RealMusician said: TwiliteKid said: Frank Zappa
Neil Young Bob Dylan Have all released more music than Prince has. With artists like Dylan and Neil Young, it's really a different story. Usually, their kind of music doesn't take very long to write/record/produce. Same with most jazz artists - you could take your band into the studio, press "record" and make a couple of albums in just an afternoon if you like... Zappa, on the other hand, is a good comparison, I think. Just like Prince, his music tends to be complex (technically as well as musically) and demands a lot of time and effort in all stages of the creation process (writing, arranging, rehearsing, recording, mixing, etc). are you serious? once you've got the genuine archtectural composition it isn't that hard to fluff it up with a keyboard here or a tangerine there. a good example might be "u're gonna c me". do you think that took long to pimp up from the one night alone version to the mplsound version? i think not. anyway, that's still an absurd comparison. and true love lives on lollipops and crisps | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
my prince "official albums" folder contains 44 albums, lol. but i have
included a few that might strictly belong there, altho i think they do. and i haven't included things like scandalous sex suite or beautiful xp. 01. for you 02. prince 03. dirty mind 04. 1999 05. purple rain 06. around the world in a day 07. madhouse 8 08. parade 09. madhouse 16 10. sign o the times 11. the black album 12. lovesexy 13. batman 14. grafitty bridge 15. diamonds and pearls 16. 17. gold nigga 18. the hits / the bsides 19. come 20. exodus 21. the undertaker 22. the gold experience 23. chaos and disorder 24. emancipation 25. kamasutra 26. the truth 27. crystal ball 28. new power soul 29. rave un2 the joy fantastic 30. the vault..old friends 4 sale 31. the rainbow children 32. one nite alone [piano album] 33. one nite alone...live 34. xpectation 35. c-note 36. n.e.w.s. 37. the chocolate invasion 38. the slaughterhouse 39. musicology 40. 3121 41. planet earth 42. indigo nights 43. lotus flow3r 44. mplsound the ones in bold could, reasonably be omitted. but then you could argue that things like "the very best off" or "ultimate" should be included. the only reason i included "hits-bsides" is because it contains something like 24 or 25 non album tracks. i also didn't include "rave IN2" since it's just the same album remixed with "beautiful strange" as a bonus. personally i think both madhouse 8 and 16 are genuine prince albums much in the way that "xpectation" or "n.e.w.s." are now released as "prince" albums. if they'd been recorded in the past i'm sure they'd been released under the name "madhouse". so imo all these jazz albums where he wrote the bulk of all the included songs and plays many instruments belongs in the prince albums list. similarly, "the undertaker" is on my list because prince had pressed that cd and it was ready to be shipped when warners forced him to destroy all copies. much like "the black album" was for years just another official album that was not for sale in stores, i think "the undertaker" is much the same. plus, it was later released officially on vhs and laserdisc. "goldnigga", "exodus" and "nps" respectively move more and more into the real genuine prince album territory. and the first two are included here for much the same reason as the madhouse album since prince is all over them and the music is a prime example of his other "real prince" album material of those eras. his own prints so heavily all over them make them more "prince" than, say the jill jones or the mayte album which are all prince compositions but still feel very different in a way. ok, i'm done now [Edited 4/11/09 10:06am] and true love lives on lollipops and crisps | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
MILES DAVIS!!! There is too much snow in Hollywood! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
IstenSzek said: 21. the undertaker Was that released in audio only ? I always thought it was a video release only and that the audio version was a 'fan production'. Also, isn't it a live performance, rather than studio?
I'm not saying it shouldn't be on your list, btw, just wondering which of my lists it belongs on. Edit - Perhaps I should've read your entire post before diving in with that question. [Edited 4/11/09 10:10am] Lemmy, Bowie, Prince, Leonard. RIP. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Anxiety said: realm said: that's what happens when you own your masters. well, he's making that money without having to lift a finger. i guess it's really only annoying for the older fans who already have everything. Did Bowie work something out such that he always owned them or did he regain them after the time of IP ownership returned them to him? Change it one more time.. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
AsylumUtopia said: IstenSzek said: 21. the undertaker Was that released in audio only ? I always thought it was a video release only and that the audio version was a 'fan production'. Also, isn't it a live performance, rather than studio?
I'm not saying it shouldn't be on your list, btw, just wondering which of my lists it belongs on. i've edited my post above with some reasons for why i included it. but a lot of the copies of this album that are now circulating are ripped from the few cd's that escaped destruction/black stickering. prince recorded it and put it on a cd to be released with "guitar magazine", until warners heard of it and forced him to drop the project and destroy the cds that were already pressed and ready to go. sometimes a few of those "destroyed" copies turn up on the net. they have a black circular sticker on the back that covers the entire cd. i don't know what kind of process that is but it makes the cd worthless i guess. it can't be played or repaired. but a few of those cd's, kinda like the black album, escaped destruction. i've yet to see one pop up on ebay though. but perhaps there have been copies that i'm unaware of. later, as part of his contract i guess, it was released on video and laserdisc. i think back to back with the "sacrifice of victor" show. but this one is imo a studio album it's just the three of them laying down the tracks in the studio. that it's "live to dat tape" doesn't mean it's a real live album as such. i view it as a studio album put down to take in one take. anyway, all of that adds up enough for me to view it as a genuine prince cd release. and true love lives on lollipops and crisps | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
AsylumUtopia said: IstenSzek said: 21. the undertaker Was that released in audio only ? I always thought it was a video release only and that the audio version was a 'fan production'. Also, isn't it a live performance, rather than studio?
I'm not saying it shouldn't be on your list, btw, just wondering which of my lists it belongs on. Edit - Perhaps I should've read your entire post before diving in with that question. [Edited 4/11/09 10:10am] No. "the undertaker" is also an album. it was supposed to be released with the guitarplayer magazin (just like PE and sunday mail). WB stoped the releasing. Fortunatly I own one of them. There is too much snow in Hollywood! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
NeptuneHQ said: Fortunatly I own one of them.
do you have one of the original copies? i have a bootleg and i'm not 100% sure if it's a rip from the real audio cd or from the laserdisc. the sound is great but there is a difference between the two. i can't remember what is was though. doesn't the videotape rip have soundbits of vanessa vomiting on the floor, at paisley park in some of the tracks? my copy has no extra sounds, just the music. and true love lives on lollipops and crisps | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
IstenSzek said: AsylumUtopia said: Was that released in audio only ? I always thought it was a video release only and that the audio version was a 'fan production'. Also, isn't it a live performance, rather than studio?
I'm not saying it shouldn't be on your list, btw, just wondering which of my lists it belongs on. i've edited my post above with some reasons for why i included it. but a lot of the copies of this album that are now circulating are ripped from the few cd's that escaped destruction/black stickering. prince recorded it and put it on a cd to be released with "guitar magazine", until warners heard of it and forced him to drop the project and destroy the cds that were already pressed and ready to go. sometimes a few of those "destroyed" copies turn up on the net. they have a black circular sticker on the back that covers the entire cd. i don't know what kind of process that is but it makes the cd worthless i guess. it can't be played or repaired. but a few of those cd's, kinda like the black album, escaped destruction. i've yet to see one pop up on ebay though. but perhaps there have been copies that i'm unaware of. later, as part of his contract i guess, it was released on video and laserdisc. i think back to back with the "sacrifice of victor" show. but this one is imo a studio album it's just the three of them laying down the tracks in the studio. that it's "live to dat tape" doesn't mean it's a real live album as such. i view it as a studio album put down to take in one take. anyway, all of that adds up enough for me to view it as a genuine prince cd release. Thanks. I never knew it's history before. I always assumed that it and 'sacrifice' were just 2 parts of the same recording, split to make more money (cynical git that I am). Anyway, I'm convinced, it should count as an official release. Lemmy, Bowie, Prince, Leonard. RIP. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
IstenSzek said: i have a bootleg and i'm not 100% sure if it's a rip from the real audio cd or from the laserdisc. the sound is great but there is a difference between the two. i can't remember what is was though.
I have a direct copy from an original. The bootleggers have copied the original so precisely you won't know if you are buying a copy or original at this point. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
paisleypark4 said: i think counting his protege self produced albums should be included since he wrote them.
OK, here we go then. I'll need help with this though. Excluding live stuff and best of's : 01 For You 02 Prince 03 Dirty Mind 04 Controversy 05 1999 06 Purple Rain 07 Around The World in a Day 08 Parade 09 Sign O' The Times 10 Lovesexy 11 Batman 12 Graffiti Bridge 13 Diamonds and Pearls 14 Symbol 15 Black Album 16 Come 17 The Gold Experience 18 Chaos and Disorder 19 Emancipation 20 Crystal Ball / The Truth / Kamasutra 21 The Vault... Old Friends 4 Sale 22 Rave Un2 The Joy Fantastic 23 Rave In2 The Joy Fantastic 24 The Rainbow Children 25 n.e.w.s. 26 Musicology 27 3121 28 Planet Earth 29 LotusFlow3r/MPLSouND * 30 New Power Soul 31 Exodus 32 Gold Nigga 33 8 34 16 35 One Nite Alone 36 C-NOTE 37 The Chocolate Invasion 38 The Saughterhouse 39 Xpectation 40 Appollonia 6 41 Vanity 6 42 What Time Is It? 43 Ice Cream Castles 44 The Time 45 Pandemonium 46 Family 47 Jill Jones 48 Martika's Kitchen 49 Mayte - Child of the Sun 50 Mazarati 50 Sheila E - The Glamorous Life 51 Sheila E - Romance 1600 (not sure Prince had anything to do with either eponymous or Sex Cymbal ?) 52 The Undertaker (sorry, can't be arsed renumbering everything to put it where it should be) * So if we count Lotus and MPLS as separate and include Elixer, that's 53. And while we're at it, should Sign O' The Times, Graffiti Bridge, Emancipation, and Crystal Ball/The Truth/Kamasutra be split out with each disc counted as a separate release? Soundscan counts each disc as a separate release, so if we do it that way that brings us up to 61. This is mostly off the top of my head, and I'm not sure about all of them (for instance, does the Martika album count? Did Prince write all or just some of it?), and I've probably left some out. Errors / Omissions ? Lemmy, Bowie, Prince, Leonard. RIP. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I think Ani DiFranco has a mighty fine chance of catching Prince in the race.
The Stones have put out a TON of stuff too. I've been able to keep up with Prince's stuff on vinyl but not the Stones. Every time I turn around a new rare record pops up with them. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Where is Michael Jackson and Madonna? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Graycap23 said: Where is Michael Jackson and Madonna?
Neither one of them is even close, even if you add the Jackson 5/Jacksons stuff to Michael's total. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
IstenSzek said: my prince "official albums" folder contains 44 albums, lol. but i have
included a few that might strictly belong there, altho i think they do. and i haven't included things like scandalous sex suite or beautiful xp. 01. for you 02. prince 03. dirty mind 04. 1999 05. purple rain 06. around the world in a day 07. madhouse 8 08. parade 09. madhouse 16 10. sign o the times 11. the black album 12. lovesexy 13. batman 14. grafitty bridge 15. diamonds and pearls 16. 17. gold nigga 18. the hits / the bsides 19. come 20. exodus 21. the undertaker 22. the gold experience 23. chaos and disorder 24. emancipation 25. kamasutra 26. the truth 27. crystal ball 28. new power soul 29. rave un2 the joy fantastic 30. the vault..old friends 4 sale 31. the rainbow children 32. one nite alone [piano album] 33. one nite alone...live 34. xpectation 35. c-note 36. n.e.w.s. 37. the chocolate invasion 38. the slaughterhouse 39. musicology 40. 3121 41. planet earth 42. indigo nights 43. lotus flow3r 44. mplsound the ones in bold could, reasonably be omitted. but then you could argue that things like "the very best off" or "ultimate" should be included. the only reason i included "hits-bsides" is because it contains something like 24 or 25 non album tracks. i also didn't include "rave IN2" since it's just the same album remixed with "beautiful strange" as a bonus. personally i think both madhouse 8 and 16 are genuine prince albums much in the way that "xpectation" or "n.e.w.s." are now released as "prince" albums. if they'd been recorded in the past i'm sure they'd been released under the name "madhouse". so imo all these jazz albums where he wrote the bulk of all the included songs and plays many instruments belongs in the prince albums list. similarly, "the undertaker" is on my list because prince had pressed that cd and it was ready to be shipped when warners forced him to destroy all copies. much like "the black album" was for years just another official album that was not for sale in stores, i think "the undertaker" is much the same. plus, it was later released officially on vhs and laserdisc. "goldnigga", "exodus" and "nps" respectively move more and more into the real genuine prince album territory. and the first two are included here for much the same reason as the madhouse album since prince is all over them and the music is a prime example of his other "real prince" album material of those eras. his own prints so heavily all over them make them more "prince" than, say the jill jones or the mayte album which are all prince compositions but still feel very different in a way. ok, i'm done now [Edited 4/11/09 10:06am] You've made some strong arguments here, but I have difficultly including The Hits/B-Sides, Chocolate Invasion and the Slaughterhouse as official albums, simply becuase the are almost entirely made up of previously available material. They're compililations, not albums. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
You've made some strong arguments here, but I have difficultly including The Hits/B-Sides, Chocolate Invasion and the Slaughterhouse as official albums, simply becuase the are almost entirely made up of previously available material. They're compililations, not albums.
I agree with you on The Hits/B-Sides. However, Chocolate Invasion and Slaughterhouse should be counted -- they were offered as album downloads through the Musicology Store, and are NOT represented on this list in any other form (meaning, they are not on here twice). | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Se7en said: You've made some strong arguments here, but I have difficultly including The Hits/B-Sides, Chocolate Invasion and the Slaughterhouse as official albums, simply becuase the are almost entirely made up of previously available material. They're compililations, not albums.
I agree with you on The Hits/B-Sides. However, Chocolate Invasion and Slaughterhouse should be counted -- they were offered as album downloads through the Musicology Store, and are NOT represented on this list in any other form (meaning, they are not on here twice). I don't see how that changes the fact that they're of previously released material. They weren't conceived as an album, they were simply compiled as a way to offer the tracks to people who weren't NPGMC members in the first year. I understand that they should be counted towards the total amount of music Prince has released, but if we were to put together a definitive Prince discography, I don't think either of them would belong in the album category (neither should ONA...Live for that matter). | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
narcotizedmind said: runningbear said: I appreciate Dylan's music, but I think Prince has released more than him. Ani Difranco may come close to Prince if she maintains her output beyond his
Wikipedia says Dylan 33 Studio 13 Live 14 Compilation = 60 Prince 21, 2, 5 = 28 Prince only 21 studio albums? Surely you know better . . . I don't want you to think like me. I just want you to think. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
TwiliteKid said: IstenSzek said: my prince "official albums" folder contains 44 albums, lol. but i have
included a few that might strictly belong there, altho i think they do. and i haven't included things like scandalous sex suite or beautiful xp. 01. for you 02. prince 03. dirty mind 04. 1999 05. purple rain 06. around the world in a day 07. madhouse 8 08. parade 09. madhouse 16 10. sign o the times 11. the black album 12. lovesexy 13. batman 14. grafitty bridge 15. diamonds and pearls 16. 17. gold nigga 18. the hits / the bsides 19. come 20. exodus 21. the undertaker 22. the gold experience 23. chaos and disorder 24. emancipation 25. kamasutra 26. the truth 27. crystal ball 28. new power soul 29. rave un2 the joy fantastic 30. the vault..old friends 4 sale 31. the rainbow children 32. one nite alone [piano album] 33. one nite alone...live 34. xpectation 35. c-note 36. n.e.w.s. 37. the chocolate invasion 38. the slaughterhouse 39. musicology 40. 3121 41. planet earth 42. indigo nights 43. lotus flow3r 44. mplsound the ones in bold could, reasonably be omitted. but then you could argue that things like "the very best off" or "ultimate" should be included. the only reason i included "hits-bsides" is because it contains something like 24 or 25 non album tracks. i also didn't include "rave IN2" since it's just the same album remixed with "beautiful strange" as a bonus. personally i think both madhouse 8 and 16 are genuine prince albums much in the way that "xpectation" or "n.e.w.s." are now released as "prince" albums. if they'd been recorded in the past i'm sure they'd been released under the name "madhouse". so imo all these jazz albums where he wrote the bulk of all the included songs and plays many instruments belongs in the prince albums list. similarly, "the undertaker" is on my list because prince had pressed that cd and it was ready to be shipped when warners forced him to destroy all copies. much like "the black album" was for years just another official album that was not for sale in stores, i think "the undertaker" is much the same. plus, it was later released officially on vhs and laserdisc. "goldnigga", "exodus" and "nps" respectively move more and more into the real genuine prince album territory. and the first two are included here for much the same reason as the madhouse album since prince is all over them and the music is a prime example of his other "real prince" album material of those eras. his own prints so heavily all over them make them more "prince" than, say the jill jones or the mayte album which are all prince compositions but still feel very different in a way. ok, i'm done now [Edited 4/11/09 10:06am] You've made some strong arguments here, but I have difficultly including The Hits/B-Sides, Chocolate Invasion and the Slaughterhouse as official albums, simply becuase the are almost entirely made up of previously available material. They're compililations, not albums. Chocolate Invasion and Slaughterhouse are official albums, even if some of the songs were out there. They weren't officially out there were they? (As in on another album by Prince.) I don't want you to think like me. I just want you to think. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
TwiliteKid said: Se7en said: I agree with you on The Hits/B-Sides. However, Chocolate Invasion and Slaughterhouse should be counted -- they were offered as album downloads through the Musicology Store, and are NOT represented on this list in any other form (meaning, they are not on here twice). I don't see how that changes the fact that they're of previously released material. They weren't conceived as an album, they were simply compiled as a way to offer the tracks to people who weren't NPGMC members in the first year. I understand that they should be counted towards the total amount of music Prince has released, but if we were to put together a definitive Prince discography, I don't think either of them would belong in the album category (neither should ONA...Live for that matter). They are counted as "albums" because Prince compiled them that way and sold them that way through his official website at the time (NPGMusicClub/Musicology Store). Your point that they're of previously-released material . . . they were, but not in album form. To your point, any NPGMC songs that did NOT appear on either album are just random catalog songs - like SST, Song Of The Heart, and F.U.N.K. TCI and Slaughterhouse would appear on a Prince discography, for sure. As for ONA:Live . . . it would appear in his discography, but I would not classify it as an album. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
TwiliteKid said: Graycap23 said: Where is Michael Jackson and Madonna?
Neither one of them is even close, even if you add the Jackson 5/Jacksons stuff to Michael's total. You could add up all the Jackson family output and it probably would still not be enough. If you got into a quantity vs. quality debate, Prince's early work alone trumps Michael's solo. 1999 vs. Off The Wall Purple Rain vs. Thriller SOTT vs. Bad The Hits/B-Sides vs. History ...the only one where MJ has the lead is Dangerous vs. D&P | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
TwiliteKid said: Graycap23 said: Where is Michael Jackson and Madonna?
Neither one of them is even close, even if you add the Jackson 5/Jacksons stuff to Michael's total. Michael has released 34 and Madge has released 11 "We may deify or demonize them but not ignore them. And we call them genius, because they are the people who change the world." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Billy Childish has probably released more music than Prince. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Se7en said: TwiliteKid said: Neither one of them is even close, even if you add the Jackson 5/Jacksons stuff to Michael's total. You could add up all the Jackson family output and it probably would still not be enough. If you got into a quantity vs. quality debate, Prince's early work alone trumps Michael's solo. 1999 vs. Off The Wall Purple Rain vs. Thriller SOTT vs. Bad The Hits/B-Sides vs. History ...the only one where MJ has the lead is Dangerous vs. D&P the entire Jackson family - 75 albums "We may deify or demonize them but not ignore them. And we call them genius, because they are the people who change the world." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
lezama said: Anxiety said: well, he's making that money without having to lift a finger. i guess it's really only annoying for the older fans who already have everything. Did Bowie work something out such that he always owned them or did he regain them after the time of IP ownership returned them to him? I would like to know too "We may deify or demonize them but not ignore them. And we call them genius, because they are the people who change the world." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
bboy87 said: TwiliteKid said: Neither one of them is even close, even if you add the Jackson 5/Jacksons stuff to Michael's total. Michael has released 34 and Madge has released 11 He has not. He's released 12. And Madonna's 11, like I said, does not put her in the running for this particular prize. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
TwiliteKid said: bboy87 said: Michael has released 34 and Madge has released 11 He has not. He's released 12. And Madonna's 11, like I said, does not put her in the running for this particular prize. I meant with The Jackson 5 and Jacksons together, he has "We may deify or demonize them but not ignore them. And we call them genius, because they are the people who change the world." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Se7en said: The question was "Has Prince released the most music?" but it seems that any answer other than NO meets some opposition.
With artists like Dylan and Neil Young, it's really a different story. Usually, their kind of music doesn't take very long to write/record/produce.
You can't believe how ignorant that sounds. I would argue that their lyrics take longer to write than Prince's, and are more genuine. You are discounting an entire genre of music because of your "perceived" idea of how long it takes to make. Same with most jazz artists - you could take your band into the studio, press "record" and make a couple of albums in just an afternoon if you like...
Some could say the same things about Prince. Madhouse/Xpectation/CNOTE/NEWS/ONALive? TwiliteKid said: You're exactly right Se7en. It seems our friend RealMusician is unaware of the stories about how quickly Prince works. I wish people around here get their facts straight before they offer opinions. I'm not denying the lyrical qualities of Bob Dylan's work - or any other qualities of anyone's elses, for that matter. For me, this is not about some kind of artistic "value", or anything like that. Of course, there are many people who have released more music than Prince. I have no problem with that. Also, I'm perfectly aware of Prince's pace in the studio. But I'm still estimating that making a record in the style of someone like Dylan or Neil Young generally would take less time than making an album in the style of Prince or Frank Zappa. I admit, I don't know exactly how long it takes for Neil Young to write a song (my guess is it differs) - but as I said, this is not only counting the songwriting but all steps in the process. I would say that Prince's and Zappa's catalogues are generally more diverse and musically complex. Normally, this would require more time, not necessarily for the composing but at least for arranging and rehearsing (IF performed by a band; yes, I do know that Prince does a lot of his stuff on his own). Also, since both him and Zappa have been known to utilize recording technology as an artistic device in different ways, the recording and mixing process itself might be more complex as well. Our singer/songwriter heroes, on the other hand, tend to have more of a "live in the studio"-approach (yes, there are exceptions, I know!) with less overdubs and such. Also, there is usually less stylistic variation, less experimenting, and a heavier emphasis on well-known and/or pre-conceived musical formulas. Now, does this affect the artistic value of the music? Of course not. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
IstenSzek said: RealMusician said: With artists like Dylan and Neil Young, it's really a different story. Usually, their kind of music doesn't take very long to write/record/produce. Same with most jazz artists - you could take your band into the studio, press "record" and make a couple of albums in just an afternoon if you like... Zappa, on the other hand, is a good comparison, I think. Just like Prince, his music tends to be complex (technically as well as musically) and demands a lot of time and effort in all stages of the creation process (writing, arranging, rehearsing, recording, mixing, etc). are you serious? once you've got the genuine archtectural composition it isn't that hard to fluff it up with a keyboard here or a tangerine there. a good example might be "u're gonna c me". do you think that took long to pimp up from the one night alone version to the mplsound version? i think not. anyway, that's still an absurd comparison. What is? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Se7en said: TwiliteKid said: I don't see how that changes the fact that they're of previously released material. They weren't conceived as an album, they were simply compiled as a way to offer the tracks to people who weren't NPGMC members in the first year. I understand that they should be counted towards the total amount of music Prince has released, but if we were to put together a definitive Prince discography, I don't think either of them would belong in the album category (neither should ONA...Live for that matter). They are counted as "albums" because Prince compiled them that way and sold them that way through his official website at the time (NPGMusicClub/Musicology Store). Your point that they're of previously-released material . . . they were, but not in album form. To your point, any NPGMC songs that did NOT appear on either album are just random catalog songs - like SST, Song Of The Heart, and F.U.N.K. TCI and Slaughterhouse would appear on a Prince discography, for sure. As for ONA:Live . . . it would appear in his discography, but I would not classify it as an album. Yeah, I hear what you're saying, but I still disagree with you. They should appear on his discography, but not under albums. They should be grouped with The Hits/The B-Sides, The Very Best of Prince, Ultimate Prince, and, now that I think of it, Crystal Ball and The Vault. None of these can truly be called albums because they weren't conceived as coherent pieces of work the same way that the other's on this list were. For example: Purple Rain is collection representing artistic intent, and specific moment in time. I don't think you can that of the discs I've mentioned above. In the specific case of The Chocolate Invasion, and Slaughterhouse, the fact that some of the tracks were previously credited to the NPG, not Prince, is evidence of the slapdash nature of these collections. Furthermore, "2045: Radical Man" had been out for [em]four[/em] years prior to its placement on The Slaughtehouse. If that doesn't speak to these albums purpose of compiling the otherwise homelss material of the late 90s/early 2000s, I don't know what does. I know they weren't explictly described this way, but they're a compiliation of singles, nothing more. Look at it this way: If Prince were to suddenly start offering a collection called F.U.N.K and consisting of the tracks you mentioned above, as well as some of the other similarly homeless material from the NPGMC like "Glass Cutter", "Silver Tongue", etc, would you call it an album, 5 years later? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |