New topic
PrintableIt passed my mind that Prince must have heard this or may has been alerted. I doubt anyone in the industry would dare to rip him off. He and his lawyers are super notorious by now.
But maybe because she haute, it'll be allowed.   &  | |
- E-mail - orgNote -  Report post to moderator |
It's clearly a cash-in on the Controversy/Minneapolis sound, but not enough to call a direct plagarism IMO. All the pop acts are going for that sound at the moment. Toejam @ Peach & Black Podcast: http://peachandblack.podbean.com
Toejam's band "Cheap Fakes": http://cheapfakes.com.au, http://www.facebook.com/cheapfakes Toejam the solo artist: http://www.youtube.com/scottbignell | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
toejam said: It's clearly a cash-in on the Controversy/Minneapolis sound, but not enough to call a direct plagarism IMO. All the pop acts are going for that sound at the moment.
And it pisses me off  It's so sad that music lacks any original creativity anymore. And lyrics? PAH, forget it  & | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
myfavorite said: and furthermore...dsean, you seem as though you are full of it.
  God bless you too. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
toejam said: It's clearly a cash-in on the Controversy/Minneapolis sound, but not enough to call a direct plagarism IMO. All the pop acts are going for that sound at the moment.
I disagree - this is pretty damn close to direct plagiarism. The music, its tone, the beat, the melody, and the consistent repetition of the title for the song in an eerily close cadence. "Sex-u-al-i-ty" "Con-tro-ver-sy" I wanna be loved to the 9s, so let me cover your ass with this sheet, and baby, you better stay on the beat! Cause you know the Karma Sutra? I can rewrite it. But, with half as many words. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
bleutuna said: toejam said: It's clearly a cash-in on the Controversy/Minneapolis sound, but not enough to call a direct plagarism IMO. All the pop acts are going for that sound at the moment.
I disagree - this is pretty damn close to direct plagiarism. The music, its tone, the beat, the melody, and the consistent repetition of the title for the song in an eerily close cadence. "Sex-u-al-i-ty" "Con-tro-ver-sy" The synthesizers in the background is what kills me! As if the 80's vocoder sound hasnt been slaughtered enough in hip hop music today. & | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |