independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Prince: Music and More > Who else is fully supportive of P and his tight Copyright controls.?
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 4 of 7 <1234567>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #90 posted 02/02/09 10:29pm

ToraToraDreams

avatar

Fuck Prince on this one. biggrin finger
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #91 posted 02/02/09 10:56pm

BigDaddyHQ

avatar

To keepo it short n simple.

I think Prince has some legal rights... and for the most part it is his right to protect them

BUT

Even though he has rights... he's not always right. There is a line which he doesn't have to cross just because he can where his fan's appreciation for him and his music are concerned.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #92 posted 02/02/09 11:16pm

BorisFishpaw

avatar

BigDaddyHQ said:

To keepo it short n simple.

I think Prince has some legal rights... and for the most part it is his right to protect them

BUT

Even though he has rights... he's not always right. There is a line which he doesn't have to cross just because he can where his fan's appreciation for him and his music are concerned.


^ and there we have it in a nutshell. Couldn't have put it better myself.

Of course I support Prince's rights to his own work. But you only have to look
at the numerous fansites of other major artists to see they are granted a vastly
looser reign by their respective heroes, without damaging to their art/product.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #93 posted 02/02/09 11:20pm

eaglebear4839

skywalker said:

I support it. I only wish that Prince would meet the demand of his fans in other ways.

For example: I think it is Prince's right to put a stop to a bootleg DVD of his 21nights in London concerts. However, I wish that he'd put out a tight, well produced, official DVD of this historic event. I bet that 90% of fans would pay money for the material if it was officially released.. rather than bootleg it.

I feel as if bootleggers of Prince's material don't do it because of the thrill of the steal or because it's free, they likely do it because it is not available otherwise.

I mean, since 1994, has anyone searched for a bootleg copy of The Black Album?


I don't agree with your argument on two counts - on the first point, the question is not whether or not it should be available, but rather does Prince want it to be released. It's like the teenager saying that she felt she had to sneak out of the house to go meet that guy she likes, because her parents would have said no. (And as I recall, Prince didn't release The Black Album, Warner Bros. did.)
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #94 posted 02/02/09 11:24pm

Sdldawn

I find him laughable in all aspects of this issue. On one hand I can see where he would want to control it, but he is extreme with his ways.


In the end it doesn't matter. I only collect his music. He can keep his banners, pictures, websites and videos.. don't give two flips about them
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #95 posted 02/02/09 11:32pm

lspear76

avatar

funkyhead said:

Another day, another drama with a fan site. So , following on from recent events and indeed previously how many on here actually look at copyright through P's eyes and subsequently can understand why he is so passionate about controlling his name and his creations?.
Me?, well my feeling is that it is clearly something he feels strongly about, he also speaks on behalf of many other artists who are finally waking up [see today's planned event in London with Coldplay, Robbie Williams etc], he's given me far more truly jaw dropping experiences than bad ones, he works damn hard and above all else his message is 100% clear about use of his image. Therefore is it too much to respect his wishes?. Whilst we may not agree with his methods or indeed the level of irrationality with some decsions there comes a point where we need to stop yanking his chain and let it be.
So i'd be really interested to see who else can sympathise with P, oh and don't flame my ass!.


Prince is rich enough not to care that fans post videos of songs they like and want to share with others. Does it really hurt Prince if someone posts his performance or video from the past? Nope. In the end, Prince wants more money, thus the $77 membership fees and such. Prince is about 1) music and 2) money, nothing else.

Copyright control is basically non-existent these days, and it's relevance in modern society will only decline. If Prince and other "artists" are so upset, they should instead take jobs in retail, at McDonald's, etc, and see how the other side lives. Prince should be grateful his "hard life" turned out so well, and be willing to let his middle aged/senor citizen fans post videos on YouTube. It really shows his lack of character and self-centered persona, when he doesn't even click with his middle aged fans. That's why I also doubt Prince is truly a man of God, because Prince is way too self centered to ever truly be about God.

If I ever won a rigged contest like those purple ticket winners, I'd tell him all this to his face, in his own house. Fat chance!
"Don't you think one of the charms of marriage is that it makes deception a necessity for both parties?"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #96 posted 02/02/09 11:32pm

lspear76

avatar

wonder505 said:

I support him because I understand what he's trying to do. In the end maybe artists down the road will thank him. Even if he did release official DVDs we all know they would end up on youtube anyway. If you look at the cost into making and distributing the DVD, would he break even from fans who would buy versus those who get them free from the Internet? I don't think so. I follow alot of indie bands and they are literally begging people to download/buy their cds.technology has made it hard to make money in music.

What I don't support are the extreme cases, such as silencing home made videos or bands covering his songs on youtube, and restricting pictures on fansites. . I honestly don't see how that hurts him or causes him to lose any money.


No, you support him because you're insane.
"Don't you think one of the charms of marriage is that it makes deception a necessity for both parties?"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #97 posted 02/02/09 11:52pm

Sdldawn

lspear76 said:

wonder505 said:

I support him because I understand what he's trying to do. In the end maybe artists down the road will thank him. Even if he did release official DVDs we all know they would end up on youtube anyway. If you look at the cost into making and distributing the DVD, would he break even from fans who would buy versus those who get them free from the Internet? I don't think so. I follow alot of indie bands and they are literally begging people to download/buy their cds.technology has made it hard to make money in music.

What I don't support are the extreme cases, such as silencing home made videos or bands covering his songs on youtube, and restricting pictures on fansites. . I honestly don't see how that hurts him or causes him to lose any money.


No, you support him because you're insane.



falloff
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #98 posted 02/03/09 12:08am

Flo6

avatar

Me. Totally.
Creative production must be protected.
It's his work, his creations, it needs protection.




funkyhead said:

Another day, another drama with a fan site. So , following on from recent events and indeed previously how many on here actually look at copyright through P's eyes and subsequently can understand why he is so passionate about controlling his name and his creations?.
Me?, well my feeling is that it is clearly something he feels strongly about, he also speaks on behalf of many other artists who are finally waking up [see today's planned event in London with Coldplay, Robbie Williams etc], he's given me far more truly jaw dropping experiences than bad ones, he works damn hard and above all else his message is 100% clear about use of his image. Therefore is it too much to respect his wishes?. Whilst we may not agree with his methods or indeed the level of irrationality with some decsions there comes a point where we need to stop yanking his chain and let it be.
So i'd be really interested to see who else can sympathise with P, oh and don't flame my ass!.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #99 posted 02/03/09 3:41am

funkyhead

Paris9748430 said:

SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:


Who in turn reward and suppport said artist because of the good will shown towards them. For we all must remember all of us, including those who no longer want to give Prince our dollars, PUT. HIS. ASS. IN. THAT. MANSION exclaim People forget that very important fact lol


.
[Edited 2/2/09 16:45pm]


Nobody "put his ass in a mansion". His talent bought him that house. None of us own a piece of it because we bought a couple of C.D. You can't go raiding his fridge because you bought Controversy!!!

Prince doesn't owe anyone here anything.

He provides a service, he never made you buy his music.

The only "good will" he owes us is a simple "Thank You" before his first encore!!!

Fine point well made. We also need to remember that his first source of income is now made up of huge chunks from Record labels, record stores, tour organisers etc, so it is THEY who put his ass in the mansion!. The financial relationship works in reverse i.e. corporates take a gamble, pay him millions and then rely on P doing his bit to ensure that we pay enough to generate income to replenish the corporate pot!.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #100 posted 02/03/09 3:43am

funkyhead

overall there seems to be some sympathy on here for P but also a wish that he would go about his business in a less aggressive way. With the new website content we may all finally be heading for a 'resolution'!.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #101 posted 02/03/09 3:55am

lspear76

avatar

Now I see why Prince shut down that camera phone 12 second clip of him playing Creep. Because he wants to SELL his professionally filmed version, for the low low price of $77 for a lifetime membership! That makes everything all right! Prince not only owns his own image, but he owns the film you shot on your camera phone, and he owns Radioheads song now too! He's right, and I support him with all my heart I can learn so much from this great man who I know so well! I'm going to give my life over to Jehovah, because every other religion has got it wrong. And although Jehovah's Witnesses despise homosexuality, Prince is right by overlooking this fact, and even studies the bible with his gay friends. Picking and choosing only what you like about a religion is RIGHT! What a man!
[Edited 2/3/09 3:56am]
"Don't you think one of the charms of marriage is that it makes deception a necessity for both parties?"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #102 posted 02/03/09 4:39am

funkyhead

lspear76 said:

Now I see why Prince shut down that camera phone 12 second clip of him playing Creep. Because he wants to SELL his professionally filmed version, for the low low price of $77 for a lifetime membership! That makes everything all right! Prince not only owns his own image, but he owns the film you shot on your camera phone, and he owns Radioheads song now too! He's right, and I support him with all my heart I can learn so much from this great man who I know so well! I'm going to give my life over to Jehovah, because every other religion has got it wrong. And although Jehovah's Witnesses despise homosexuality, Prince is right by overlooking this fact, and even studies the bible with his gay friends. Picking and choosing only what you like about a religion is RIGHT! What a man!
[Edited 2/3/09 3:56am]

we all mistakes and i'm sure you're not perfect. Give the man a break and think of the good stuff.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #103 posted 02/03/09 4:42am

udo

avatar

lspear76 said:

Now I see why Prince shut down that camera phone 12 second clip of him playing Creep. Because he wants to SELL his professionally filmed version, for the low low price of $77 for a lifetime membership! That makes everything all right! Prince not only owns his own image, but he owns the film you shot on your camera phone, and he owns Radioheads song now too!

Luckily I read some sarcasm here.
Pills and thrills and daffodils will kill... If you don't believe me or don't get it, I don't have time to try to convince you, sorry.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #104 posted 02/03/09 4:51am

jn2

After this last silly useless lawsuit against the baby dancing to Let's Go Crazy's video:
http://www.wikio.com/video/20551
I think that Prince has a cultish mind.
*
[Edited 2/3/09 4:59am]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #105 posted 02/03/09 8:14am

wonder505

jn2 said:

After this last silly useless lawsuit against the baby dancing to Let's Go Crazy's video:
http://www.wikio.com/video/20551
I think that Prince has a cultish mind.
*
[Edited 2/3/09 4:59am]


correction. the lawsuit is against Prince not the other way around, although she did receive a letter from universal which was silly the same.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #106 posted 02/03/09 10:00am

Ugot2shakesumt
hin

wave

hey why have laws only to protect nilly-willy just you and your stuff,
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #107 posted 02/03/09 10:43am

thepope2the9s

avatar

I support him.
If he made it he can do what he wants.
It's his creation.
very simple people
Stand Up! Everybody, this is your life!
https://www.facebook.com/...pope2the9s follow me on twitter @thepope2the9s
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #108 posted 02/03/09 10:46am

SupaFunkyOrgan
grinderSexy

avatar

thepope2the9s said:

I support him.
If he made it he can do what he wants.
It's his creation.
very simple people

Who then gives them out to people he's sued before lol Someone needs a grip.
2010: Healing the Wounds of the Past.... http://prince.org/msg/8/325740
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #109 posted 02/03/09 11:01am

ufoclub

avatar

thepope2the9s said:

I support him.
If he made it he can do what he wants.
It's his creation.
very simple people


His representatives are going after stuff he didn't create and doesn't own, and using their finances as muscle.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #110 posted 02/03/09 11:05am

L4OATheOrigina
l

avatar

BigDaddyHQ said:

To keepo it short n simple.

I think Prince has some legal rights... and for the most part it is his right to protect them

BUT

Even though he has rights... he's not always right. There is a line which he doesn't have to cross just because he can where his fan's appreciation for him and his music are concerned.


i agree with this ..

there is a fine line of protecting one's music but if ur gonna squawk about every little thing then that's a different matter.
man, he has such an amazing body of music that it's sad to see him constrict it down to the basics. he's too talented for the lineup he's doing. estelle 81
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #111 posted 02/03/09 11:14am

purplecam

avatar

BigDaddyHQ said:

To keepo it short n simple.

I think Prince has some legal rights... and for the most part it is his right to protect them

BUT

Even though he has rights... he's not always right. There is a line which he doesn't have to cross just because he can where his fan's appreciation for him and his music are concerned.

I agree with that.
I'm not a fan of "old Prince". I'm not a fan of "new Prince". I'm just a fan of Prince. Simple as that
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #112 posted 02/03/09 11:45am

yvanehtnioj121
4

I support his right to control his own music, but I think he could be more lenient. I think if he were to allow his songs to be on Youtube, for instance, it could even work in his favor. I can't tell you how many times I've heard a song on Youtube and then subsequently purchased it in the iTunes music store. If only he owned the rights to all of his masters, then he could have his own Youtube channel with all his music videos.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #113 posted 02/03/09 4:30pm

Tremolina

Of course his work should be protected. Everybody's work should be.

But there is a difference between having your work protected and the way you enforce that protection.

Prince often takes it too far, as with the Let's go crazy You tube clip and the impossible to meet demands he sets for fansites, under the barrel of a legal gun with an army of big shot lawyers and a vigilant Paisley police squad.

Prince also doesn't seem to realise that he is only bringing water to the sea, doing nothing more than piss off fans and lose customers, while his lawyers are lining their pockets, as he can't stop the internet.

When you couple that to the many times he too violated other people's rights and screwed his fans and band members over, it already leaves a bitter taste when he is on another one of his copyright crusades.

But even if you factor that out, he is still not consistent because of the fact that he doesn't releases the many albums he said he would once he would get "free".

Worse yet, due to his disputes with Warner brothers even some of his older material isn't even available anymore or very hard to find.

And then I am not even expecting him to release more of his alleged "vault" or endorse a tribute project like the Norwegian cd-box..

All this together I don't find myself feeling much sympathy for his "cause" very often anymore.

It's a shame.


--
[Edited 2/3/09 16:35pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #114 posted 02/03/09 4:35pm

Cinnie

skywalker said:

I only wish that Prince would meet the demand of his fans in other ways.

I mean, since 1994, has anyone searched for a bootleg copy of The Black Album?


Sigworthy^^
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #115 posted 02/03/09 5:26pm

skywalker

avatar


I don't agree with your argument on two counts - on the first point, the question is not whether or not it should be available, but rather does Prince want it to be released. It's like the teenager saying that she felt she had to sneak out of the house to go meet that guy she likes, because her parents would have said no. (And as I recall, Prince didn't release The Black Album, Warner Bros. did.)


Don't get me wrong, I don't condone bootlegs...I am just saying that there is a HIGH demand for Prince's art and that I think he could do a better job of meeting it. Of course it is his right to release, or not release, what he wants. That does not mean that we should go around stealing it because we want it. From a fan perspective, I look at other artists of his caliber and wish that Prince would be a little less stingy with his releases. I mean, he is the greatest live performer of his generation and look at the pitiful amount of official live releases from him. Simply put, if he had a better business model he'd cut down on bootlegs heavily....
"New Power slide...."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #116 posted 02/03/09 5:28pm

skywalker

avatar

Cinnie said:

skywalker said:

I only wish that Prince would meet the demand of his fans in other ways.

I mean, since 1994, has anyone searched for a bootleg copy of The Black Album?


Sigworthy^^



smile
"New Power slide...."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #117 posted 02/03/09 5:34pm

SupaFunkyOrgan
grinderSexy

avatar

skywalker said:


I don't agree with your argument on two counts - on the first point, the question is not whether or not it should be available, but rather does Prince want it to be released. It's like the teenager saying that she felt she had to sneak out of the house to go meet that guy she likes, because her parents would have said no. (And as I recall, Prince didn't release The Black Album, Warner Bros. did.)


Don't get me wrong, I don't condone bootlegs...I am just saying that there is a HIGH demand for Prince's art and that I think he could do a better job of meeting it. Of course it is his right to release, or not release, what he wants. That does not mean that we should go around stealing it because we want it. From a fan perspective, I look at other artists of his caliber and wish that Prince would be a little less stingy with his releases. I mean, he is the greatest live performer of his generation and look at the pitiful amount of official live releases from him. Simply put, if he had a better business model he'd cut down on bootlegs heavily....


Is it really an issue taht a million horny chicks have his pictures in their Prince folders on a PC? lol
2010: Healing the Wounds of the Past.... http://prince.org/msg/8/325740
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #118 posted 02/03/09 7:10pm

violetblues

SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:

minneapolisFunq said:

im with it

its annoying that i cant watch his videos on youtube but if i was in his position i would probably do the same

Yeah cuz that's what artists do, create videos that can't be seen anywhere nuts


I think the point is that there should be royalties payed, just like radio pays.

To my knowledge Youtube pays no royalties (i may be wrong)
The music biz is dieing because its so easy to get things for free.
I think thats Prince's take on the matter
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #119 posted 02/03/09 8:12pm

skywalker

avatar

SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:

skywalker said:



Don't get me wrong, I don't condone bootlegs...I am just saying that there is a HIGH demand for Prince's art and that I think he could do a better job of meeting it. Of course it is his right to release, or not release, what he wants. That does not mean that we should go around stealing it because we want it. From a fan perspective, I look at other artists of his caliber and wish that Prince would be a little less stingy with his releases. I mean, he is the greatest live performer of his generation and look at the pitiful amount of official live releases from him. Simply put, if he had a better business model he'd cut down on bootlegs heavily....


Is it really an issue taht a million horny chicks have his pictures in their Prince folders on a PC? lol


No. I don't think he is going after millions of horny chicks because of what is in their folders on their PC. I think he is going after those putting up on a website. His right? Probably. Right? Hmmmm
"New Power slide...."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 4 of 7 <1234567>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Prince: Music and More > Who else is fully supportive of P and his tight Copyright controls.?