOrgan
grinderSexy

avatar

gubbins4ever said:

I really dislike this review. The reviewer's reliance on comparisons to Prince's older music irritates me.


When Prince's goal is to evoke the old "Controversy" sound, such an approach is totally appropriate.
2010: Healing the Wounds of the Past.... http://prince.org/msg/8/325740
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #144 posted 04/14/09 5:17pm

SupaFunkyOrgan
grinderSexy

avatar

xlr8r said:

SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:


If anything he wouldn't have been doing wrong shit trying to get away with it in the first place exclaim And look what a fucking cheap ass he is. He'd rather desecrate his own creation than pay rightfully someone else for using their work disbelief

Prince would never have the balls to have a real conversation with someone like me lol
[Edited 4/14/09 17:10pm]


A 'real' conversation?

Would you have a luandry list of things to yell at him about?

And its not a desecration. For you to use these terms is kind of interesting lol

I don't think youd have the balls to say half the things you say on here to him (at least not with even 1/4 the zeal you do hear). I saw you dancing at Musicology opener lol and you were NOT mad.


That was before he started in with his bullshit and you obviously don't know me because not only do I have the balls to stand up to Prince and school him on all his bullshit but I would do so with a joyous heart! lol
2010: Healing the Wounds of the Past.... http://prince.org/msg/8/325740
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #145 posted 04/14/09 5:18pm

squirrelgrease

avatar

Holy shit. Quentin Tarantino is mentoring the American Idol contestants. I think I may have fallen into another dimension.
If prince.org were to be made idiot proof, someone would just invent a better idiot.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #146 posted 04/14/09 5:18pm

SupaFunkyOrgan
grinderSexy

avatar

squirrelgrease said:

Holy shit. Quentin Tarantino is mentoring the American Idol contestants. I think I may have fallen into another dimension.

This isn't his first time! lol
2010: Healing the Wounds of the Past.... http://prince.org/msg/8/325740
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #147 posted 04/14/09 5:21pm

xlr8r

avatar

SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:

xlr8r said:



A 'real' conversation?

Would you have a luandry list of things to yell at him about?

And its not a desecration. For you to use these terms is kind of interesting lol

I don't think youd have the balls to say half the things you say on here to him (at least not with even 1/4 the zeal you do hear). I saw you dancing at Musicology opener lol and you were NOT mad.


That was before he started in with his bullshit and you obviously don't know me because not only do I have the balls to stand up to Prince and school him on all his bullshit but I would do so with a joyous heart! lol


How are you gonna school Prince? By stating your greivances? He'd laugh at your ass and keep it moving. lol

And he did your so called desecration of songs before Musicology an all the rest of the stuff your angry about.

Stop fronting.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #148 posted 04/14/09 5:23pm

SupaFunkyOrgan
grinderSexy

avatar

xlr8r said:

SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:



That was before he started in with his bullshit and you obviously don't know me because not only do I have the balls to stand up to Prince and school him on all his bullshit but I would do so with a joyous heart! lol


How are you gonna school Prince? By stating your greivances? He'd laugh at your ass and keep it moving. lol

And he did your so called desecration of songs before Musicology an all the rest of the stuff your angry about.

Stop fronting.


He was becoming amicable to the fanbase and moving away from the madness and for that I was willing to cut him a break. And yeah, I'd state all my and everyone else's grievances and cut through all the bullshit of his fakery. The only reason he'd be movin on and laughing is because he couldn't handle the fucking conversation.

Anyone who wants to orchestrate this without editing tricks and yes men at his side, let me know and bring it on. I'll never be afraid of that conversation. NEVAH!
2010: Healing the Wounds of the Past.... http://prince.org/msg/8/325740
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #149 posted 04/14/09 5:24pm

squirrelgrease

avatar

SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:

squirrelgrease said:

Holy shit. Quentin Tarantino is mentoring the American Idol contestants. I think I may have fallen into another dimension.

This isn't his first time! lol



Maybe David Lynch will be on next week!
If prince.org were to be made idiot proof, someone would just invent a better idiot.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 5 of 6 <123456>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Prince: Music and More > Pitchfork Lotusflow3r Review