Author | Message |
No sharp change with this 4 new songs, just a continuation on the Planet Earth sound I am not talking directly about the quality of this new material, but somehow i don't get the people who say these new songs are a breakaway from his previous 3 albums.
Soundwise these songs continue were Planet Earth 'stopped', Prince going into some kind of adult contemporary pop / rock direction. I agree, these new songs sound more fluent then the attempts on Planet Earth, but they still are a mile away from the sonic innovations on albums like 1999, Parade and Sign of the Times. Another observation: I see several people here saying: Prince is rocking again! But its definitely not rock in a raw Band of gypsies kind of way, or even Princes own album Chaos and Disorder. I agree, some nice guitar-soloing one these songs, but the overal production is rather polished and the delivery quite constrained. To conclude: these songs are a continuation of what Prince tried to achieve with Planet Earth, but after a few listens these new songs seem more fluent and thought out then those on his last album. But to say they are a return to form or his best work since the Rainbow Children is stretching things too far IMO. [Edited 12/19/08 15:36pm] [Edited 12/19/08 15:37pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
To me they sound like he was impressed with the raw guitar-driven 'live-in-studio' sound of tracks like "Planet Earth" and "Guitar" and decided to make an album in that vein. So in that sense, I also see it as a continuation of Planet Earth. Toejam @ Peach & Black Podcast: http://peachandblack.podbean.com
Toejam's band "Cheap Fakes": http://cheapfakes.com.au, http://www.facebook.com/cheapfakes Toejam the solo artist: http://www.youtube.com/scottbignell | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Riverpoet31 said: I am not talking directly about the quality of this new material, but somehow i don't get the people who say these new songs are a breakaway from his previous 3 albums.
Soundwise these songs continue were Planet Earth 'stopped', Prince going into some kind of adult contemporary pop / rock direction. I agree, these new songs sound more fluent then the attempts on Planet Earth, but they still are a mile away from the sonic innovations on albums like 1999, Parade and Sign of the Times. Another observation: I see several people here saying: Prince is rocking again! But its definitely not rock in a raw Band of gypsies kind of way, or even Princes own album Chaos and Disorder. I agree, some nice guitar-soloing one these songs, but the overal production is rather polished and calculated. To conclude: these songs are a continuation of what Prince tried to achieve with Planet Earth, but after a few listens these new songs seem more fluent and thought out then those on his last album. But to say they are a return to form or his best work since the Rainbow Children is stretching things too far IMO. [Edited 12/19/08 15:36pm] While I can see what you're saying... TRC isn't judged a classic by 4 songs. Its the totality that makes it a classic, just like SOTT. If people say its a return to a TRC level album I think its because from what they've heard thusfar, the consistency in production and song quality reads TRC, not the inconsistent PE, which only has a few polished songs. IMO nobody will honestly be able to compare it to anything until the whole thing is released. Change it one more time.. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Riverpoet31 said: I am not talking directly about the quality of this new material, but somehow i don't get the people who say these new songs are a breakaway from his previous 3 albums.
Soundwise these songs continue were Planet Earth 'stopped', Prince going into some kind of adult contemporary pop / rock direction. I agree, these new songs sound more fluent then the attempts on Planet Earth, but they still are a mile away from the sonic innovations on albums like 1999, Parade and Sign of the Times. Another observation: I see several people here saying: Prince is rocking again! But its definitely not rock in a raw Band of gypsies kind of way, or even Princes own album Chaos and Disorder. I agree, some nice guitar-soloing one these songs, but the overal production is rather polished and the delivery quite constrained. To conclude: these songs are a continuation of what Prince tried to achieve with Planet Earth, but after a few listens these new songs seem more fluent and thought out then those on his last album. But to say they are a return to form or his best work since the Rainbow Children is stretching things too far IMO. [Edited 12/19/08 15:36pm] [Edited 12/19/08 15:37pm] You nailed it spot on. There is nothing going on here. He's too mixed up with the LA "in crowd" to make new music. His lyrics are confused. He's confused politically, because JWs aren't supposed to talk about that shit anyway. This is hugely relevent to Prince as he was once considered one of the top pop/rock lyricists of our time. Now its just naive platitudes and cliches. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
To make one point clear: The Rainbow Children personally is one of my least favourite Prince albums. It just that people seem to say: these new songs are a change from the material of the last 3 albums, and therefore seem the feel the need to bring The Rainbow Children into the picture.
As i said Prince is doing some nice soloing on these new songs, but I wonder if some people who call it 'raw, guitar driven rock' ever listen to...well...raw, guitar driven rock... lol. Thats a term that makes me think of the likes of Led Zeppelin, Jimi Hendrix, King's X or The Jon Spencer Blues Explosion, to name a few. One thing, the rest of the band is playing this music much to 'clean', in a session musician kind of way, to consider it 'rock'. Next to that, you can obviously hear that Prince is going for a certain 'type' of sound, its too calculated, and not enough 'in your face' to call it raw rock. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Riverpoet31 said: ...but I wonder if some people who call it 'raw, guitar driven rock' ever listen to...well...raw, guitar driven rock... lol. Thats a term that makes me think of the likes of Led Zeppelin, Jimi Hendrix, King's X or The Jon Spencer Blues Explosion, to name a few.
I was refering to 'raw guitar driven rock' in the context of Prince's music and that album - not necessarily compared to the history of rock. Tell me last 2 mins of "Wall Of Berlin" isn't inspired by Hendrix. I dare you. [Edited 12/19/08 15:57pm] Toejam @ Peach & Black Podcast: http://peachandblack.podbean.com
Toejam's band "Cheap Fakes": http://cheapfakes.com.au, http://www.facebook.com/cheapfakes Toejam the solo artist: http://www.youtube.com/scottbignell | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Riverpoet31 said: these new songs sound more fluent then the attempts on Planet Earth, but they still are a mile away from the sonic innovations on albums like 1999, Parade and Sign of the Times. The wheel is round, it can't be re-invented. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
toejam said: Riverpoet31 said: ...but I wonder if some people who call it 'raw, guitar driven rock' ever listen to...well...raw, guitar driven rock... lol. Thats a term that makes me think of the likes of Led Zeppelin, Jimi Hendrix, King's X or The Jon Spencer Blues Explosion, to name a few.
Tell me last 2 mins of "Wall Of Berlin" isn't inspired by Hendrix. I dare you. [Edited 12/19/08 15:54pm] It's one thing to be "inspired" by Jimi and another to be "raw" like Jimi or the other referenced bands. Prince is either playing all the instruments and recording one by one or someone else is playing too clean. Listen to "band of gypsies" and get back to me. PS: its on youtube. and BTW: 'wall of berlin' is the best track of the 5 so far easily. [Edited 12/19/08 16:00pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Riverpoet31 said: To make one point clear: The Rainbow Children personally is one of my least favourite Prince albums. It just that people seem to say: these new songs are a change from the material of the last 3 albums, and therefore seem the feel the need to bring The Rainbow Children into the picture.
As i said Prince is doing some nice soloing on these new songs, but I wonder if some people who call it 'raw, guitar driven rock' ever listen to...well...raw, guitar driven rock... lol. Thats a term that makes me think of the likes of Led Zeppelin, Jimi Hendrix, King's X or The Jon Spencer Blues Explosion, to name a few. One thing, the rest of the band is playing this music much to 'clean', in a session musician kind of way, to consider it 'rock'. Next to that, you can obviously hear that Prince is going for a certain 'type' of sound, its too calculated, and not enough 'in your face' to call it raw rock. It may not be raw rock but its a perfect blend if guitar soloiing and well written and produced songs. I love it. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
^I already own Gypsies. I'm not realy sure what we're arguing about here. I'm not talking about the 'quality' either - I was merely saying that I think he was happy with tracks like "Planet Earth" and "Guitar" and decided to go in that direction for his next project. Whether or not it's up there with Jimi is a matter of opinion. Toejam @ Peach & Black Podcast: http://peachandblack.podbean.com
Toejam's band "Cheap Fakes": http://cheapfakes.com.au, http://www.facebook.com/cheapfakes Toejam the solo artist: http://www.youtube.com/scottbignell | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
mamabeafan said: Riverpoet31 said: To make one point clear: The Rainbow Children personally is one of my least favourite Prince albums. It just that people seem to say: these new songs are a change from the material of the last 3 albums, and therefore seem the feel the need to bring The Rainbow Children into the picture.
As i said Prince is doing some nice soloing on these new songs, but I wonder if some people who call it 'raw, guitar driven rock' ever listen to...well...raw, guitar driven rock... lol. Thats a term that makes me think of the likes of Led Zeppelin, Jimi Hendrix, King's X or The Jon Spencer Blues Explosion, to name a few. One thing, the rest of the band is playing this music much to 'clean', in a session musician kind of way, to consider it 'rock'. Next to that, you can obviously hear that Prince is going for a certain 'type' of sound, its too calculated, and not enough 'in your face' to call it raw rock. It may not be raw rock but its a perfect blend if guitar soloiing and well written and produced songs. I love it. oh come on you love everything. you cried during one of these lol. ok its good, but its not the Prince, the one with the attitude. Relax tho, I'm sure there are more than 4 songs on this new album. so far its mediocre tho. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Thanks Rockability,
That is somehow what I was trying to say. I am thinking too many people here who consider these new songs, 'raw, guitar driven rock' are the first to scream 'whats this noise?' when listening to some track by The Rollins band, Rage against the Machine or King's X... lol | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
^What are you talking about? I love Rage and the Rollins band! Toejam @ Peach & Black Podcast: http://peachandblack.podbean.com
Toejam's band "Cheap Fakes": http://cheapfakes.com.au, http://www.facebook.com/cheapfakes Toejam the solo artist: http://www.youtube.com/scottbignell | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
toejam said: ^I already own Gypsies. I'm not realy sure what we're arguing about here. I'm not talking about the 'quality' either - I was merely saying that I think he was happy with tracks like "Planet Earth" and "Guitar" and decided to go in that direction for his next project. Whether or not it's up there with Jimi is a matter of opinion.
what we're saying here Toejam is that Prince making a statement that he is giving us a rock-driven album. we are simply noticing its kinda clean and calculated for a rock album. remember how dirty some tracks on PR were? Notably Darling Nikki, Lets go Crazy, and many from earlier albums? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Okay, after listening to these new songs on repeat for a while now, i might as well give my opinion on the quality of the material.. lol
In general a slight improvement on the 'rockier' tracks on Planet Earth, but rather mediocre, effortless when it comes to the songwriting and composing. Not rockin' enough to energize me, and not inspired enough to inspire me in return. An early warning: i am sensing ***-star album nr. 4 in a row. Not exactly 'bad', but too boring and uninspired to stay in my CD-player for more then 3 weeks. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Rockability said: You nailed it spot on. There is nothing going on here. He's too mixed up with the LA "in crowd" to make new music. His lyrics are confused. He's confused politically, because JWs aren't supposed to talk about that shit anyway. This is hugely relevent to Prince as he was once considered one of the top pop/rock lyricists of our time. Now its just naive platitudes and cliches. You say he's "confused" politically presumably because you either disagree with him or don't understand him. I don't see anything confused about his politics. Its been pretty consistent for a long while now. He's probably confused about his relationship with his religion, but thats another story. Change it one more time.. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Quote:
what we're saying here Toejam is that Prince making a statement that he is giving us a rock-driven album. we are simply noticing its kinda clean and calculated for a rock album. remember how dirty some tracks on PR were? Notably Darling Nikki, Lets go Crazy, and many from earlier albums? Yes, were are the pumping, energetic sounding bass-notes of Michael B? the raw, sleazy electro-rock sound of The Beatifull ones? Or the 'recording it, while playing it' mentality of Chaos and Disorder? If these news songs are anything, they are trying to give the surface appeal of 'Prince doing rock again', when its quite obvious he is first of all LAZY when it comes to using his musical abilities at the moment. [Edited 12/19/08 16:25pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
lezama said: Rockability said: You nailed it spot on. There is nothing going on here. He's too mixed up with the LA "in crowd" to make new music. His lyrics are confused. He's confused politically, because JWs aren't supposed to talk about that shit anyway. This is hugely relevent to Prince as he was once considered one of the top pop/rock lyricists of our time. Now its just naive platitudes and cliches. You say he's "confused" politically presumably because you either disagree with him or don't understand him. I don't see anything confused about his politics. Its been pretty consistent for a long while now. He's probably confused about his relationship with his religion, but thats another story. No. I say he's confused because he is making political statements that don't make sense. Basically, he thinks he's one thing, but he's coming off as another. You know, you can't be conservative, liberal and fascist all in one. And you say "relationship with religion." That is probably what confuses him about politics. Its taboo to be political in that religion. So to be a good JW, at least so far as I've been told, you don't get into politics. [Edited 12/19/08 16:28pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Top lyricist?
Lol... When it comes to that view, i very much disagree with you, Rockability. I have always considered Prince a hit or miss type when it comes to his lyrics. Just as he seems to lack quality control when it comes to the music he releases, he seems to meander on the lyrical level. For every If I was your girlfriend or Reflection you have a Hot with U or United States of Division. It has become clear to me that Prince has an obsession with constantly creating and releasing new music, but that he might sometimes be better off with a manager or producer who would say to him: You cant release that! or its better if you strip that album down to 11 songs. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Riverpoet31 and Rockability, I think the mistake you're making is that you're comparing these tracks with historically 'rockier' albums. To me, this is just Prince having some fun with that sound - but not necessarily trying to outdo it. You're only setting yourself up for dissapointment if you're going to compare a 20 minuite, low bit-rate radio broadcast with the likes of Band Of Gypsies, Rage, Zeppelin, the Rollins Band and whoever else you feel the need to name check. [Edited 12/19/08 16:38pm] Toejam @ Peach & Black Podcast: http://peachandblack.podbean.com
Toejam's band "Cheap Fakes": http://cheapfakes.com.au, http://www.facebook.com/cheapfakes Toejam the solo artist: http://www.youtube.com/scottbignell | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Riverpoet31 said: One thing, the rest of the band is playing this music much to 'clean', in a session musician kind of way, to consider it 'rock'. Next to that, you can obviously hear that Prince is going for a certain 'type' of sound, its too calculated, and not enough 'in your face' to call it raw rock. Well, we can all be a bit picky with the use of adjectives. The fact is that all descriptors are relative. What you call "raw" would be considered bubble gum pop compared to artists like Merzbow or Swallow the Sun. Calling these songs "rock" are in comparison to what the mass public has heard from Prince in the past 15 years. The drumming at the end of the Berlin Wall pretty 'in your face' IMO as well. Change it one more time.. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
^Exactly. When I use the term 'raw' I'm usually refering to the instrumentation, not the style or the quality - just the fact that it's primarily bass, drums and guitar. Toejam @ Peach & Black Podcast: http://peachandblack.podbean.com
Toejam's band "Cheap Fakes": http://cheapfakes.com.au, http://www.facebook.com/cheapfakes Toejam the solo artist: http://www.youtube.com/scottbignell | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Riverpoet31 said: Top lyricist?
Lol... When it comes to that view, i very much disagree with you, Rockability. I have always considered Prince a hit or miss type when it comes to his lyrics. Just as he seems to lack quality control when it comes to the music he releases, he seems to meander on the lyrical level. For every If I was your girlfriend or Reflection you have a Hot with U or United States of Division. It has become clear to me that Prince has an obsession with constantly creating and releasing new music, but that he might sometimes be better off with a manager or producer who would say to him: You cant release that! or its better if you strip that album down to 11 songs. I'm going back to SOTT and earlier. I make the mistake of not mentioning that I've had difficulty enjoying more than one or two songs off anything since. But I refuse to jump off the bandwagon! I agree with you and what would be nice is someone worked with him to release a double album every couple years and at the same time told Prince what he really felt unlike most of these orgers lol! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
toejam said: ^Exactly. When I use the term 'raw' I'm usually refering to the instrumentation, not the style or the quality - just the fact that it's primarily bass, drums and guitar.
Why u name yourself 'toejam'??? I swear the words "HATER" is wayyy over-rated...smh | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Some good thoughts here. As I've stated before, Prince simply doesn't know how to make a rock record. This is evidenced by the fact that he never has and at the ripe old age of 50, he never will. He's out of touch.
Whoever said this music is just a continuation of Planet Earth was spot on. I can just seem him thinking this latest batch of drivel is Hendrix-like. It couldn't be any further from Hendrix. It's closer to alt-adult contemporary pop-rock, aka disposable filler, than it is to any respectable musician or album in the history of the genre. And who in their right mind finds any of these lyrics to be anything beyond naive or just downright embarrassing? 'Forever' is hilarious. To think it's being sung by a 50 year old man who's been married twice and still writing lyrics like he's some 15 year old puppy love victim is unbelievable. No hard feelings. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Wall said: Some good thoughts here. As I've stated before, Prince simply doesn't know how to make a rock record. This is evidenced by the fact that he never has and at the ripe old age of 50, he never will.
Not wanting to and not knowing how are two very different things. Common sense would say if he's an artist that from day one has blended genres, thats what he's interested in doing. If you want an artist who makes only rock music why would anyone expect Prince to do that? Change it one more time.. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Riverpoet31 said: I am not talking directly about the quality of this new material, but somehow i don't get the people who say these new songs are a breakaway from his previous 3 albums.
Soundwise these songs continue were Planet Earth 'stopped', Prince going into some kind of adult contemporary pop / rock direction. I agree, these new songs sound more fluent then the attempts on Planet Earth, but they still are a mile away from the sonic innovations on albums like 1999, Parade and Sign of the Times. Another observation: I see several people here saying: Prince is rocking again! But its definitely not rock in a raw Band of gypsies kind of way, or even Princes own album Chaos and Disorder. I agree, some nice guitar-soloing one these songs, but the overal production is rather polished and the delivery quite constrained. To conclude: these songs are a continuation of what Prince tried to achieve with Planet Earth, but after a few listens these new songs seem more fluent and thought out then those on his last album. But to say they are a return to form or his best work since the Rainbow Children is stretching things too far IMO. [Edited 12/19/08 15:36pm] [Edited 12/19/08 15:37pm] I agree mostly. I didn't hear these songs until Friday afternoon so I had a full 24 hours of reading everyones reactions to color my expectations. I was expecting (from what everyone said) a rocked out sound. It was DEFinitely more on the adult contemporary/soft rock tip. That is not to say it was bad, it was just set up a different way so it threw me off. The only dissapointment was Crimpson and Clover--it was a little too flowery sounding. I like the hardness of his cover of Best of You, which would have set up the other tracks better. Like a good basketball team, he shouuld have started the four tracks hot and heavy and run up the score, and then just run out the clock. I give the four track sample 3 out of 5 stars and put it on par with The Truth and Chaos and Disorder. A step above Emancipation, but not as rocking and cool as say... his NPGMC rock stuff. I wish u heaven | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |