independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Prince: Music and More > Critical thought
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 4 of 6 <123456>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #90 posted 04/02/09 5:46pm

SupaFunkyOrgan
grinderSexy

avatar

2elijah said:

Back in the day, you had the Stylistics, Delfonics, Black Ivory, etc., with lead singers whose voices "stood out", and there was also solo artists like Phil Perry whose voice can knock you off your feet when he sings a slow jam. I could even put Maxwell in that category. Very few r&b artists today, have that "distinct" voice like the ones I just mentioned. As far as female r&b singers, I love "Leela James" style of r&b/soul, it has a gospel/blues sound, unfortunately, she and other r&b singers are ignored by the industry, because the industry today, is stuck on looks and manufactured artists.



OK, why the hell is Prince using the same Cher "I believe in life after love" voice effect that all those other r&b types today are using?! Prince's asset is his voice and he's using gimmicks that aren't even smart or that good and are the same as the kids today who are recording. It totally smells of pandering.
2010: Healing the Wounds of the Past.... http://prince.org/msg/8/325740
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #91 posted 04/02/09 5:57pm

nosajd

avatar

SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:

LondonStyle said:




Who shot ya.....both of you are wrong ...SWHOE ....Future Baby Mama...BL&B...

Look the whole point of this thread is to point out that if R&B / Soul is not your think then that's cool....some people like just the "Purple Rain" Prince.... lol and if a record is not like that then he's not on form ... lol

Uh yeah, I'm a total fan of GOOD R&B. All this shit is generic compared to the real efforts of the past. He has it in him and if he can't bring it, he just shouldn't bother.


Well I think he should bother bc/ some people do like it like me & several other people. Everyone likes diff stuff & that's ok. There are some songs that I don't like that other people do. Just b/c Prince or whoever else makes a song u don't like doesn't mean everyone else won't like it too.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #92 posted 04/02/09 6:01pm

SupaFunkyOrgan
grinderSexy

avatar

nosajd said:

SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:


Uh yeah, I'm a total fan of GOOD R&B. All this shit is generic compared to the real efforts of the past. He has it in him and if he can't bring it, he just shouldn't bother.


Well I think he should bother bc/ some people do like it like me & several other people. Everyone likes diff stuff & that's ok. There are some songs that I don't like that other people do. Just b/c Prince or whoever else makes a song u don't like doesn't mean everyone else won't like it too.

I'd hate to think that 30 is young enough to have fallen into the trap of the horrid state of today's popular music industry but that's probably the case.
2010: Healing the Wounds of the Past.... http://prince.org/msg/8/325740
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #93 posted 04/02/09 6:09pm

nosajd

avatar

SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:

nosajd said:



Well I think he should bother bc/ some people do like it like me & several other people. Everyone likes diff stuff & that's ok. There are some songs that I don't like that other people do. Just b/c Prince or whoever else makes a song u don't like doesn't mean everyone else won't like it too.

I'd hate to think that 30 is young enough to have fallen into the trap of the horrid state of today's popular music industry but that's probably the case.



sure buddy
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #94 posted 04/02/09 6:23pm

Ugot2shakesumt
hin

tricky99 said:

I've come to the conclusion from reading lots of reviews of Prince's latest that alot of reviewers disregard Prince's output unless it falls along a pop/rock fault-line.

I think they like some orgers are very dismissive of r&b and soul music. I haven't taken a scientific poll but I believe the guitiar based songs are given more props because it falls in line with what the generic white-listener wants to hear. I don't see this as racism but more racial. In that they are only reflecting thru the critique of Prince their own musical bias.

Remember Prince reached his popularity peak with an album that was more pop/rock then the majority of his output. Its become quite cliche to read some reviewer who will praise Prince while tending to dismiss the last 15 years worth of songs that cover a whole gamut of musical styles. I can't think of another musician who is lauded as a genuis but who's actual work as been so dismissed.

Each album bring phrases "like return to form" (what form?) "self-indulgent" (who should he indulge?) and "hit or miss" (funny but the "hit" and "misses" changes with each reviewer). Each reviewer seems to want Prince to return to some undefined form that doesn't exist. Generally there has never been a time Prince produced the same kind of music over an extended time period.

I think part of the problem is that Prince so extraordinarliy creative, prolific and contrary that there really isn't much precedent in the music world on how to approch him. Fans and critics have taken for granted that Prince will always be producing music. Its too much music for most of it to be good right? He's too old for it too be good right? Take a look at how much music that gets 4 stars from reviews would be described as disapointing if Prince's name was attached to it.

I really feel that no matter how "good" a Prince album is it will always be dismissed to some digree with the 3 terms I described earlier. Prince is too radical to be safely praised be the majority. Very many will claim only a piece of the purple rock, few love the many aspects he presents..



