New topic
PrintableL4OATheOriginal said: laurarichardson said: Lord your not even addressing the fact that the Stones sucked and Prince is not U2. Lot's artist with exception of U2 perform their old hits at a event like the Superbowl.
You will see Tom Petty do the same thing this year. ----- i liked the stones set better than prince's and ur right u2 is not prince..u2's kicked prince's ass all over the map on that one.. as 4 tom petty i'm not really interested in ----- Well that is your opinion. I am glad you enjoyed the performance but, no one else did. | |
- E-mail - orgNote -  Report post to moderator |
laurarichardson said: He did a set list that would appeal to the masses. WTF is this so hard to understand. People are not going to pay big bucks to hear a bunch of obsucre songs that only the hard core fams know.
If you don't know that P has done more CD than PR than you don't know much about his style of music. ----- L4OATheOriginal said: because in their eyes "purple reign" is the only album he's ever done  and judging from this time last year in miami, he was proving it by that lame set list done at the superbowlActually, they paid big enough bucks to see him perform ABSOLUTELY OBSCURE SHIT FROM THE RAINBOW CHILDREN during the One Night Alone tour. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
laurarichardson said: L4OATheOriginal said: i was watching the per4mance that they did while on their infamous logo..gee where did prince get the idea 4 that?  ----- You do not have anything else to do but, notice the most simple and unimportant things. I don't know P has been using his logo for a long time and so have lots of other bands. Maybe they all bothered from the Rolling Stone. Who the hell cares and what does that have to do with the awful performance the RS put on. They were panned by everyone and Prince was praised. You got to give credit when credit is due. "Everyone else" would really have to include more than just you, & other pathetic disciples of craptastic music to be a valid point. Not to nitpick, because it's such a hopeless enterprise with certain types of people, but you also might want to spend some more time focusing on punctuation & grammar in your posts. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
laurarichardson said: L4OATheOriginal said: i was watching the per4mance that they did while on their infamous logo..gee where did prince get the idea 4 that? ----- You do not have anything else to do but, notice the most simple and unimportant things. I don't know P has been using his logo for a long time and so have lots of other bands. Maybe they all bothered from the Rolling Stone. Who the hell cares and what does that have to do with the awful performance the RS put on. They were panned by everyone and Prince was praised. You got to give credit when credit is due. i give props 4 the alma per4mance ..that was hot ..the superbowl was lame ..not everyone has the purple glasses on 2 c that it was a oldies act reliving and STILL reliving the 80's where as the alma per4mance was a CURRENT artist promoting his then LATEST work ..i guess u like 2 live in a time warp man, he has such an amazing body of music that it's sad to see him constrict it down to the basics. he's too talented for the lineup he's doing. estelle 81 | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
laurarichardson said: L4OATheOriginal said: i liked the stones set better than prince's and ur right u2 is not prince..u2's kicked prince's ass all over the map on that one.. as 4 tom petty i'm not really interested in ----- Well that is your opinion. I am glad you enjoyed the performance but, no one else did. just like not everyone liked prince's man, he has such an amazing body of music that it's sad to see him constrict it down to the basics. he's too talented for the lineup he's doing. estelle 81 | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Nothinbutjoy said: Neophyte said: It is a bit cringe-worthy, but at least when you read it you automatically know who they chatting bout. Which is why they do it. 
Would it be jaded of me to have felt all along that he was in Miami because of the woman he is currently involved with?  Bitches come to him, not the other way around.  And by bitches I mean nice, young ladies.  Shake it til ya make it  | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
L4OATheOriginal said: laurarichardson said: ----- You do not have anything else to do but, notice the most simple and unimportant things. I don't know P has been using his logo for a long time and so have lots of other bands. Maybe they all bothered from the Rolling Stone. Who the hell cares and what does that have to do with the awful performance the RS put on. They were panned by everyone and Prince was praised. You got to give credit when credit is due. i give props 4 the alma per4mance ..that was hot ..the superbowl was lame ..not everyone has the purple glasses on 2 c that it was a oldies act reliving and STILL reliving the 80's where as the alma per4mance was a CURRENT artist promoting his then LATEST work ..i guess u like 2 live in a time warp I'm very much into Prince's current music, but he put on a hell of a show at the super bowl. He came with it. I too prefer to see him perform his newer material, but I agree performing the more familiar material paid off | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
fantasticjoy said: L4OATheOriginal said: i give props 4 the alma per4mance ..that was hot ..the superbowl was lame ..not everyone has the purple glasses on 2 c that it was a oldies act reliving and STILL reliving the 80's where as the alma per4mance was a CURRENT artist promoting his then LATEST work ..i guess u like 2 live in a time warp I'm very much into Prince's current music, but he put on a hell of a show at the super bowl. He came with it. I too prefer to see him perform his newer material, but I agree performing the more familiar material paid off symbol stage ...hmmmm sounds post 1980's 2 me ..thus the music should have reflected it ...nothing wrong with hearing 7,(top 10 hit) and some other hits ..hell even TMGITW was a familiar hit. the fact of playing nothing but songs from 23 years ago at the time was just sad. man, he has such an amazing body of music that it's sad to see him constrict it down to the basics. he's too talented for the lineup he's doing. estelle 81 | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I think/hope he's scouting locations for 3121 Miami. Yeah!   | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SCNDLS said: I think/hope he's scouting locations for 3121 Miami. Yeah!
  | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
wildgoldenhoney said: SCNDLS said: I think/hope he's scouting locations for 3121 Miami. Yeah!
Hopefully as I got relatives I can come from the UK to stay with, go for Miami Prince  | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
is this as true as him going to the party he didnt go to? dont worry baby, aint nuthin new, thats just love sneakin up on you ~ bonnie rait | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
HOW COULD HE BE PRESENTING AT THE GRAMMYS ON SUNDAY IN LOS ANGELES and then BE IN MIAMI THE SAME NIGHT????? | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |