New topic
Printablevioletblues said: But lets not sweat it, everybody we know of today, will be tomorrows, Fatty Arbuckle (MJ) and Bette Davis
So true! | |
- E-mail - orgNote -  Report post to moderator |
iloveannie said: He's an old artist and old artists will always be out of sync/touch with the new. Unless of course they are clever enough to employ a younger act?
This made me think of Santana's "Supernatural". Carlos Santana worked with everybody under the sun on that album. It went 15x Platinum, and won 9 Grammys, including "Album of the Year" in 1999. Can U honestly see Prince doing that? "Love Hurts. Your lies, they cut me. Now your words don't mean a thing. I don't give a damn if you ever loved me..." -Cher, "Woman's World" | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
iloveannie said: Perhaps it's because he's so very hard to pigeonhole? Let's face it he's not really modern pop and then again he's not always funk or soul or rnb. He's occasionally rock but not that much. So where in a shop should he be placed? Take Planet Earth for instance. Just what style could you place it under? When I imported the bought version of it into iTunes the genre set itself as R&B. Clearly it's not.
And also I take back my earlier comments. It's not that bad an album and has some really good tracks. And having listened to some of the lyrics I now know why so many of you use the word 'hater'. Ooh, you little Prince fans you  i would log it under bullshit tracks  man, he has such an amazing body of music that it's sad to see him constrict it down to the basics. he's too talented for the lineup he's doing. estelle 81 | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