I think you are so confused, some dislike some of his newer work not because any of the ugly thinly veiled racial unsecurities you harbor, but becasue the of the "MUSIC" not the label "RnB" you want to stick on it.
Can you can honestly say his music is as creative, inovative and original even when borrowing huge chunks from other artists now as he was when he was younger?
Please, the very premise of MNPLSOUND is not to be original or creative, but to rehash, pander and chase succesfull trends like he has for the last 15-20 years.
[Edited 4/2/09 20:40pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #95 posted 04/02/09 6:38pm

2elijah

SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:



OK Elijah, as a connoiseur of R&B do you REALLY really think Prince is kicking out the hardcore amazing R&B jams right now?

And people need to dump the myth that white folk/non blacks don't listen to R&B!! lol
[Edited 4/2/09 17:47pm]



Different strokes for different folks Supa. I am not just talking about now, but his catalogue of r&b classics. I'm not worried if he's putting on r&b classics like he did 15 - 20 years ago. The point is, every now and then when he sings his classic r&b live, he does it well, and the fact that when I want to hear a Prince r&b classic, like "Adore", "How Come You Don't Call Me Anymore", just to name a few, I can do that. I don't have to wait until he puts out an r&b track today and hope it becomes a major hit for me to like it. If I like it, then that'a fine with me. If it's not an out-of-the-ball park hit, then so be it. I don't care what some billboard or other music chart says. They don't choose my music for me.

Secondly, many of his songs like "Shh" starts off with a nice r&b flavor, only to bring in blues/rock solo midway to the end. That's what I like about many of his songs, he could mix various flavors into one, and that does it for me.
As far as people needing to drop the myth about non-blacks not liking r&b, that was not stated in my post. I have stated several times, we are individuals with different tastes, so you cannot tell me that just because you don't consider his more recent r&b tracks as amazing as in the past, doesn't mean I may think it's not. Everyone hears a different tune in a song, whether it's r&b, rock, jazz or blues.
[Edited 4/2/09 18:43pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #96 posted 04/02/09 6:46pm

2elijah

SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:

2elijah said:

Back in the day, you had the Stylistics, Delfonics, Black Ivory, etc., with lead singers whose voices "stood out", and there was also solo artists like Phil Perry whose voice can knock you off your feet when he sings a slow jam. I could even put Maxwell in that category. Very few r&b artists today, have that "distinct" voice like the ones I just mentioned. As far as female r&b singers, I love "Leela James" style of r&b/soul, it has a gospel/blues sound, unfortunately, she and other r&b singers are ignored by the industry, because the industry today, is stuck on looks and manufactured artists.



OK, why the hell is Prince using the same Cher "I believe in life after love" voice effect that all those other r&b types today are using?! Prince's asset is his voice and he's using gimmicks that aren't even smart or that good and are the same as the kids today who are recording. It totally smells of pandering.



That is your opinion, I don't see it "your way", because we both have our individual tastes for what type of Prince music we like.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #97 posted 04/02/09 8:03pm

jill4life

tricky99 said:

I've come to the conclusion from reading lots of reviews of Prince's latest that alot of reviewers disregard Prince's output unless it falls along a pop/rock fault-line.

I think they like some orgers are very dismissive of r&b and soul music. I haven't taken a scientific poll but I believe the guitiar based songs are given more props because it falls in line with what the generic white-listener wants to hear. I don't see this as racism but more racial. In that they are only reflecting thru the critique of Prince their own musical bias.

Remember Prince reached his popularity peak with an album that was more pop/rock then the majority of his output. Its become quite cliche to read some reviewer who will praise Prince while tending to dismiss the last 15 years worth of songs that cover a whole gamut of musical styles. I can't think of another musician who is lauded as a genuis but who's actual work as been so dismissed.

Each album bring phrases "like return to form" (what form?) "self-indulgent" (who should he indulge?) and "hit or miss" (funny but the "hit" and "misses" changes with each reviewer). Each reviewer seems to want Prince to return to some undefined form that doesn't exist. Generally there has never been a time Prince produced the same kind of music over an extended time period.

I think part of the problem is that Prince so extraordinarliy creative, prolific and contrary that there really isn't much precedent in the music world on how to approch him. Fans and critics have taken for granted that Prince will always be producing music. Its too much music for most of it to be good right? He's too old for it too be good right? Take a look at how much music that gets 4 stars from reviews would be described as disapointing if Prince's name was attached to it.

I really feel that no matter how "good" a Prince album is it will always be dismissed to some digree with the 3 terms I described earlier. Prince is too radical to be safely praised be the majority. Very many will claim only a piece of the purple rock, few love the many aspects he presents..





Well said and true.
nod
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #98 posted 04/02/09 8:15pm

stanleylieber

avatar

2elijah said:

SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:



OK, why the hell is Prince using the same Cher "I believe in life after love" voice effect that all those other r&b types today are using?! Prince's asset is his voice and he's using gimmicks that aren't even smart or that good and are the same as the kids today who are recording. It totally smells of pandering.



That is your opinion, I don't see it "your way", because we both have our individual tastes for what type of Prince music we like.


this thread starts from a racist premise that you are tacitly defending by arguing against the targets of the original post -- even if you don't feel the same way as tricky99.

tricky99 puts across all kinds of assumptions that are frankly unfounded. sure, there are people who fit her description, but none of them are the ones she's arguing with in this thread.

nobody is telling her what her views are. if only she would extend the same courtesy. but she's telling everyone who doesn't share her views that there is something fundamentally wrong with their perspective and then heavily implying that this means they are racist, simply because... well, it's not really clear what she's on about because the people she is arguing with in this thread have said repeatedly that they don't hold the views she insists that they hold.

i mean, what do you say to that sort of thing?

the only sensible response is to walk away. but, the topic has been creeping up in a lot of threads lately. the 'mplsound defense squad' has sewn the implication that people who don't like the album are racist all over the org.

it's absolutely silly.

there are a lot of black people who have worked with prince who have expressed the exact same disillusionment with his modern work, for exactly the same reasons. presumably, those black people are not anti-black racists. i think preconceptions about race are coloring tricky99's interpretation of this situation every bit as much as race supposedly colors the general reaction to 'mplsound.'

in any case, i have a hard time categorizing more than a couple of songs at most off of 'mplsound' as r&b in the first place. it's certainly not what prince has stated his aim was. this was supposed to be 'controversy, pt. 2,' right? the minneapolis sound, as indicated by the title of the album. the minneapolis sound was not r&b. it was a hybrid of virtually every form of popular music that emerged between wwii and the early 1980s. a couple of songs on the album seem to be trying to emulate modern radio r&b hits, which is what people are complaining about. the other songs are different styles entirely.

prince had mass appeal because he crossed all lines. he was a collage of influences -- racial, musical, etc.

a lot of people became fans of that early prince, and indeed, the early prince is the reason anybody even knows he exists. because he was interesting. radical. he advanced a post-racial message in a time when black artists were not prominently featured on white radio (in fact, his early work did much to change this). sure, it was disappointing to a lot of people when he receded into a static, old-fashioned, increasingly belligerent 'black' identity. not because prince fans dislike black people (considering that many prince fans were and are black people), but because prince used to represent transcending racial boundaries and existing as a human being instead of taking refuge in the divisive construct of an exclusive racial identity. he became popular because he was an enigma, and then he decided to shatter the enigma by solidifying into a static identity.

that's a lot less interesting to a lot of people. not because they're racist, but because it's not what attracted them to him in the first place. it's like if you open up a box of crayons and for some reason they're all 'flesh colored.' well, what if you wanted to color a strawberry that day? your options just became a lot more limited.

unfortunately, even this isn't a real answer for the argument 'r&b detractors' are racist. because the argument isn't really about racism. the phantom specter of prince 'the rocker' is just that; prince has never and will never make straight white rock music. 'lotusflow3r's heaviest rock songs are jimi hendrix pastiches. you know, a black guy. all these square white folks just pining away for prince to make real black music again, right?

is that really the argument you guys ('you guys' in this thread -- please don't misunderstand) trying to make?

because it doesn't make any sense. biggrin

rock n roll is black music too. biggrin

there are even some pretty awesome japanese metal bands.

everyone on this board is a fan of prince. even bart.
it's time for a new direction / it's time for jazz to die
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #99 posted 04/02/09 8:24pm

stanleylieber

avatar

in the interests of establishing r&b credentials, maybe we could share our favorite prince straight r&b/soul songs. here are some of my favorites:

adonis and bathsheba
adore
crucial
dark
do me baby
get blue
open book
satisfied
shhh (yes, guitars are sometimes played in r&b; see the beatles' influences)
slow love

you can't fuck with these songs.
[Edited 4/2/09 20:24pm]
it's time for a new direction / it's time for jazz to die
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #100 posted 04/02/09 8:29pm

stanleylieber

avatar

i also love prince's jazzier stuff (particularly the run of released and unreleased jazzy material from '91-'93). it's interesting nobody is bringing that up as a litmus test for race. i'd be willing to bet a lot of people that are getting fingers waved at them for not liking 'mplsound' are big fans of some of prince's jazz explorations.

or is jazz 'white' now too. eek
[Edited 4/2/09 20:30pm]
it's time for a new direction / it's time for jazz to die
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #101 posted 04/02/09 8:48pm

Ugot2shakesumt
hin

stanleylieber said:

2elijah said:




That is your opinion, I don't see it "your way", because we both have our individual tastes for what type of Prince music we like.


this thread starts from a racist premise that you are tacitly defending by arguing against the targets of the original post -- even if you don't feel the same way as tricky99.

tricky99 puts across all kinds of assumptions that are frankly unfounded. sure, there are people who fit her description, but none of them are the ones she's arguing with in this thread.

nobody is telling her what her views are. if only she would extend the same courtesy. but she's telling everyone who doesn't share her views that there is something fundamentally wrong with their perspective and then heavily implying that this means they are racist, simply because... well, it's not really clear what she's on about because the people she is arguing with in this thread have said repeatedly that they don't hold the views she insists that they hold.

i mean, what do you say to that sort of thing?

the only sensible response is to walk away. but, the topic has been creeping up in a lot of threads lately. the 'mplsound defense squad' has sewn the implication that people who don't like the album are racist all over the org.

it's absolutely silly.

there are a lot of black people who have worked with prince who have expressed the exact same disillusionment with his modern work, for exactly the same reasons. presumably, those black people are not anti-black racists. i think preconceptions about race are coloring tricky99's interpretation of this situation every bit as much as race supposedly colors the general reaction to 'mplsound.'

in any case, i have a hard time categorizing more than a couple of songs at most off of 'mplsound' as r&b in the first place. it's certainly not what prince has stated his aim was. this was supposed to be 'controversy, pt. 2,' right? the minneapolis sound, as indicated by the title of the album. the minneapolis sound was not r&b. it was a hybrid of virtually every form of popular music that emerged between wwii and the early 1980s. a couple of songs on the album seem to be trying to emulate modern radio r&b hits, which is what people are complaining about. the other songs are different styles entirely.

prince had mass appeal because he crossed all lines. he was a collage of influences -- racial, musical, etc.

a lot of people became fans of that early prince, and indeed, the early prince is the reason anybody even knows he exists. because he was interesting. radical. he advanced a post-racial message in a time when black artists were not prominently featured on white radio (in fact, his early work did much to change this). sure, it was disappointing to a lot of people when he receded into a static, old-fashioned, increasingly belligerent 'black' identity. not because prince fans dislike black people (considering that many prince fans were and are black people), but because prince used to represent transcending racial boundaries and existing as a human being instead of taking refuge in the divisive construct of an exclusive racial identity. he became popular because he was an enigma, and then he decided to shatter the enigma by solidifying into a static identity.

that's a lot less interesting to a lot of people. not because they're racist, but because it's not what attracted them to him in the first place. it's like if you open up a box of crayons and for some reason they're all 'flesh colored.' well, what if you wanted to color a strawberry that day? your options just became a lot more limited.

unfortunately, even this isn't a real answer for the argument 'r&b detractors' are racist. because the argument isn't really about racism. the phantom specter of prince 'the rocker' is just that; prince has never and will never make straight white rock music. 'lotusflow3r's heaviest rock songs are jimi hendrix pastiches. you know, a black guy. all these square white folks just pining away for prince to make real black music again, right?

is that really the argument you guys ('you guys' in this thread -- please don't misunderstand) trying to make?

because it doesn't make any sense. biggrin

rock n roll is black music too. biggrin

there are even some pretty awesome japanese metal bands.

everyone on this board is a fan of prince. even bart.


clapping
Very good points,
Its the pot calling the kettle white, it seems that the music Hendrix, one of the most influential guitarists of all time and Jazz, like Rock, music created by blacks,.....is too white for some people here.

Some need to try and be a little more critical of your thoughts.
[Edited 4/2/09 20:52pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #102 posted 04/02/09 9:08pm

jill4life

Question: Was Jimmi's music praised on its merits -- best rock -- during his time or was he recognized because he was a "black" rock guitarist?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #103 posted 04/02/09 9:17pm

stanleylieber

avatar

jill4life said:

Question: Was Jimmi's music praised on its merits -- best rock -- during his time or was he recognized because he was a "black" rock guitarist?


fucked if i know, but i grew up in a small town where i took beatings in high school for dating black girls and the guys who used to attack me in the parking lot were all obsessed with jimi and led zepplin.

my take on it is that good music transcends race even for racists.
it's time for a new direction / it's time for jazz to die
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #104 posted 04/02/09 9:18pm

NuPwrSoul

tricky99 said:



I think they like some orgers are very dismissive of r&b and soul music.


So what do you make of orgers who love R&B & soul music and STILL aren't feeling some of Prince's music in that direction?

Yes, some people maybe obscuring their dislike of a genre by hiding it behind an expressed dislike of Prince's music.

However, does that mean that EVERY criticism of Prince's music in that direction can simply be dismissed as "you just don't like R&B / soul?"

How does that leave space for legitimate criticism of Prince's music even within the context of a love for R&B / soul music? Don't you think that exists?


Personally, I love R&B / soul... in fact I'm not a big fan of rock, and while I like Prince's rock music I wouldn't venture to compare Prince's "rock" to other "rock" music because I don't really have that frame of reference. I just dig Prince's "rock" music.

As for R&B, it's a little different... I have a better frame of reference for R&B / soul and hip hop and I can say that some of Prince's latest aren't all that within those critical contexts, critically speaking. The music is top-notch, but the lyrics are not. Much of the lyrics comes off as cliched, corny, and faux-hip... the way old people are on TV giving each other "pounds" / "dap" years after it was done in the hood. Some of Prince's attempts at being hip come off to me that way, and he can't hide behind the R&B / hip hop shield because within the world of R&B or hip hop we have standards too! And Prince ain't always hittin them.
"That...magic, the start of something revolutionary-the Minneapolis Sound, we should cherish it and not punish prince for not being able to replicate it."-Dreamshaman32
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #105 posted 04/02/09 9:21pm

SupaFunkyOrgan
grinderSexy

avatar

nosajd said:

SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:


I'd hate to think that 30 is young enough to have fallen into the trap of the horrid state of today's popular music industry but that's probably the case.



sure buddy

OK

Name your top 10 favorite albums of all time
Name your favorite singers/bands/groups.

Let's start there smile
2010: Healing the Wounds of the Past.... http://prince.org/msg/8/325740
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #106 posted 04/02/09 9:36pm

1725topp

I'm a 39 year old African American, living in Mississippi, a state with some of the worst racism of American history, and I love Lotusflow3r and MPLSound equally. Yet, I also feel that I am in that rare space of Prince fans who loved his output during the eighties and love his output today equally. I teach college kids, have a close relationship with my step-kids, and coordinate two open mic poetry venues, so I have a pretty good idea of what's on today's radio and what people between the ages of fifteen and twenty-five are purchasing, and it does not move me enough to be displeased with what Prince has done since 2000. When I was hearing how bad Planet Earth was, I looked around, and all else did not move me. What does that mean? Do I not have good taste? My record collection is filled with everything from James Brown to Def Leopard to Muddy Waters to John Cafferty and the Beaver Brown Band as well as Sam Cook. So when I hear that Prince's latest output is lacking. My question is always the same--lacking to what??? If I want to hear 1999 I'll play 1999. I'm not saying that I know funk music any more or better than anyone else, but to call "Dance 4 Me" or "Ol' Skool Company" tried or weak is just baffling to me. But, as I said, I am in rare space because Prince moves me as much today as when I sneaked to where the "bad kids who didn't go to church" hanged and got my ear full of Dirty Mind.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #107 posted 04/02/09 9:38pm

stanleylieber

avatar

1725topp said:

I'm a 39 year old African American, living in Mississippi, a state with some of the worst racism of American history, and I love Lotusflow3r and MPLSound equally. Yet, I also feel that I am in that rare space of Prince fans who loved his output during the eighties and love his output today equally. I teach college kids, have a close relationship with my step-kids, and coordinate two open mic poetry venues, so I have a pretty good idea of what's on today's radio and what people between the ages of fifteen and twenty-five are purchasing, and it does not move me enough to be displeased with what Prince has done since 2000. When I was hearing how bad Planet Earth was, I looked around, and all else did not move me. What does that mean? Do I not have good taste? My record collection is filled with everything from James Brown to Def Leopard to Muddy Waters to John Cafferty and the Beaver Brown Band as well as Sam Cook. So when I hear that Prince's latest output is lacking. My question is always the same--lacking to what??? If I want to hear 1999 I'll play 1999. I'm not saying that I know funk music any more or better than anyone else, but to call "Dance 4 Me" or "Ol' Skool Company" tried or weak is just baffling to me. But, as I said, I am in rare space because Prince moves me as much today as when I sneaked to where the "bad kids who didn't go to church" hanged and got my ear full of Dirty Mind.


hug

i wish i still felt it. i like the new albums more than anything since 'trc' (and since 'tge' before that).
it's time for a new direction / it's time for jazz to die
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #108 posted 04/02/09 9:44pm

1725topp

And I wish I knew my his work still moves me. Most of my college friends have long since stopped listening to his work. All I can say is that his music still touches my soul, and his lyrics still give me pause to think. He still turns a phrase. Most work by most poets misses, but their jewels keep you going. Same for me with Prince. I have always like his metaphysical musings, even when I didn't completely agree with them. But he still is able to make me laugh, think, and cry. But, as I said, I don't know why.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #109 posted 04/02/09 10:16pm

fakir

tricky99 said:

I've come to the conclusion from reading lots of reviews of Prince's latest that alot of reviewers disregard Prince's output unless it falls along a pop/rock fault-line.

I think they like some orgers are very dismissive of r&b and soul music. I haven't taken a scientific poll but I believe the guitiar based songs are given more props because it falls in line with what the generic white-listener wants to hear. I don't see this as racism but more racial. In that they are only reflecting thru the critique of Prince their own musical bias.

Remember Prince reached his popularity peak with an album that was more pop/rock then the majority of his output. Its become quite cliche to read some reviewer who will praise Prince while tending to dismiss the last 15 years worth of songs that cover a whole gamut of musical styles. I can't think of another musician who is lauded as a genuis but who's actual work as been so dismissed.

Each album bring phrases "like return to form" (what form?) "self-indulgent" (who should he indulge?) and "hit or miss" (funny but the "hit" and "misses" changes with each reviewer). Each reviewer seems to want Prince to return to some undefined form that doesn't exist. Generally there has never been a time Prince produced the same kind of music over an extended time period.

I think part of the problem is that Prince so extraordinarliy creative, prolific and contrary that there really isn't much precedent in the music world on how to approch him. Fans and critics have taken for granted that Prince will always be producing music. Its too much music for most of it to be good right? He's too old for it too be good right? Take a look at how much music that gets 4 stars from reviews would be described as disapointing if Prince's name was attached to it.

I really feel that no matter how "good" a Prince album is it will always be dismissed to some digree with the 3 terms I described earlier. Prince is too radical to be safely praised be the majority. Very many will claim only a piece of the purple rock, few love the many aspects he presents..


1,000 times right on this!
The Ignorant asserts,The learned doubts,The wise thinks.

Aristotle
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #110 posted 04/02/09 10:47pm

MajesticOne89

avatar

NuPwrSoul said:

tricky99 said:



I think they like some orgers are very dismissive of r&b and soul music.


So what do you make of orgers who love R&B & soul music and STILL aren't feeling some of Prince's music in that direction?

Yes, some people maybe obscuring their dislike of a genre by hiding it behind an expressed dislike of Prince's music.

However, does that mean that EVERY criticism of Prince's music in that direction can simply be dismissed as "you just don't like R&B / soul?"

How does that leave space for legitimate criticism of Prince's music even within the context of a love for R&B / soul music? Don't you think that exists?


Personally, I love R&B / soul... in fact I'm not a big fan of rock, and while I like Prince's rock music I wouldn't venture to compare Prince's "rock" to other "rock" music because I don't really have that frame of reference. I just dig Prince's "rock" music.

As for R&B, it's a little different... I have a better frame of reference for R&B / soul and hip hop and I can say that some of Prince's latest aren't all that within those critical contexts, critically speaking. The music is top-notch, but the lyrics are not. Much of the lyrics comes off as cliched, corny, and faux-hip... the way old people are on TV giving each other "pounds" / "dap" years after it was done in the hood. Some of Prince's attempts at being hip come off to me that way, and he can't hide behind the R&B / hip hop shield because within the world of R&B or hip hop we have standards too! And Prince ain't always hittin them.


clapping
chill..prince doesnt like men being front row, makes it hard to sing the ballads
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #111 posted 04/02/09 10:55pm

SUPRMAN

avatar

SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:

LondonStyle said:



Take you 80's hat off ....your an 80's chick you like the Rock n Roller Prince you don't like the Jazz / Modern RnB Prince it's easy ...it's not your type of music...so you hate it ...that's cool...why make it out like it some sort of quality issue ....it's just your taste in music...

I hate "Delirious" but i don't like that stuff from Prince ....it's not like he's gone down in quality for producing a track like that.....

Gett over it... lol


You know, the outright dismissal of someone not liking jazz / Modern R&B is total bullshit. I am sure Nouveaudance is in the same category as myself in loving all the genres we're talking about. If it aint good it aint good and that's what it comes down to.


MPLSound works for me. 'U're Gonna C Me', is a fave, even though I've had a version for a few years. 'Valentina' is a blast, with a subject only Prince would enshrine in vinyl. 'Chocolate Box' is just fun. 'Ol' Skool Company would've worked on 'Musicology' but would've been lyrically redundant. 'No More Candy 4 U', another shot of creative brilliance. (There'll Never Be) Another Like Me,' isn't exactly new but obviously it's something Prince likes to do and does it better here than he has in the past.
I don't want you to think like me. I just want you to think.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #112 posted 04/02/09 10:59pm

SUPRMAN

avatar

SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:

LondonStyle said:

don't be a sucker you can't box prince it's not beans

there is no quality issue....

Just your own personal taste in music.... lol


Just because you have a slick slogan doesn't make your statement true. Prince is a fucking genius and this album is not a display of it.


Does that "genius" have to be on display on every release?
Why does he have to have that pressure on him?
Why can't he just release music?

Was it Picasso's duty that every painting be a $50 million masterpiece?

Maybe Prince just likes to have his brand of fun. I'm there.
I don't want you to think like me. I just want you to think.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #113 posted 04/02/09 11:02pm

SUPRMAN

avatar

WetDream said:

SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:


THAT maybe but the rest? Please! lol 2 tracks doesn't make an album genius.


77 Bv. Park -> Wall of Berlin

Have you ever seen such a transition from one mind?

Look at things as a whole, 3cds that contrast each other completely, each sounding like hes the master at each concept chosen...and it's all from one mind.


I figured you were asking too much.
I don't want you to think like me. I just want you to think.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #114 posted 04/02/09 11:02pm

stanleylieber

avatar

SUPRMAN said:

SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:



Just because you have a slick slogan doesn't make your statement true. Prince is a fucking genius and this album is not a display of it.


Does that "genius" have to be on display on every release?
Why does he have to have that pressure on him?
Why can't he just release music?

Was it Picasso's duty that every painting be a $50 million masterpiece?

Maybe Prince just likes to have his brand of fun. I'm there.


prince is the dude taking shots at less creative folk in some of these very same songs.

which way does he want it? is he 'the best' or just a little fun?
it's time for a new direction / it's time for jazz to die
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #115 posted 04/02/09 11:04pm

SUPRMAN

avatar

Whitnail said:

Hey Londonstyle, can you please stop acting like a spoilt 10 yr old when replying to other posts, it completely detracts from the arguments you are trying to put forward or maybe you should spend less time on the MJ O2 thread over at Non Music.

As for the discussion about the new music, alot of us here are in our mid 30´s or older, and 80´s Prince without doubt had an influence on what we consider to be good music. Prince raised the bar on music to incredible heights then and he has seldom hit those heights since, especially in the studio. The new albums are brilliant and they certainly contain some "WTF" moments, but I am not totally convinced that this material is on a par with that of his 80´s output.


But I can hear that anytime I get ready. I enjoy new songs to wear out.
I don't want you to think like me. I just want you to think.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #116 posted 04/02/09 11:12pm

SUPRMAN

avatar

emesem said:

murph said:



Folks are searching for a reason; any reason to say why they don't like much of the material on MPLS....When the truth is they have a hard time dealing with the idea of their rude boy, wild boy who made genre-busting records like Around The World...Parade...and Dream Factory making an R&B record...



Nothing wrong with making an "R&B" record. Whatever that is supposed to mean. If all Prince is supposed to be is, as you put it, "always a R&B artist who did soul, pop, and rock on his own terms" then fine we can just take For You and Prince Prince as the "real" prince and then just say that Dirty Mind through Emancipation" where just often-glorious flukes.

But that ignores the point of what Prince meant to the 80s generation. It mean that a rocker who grew up on Led Zepplin or Jimi Hendrix all of the sudden started appreciating James Brown or Stevie. That same guy would buy a new Pink Floyd album but pick up also pick up TTD or Lauryn Hill. Conversely, he opened up a whole new world for converse wearing break dancers b-boppers to say hey maybe if I sampled this cool guitar lick or hey maybe I should check out this guy "Jimi Hendrix" out.

If all Prince offers now is the equivalent of an all you can eat smorgasboard,ie rock fans kinda like the "rock" songs and "R&B" people sort of like the R&B songs, then something is off. Its not enough that he perform these genres proficiently. Much of Prince's output nowadays sacrifices genre breadth over craftmanship. "Look ma I can even do Latin music and watch me while I do a cover of 'Creep!'" The point is that he used to transcend the genres and the fact that this is even a topic is telling.
[Edited 4/2/09 14:58pm]



Does Prince really owe the world all that?
What if Prince doesn't want to mix genres incessantly? That can be just as limiting as a Linn drum machine.
I don't want you to think like me. I just want you to think.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #117 posted 04/02/09 11:24pm

SUPRMAN

avatar

SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:

2elijah said:



I don't agree with that, however, you're entitled to your opinion. It depends on what the individual likes, and what they get from the music, so I can never say that over the course of 30 years of his music, that his rock songs are better than the r&b ones, being that he plays jazz, pop, and blues as well. I also don't find his r&b songs generic, because not everyone can do falsetto and smooth, distinctive styles with r&b songs. When you listen to r&b artists today, like Usher, JT (he tries but bleh lol ), they sound very generic. I do agree with Tricky though, that his r&b songs are heavily criticized by many, not all, of his white fans.

Back in the day, you had the Stylistics, Delfonics, Black Ivory, etc., with lead singers whose voices "stood out", and there was also solo artists like Phil Perry whose voice can knock you off your feet when he sings a slow jam. I could even put Maxwell in that category. Very few r&b artists today, have that "distinct" voice like the ones I just mentioned. As far as female r&b singers, I love "Leela James" style of r&b/soul, it has a gospel/blues sound, unfortunately, she and other r&b singers are ignored by the industry, because the industry today, is stuck on looks and manufactured artists.

It's no secret that Prince is well-known for his rock guitar style, just like Jimi was. I find Prince's music style to be more varied. You can't really put him in one category. In the early part of his career, he was categorized mainly as a rock/pop artist, but at the time of his career, we already had other artists doing heavy r&b, so he was smart to come out a and stand out. He was able to grab the listener's attention and drew in a multicultural audience. After Jimi passed, no other Black artist was able to basically "take his place" so to speak, and even if you don't believe it, there were "many" black fans of Jimi's music at the time he was around, but for a very, long time, "rock" was associated with white musicians, while Black musicians who played "rock" styled music did not get the light shined on them for it, because often black artists have been lumped into one category. I'm glad various black artists with different and unique styles, for the past 20 years, have been exposed. They may not get the kind of attention as white artists, but they are out there, and not just doing r&b.

I grew up with a drummer who plays with a well-known singer who started out from the time he was 10 years old, playing rock music with 2 white friends who were brothers, and they played guitar, and were well-known in school. At least 4 times a week, you could hear them rehearsing. I think people in general have to get that myth out of their heads, that Blacks don't listen to rock music, or other varied styles of music. The friends I went to school with sure did, and family members and friends today, that listen to all types of music. It all depends on the individual, as none of us are monolithic when it comes to the type of music we choose to listen to. Just my two cents.
[Edited 4/2/09 17:29pm]


OK Elijah, as a connoiseur of R&B do you REALLY really think Prince is kicking out the hardcore amazing R&B jams right now?

And people need to dump the myth that white folk/non blacks don't listen to R&B!! lol
[Edited 4/2/09 17:47pm]


When has that myth ever existed?
In the 50's and 60's parents tried to keep their white kids from listening to "race music." They'd get together and guess what? Listen to R&B.

Metalhead or Goth you wouldn't expect to listen to R&B but just about anyone else white, I would expect to have R&B on their IPod.
R&B is, I think, very American. Everyone knows in a dark room, you're putting on R&B, not country.
[Edited 4/2/09 23:25pm]
I don't want you to think like me. I just want you to think.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #118 posted 04/02/09 11:51pm

SUPRMAN

avatar

stanleylieber said:

in the interests of establishing r&b credentials, maybe we could share our favorite prince straight r&b/soul songs. here are some of my favorites:

adonis and bathsheba
adore
crucial
dark
do me baby
get blue
open book
satisfied
shhh (yes, guitars are sometimes played in r&b; see the beatles' influences)
slow love

you can't fuck with these songs.
[Edited 4/2/09 20:24pm]


Slow Love is R & B but I don't like it.

An R & B list would be a long one.
But I just like Prince. It's easier to just make Prince his own genre.
Just because I like MPLSound a lot, doesn't mean I appreciate the guitar in 'Boom' any less. He should have done that with 'The Morning After', just play on . . .
But what I hear is more expectations than racism.
Prince could do 'When The Lights Go Down', corner bar R&B all day if he wanted to. Releasing it is something else.
Prince didn't seem to thing better of 'When the Lights Go Down' than to release it on 'The Vault.' An album he clearly wasn't interested in seeing succeed.

My perspective looks like this - 1524 Prince tracks on my IPod (several concerts not on the Ipod and a few tracks.) My playlist of Essential Prince is 196 tracks, some of which are live performances and bootlegs.
So out of of 10.04 GB of Prince, only 1.17 GB rates as songs I like/love and in heavy rotation.
There's a few songs I won't listen to unless I'm playing the album it's on - 'Jughead' of course, comes immediately to mind. lol
But if Prince wants to do adult urban, I don't care. I didn't appreciate 'Planet Earth,' easily the worst official Prince album but he's bounced back nicely.
I don't want you to think like me. I just want you to think.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #119 posted 04/02/09 11:56pm

SUPRMAN

avatar

stanleylieber said:

i also love prince's jazzier stuff (particularly the run of released and unreleased jazzy material from '91-'93). it's interesting nobody is bringing that up as a litmus test for race. i'd be willing to bet a lot of people that are getting fingers waved at them for not liking 'mplsound' are big fans of some of prince's jazz explorations.

or is jazz 'white' now too. eek
[Edited 4/2/09 20:30pm]



Doesn't that immediately bring to mind 'The Rainbow Children'?
He ruined a masterpiece . . . but I love it live.
I only care that I like MPLSound really. I've never cared whether Prince ever had a chart hit. I just liked what he did and still do.
Few like 'New Power Soul', while it's one of Top Ten Prince albums. No here has yet changed my opinion of it.
I don't want you to think like me. I just want you to think.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 4 of 6 <123456>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Prince: Music and More > Critical thought