Author | Message |
Has Prince become Warner Brothers? By liberating himself from the shackles of what he had deemed a restrictive employer, has Prince become the equivalent of the very establishments he rebelled against in his stategies as an independent businessman to maintain his brand, celebrity status and competitive edge? What do you feel the effect has been on Prince's music by his having to focus on the business side of the music industry? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
No, his whole fight with Warner Brother was over ownership, just like it is now. This thing against youtube/fansites is because Prince wants to be 100% in control over the distribution of his work.
It's 1995 all over again. JERKIN' EVERYTHING IN SIGHT!!!!! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Paris, I disagree. Prince's fight was for independence and not the mold the record companies try to package you in.
Fighting for this indepedence has definitely made an impact on Prince's music, because Prince broke free, from the "Slavery" of what businessmen wanted Him to be, for their financial benefit... This of course made Prince a Clever man. Prince learned how an artist Has every right to sell Her or Himself. "The Lion Sleeps Tonight... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Paris, you make a very good point regarding ownership and control over distribution, however, Prince has employed numerous strategies to maintain his brand, celebrity status and competitive edge since his emanicipation from Warner Brothers; it would be somewhat misleading to focus the discussion on his stance against YouTube or fansites. On a different tangent, for example, how do you feel about his likely ploy in recent years to minimise the length of his albums to that duration considered optimal for a popular audience?
. [Edited 1/13/08 17:58pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I don't know how to respond to the duration of an album...
I just wanted to come back and say, that my previous statement could have been better said, I did the best that I could, However, I should have added, the, respect of a Management that gives an artist a chance to be heard and distributed....I believe that respect comes down to a fair percentage of what they deserve, especially, if the artist's grows more popular...That money talk is over my head.... I believe that Warner Brothers, deserves credit of course, and Prince's emotional and financial credit, for his introduction is only 4 Prince to decide. "The Lion Sleeps Tonight... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Paris9748430 said: No, his whole fight with Warner Brother was over ownership, just like it is now. This thing against youtube/fansites is because Prince wants to be 100% in control over the distribution of his work.
It's 1995 all over again. yet instead of seeking his fan's support to side with him in his battle he's now turned his attention to those who supported him since forever. i understand his wishes to control his image and music but it seems to have gotten out of control. it feels more like he's trying to set yet another precedent for alternate media vs creative ownership. all good and well but he's treading a very fine line right now imo. he stepped up in the early 90's to make people aware of what was goin on with contracts and major labels and a lot of other artists have had nothing but praise for him since then. he was a pioneer of sorts back then, altho perhaps not the first one to adress the issues, he was a "superstar" and the first one to go public and battle for his cause in such a bold and public manner. perhaps he's got a good point now, time will tell. the internet is a free haven now for theft and copyright infringement. it would all just be a bit more understandable if he wrote something about it on his website. something in depth, explaining his reasons, and his aims. instead of just lashing out to everyone online, as it seems now. and true love lives on lollipops and crisps | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I'm sure he wishes he had become WB...but got to keep all the money, being #1 at the bank being so important to him.
We'll never get a serious interview from him. The most we can home for is that he continues down this path of idiocy & winds up on 60 Minutes or something, talking about how he "was 4ced 2 resort 2 legal akshun" against his fams & offering answers about as coherent as "Sometimes it snows in April." In reality, he's just a largely washed up, one-time icon, seeking to hold onto some fleeting whisps of glory. But since he's not a very intelligent man, he's going about it in a way that is going to do much more harm to his career than good. You don't agree? There are many more people lamenting Prince's current business practices & methods of "fan interaction" than there are celebrating them. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
prince is and never has been a mastermind at his business relations. because he wants control over his music so much, thus u have out in the market, no DVD's that truly show off his talents as a musician. the leadoff singles 4 his albums have been terrible ever since emancipation something that warner bros or any real record company would have talked him out of doing. so if anyone is 2 blame 4 this, it's prince now that he is independent and not having people around him 2 challange him and go against him 2 make the RIGHT decisions. man, he has such an amazing body of music that it's sad to see him constrict it down to the basics. he's too talented for the lineup he's doing. estelle 81 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
It's a bad analogy. WB is about controlling someone else's intellectual and artistic property. Prince seeks to control his own. We don’t mourn artists because we knew them. We mourn them because they helped us know ourselves. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Genesia said: It's a bad analogy. WB is about controlling someone else's intellectual and artistic property. Prince seeks to control his own.
Good point, Genesia, however, whilst Prince was under Warner Brothers less of his time and energy was spent managing the business side of his affairs, which meant he was able to focus firmly on the music. By becoming independent, he's necessarily had to spend considerable time and energy learning how to manage his business in order to maintain his brand, celebrity status and remain competitive. The question is, has this shift in his attention impacted the music? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
IstenSzek said: Paris9748430 said: No, his whole fight with Warner Brother was over ownership, just like it is now. This thing against youtube/fansites is because Prince wants to be 100% in control over the distribution of his work.
It's 1995 all over again. yet instead of seeking his fan's support to side with him in his battle he's now turned his attention to those who supported him since forever. i understand his wishes to control his image and music but it seems to have gotten out of control. it feels more like he's trying to set yet another precedent for alternate media vs creative ownership. all good and well but he's treading a very fine line right now imo. he stepped up in the early 90's to make people aware of what was goin on with contracts and major labels and a lot of other artists have had nothing but praise for him since then. he was a pioneer of sorts back then, altho perhaps not the first one to adress the issues, he was a "superstar" and the first one to go public and battle for his cause in such a bold and public manner. perhaps he's got a good point now, time will tell. the internet is a free haven now for theft and copyright infringement. it would all just be a bit more understandable if he wrote something about it on his website. something in depth, explaining his reasons, and his aims. instead of just lashing out to everyone online, as it seems now. not only that but in the process he forgot about the most important aspect: the music. Space for sale... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
sosgemini said: IstenSzek said: yet instead of seeking his fan's support to side with him in his battle he's now turned his attention to those who supported him since forever. i understand his wishes to control his image and music but it seems to have gotten out of control. it feels more like he's trying to set yet another precedent for alternate media vs creative ownership. all good and well but he's treading a very fine line right now imo. he stepped up in the early 90's to make people aware of what was goin on with contracts and major labels and a lot of other artists have had nothing but praise for him since then. he was a pioneer of sorts back then, altho perhaps not the first one to adress the issues, he was a "superstar" and the first one to go public and battle for his cause in such a bold and public manner. perhaps he's got a good point now, time will tell. the internet is a free haven now for theft and copyright infringement. it would all just be a bit more understandable if he wrote something about it on his website. something in depth, explaining his reasons, and his aims. instead of just lashing out to everyone online, as it seems now. not only that but in the process he forgot about the most important aspect: the music. What are you talking about? He put out a record less than a year ago, and alot of this stuff was going on when he was in the middle of a tour. How many of the U.K. orgers sold their concert tickets when this whole thing started??? JERKIN' EVERYTHING IN SIGHT!!!!! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Paris9748430 said: sosgemini said: not only that but in the process he forgot about the most important aspect: the music. What are you talking about? He put out a record less than a year ago, and alot of this stuff was going on when he was in the middle of a tour. How many of the U.K. orgers sold their concert tickets when this whole thing started??? oh, im sorry...i meant: good music. Space for sale... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
sosgemini said: Paris9748430 said: What are you talking about? He put out a record less than a year ago, and alot of this stuff was going on when he was in the middle of a tour. How many of the U.K. orgers sold their concert tickets when this whole thing started??? oh, im sorry...i meant: good music. i was going 2 say the same thing ..just cause he put out a record didn't mean that the music was great cause it wasn't! it sucked big time! man, he has such an amazing body of music that it's sad to see him constrict it down to the basics. he's too talented for the lineup he's doing. estelle 81 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Tame said: Paris, I disagree. Prince's fight was for independence and not the mold the record companies try to package you in.
Fighting for this indepedence has definitely made an impact on Prince's music, because Prince broke free, from the "Slavery" of what businessmen wanted Him to be, for their financial benefit... This of course made Prince a Clever man. Prince learned how an artist Has every right to sell Her or Himself. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
sosgemini said: Paris9748430 said: What are you talking about? He put out a record less than a year ago, and alot of this stuff was going on when he was in the middle of a tour. How many of the U.K. orgers sold their concert tickets when this whole thing started??? oh, im sorry...i meant: good music. and true love lives on lollipops and crisps | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Prince hasnt put out anything decent since... shit Exodus? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |