This is a "featured" topic! — From here you can jump to the « previous or next » featured topic.
New topic PrintableSupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said: KidaDynamite said: Exactly my thoughts. Isn't it time for your break! YOU LOVE ME!!! surviving on the thought of loving you, it's just like the water
I ain't felt this way in years... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said: pplrain said: Bottom line no one can control Prince not even through this message board.
If he does not want to air the footage of his part of the Coachella concert on Youtube. He has every right not to. He probably signed an agreement with Coachella about rights to his performance.. Lawd wake up folks! Earth to you.... IT'S NOT HIS SONG! I wish they would Sue his ass on what grounds would they sue him for? you cannot sue someone for covering a live songs. here is something to think about. What if Radiohead was the one who put Prince's performance of Creep up and Prince did not want his performance up. Who would have more say in the matter? i hope that does not happen by the way, would make Prince look real bad. [Edited 5/30/08 12:30pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
KidaDynamite said: SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said: Isn't it time for your break! YOU LOVE ME!!! I do! I even listed you in a thread asking which orgers you wanted to get to know better but you never contacted me! But if you're going to defend Prince, I must demand you take your break NOW! . [Edited 5/30/08 12:26pm] 2010: Healing the Wounds of the Past.... http://prince.org/msg/8/325740 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said: KidaDynamite said: YOU LOVE ME!!! I do! I even listed you in a thread asking which orgers you wanted to get to know better but you never contacted me! But if you're going to defend Prince, I must demand you take your break NOW! . [Edited 5/30/08 12:26pm] I so didn't see that thread!...you really listed me?! surviving on the thought of loving you, it's just like the water
I ain't felt this way in years... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
KidaDynamite said: SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said: I do! I even listed you in a thread asking which orgers you wanted to get to know better but you never contacted me! But if you're going to defend Prince, I must demand you take your break NOW! I so didn't see that thread!...you really listed me?! yes! Bet you don't want that break now do ya? I think you're rad Now tell me your life story! 2010: Healing the Wounds of the Past.... http://prince.org/msg/8/325740 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said: KidaDynamite said: I so didn't see that thread!...you really listed me?! yes! Bet you don't want that break now do ya? I think you're rad Now tell me your life story! I have to admit, you make it hard for a chick. I think you are freakin' SPLENDIFEROUS As for my life story - It was a bright sunny day in 1987 and my mom was hot to trot.... surviving on the thought of loving you, it's just like the water
I ain't felt this way in years... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Totally agree. Bring back Prince's Creep on YouTube now! http://www.myspace.com/savage1999uk
Welcome2 the Dawn Experience http://www.thedawnexperie...ferrerid=4 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
u go boys it's ur song and u told him! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Obsidian said: I don't think this has anything to do with the song, but more to do with the actual physical performance. I think he doesn't want to be seen by anyone outside of performance dates and times. It's just another image control thing, and very little to do with the silly song.
Sounds like to me that Radiohead has got their fair share of arrogance too...thinking that Prince is trying to "lay claim" to their song...lololol! :confused: what are you going on about? where have they claimed this? my lord, this forum sometimes.... :turd: Space for sale... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
sosgemini said: Obsidian said: I don't think this has anything to do with the song, but more to do with the actual physical performance. I think he doesn't want to be seen by anyone outside of performance dates and times. It's just another image control thing, and very little to do with the silly song.
Sounds like to me that Radiohead has got their fair share of arrogance too...thinking that Prince is trying to "lay claim" to their song...lololol! :confused: what are you going on about? where have they claimed this? my lord, this forum sometimes.... :turd: What I got from that article was that he just laughed it off and that was that, not that he was pissed or was accusing Prince of laying claim to anything. I dunno what's funnier, Prince's lame-o behaviour at times or the people on here defending him on every little stupid move he makes. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Savage said: Totally agree. Bring back Prince's Creep on YouTube now!
Its funny cause its out there - people just have to know where to look! The greatest live performer of our times was is and always will be Prince.
Remember there is only one destination and that place is U All of it. Everything. Is U. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
2020 said: Savage said: Totally agree. Bring back Prince's Creep on YouTube now!
Its funny cause its out there - people just have to know where to look! there's a LOT out there still. the games of cat & mouse between prince and his purple underground are alive and well. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said: pplrain said: Bottom line no one can control Prince not even through this message board.
If he does not want to air the footage of his part of the Coachella concert on Youtube. He has every right not to. He probably signed an agreement with Coachella about rights to his performance.. Lawd wake up folks! Earth to you.... IT'S NOT HIS SONG! I wish they would Sue his ass Earth to you.... where did I say it is his song? He does own rights to his performance of that song. you can pull your finger out of my arse anytime now | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
pplrain said: you can pull your finger out of my arse anytime now i take back what i said about a lack of twisted panties on this thread. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ieve Freedom and it should not be denied by Others. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
pro said: | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Anxiety said: 2020 said: Its funny cause its out there - people just have to know where to look! there's a LOT out there still. the games of cat & mouse between prince and his purple underground are alive and well. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Moderator | Radiohead
In spite of the cost of living, it's still popular. |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
i'm cringing 2 think what these english lads might b up to..it might b kinda funny 2 c what happens here
however i hope he doesn't think twice about doing more covers..i like the covers! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Moderator moderator |
pro said: This surpasses your web sheriff poster Ohh purple joy oh purple bliss oh purple rapture! REAL MUSIC by REAL MUSICIANS - Prince "I kind of wish there was a reason for Prince to make the site crash more" ~~ Ben |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Anxiety said: pro said: surviving on the thought of loving you, it's just like the water
I ain't felt this way in years... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Alltough i don't really like Radioheads music, i must admit their loose, relaxed approach towards the 'distribution of their music' appeals much more to me then the stalled, rigid, overserious path Prince is following. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
KidaDynamite said: Obsidian said: I don't think this has anything to do with the song, but more to do with the actual physical performance. I think he doesn't want to be seen by anyone outside of performance dates and times. It's just another image control thing, and very little to do with the silly song.
Sounds like to me that Radiohead has got their fair share of arrogance too...thinking that Prince is trying to "lay claim" to their song...lololol! Exactly my thoughts. Well, then you're both off your rockers. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
pplrain said: Bottom line no one can control Prince not even through this message board.
If he does not want to air the footage of his part of the Coachella concert on Youtube. He has every right not to. He probably signed an agreement with Coachella about rights to his performance.. Lawd wake up folks! Is that really the bottom line? I don't think so. You don't aim very highly, but maybe that's because you're on your knees kissing Prince's arse. "Lawd?" Please. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Riverpoet31 said: Alltough i don't really like Radioheads music, i must admit their loose, relaxed approach towards the 'distribution of their music' appeals much more to me then the stalled, rigid, overserious path Prince is following.
i like how it seems that radiohead's whole purpose in making music has to do with their wanting people to hear it. i think that's a fresh, innovative approach. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
pplrain said: SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said: Earth to you.... IT'S NOT HIS SONG! I wish they would Sue his ass Earth to you.... where did I say it is his song? He does own rights to his performance of that song. I know this it isn't popular to say this... but legally Prince is in the right in this istuation.. even if he doesn't own the copyright to the song... he 'authored' this rendition and was the performer. He does not own the copyright of the song.. but he does own authorship of performance itself. I know my terminology is a little off... but this is a law I've had to deal with as it relates to copyrighted works of art and fair usage in s gaming community and dealing with Marvel Comics. On my website we used to have renditions of copyrighted Marvel characters (Spiderman, Hulk, etc) created by my site's artist. Marvel maintained their copyrights which they could have exercised at any time and forced us to remove the copyrighted content..... but as the creators of the artistic content..i.e. it's authors... we maintained the right of distribution and how the work could be used up to the point of not claiming copyright.. Marvel could have told us to cease and desist if they choose at any time(which they did to another site in the community).. but in no way could they take control of the material we created and dictated how it could be used. We were the authors and we owned 'rights of authorship' to the work of art..even if we didn't own 'copyrights' to the subject matter. This same rule applies to video, audio and any other artistic medium. Radio head owns the song and could prevent distribution if they want (depending on other factors though).. but they cannot take control of the performance itself because Prince maintains the right to distribute any rendition of his creative work..even if he does not own the copyrights to the subject. Those who video taped the performance are at the bottom of the totem poll While they can be made to not distribute publicly the material as it could violate both Radiohead's copyright.. and Prince's creators right to the performance... they do own any distribution rights which does not conflict with the formerly mentioned. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Anxiety said: Militant said: If we didn't think before that you were Kevin Smith himself, we do now. (for the uninformed, he just quoted (sorta) a Kevin Smith movie...except for it being about Prince, lol) nah. kevin smith would have more class. even though his movies are crass, he seems to have at least a tenuous grasp on tact as a public figure. For a moderator, you sure don't trouble yourself with much class either. But that seems to be the norm around here. I hope this goes further than a lot of the zealots here would like it to. Billboard, bloggers & other media outlets covering it bring attention to the fact that Prince is an increasingly irrelevant midget tool with a Napoleon complex. Maybe if it continues to blow up, we'll get another song on the level of P-Funk released as his "answer." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
BigDaddyHQ said: pplrain said: Earth to you.... where did I say it is his song? He does own rights to his performance of that song. I know this it isn't popular to say this... but legally Prince is in the right in this istuation.. even if he doesn't own the copyright to the song... he 'authored' this rendition and was the performer. He does not own the copyright of the song.. but he does own authorship of performance itself. I know my terminology is a little off... but this is a law I've had to deal with as it relates to copyrighted works of art and fair usage in s gaming community and dealing with Marvel Comics. On my website we used to have renditions of copyrighted Marvel characters (Spiderman, Hulk, etc) created by my site's artist. Marvel maintained their copyrights which they could have exercised at any time and forced us to remove the copyrighted content..... but as the creators of the artistic content..i.e. it's authors... we maintained the right of distribution and how the work could be used up to the point of not claiming copyright.. Marvel could have told us to cease and desist if they choose at any time(which they did to another site in the community).. but in no way could they take control of the material we created and dictated how it could be used. We were the authors and we owned 'rights of authorship' to the work of art..even if we didn't own 'copyrights' to the subject matter. This same rule applies to video, audio and any other artistic medium. Radio head owns the song and could prevent distribution if they want (depending on other factors though).. but they cannot take control of the performance itself because Prince maintains the right to distribute any rendition of his creative work..even if he does not own the copyrights to the subject. Those who video taped the performance are at the bottom of the totem poll While they can be made to not distribute publicly the material as it could violate both Radiohead's copyright.. and Prince's creators right to the performance... they do own any distribution rights which does not conflict with the formerly mentioned. so...could marvel post your art on their official sites without your permission, or would you have the ability to make them take it down? could radiohead post a clip of prince performing "creep" on their official site without complying to a cease and desist from prince's people? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Anxiety said: Riverpoet31 said: Alltough i don't really like Radioheads music, i must admit their loose, relaxed approach towards the 'distribution of their music' appeals much more to me then the stalled, rigid, overserious path Prince is following.
i like how it seems that radiohead's whole purpose in making music has to do with their wanting people to hear it. i think that's a fresh, innovative approach. Oh you mean like not bitching about being a "slave," claiming you want to "free the music" & put it directly in the hands of the fans & then releasing shitty record after shitty record while you spend more time attacking fans than appeasing them? If only Prince would consider that business model. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
pplrain said: SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said: Earth to you.... IT'S NOT HIS SONG! I wish they would Sue his ass Earth to you.... where did I say it is his song? He does own rights to his performance of that song. you can pull your finger out of my arse anytime now He'll do that as soon as you detach your lips from Prince's "arse." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
This is a "featured" topic! — From here you can jump to the « previous or next » featured topic.